Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Behold the Rat party voter
Comments
-
blob comes out in favor of the "living, breathing Constitution."SFGbob said:
In this case EP isn't undefined. Why do you lie? This isn't like Clinton claiming EP over Lewinsky. Private conversations had with foreign leaders are a text book example of things covered by EP.HHusky said:
Liberal, undefined magic term: DiversitySFGbob said:
Can congress pass a law that takes away the Executive Privilege O'Keefed? If the whistle blower isn't covered by the law, then by what authority does Congress have to see the Complaint that would over ride EP?HHusky said:
I completely understand that you wish to hang your hat on positions taken by those who are acting outside of the law. I know will ignore the fact that the law does not provide them any legal right to block providing the complaint to Congress. That’s how you roll.SFGbob said:
And the Justice Department, and the DNI are saying the complaint isn't covered by the laws applying to intelligence whistleblowers. The law can't compel a President to give up EP. What kind of fucking lawyer are you?HHusky said:
IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!Sledog said:
No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.HHusky said:
Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.Sledog said:
It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.insinceredawg said:
You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?SFGbob said:
Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?insinceredawg said:
of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.HHusky said:
blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
I'm saying let them fight it out in court. You're the one lying claiming the Biden didn't do anything.
Conservative, undefined magic term: Executive Privilege
Where did you go to law school? If it goes to court the Congress with lose. -
Trump supporters have entered R Kelly supporters territory. They won’t believe any wrongdoing unless there’s a video of him doing it while the victim is holding multiple forms of government ID. That piss could be digital!
-
Yeah, EP is an entirely new an recent concept. I believe Washington was the 1st Prez to invoke it.HHusky said:
blob comes out in favor of the "living, breathing Constitution."SFGbob said:
In this case EP isn't undefined. Why do you lie? This isn't like Clinton claiming EP over Lewinsky. Private conversations had with foreign leaders are a text book example of things covered by EP.HHusky said:
Liberal, undefined magic term: DiversitySFGbob said:
Can congress pass a law that takes away the Executive Privilege O'Keefed? If the whistle blower isn't covered by the law, then by what authority does Congress have to see the Complaint that would over ride EP?HHusky said:
I completely understand that you wish to hang your hat on positions taken by those who are acting outside of the law. I know will ignore the fact that the law does not provide them any legal right to block providing the complaint to Congress. That’s how you roll.SFGbob said:
And the Justice Department, and the DNI are saying the complaint isn't covered by the laws applying to intelligence whistleblowers. The law can't compel a President to give up EP. What kind of fucking lawyer are you?HHusky said:
IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!Sledog said:
No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.HHusky said:
Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.Sledog said:
It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.insinceredawg said:
You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?SFGbob said:
Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?insinceredawg said:
of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.HHusky said:
blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
I'm saying let them fight it out in court. You're the one lying claiming the Biden didn't do anything.
Conservative, undefined magic term: Executive Privilege
Where did you go to law school? If it goes to court the Congress with lose. -
EP isn't mentioned in the Constitution. You suddenly think it's a blanket and absolute.SFGbob said:
Yeah, EP is an entirely new an recent concept. I believe Washington was the 1st Prez to invoke it.HHusky said:
blob comes out in favor of the "living, breathing Constitution."SFGbob said:
In this case EP isn't undefined. Why do you lie? This isn't like Clinton claiming EP over Lewinsky. Private conversations had with foreign leaders are a text book example of things covered by EP.HHusky said:
Liberal, undefined magic term: DiversitySFGbob said:
Can congress pass a law that takes away the Executive Privilege O'Keefed? If the whistle blower isn't covered by the law, then by what authority does Congress have to see the Complaint that would over ride EP?HHusky said:
I completely understand that you wish to hang your hat on positions taken by those who are acting outside of the law. I know will ignore the fact that the law does not provide them any legal right to block providing the complaint to Congress. That’s how you roll.SFGbob said:
And the Justice Department, and the DNI are saying the complaint isn't covered by the laws applying to intelligence whistleblowers. The law can't compel a President to give up EP. What kind of fucking lawyer are you?HHusky said:
IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!Sledog said:
No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.HHusky said:
Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.Sledog said:
It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.insinceredawg said:
You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?SFGbob said:
Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?insinceredawg said:
of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.HHusky said:
blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
I'm saying let them fight it out in court. You're the one lying claiming the Biden didn't do anything.
Conservative, undefined magic term: Executive Privilege
Where did you go to law school? If it goes to court the Congress with lose. -
Looking forward to Trump shooting someone in the face in Time Square and the sycophants here screaming “executive privilege!”
-
IE: What about your hypocrisy?HHusky said:
I.e., What about Obama?!?!Sledog said:
I'm sure you raged at Obama doing that with Fast and Furious. A program with more than 125 deaths to it's credit including Brian Terry of the US Border Patrol.HHusky said:
Liberal, undefined magic term: DiversitySFGbob said:
Can congress pass a law that takes away the Executive Privilege O'Keefed? If the whistle blower isn't covered by the law, then by what authority does Congress have to see the Complaint that would over ride EP?HHusky said:
I completely understand that you wish to hang your hat on positions taken by those who are acting outside of the law. I know will ignore the fact that the law does not provide them any legal right to block providing the complaint to Congress. That’s how you roll.SFGbob said:
And the Justice Department, and the DNI are saying the complaint isn't covered by the laws applying to intelligence whistleblowers. The law can't compel a President to give up EP. What kind of fucking lawyer are you?HHusky said:
IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!Sledog said:
No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.HHusky said:
Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.Sledog said:
It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.insinceredawg said:
You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?SFGbob said:
Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?insinceredawg said:
of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.HHusky said:
blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
I'm saying let them fight it out in court. You're the one lying claiming the Biden didn't do anything.
Conservative, undefined magic term: Executive Privilege
I'm sure you were outraged. -
Not me, I'm looking forward to more high quality strawman ass fucks just like this.ThomasFremont said:Looking forward to Trump shooting someone in the face in Time Square and the sycophants here screaming “executive privilege!”
-
How much more abuse can the strawman's asswhole take? I think we're going to find out.HHusky said:
EP isn't mentioned in the Constitution. You suddenly think it's a blanket and absolute.SFGbob said:
Yeah, EP is an entirely new an recent concept. I believe Washington was the 1st Prez to invoke it.HHusky said:
blob comes out in favor of the "living, breathing Constitution."SFGbob said:
In this case EP isn't undefined. Why do you lie? This isn't like Clinton claiming EP over Lewinsky. Private conversations had with foreign leaders are a text book example of things covered by EP.HHusky said:
Liberal, undefined magic term: DiversitySFGbob said:
Can congress pass a law that takes away the Executive Privilege O'Keefed? If the whistle blower isn't covered by the law, then by what authority does Congress have to see the Complaint that would over ride EP?HHusky said:
I completely understand that you wish to hang your hat on positions taken by those who are acting outside of the law. I know will ignore the fact that the law does not provide them any legal right to block providing the complaint to Congress. That’s how you roll.SFGbob said:
And the Justice Department, and the DNI are saying the complaint isn't covered by the laws applying to intelligence whistleblowers. The law can't compel a President to give up EP. What kind of fucking lawyer are you?HHusky said:
IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!Sledog said:
No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.HHusky said:
Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.Sledog said:
It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.insinceredawg said:
You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?SFGbob said:
Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?insinceredawg said:
of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.HHusky said:
blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
I'm saying let them fight it out in court. You're the one lying claiming the Biden didn't do anything.
Conservative, undefined magic term: Executive Privilege
Where did you go to law school? If it goes to court the Congress with lose. -
He’s the one that said he could do it and get away with it.SFGbob said:
Not me, I'm looking forward to more high quality strawman ass fucks just like this.ThomasFremont said:Looking forward to Trump shooting someone in the face in Time Square and the sycophants here screaming “executive privilege!”
-
Yeah, and you claimed that people here would excuse it by screaming “executive privilege!”ThomasFremont said:
He’s the one that said he could do it and get away with it.SFGbob said:
Not me, I'm looking forward to more high quality strawman ass fucks just like this.ThomasFremont said:Looking forward to Trump shooting someone in the face in Time Square and the sycophants here screaming “executive privilege!”
-
Seems more plausible than wearing a mask and driving a getaway car to evade capture.SFGbob said:
Yeah, and you claimed that people here would excuse it by screaming “executive privilege!”ThomasFremont said:
He’s the one that said he could do it and get away with it.SFGbob said:
Not me, I'm looking forward to more high quality strawman ass fucks just like this.ThomasFremont said:Looking forward to Trump shooting someone in the face in Time Square and the sycophants here screaming “executive privilege!”
-
Neither is a right to privacy, I guess it doesn't exist either.HHusky said:
EP isn't mentioned in the Constitution. You suddenly think it's a blanket and absolute.SFGbob said:
Yeah, EP is an entirely new an recent concept. I believe Washington was the 1st Prez to invoke it.HHusky said:
blob comes out in favor of the "living, breathing Constitution."SFGbob said:
In this case EP isn't undefined. Why do you lie? This isn't like Clinton claiming EP over Lewinsky. Private conversations had with foreign leaders are a text book example of things covered by EP.HHusky said:
Liberal, undefined magic term: DiversitySFGbob said:
Can congress pass a law that takes away the Executive Privilege O'Keefed? If the whistle blower isn't covered by the law, then by what authority does Congress have to see the Complaint that would over ride EP?HHusky said:
I completely understand that you wish to hang your hat on positions taken by those who are acting outside of the law. I know will ignore the fact that the law does not provide them any legal right to block providing the complaint to Congress. That’s how you roll.SFGbob said:
And the Justice Department, and the DNI are saying the complaint isn't covered by the laws applying to intelligence whistleblowers. The law can't compel a President to give up EP. What kind of fucking lawyer are you?HHusky said:
IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!Sledog said:
No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.HHusky said:
Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.Sledog said:
It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.insinceredawg said:
You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?SFGbob said:
Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?insinceredawg said:
of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.HHusky said:
blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
I'm saying let them fight it out in court. You're the one lying claiming the Biden didn't do anything.
Conservative, undefined magic term: Executive Privilege
Where did you go to law school? If it goes to court the Congress with lose. -
That's the claim of your knuckle dragging colleagues. You off that bus now?SFGbob said:
Neither is a right to privacy, I guess it doesn't exist either.HHusky said:
EP isn't mentioned in the Constitution. You suddenly think it's a blanket and absolute.SFGbob said:
Yeah, EP is an entirely new an recent concept. I believe Washington was the 1st Prez to invoke it.HHusky said:
blob comes out in favor of the "living, breathing Constitution."SFGbob said:
In this case EP isn't undefined. Why do you lie? This isn't like Clinton claiming EP over Lewinsky. Private conversations had with foreign leaders are a text book example of things covered by EP.HHusky said:
Liberal, undefined magic term: DiversitySFGbob said:
Can congress pass a law that takes away the Executive Privilege O'Keefed? If the whistle blower isn't covered by the law, then by what authority does Congress have to see the Complaint that would over ride EP?HHusky said:
I completely understand that you wish to hang your hat on positions taken by those who are acting outside of the law. I know will ignore the fact that the law does not provide them any legal right to block providing the complaint to Congress. That’s how you roll.SFGbob said:
And the Justice Department, and the DNI are saying the complaint isn't covered by the laws applying to intelligence whistleblowers. The law can't compel a President to give up EP. What kind of fucking lawyer are you?HHusky said:
IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!Sledog said:
No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.HHusky said:
Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.Sledog said:
It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.insinceredawg said:
You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?SFGbob said:
Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?insinceredawg said:
of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.HHusky said:
blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
I'm saying let them fight it out in court. You're the one lying claiming the Biden didn't do anything.
Conservative, undefined magic term: Executive Privilege
Where did you go to law school? If it goes to court the Congress with lose. -
-
I'm responsible for what I say, should I hold you responsible for the lies and bullshit that Hondo spouts since you're on the same team?HHusky said:
That's the claim of your knuckle dragging colleagues. You off that bus now?SFGbob said:
Neither is a right to privacy, I guess it doesn't exist either.HHusky said:
EP isn't mentioned in the Constitution. You suddenly think it's a blanket and absolute.SFGbob said:
Yeah, EP is an entirely new an recent concept. I believe Washington was the 1st Prez to invoke it.HHusky said:
blob comes out in favor of the "living, breathing Constitution."SFGbob said:
In this case EP isn't undefined. Why do you lie? This isn't like Clinton claiming EP over Lewinsky. Private conversations had with foreign leaders are a text book example of things covered by EP.HHusky said:
Liberal, undefined magic term: DiversitySFGbob said:
Can congress pass a law that takes away the Executive Privilege O'Keefed? If the whistle blower isn't covered by the law, then by what authority does Congress have to see the Complaint that would over ride EP?HHusky said:
I completely understand that you wish to hang your hat on positions taken by those who are acting outside of the law. I know will ignore the fact that the law does not provide them any legal right to block providing the complaint to Congress. That’s how you roll.SFGbob said:
And the Justice Department, and the DNI are saying the complaint isn't covered by the laws applying to intelligence whistleblowers. The law can't compel a President to give up EP. What kind of fucking lawyer are you?HHusky said:
IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!Sledog said:
No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.HHusky said:
Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.Sledog said:
It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.insinceredawg said:
You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?SFGbob said:
Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?insinceredawg said:
of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.HHusky said:
blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
I'm saying let them fight it out in court. You're the one lying claiming the Biden didn't do anything.
Conservative, undefined magic term: Executive Privilege
Where did you go to law school? If it goes to court the Congress with lose. -
I was gone for a year and I’ve been labeled a HondoBro for disagreeing with you and the Trump supporters here.SFGbob said:
I'm responsible for what I say, should I hold you responsible for the lies and bullshit that Hondo spouts since you're on the same team?HHusky said:
That's the claim of your knuckle dragging colleagues. You off that bus now?SFGbob said:
Neither is a right to privacy, I guess it doesn't exist either.HHusky said:
EP isn't mentioned in the Constitution. You suddenly think it's a blanket and absolute.SFGbob said:
Yeah, EP is an entirely new an recent concept. I believe Washington was the 1st Prez to invoke it.HHusky said:
blob comes out in favor of the "living, breathing Constitution."SFGbob said:
In this case EP isn't undefined. Why do you lie? This isn't like Clinton claiming EP over Lewinsky. Private conversations had with foreign leaders are a text book example of things covered by EP.HHusky said:
Liberal, undefined magic term: DiversitySFGbob said:
Can congress pass a law that takes away the Executive Privilege O'Keefed? If the whistle blower isn't covered by the law, then by what authority does Congress have to see the Complaint that would over ride EP?HHusky said:
I completely understand that you wish to hang your hat on positions taken by those who are acting outside of the law. I know will ignore the fact that the law does not provide them any legal right to block providing the complaint to Congress. That’s how you roll.SFGbob said:
And the Justice Department, and the DNI are saying the complaint isn't covered by the laws applying to intelligence whistleblowers. The law can't compel a President to give up EP. What kind of fucking lawyer are you?HHusky said:
IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!Sledog said:
No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.HHusky said:
Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.Sledog said:
It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.insinceredawg said:
You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?SFGbob said:
Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?insinceredawg said:
of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.HHusky said:
blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
I'm saying let them fight it out in court. You're the one lying claiming the Biden didn't do anything.
Conservative, undefined magic term: Executive Privilege
Where did you go to law school? If it goes to court the Congress with lose. -
Everything is us against them with Bob. Because all conservatives here fall in line. He expects "liberals"* do as well.ThomasFremont said:
I was gone for a year and I’ve been labeled a HondoBro for disagreeing with you and the Trump supporters here.SFGbob said:
I'm responsible for what I say, should I hold you responsible for the lies and bullshit that Hondo spouts since you're on the same team?HHusky said:
That's the claim of your knuckle dragging colleagues. You off that bus now?SFGbob said:
Neither is a right to privacy, I guess it doesn't exist either.HHusky said:
EP isn't mentioned in the Constitution. You suddenly think it's a blanket and absolute.SFGbob said:
Yeah, EP is an entirely new an recent concept. I believe Washington was the 1st Prez to invoke it.HHusky said:
blob comes out in favor of the "living, breathing Constitution."SFGbob said:
In this case EP isn't undefined. Why do you lie? This isn't like Clinton claiming EP over Lewinsky. Private conversations had with foreign leaders are a text book example of things covered by EP.HHusky said:
Liberal, undefined magic term: DiversitySFGbob said:
Can congress pass a law that takes away the Executive Privilege O'Keefed? If the whistle blower isn't covered by the law, then by what authority does Congress have to see the Complaint that would over ride EP?HHusky said:
I completely understand that you wish to hang your hat on positions taken by those who are acting outside of the law. I know will ignore the fact that the law does not provide them any legal right to block providing the complaint to Congress. That’s how you roll.SFGbob said:
And the Justice Department, and the DNI are saying the complaint isn't covered by the laws applying to intelligence whistleblowers. The law can't compel a President to give up EP. What kind of fucking lawyer are you?HHusky said:
IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!Sledog said:
No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.HHusky said:
Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.Sledog said:
It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.insinceredawg said:
You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?SFGbob said:
Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?insinceredawg said:
of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.HHusky said:
blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
I'm saying let them fight it out in court. You're the one lying claiming the Biden didn't do anything.
Conservative, undefined magic term: Executive Privilege
Where did you go to law school? If it goes to court the Congress with lose.
* And "liberals" in Bob's mind is everyone who doesn't fall in line with Trump and Republicans. -
You didn't get called a HondoBro just for disagreeing with me. Do you not like being a HondoBro?ThomasFremont said:
I was gone for a year and I’ve been labeled a HondoBro for disagreeing with you and the Trump supporters here.SFGbob said:
I'm responsible for what I say, should I hold you responsible for the lies and bullshit that Hondo spouts since you're on the same team?HHusky said:
That's the claim of your knuckle dragging colleagues. You off that bus now?SFGbob said:
Neither is a right to privacy, I guess it doesn't exist either.HHusky said:
EP isn't mentioned in the Constitution. You suddenly think it's a blanket and absolute.SFGbob said:
Yeah, EP is an entirely new an recent concept. I believe Washington was the 1st Prez to invoke it.HHusky said:
blob comes out in favor of the "living, breathing Constitution."SFGbob said:
In this case EP isn't undefined. Why do you lie? This isn't like Clinton claiming EP over Lewinsky. Private conversations had with foreign leaders are a text book example of things covered by EP.HHusky said:
Liberal, undefined magic term: DiversitySFGbob said:
Can congress pass a law that takes away the Executive Privilege O'Keefed? If the whistle blower isn't covered by the law, then by what authority does Congress have to see the Complaint that would over ride EP?HHusky said:
I completely understand that you wish to hang your hat on positions taken by those who are acting outside of the law. I know will ignore the fact that the law does not provide them any legal right to block providing the complaint to Congress. That’s how you roll.SFGbob said:
And the Justice Department, and the DNI are saying the complaint isn't covered by the laws applying to intelligence whistleblowers. The law can't compel a President to give up EP. What kind of fucking lawyer are you?HHusky said:
IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!Sledog said:
No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.HHusky said:
Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.Sledog said:
It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.insinceredawg said:
You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?SFGbob said:
Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?insinceredawg said:
of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.HHusky said:
blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
I'm saying let them fight it out in court. You're the one lying claiming the Biden didn't do anything.
Conservative, undefined magic term: Executive Privilege
Where did you go to law school? If it goes to court the Congress with lose. -
All 17 whack a mole agencies agree with you. IMPEACHHHusky said:
IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!Sledog said:
No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.HHusky said:
Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.Sledog said:
It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.insinceredawg said:
You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?SFGbob said:
Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?insinceredawg said:
of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.HHusky said:
blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole. -
Weird how there are never any examples is support of your worthless lying twat of a mouth Hondo.2001400ex said:
Everything is us against them with Bob. Because all conservatives here fall in line. He expects "liberals"* do as well.ThomasFremont said:
I was gone for a year and I’ve been labeled a HondoBro for disagreeing with you and the Trump supporters here.SFGbob said:
I'm responsible for what I say, should I hold you responsible for the lies and bullshit that Hondo spouts since you're on the same team?HHusky said:
That's the claim of your knuckle dragging colleagues. You off that bus now?SFGbob said:
Neither is a right to privacy, I guess it doesn't exist either.HHusky said:
EP isn't mentioned in the Constitution. You suddenly think it's a blanket and absolute.SFGbob said:
Yeah, EP is an entirely new an recent concept. I believe Washington was the 1st Prez to invoke it.HHusky said:
blob comes out in favor of the "living, breathing Constitution."SFGbob said:
In this case EP isn't undefined. Why do you lie? This isn't like Clinton claiming EP over Lewinsky. Private conversations had with foreign leaders are a text book example of things covered by EP.HHusky said:
Liberal, undefined magic term: DiversitySFGbob said:
Can congress pass a law that takes away the Executive Privilege O'Keefed? If the whistle blower isn't covered by the law, then by what authority does Congress have to see the Complaint that would over ride EP?HHusky said:
I completely understand that you wish to hang your hat on positions taken by those who are acting outside of the law. I know will ignore the fact that the law does not provide them any legal right to block providing the complaint to Congress. That’s how you roll.SFGbob said:
And the Justice Department, and the DNI are saying the complaint isn't covered by the laws applying to intelligence whistleblowers. The law can't compel a President to give up EP. What kind of fucking lawyer are you?HHusky said:
IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!Sledog said:
No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.HHusky said:
Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.Sledog said:
It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.insinceredawg said:
You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?SFGbob said:
Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?insinceredawg said:
of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.HHusky said:
blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
I'm saying let them fight it out in court. You're the one lying claiming the Biden didn't do anything.
Conservative, undefined magic term: Executive Privilege
Where did you go to law school? If it goes to court the Congress with lose.
* And "liberals" in Bob's mind is everyone who doesn't fall in line with Trump and Republicans.
-
Labels are BAD. Just axe Race.SFGbob said:
You didn't get called a HondoBro just for disagreeing with me. Do you not like being a HondoBro?ThomasFremont said:
I was gone for a year and I’ve been labeled a HondoBro for disagreeing with you and the Trump supporters here.SFGbob said:
I'm responsible for what I say, should I hold you responsible for the lies and bullshit that Hondo spouts since you're on the same team?HHusky said:
That's the claim of your knuckle dragging colleagues. You off that bus now?SFGbob said:
Neither is a right to privacy, I guess it doesn't exist either.HHusky said:
EP isn't mentioned in the Constitution. You suddenly think it's a blanket and absolute.SFGbob said:
Yeah, EP is an entirely new an recent concept. I believe Washington was the 1st Prez to invoke it.HHusky said:
blob comes out in favor of the "living, breathing Constitution."SFGbob said:
In this case EP isn't undefined. Why do you lie? This isn't like Clinton claiming EP over Lewinsky. Private conversations had with foreign leaders are a text book example of things covered by EP.HHusky said:
Liberal, undefined magic term: DiversitySFGbob said:
Can congress pass a law that takes away the Executive Privilege O'Keefed? If the whistle blower isn't covered by the law, then by what authority does Congress have to see the Complaint that would over ride EP?HHusky said:
I completely understand that you wish to hang your hat on positions taken by those who are acting outside of the law. I know will ignore the fact that the law does not provide them any legal right to block providing the complaint to Congress. That’s how you roll.SFGbob said:
And the Justice Department, and the DNI are saying the complaint isn't covered by the laws applying to intelligence whistleblowers. The law can't compel a President to give up EP. What kind of fucking lawyer are you?HHusky said:
IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!Sledog said:
No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.HHusky said:
Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.Sledog said:
It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.insinceredawg said:
You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?SFGbob said:
Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?insinceredawg said:
of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.HHusky said:
blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
I'm saying let them fight it out in court. You're the one lying claiming the Biden didn't do anything.
Conservative, undefined magic term: Executive Privilege
Where did you go to law school? If it goes to court the Congress with lose. -
Is that a yes or a no? Why do you object to being called a Hondo Bro?ThomasFremont said:
Labels are BAD. Just axe Race.SFGbob said:
You didn't get called a HondoBro just for disagreeing with me. Do you not like being a HondoBro?ThomasFremont said:
I was gone for a year and I’ve been labeled a HondoBro for disagreeing with you and the Trump supporters here.SFGbob said:
I'm responsible for what I say, should I hold you responsible for the lies and bullshit that Hondo spouts since you're on the same team?HHusky said:
That's the claim of your knuckle dragging colleagues. You off that bus now?SFGbob said:
Neither is a right to privacy, I guess it doesn't exist either.HHusky said:
EP isn't mentioned in the Constitution. You suddenly think it's a blanket and absolute.SFGbob said:
Yeah, EP is an entirely new an recent concept. I believe Washington was the 1st Prez to invoke it.HHusky said:
blob comes out in favor of the "living, breathing Constitution."SFGbob said:
In this case EP isn't undefined. Why do you lie? This isn't like Clinton claiming EP over Lewinsky. Private conversations had with foreign leaders are a text book example of things covered by EP.HHusky said:
Liberal, undefined magic term: DiversitySFGbob said:
Can congress pass a law that takes away the Executive Privilege O'Keefed? If the whistle blower isn't covered by the law, then by what authority does Congress have to see the Complaint that would over ride EP?HHusky said:
I completely understand that you wish to hang your hat on positions taken by those who are acting outside of the law. I know will ignore the fact that the law does not provide them any legal right to block providing the complaint to Congress. That’s how you roll.SFGbob said:
And the Justice Department, and the DNI are saying the complaint isn't covered by the laws applying to intelligence whistleblowers. The law can't compel a President to give up EP. What kind of fucking lawyer are you?HHusky said:
IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!Sledog said:
No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.HHusky said:
Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.Sledog said:
It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.insinceredawg said:
You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?SFGbob said:
Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?insinceredawg said:
of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.HHusky said:
blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
I'm saying let them fight it out in court. You're the one lying claiming the Biden didn't do anything.
Conservative, undefined magic term: Executive Privilege
Where did you go to law school? If it goes to court the Congress with lose. -
Because my opinion differs from his in many ways. But I understand it helps simple minded folks to categorize things into binary options.SFGbob said:
Is that a yes or a no? Why do you object to being called a Hondo Bro?ThomasFremont said:
Labels are BAD. Just axe Race.SFGbob said:
You didn't get called a HondoBro just for disagreeing with me. Do you not like being a HondoBro?ThomasFremont said:
I was gone for a year and I’ve been labeled a HondoBro for disagreeing with you and the Trump supporters here.SFGbob said:
I'm responsible for what I say, should I hold you responsible for the lies and bullshit that Hondo spouts since you're on the same team?HHusky said:
That's the claim of your knuckle dragging colleagues. You off that bus now?SFGbob said:
Neither is a right to privacy, I guess it doesn't exist either.HHusky said:
EP isn't mentioned in the Constitution. You suddenly think it's a blanket and absolute.SFGbob said:
Yeah, EP is an entirely new an recent concept. I believe Washington was the 1st Prez to invoke it.HHusky said:
blob comes out in favor of the "living, breathing Constitution."SFGbob said:
In this case EP isn't undefined. Why do you lie? This isn't like Clinton claiming EP over Lewinsky. Private conversations had with foreign leaders are a text book example of things covered by EP.HHusky said:
Liberal, undefined magic term: DiversitySFGbob said:
Can congress pass a law that takes away the Executive Privilege O'Keefed? If the whistle blower isn't covered by the law, then by what authority does Congress have to see the Complaint that would over ride EP?HHusky said:
I completely understand that you wish to hang your hat on positions taken by those who are acting outside of the law. I know will ignore the fact that the law does not provide them any legal right to block providing the complaint to Congress. That’s how you roll.SFGbob said:
And the Justice Department, and the DNI are saying the complaint isn't covered by the laws applying to intelligence whistleblowers. The law can't compel a President to give up EP. What kind of fucking lawyer are you?HHusky said:
IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!Sledog said:
No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.HHusky said:
Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.Sledog said:
It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.insinceredawg said:
You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?SFGbob said:
Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?insinceredawg said:
of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.HHusky said:
blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
I'm saying let them fight it out in court. You're the one lying claiming the Biden didn't do anything.
Conservative, undefined magic term: Executive Privilege
Where did you go to law school? If it goes to court the Congress with lose. -
I don't care what your gender fluidity is I just care about the nation. You are against America and say your voting for all the socialists. Is there really anything else to know?ThomasFremont said:
Because my opinion differs from his in many ways. But I understand it helps simple minded folks to categorize things into binary options.SFGbob said:
Is that a yes or a no? Why do you object to being called a Hondo Bro?ThomasFremont said:
Labels are BAD. Just axe Race.SFGbob said:
You didn't get called a HondoBro just for disagreeing with me. Do you not like being a HondoBro?ThomasFremont said:
I was gone for a year and I’ve been labeled a HondoBro for disagreeing with you and the Trump supporters here.SFGbob said:
I'm responsible for what I say, should I hold you responsible for the lies and bullshit that Hondo spouts since you're on the same team?HHusky said:
That's the claim of your knuckle dragging colleagues. You off that bus now?SFGbob said:
Neither is a right to privacy, I guess it doesn't exist either.HHusky said:
EP isn't mentioned in the Constitution. You suddenly think it's a blanket and absolute.SFGbob said:
Yeah, EP is an entirely new an recent concept. I believe Washington was the 1st Prez to invoke it.HHusky said:
blob comes out in favor of the "living, breathing Constitution."SFGbob said:
In this case EP isn't undefined. Why do you lie? This isn't like Clinton claiming EP over Lewinsky. Private conversations had with foreign leaders are a text book example of things covered by EP.HHusky said:
Liberal, undefined magic term: DiversitySFGbob said:
Can congress pass a law that takes away the Executive Privilege O'Keefed? If the whistle blower isn't covered by the law, then by what authority does Congress have to see the Complaint that would over ride EP?HHusky said:
I completely understand that you wish to hang your hat on positions taken by those who are acting outside of the law. I know will ignore the fact that the law does not provide them any legal right to block providing the complaint to Congress. That’s how you roll.SFGbob said:
And the Justice Department, and the DNI are saying the complaint isn't covered by the laws applying to intelligence whistleblowers. The law can't compel a President to give up EP. What kind of fucking lawyer are you?HHusky said:
IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!Sledog said:
No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.HHusky said:
Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.Sledog said:
It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.insinceredawg said:
You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?SFGbob said:
Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?insinceredawg said:
of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.HHusky said:
blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
I'm saying let them fight it out in court. You're the one lying claiming the Biden didn't do anything.
Conservative, undefined magic term: Executive Privilege
Where did you go to law school? If it goes to court the Congress with lose. -
I wasn't aware that all Hondo bros shared the same positions on all issues. Do you believe Trump supporters agree on every issue?ThomasFremont said:
Because my opinion differs from his in many ways. But I understand it helps simple minded folks to categorize things into binary options.SFGbob said:
Is that a yes or a no? Why do you object to being called a Hondo Bro?ThomasFremont said:
Labels are BAD. Just axe Race.SFGbob said:
You didn't get called a HondoBro just for disagreeing with me. Do you not like being a HondoBro?ThomasFremont said:
I was gone for a year and I’ve been labeled a HondoBro for disagreeing with you and the Trump supporters here.SFGbob said:
I'm responsible for what I say, should I hold you responsible for the lies and bullshit that Hondo spouts since you're on the same team?HHusky said:
That's the claim of your knuckle dragging colleagues. You off that bus now?SFGbob said:
Neither is a right to privacy, I guess it doesn't exist either.HHusky said:
EP isn't mentioned in the Constitution. You suddenly think it's a blanket and absolute.SFGbob said:
Yeah, EP is an entirely new an recent concept. I believe Washington was the 1st Prez to invoke it.HHusky said:
blob comes out in favor of the "living, breathing Constitution."SFGbob said:
In this case EP isn't undefined. Why do you lie? This isn't like Clinton claiming EP over Lewinsky. Private conversations had with foreign leaders are a text book example of things covered by EP.HHusky said:
Liberal, undefined magic term: DiversitySFGbob said:
Can congress pass a law that takes away the Executive Privilege O'Keefed? If the whistle blower isn't covered by the law, then by what authority does Congress have to see the Complaint that would over ride EP?HHusky said:
I completely understand that you wish to hang your hat on positions taken by those who are acting outside of the law. I know will ignore the fact that the law does not provide them any legal right to block providing the complaint to Congress. That’s how you roll.SFGbob said:
And the Justice Department, and the DNI are saying the complaint isn't covered by the laws applying to intelligence whistleblowers. The law can't compel a President to give up EP. What kind of fucking lawyer are you?HHusky said:
IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!Sledog said:
No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.HHusky said:
Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.Sledog said:
It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.insinceredawg said:
You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?SFGbob said:
Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?insinceredawg said:
of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.HHusky said:
blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
I'm saying let them fight it out in court. You're the one lying claiming the Biden didn't do anything.
Conservative, undefined magic term: Executive Privilege
Where did you go to law school? If it goes to court the Congress with lose. -
Against America? Are you and Sledog sharing the same needle?Sledog said:
I don't care what your gender fluidity is I just care about the nation. You are against America and say your voting for all the socialists. Is there really anything else to know?ThomasFremont said:
Because my opinion differs from his in many ways. But I understand it helps simple minded folks to categorize things into binary options.SFGbob said:
Is that a yes or a no? Why do you object to being called a Hondo Bro?ThomasFremont said:
Labels are BAD. Just axe Race.SFGbob said:
You didn't get called a HondoBro just for disagreeing with me. Do you not like being a HondoBro?ThomasFremont said:
I was gone for a year and I’ve been labeled a HondoBro for disagreeing with you and the Trump supporters here.SFGbob said:
I'm responsible for what I say, should I hold you responsible for the lies and bullshit that Hondo spouts since you're on the same team?HHusky said:
That's the claim of your knuckle dragging colleagues. You off that bus now?SFGbob said:
Neither is a right to privacy, I guess it doesn't exist either.HHusky said:
EP isn't mentioned in the Constitution. You suddenly think it's a blanket and absolute.SFGbob said:
Yeah, EP is an entirely new an recent concept. I believe Washington was the 1st Prez to invoke it.HHusky said:
blob comes out in favor of the "living, breathing Constitution."SFGbob said:
In this case EP isn't undefined. Why do you lie? This isn't like Clinton claiming EP over Lewinsky. Private conversations had with foreign leaders are a text book example of things covered by EP.HHusky said:
Liberal, undefined magic term: DiversitySFGbob said:
Can congress pass a law that takes away the Executive Privilege O'Keefed? If the whistle blower isn't covered by the law, then by what authority does Congress have to see the Complaint that would over ride EP?HHusky said:
I completely understand that you wish to hang your hat on positions taken by those who are acting outside of the law. I know will ignore the fact that the law does not provide them any legal right to block providing the complaint to Congress. That’s how you roll.SFGbob said:
And the Justice Department, and the DNI are saying the complaint isn't covered by the laws applying to intelligence whistleblowers. The law can't compel a President to give up EP. What kind of fucking lawyer are you?HHusky said:
IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!Sledog said:
No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.HHusky said:
Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.Sledog said:
It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.insinceredawg said:
You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?SFGbob said:
Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?insinceredawg said:
of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.HHusky said:
blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
I'm saying let them fight it out in court. You're the one lying claiming the Biden didn't do anything.
Conservative, undefined magic term: Executive Privilege
Where did you go to law school? If it goes to court the Congress with lose. -
Confused you are!ThomasFremont said:
Against America? Are you and Sledog sharing the same needle?Sledog said:
I don't care what your gender fluidity is I just care about the nation. You are against America and say your voting for all the socialists. Is there really anything else to know?ThomasFremont said:
Because my opinion differs from his in many ways. But I understand it helps simple minded folks to categorize things into binary options.SFGbob said:
Is that a yes or a no? Why do you object to being called a Hondo Bro?ThomasFremont said:
Labels are BAD. Just axe Race.SFGbob said:
You didn't get called a HondoBro just for disagreeing with me. Do you not like being a HondoBro?ThomasFremont said:
I was gone for a year and I’ve been labeled a HondoBro for disagreeing with you and the Trump supporters here.SFGbob said:
I'm responsible for what I say, should I hold you responsible for the lies and bullshit that Hondo spouts since you're on the same team?HHusky said:
That's the claim of your knuckle dragging colleagues. You off that bus now?SFGbob said:
Neither is a right to privacy, I guess it doesn't exist either.HHusky said:
EP isn't mentioned in the Constitution. You suddenly think it's a blanket and absolute.SFGbob said:
Yeah, EP is an entirely new an recent concept. I believe Washington was the 1st Prez to invoke it.HHusky said:
blob comes out in favor of the "living, breathing Constitution."SFGbob said:
In this case EP isn't undefined. Why do you lie? This isn't like Clinton claiming EP over Lewinsky. Private conversations had with foreign leaders are a text book example of things covered by EP.HHusky said:
Liberal, undefined magic term: DiversitySFGbob said:
Can congress pass a law that takes away the Executive Privilege O'Keefed? If the whistle blower isn't covered by the law, then by what authority does Congress have to see the Complaint that would over ride EP?HHusky said:
I completely understand that you wish to hang your hat on positions taken by those who are acting outside of the law. I know will ignore the fact that the law does not provide them any legal right to block providing the complaint to Congress. That’s how you roll.SFGbob said:
And the Justice Department, and the DNI are saying the complaint isn't covered by the laws applying to intelligence whistleblowers. The law can't compel a President to give up EP. What kind of fucking lawyer are you?HHusky said:
IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!Sledog said:
No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.HHusky said:
Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.Sledog said:
It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.insinceredawg said:
You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?SFGbob said:
Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?insinceredawg said:
of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.HHusky said:
blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
I'm saying let them fight it out in court. You're the one lying claiming the Biden didn't do anything.
Conservative, undefined magic term: Executive Privilege
Where did you go to law school? If it goes to court the Congress with lose. -
Whatever makes you feel better. I know your life choices won’t cut it.Sledog said:
Confused you are!ThomasFremont said:
Against America? Are you and Sledog sharing the same needle?Sledog said:
I don't care what your gender fluidity is I just care about the nation. You are against America and say your voting for all the socialists. Is there really anything else to know?ThomasFremont said:
Because my opinion differs from his in many ways. But I understand it helps simple minded folks to categorize things into binary options.SFGbob said:
Is that a yes or a no? Why do you object to being called a Hondo Bro?ThomasFremont said:
Labels are BAD. Just axe Race.SFGbob said:
You didn't get called a HondoBro just for disagreeing with me. Do you not like being a HondoBro?ThomasFremont said:
I was gone for a year and I’ve been labeled a HondoBro for disagreeing with you and the Trump supporters here.SFGbob said:
I'm responsible for what I say, should I hold you responsible for the lies and bullshit that Hondo spouts since you're on the same team?HHusky said:
That's the claim of your knuckle dragging colleagues. You off that bus now?SFGbob said:
Neither is a right to privacy, I guess it doesn't exist either.HHusky said:
EP isn't mentioned in the Constitution. You suddenly think it's a blanket and absolute.SFGbob said:
Yeah, EP is an entirely new an recent concept. I believe Washington was the 1st Prez to invoke it.HHusky said:
blob comes out in favor of the "living, breathing Constitution."SFGbob said:
In this case EP isn't undefined. Why do you lie? This isn't like Clinton claiming EP over Lewinsky. Private conversations had with foreign leaders are a text book example of things covered by EP.HHusky said:
Liberal, undefined magic term: DiversitySFGbob said:
Can congress pass a law that takes away the Executive Privilege O'Keefed? If the whistle blower isn't covered by the law, then by what authority does Congress have to see the Complaint that would over ride EP?HHusky said:
I completely understand that you wish to hang your hat on positions taken by those who are acting outside of the law. I know will ignore the fact that the law does not provide them any legal right to block providing the complaint to Congress. That’s how you roll.SFGbob said:
And the Justice Department, and the DNI are saying the complaint isn't covered by the laws applying to intelligence whistleblowers. The law can't compel a President to give up EP. What kind of fucking lawyer are you?HHusky said:
IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!Sledog said:
No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.HHusky said:
Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.Sledog said:
It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.insinceredawg said:
You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?SFGbob said:
Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?insinceredawg said:
of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.HHusky said:
blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
I'm saying let them fight it out in court. You're the one lying claiming the Biden didn't do anything.
Conservative, undefined magic term: Executive Privilege
Where did you go to law school? If it goes to court the Congress with lose. -
I am Sledog. Better check your needle sharing post.ThomasFremont said:
Whatever makes you feel better. I know your life choices won’t cut it.Sledog said:
Confused you are!ThomasFremont said:
Against America? Are you and Sledog sharing the same needle?Sledog said:
I don't care what your gender fluidity is I just care about the nation. You are against America and say your voting for all the socialists. Is there really anything else to know?ThomasFremont said:
Because my opinion differs from his in many ways. But I understand it helps simple minded folks to categorize things into binary options.SFGbob said:
Is that a yes or a no? Why do you object to being called a Hondo Bro?ThomasFremont said:
Labels are BAD. Just axe Race.SFGbob said:
You didn't get called a HondoBro just for disagreeing with me. Do you not like being a HondoBro?ThomasFremont said:
I was gone for a year and I’ve been labeled a HondoBro for disagreeing with you and the Trump supporters here.SFGbob said:
I'm responsible for what I say, should I hold you responsible for the lies and bullshit that Hondo spouts since you're on the same team?HHusky said:
That's the claim of your knuckle dragging colleagues. You off that bus now?SFGbob said:
Neither is a right to privacy, I guess it doesn't exist either.HHusky said:
EP isn't mentioned in the Constitution. You suddenly think it's a blanket and absolute.SFGbob said:
Yeah, EP is an entirely new an recent concept. I believe Washington was the 1st Prez to invoke it.HHusky said:
blob comes out in favor of the "living, breathing Constitution."SFGbob said:
In this case EP isn't undefined. Why do you lie? This isn't like Clinton claiming EP over Lewinsky. Private conversations had with foreign leaders are a text book example of things covered by EP.HHusky said:
Liberal, undefined magic term: DiversitySFGbob said:
Can congress pass a law that takes away the Executive Privilege O'Keefed? If the whistle blower isn't covered by the law, then by what authority does Congress have to see the Complaint that would over ride EP?HHusky said:
I completely understand that you wish to hang your hat on positions taken by those who are acting outside of the law. I know will ignore the fact that the law does not provide them any legal right to block providing the complaint to Congress. That’s how you roll.SFGbob said:
And the Justice Department, and the DNI are saying the complaint isn't covered by the laws applying to intelligence whistleblowers. The law can't compel a President to give up EP. What kind of fucking lawyer are you?HHusky said:
IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!Sledog said:
No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.HHusky said:
Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.Sledog said:
It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.insinceredawg said:
You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?SFGbob said:
Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?insinceredawg said:
of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.HHusky said:
blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
I'm saying let them fight it out in court. You're the one lying claiming the Biden didn't do anything.
Conservative, undefined magic term: Executive Privilege
Where did you go to law school? If it goes to court the Congress with lose.
And please enlighten us with your yachting lifestyle and job that allows a yacht purchase. -
Considering the track record of his accusers many of whom embarrassed themselves several times in your absence, why in the fuck would we fall for the bullshit anymore?ThomasFremont said:Trump supporters have entered R Kelly supporters territory. They won’t believe any wrongdoing unless there’s a video of him doing it while the victim is holding multiple forms of government ID. That piss could be digital!
You and your little band of deranged never Trumpers have been wrong about EVERYTHING and failed miserably at making shit up to get him out of office
I voted for him. I expect that to be respected. If your little band of retards can't beat him a year from now in an election then you might seriously consider just shutting the fuck up for awhile
