Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Behold the Rat party voter

135678

Comments

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,622
    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.

    Stawman ass fucking very big deal.

    I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
    Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.
    blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.
    of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.
    Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?
    You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?
    It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.
    Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,958 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.

    Stawman ass fucking very big deal.

    I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
    Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.
    blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.
    of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.
    Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?
    You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?
    It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.
    Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.
    No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,622
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.

    Stawman ass fucking very big deal.

    I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
    Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.
    blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.
    of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.
    Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?
    You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?
    It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.
    Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.
    No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.
    IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,219
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.

    Stawman ass fucking very big deal.

    I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
    Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.
    blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.
    of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.
    Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?
    You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?
    It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.
    Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.
    No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.
    IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!
    And the Justice Department, and the DNI are saying the complaint isn't covered by the laws applying to intelligence whistleblowers. The law can't compel a President to give up EP. What kind of fucking lawyer are you?

    I'm saying let them fight it out in court. You're the one lying claiming the Biden didn't do anything.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,622
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.

    Stawman ass fucking very big deal.

    I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
    Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.
    blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.
    of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.
    Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?
    You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?
    It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.
    Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.
    No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.
    IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!
    And the Justice Department, and the DNI are saying the complaint isn't covered by the laws applying to intelligence whistleblowers. The law can't compel a President to give up EP. What kind of fucking lawyer are you?

    I'm saying let them fight it out in court. You're the one lying claiming the Biden didn't do anything.
    I completely understand that you wish to hang your hat on positions taken by those who are acting outside of the law. I know will ignore the fact that the law does not provide them any legal right to block providing the complaint to Congress. That’s how you roll.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,219
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.

    Stawman ass fucking very big deal.

    I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
    Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.
    blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.
    of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.
    Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?
    You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?
    It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.
    Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.
    No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.
    IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!
    And the Justice Department, and the DNI are saying the complaint isn't covered by the laws applying to intelligence whistleblowers. The law can't compel a President to give up EP. What kind of fucking lawyer are you?

    I'm saying let them fight it out in court. You're the one lying claiming the Biden didn't do anything.
    I completely understand that you wish to hang your hat on positions taken by those who are acting outside of the law. I know will ignore the fact that the law does not provide them any legal right to block providing the complaint to Congress. That’s how you roll.
    Can congress pass a law that takes away the Executive Privilege O'Keefed? If the whistle blower isn't covered by the law, then by what authority does Congress have to see the Complaint that would over ride EP?
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,622
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.

    Stawman ass fucking very big deal.

    I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
    Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.
    blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.
    of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.
    Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?
    You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?
    It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.
    Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.
    No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.
    IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!
    And the Justice Department, and the DNI are saying the complaint isn't covered by the laws applying to intelligence whistleblowers. The law can't compel a President to give up EP. What kind of fucking lawyer are you?

    I'm saying let them fight it out in court. You're the one lying claiming the Biden didn't do anything.
    I completely understand that you wish to hang your hat on positions taken by those who are acting outside of the law. I know will ignore the fact that the law does not provide them any legal right to block providing the complaint to Congress. That’s how you roll.
    Can congress pass a law that takes away the Executive Privilege O'Keefed? If the whistle blower isn't covered by the law, then by what authority does Congress have to see the Complaint that would over ride EP?
    Liberal, undefined magic term: Diversity

    Conservative, undefined magic term: Executive Privilege
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,958 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.

    Stawman ass fucking very big deal.

    I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
    Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.
    blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.
    of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.
    Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?
    You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?
    It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.
    Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.
    No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.
    IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!
    And the Justice Department, and the DNI are saying the complaint isn't covered by the laws applying to intelligence whistleblowers. The law can't compel a President to give up EP. What kind of fucking lawyer are you?

    I'm saying let them fight it out in court. You're the one lying claiming the Biden didn't do anything.
    I completely understand that you wish to hang your hat on positions taken by those who are acting outside of the law. I know will ignore the fact that the law does not provide them any legal right to block providing the complaint to Congress. That’s how you roll.
    Can congress pass a law that takes away the Executive Privilege O'Keefed? If the whistle blower isn't covered by the law, then by what authority does Congress have to see the Complaint that would over ride EP?
    Liberal, undefined magic term: Diversity

    Conservative, undefined magic term: Executive Privilege
    I'm sure you raged at Obama doing that with Fast and Furious. A program with more than 125 deaths to it's credit including Brian Terry of the US Border Patrol.

    I'm sure you were outraged.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,219
    edited September 2019
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.

    Stawman ass fucking very big deal.

    I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
    Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.
    blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.
    of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.
    Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?
    You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?
    It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.
    Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.
    No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.
    IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!
    And the Justice Department, and the DNI are saying the complaint isn't covered by the laws applying to intelligence whistleblowers. The law can't compel a President to give up EP. What kind of fucking lawyer are you?

    I'm saying let them fight it out in court. You're the one lying claiming the Biden didn't do anything.
    I completely understand that you wish to hang your hat on positions taken by those who are acting outside of the law. I know will ignore the fact that the law does not provide them any legal right to block providing the complaint to Congress. That’s how you roll.
    Can congress pass a law that takes away the Executive Privilege O'Keefed? If the whistle blower isn't covered by the law, then by what authority does Congress have to see the Complaint that would over ride EP?
    Liberal, undefined magic term: Diversity

    Conservative, undefined magic term: Executive Privilege
    In this case EP isn't undefined. Why do you lie? This isn't like Clinton claiming EP over Lewinsky. Private conversations had with foreign leaders are a text book example of things covered by EP.

    Where did you go to law school? If it goes to court the Congress with lose.

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,622
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.

    Stawman ass fucking very big deal.

    I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
    Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.
    blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.
    of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.
    Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?
    You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?
    It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.
    Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.
    No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.
    IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!
    And the Justice Department, and the DNI are saying the complaint isn't covered by the laws applying to intelligence whistleblowers. The law can't compel a President to give up EP. What kind of fucking lawyer are you?

    I'm saying let them fight it out in court. You're the one lying claiming the Biden didn't do anything.
    I completely understand that you wish to hang your hat on positions taken by those who are acting outside of the law. I know will ignore the fact that the law does not provide them any legal right to block providing the complaint to Congress. That’s how you roll.
    Can congress pass a law that takes away the Executive Privilege O'Keefed? If the whistle blower isn't covered by the law, then by what authority does Congress have to see the Complaint that would over ride EP?
    Liberal, undefined magic term: Diversity

    Conservative, undefined magic term: Executive Privilege
    I'm sure you raged at Obama doing that with Fast and Furious. A program with more than 125 deaths to it's credit including Brian Terry of the US Border Patrol.

    I'm sure you were outraged.
    I.e., What about Obama?!?!