Behold the Rat party voter

Mentally unhinged, single women make up a core voting block for the Rats
Comments
-
Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
-
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole. -
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole. -
You're like a fucking soothsayer Kunt. You can see the future. You know where the 2020 G7 Meeting is going to be held despite the fact the location hasn't been announced and you know what I'm going to say in the future.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
So tell me why I've never seen you criticize a liberal you fucking hypocritical piece of shit? -
You are the most predictable Kunt on this board. I seriously thought you were a Russian bot initially because your responses were so fucking redundant.SFGbob said:
You're like a fucking soothsayer Kunt. You can see the future. You know where the 2020 G7 Meeting is going to be held despite the fact the location hasn't been announced and you know what I'm going to say in the future.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
So tell me why I've never seen you criticize a liberal you fucking hypocritical piece of shit? -
blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole. -
of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.HHusky said:
blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole. -
insinceredawg said:
You are the most predictable Kunt on this board. I seriously thought you were a Russian bot initially because your responses were so fucking redundant.SFGbob said:
You're like a fucking soothsayer Kunt. You can see the future. You know where the 2020 G7 Meeting is going to be held despite the fact the location hasn't been announced and you know what I'm going to say in the future.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
So tell me why I've never seen you criticize a liberal you fucking hypocritical piece of shit?
White flaginsinceredawg said:
You are the most predictable Kunt on this board. I seriously thought you were a Russian bot initially because your responses were so fucking redundant.SFGbob said:
You're like a fucking soothsayer Kunt. You can see the future. You know where the 2020 G7 Meeting is going to be held despite the fact the location hasn't been announced and you know what I'm going to say in the future.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
So tell me why I've never seen you criticize a liberal you fucking hypocritical piece of shit? -
another predictable response from Gay Bob. Claiming victory after he's been cornered. Sure, you and your geriatric crew of Trumptards can claim all the Ws you want on this board. Doesn't take away from the fact that you're a dumbfuck bitchass partisan kunt.SFGbob said:insinceredawg said:
You are the most predictable Kunt on this board. I seriously thought you were a Russian bot initially because your responses were so fucking redundant.SFGbob said:
You're like a fucking soothsayer Kunt. You can see the future. You know where the 2020 G7 Meeting is going to be held despite the fact the location hasn't been announced and you know what I'm going to say in the future.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
So tell me why I've never seen you criticize a liberal you fucking hypocritical piece of shit?
White flaginsinceredawg said:
You are the most predictable Kunt on this board. I seriously thought you were a Russian bot initially because your responses were so fucking redundant.SFGbob said:
You're like a fucking soothsayer Kunt. You can see the future. You know where the 2020 G7 Meeting is going to be held despite the fact the location hasn't been announced and you know what I'm going to say in the future.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
So tell me why I've never seen you criticize a liberal you fucking hypocritical piece of shit? -
Yeah, how dare I call for evidence before I'm willing to convict someone. I should be like you and just make shit up about Mike Brown being shot in the back while running away and that there's no evidence showing Trademark and Zimmerman were in a fight.HHusky said:
blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
Sorry Kunt, you love swallowing like a bitch and making an ass out of yourself, I prefer to deal in facts. -
SFGbob said:
Yeah, how dare I call for evidence before I'm willing to convict someone. I should be like you and just make shit up about Mike Brown being shot in the back while running away and that there's no evidence showing Trademark and Zimmerman were in a fight.HHusky said:
blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
Sorry Kunt, you love swallowing like a bitch and making an ass out of yourself, I prefer to deal in facts.
-
You're free to refute that with some evidence Kunt, but we both know you're too big a lightweight to do that.insinceredawg said:SFGbob said:
Yeah, how dare I call for evidence before I'm willing to convict someone. I should be like you and just make shit up about Mike Brown being shot in the back while running away and that there's no evidence showing Trademark and Zimmerman were in a fight.HHusky said:
blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
Sorry Kunt, you love swallowing like a bitch and making an ass out of yourself, I prefer to deal in facts. -
Ahhhh, the poor little dumbfuck can't back up his mouth. So sad.SFGbob said:
You're free to refute that with some evidence Kunt, but we both know you're too big a lightweight to do that.insinceredawg said:SFGbob said:
Yeah, how dare I call for evidence before I'm willing to convict someone. I should be like you and just make shit up about Mike Brown being shot in the back while running away and that there's no evidence showing Trademark and Zimmerman were in a fight.HHusky said:
blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
Sorry Kunt, you love swallowing like a bitch and making an ass out of yourself, I prefer to deal in facts.
-
lol claiming victory because I didn't respond within 3 minutes. Congratulations Kunt. You just won the chance to tongue your buddy Race's asshole.SFGbob said:
Ahhhh, the poor little dumbfuck can't back up his mouth. So sad.SFGbob said:
You're free to refute that with some evidence Kunt, but we both know you're too big a lightweight to do that.insinceredawg said:SFGbob said:
Yeah, how dare I call for evidence before I'm willing to convict someone. I should be like you and just make shit up about Mike Brown being shot in the back while running away and that there's no evidence showing Trademark and Zimmerman were in a fight.HHusky said:
blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
Sorry Kunt, you love swallowing like a bitch and making an ass out of yourself, I prefer to deal in facts.
-
Flimsy circumstantial evidence is better than the none you haveinsinceredawg said:
of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.HHusky said:
blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole. -
Victory? You're too fucking stupid to even get into the game Kunt. There's no contest to begin with.insinceredawg said:
lol claiming victory because I didn't respond within 3 minutes. Congratulations Kunt. You just won the chance to tongue your buddy Race's asshole.SFGbob said:
Ahhhh, the poor little dumbfuck can't back up his mouth. So sad.SFGbob said:
You're free to refute that with some evidence Kunt, but we both know you're too big a lightweight to do that.insinceredawg said:SFGbob said:
Yeah, how dare I call for evidence before I'm willing to convict someone. I should be like you and just make shit up about Mike Brown being shot in the back while running away and that there's no evidence showing Trademark and Zimmerman were in a fight.HHusky said:
blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
Sorry Kunt, you love swallowing like a bitch and making an ass out of yourself, I prefer to deal in facts. -
Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?insinceredawg said:
of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.HHusky said:
blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole. -
You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?SFGbob said:
Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?insinceredawg said:
of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.HHusky said:
blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole. -
That's a good Kunt, never acknowledge the fact you fucking lied and just press on with more lies and bullshit.insinceredawg said:
You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?SFGbob said:
Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?insinceredawg said:
of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.HHusky said:
blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
-
It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.insinceredawg said:
You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?SFGbob said:
Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?insinceredawg said:
of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.HHusky said:
blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole. -
Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.Sledog said:
It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.insinceredawg said:
You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?SFGbob said:
Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?insinceredawg said:
of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.HHusky said:
blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole. -
No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.HHusky said:
Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.Sledog said:
It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.insinceredawg said:
You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?SFGbob said:
Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?insinceredawg said:
of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.HHusky said:
blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole. -
IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!Sledog said:
No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.HHusky said:
Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.Sledog said:
It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.insinceredawg said:
You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?SFGbob said:
Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?insinceredawg said:
of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.HHusky said:
blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole. -
And the Justice Department, and the DNI are saying the complaint isn't covered by the laws applying to intelligence whistleblowers. The law can't compel a President to give up EP. What kind of fucking lawyer are you?HHusky said:
IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!Sledog said:
No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.HHusky said:
Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.Sledog said:
It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.insinceredawg said:
You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?SFGbob said:
Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?insinceredawg said:
of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.HHusky said:
blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
I'm saying let them fight it out in court. You're the one lying claiming the Biden didn't do anything. -
I completely understand that you wish to hang your hat on positions taken by those who are acting outside of the law. I know will ignore the fact that the law does not provide them any legal right to block providing the complaint to Congress. That’s how you roll.SFGbob said:
And the Justice Department, and the DNI are saying the complaint isn't covered by the laws applying to intelligence whistleblowers. The law can't compel a President to give up EP. What kind of fucking lawyer are you?HHusky said:
IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!Sledog said:
No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.HHusky said:
Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.Sledog said:
It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.insinceredawg said:
You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?SFGbob said:
Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?insinceredawg said:
of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.HHusky said:
blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
I'm saying let them fight it out in court. You're the one lying claiming the Biden didn't do anything. -
Can congress pass a law that takes away the Executive Privilege O'Keefed? If the whistle blower isn't covered by the law, then by what authority does Congress have to see the Complaint that would over ride EP?HHusky said:
I completely understand that you wish to hang your hat on positions taken by those who are acting outside of the law. I know will ignore the fact that the law does not provide them any legal right to block providing the complaint to Congress. That’s how you roll.SFGbob said:
And the Justice Department, and the DNI are saying the complaint isn't covered by the laws applying to intelligence whistleblowers. The law can't compel a President to give up EP. What kind of fucking lawyer are you?HHusky said:
IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!Sledog said:
No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.HHusky said:
Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.Sledog said:
It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.insinceredawg said:
You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?SFGbob said:
Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?insinceredawg said:
of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.HHusky said:
blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
I'm saying let them fight it out in court. You're the one lying claiming the Biden didn't do anything. -
Liberal, undefined magic term: DiversitySFGbob said:
Can congress pass a law that takes away the Executive Privilege O'Keefed? If the whistle blower isn't covered by the law, then by what authority does Congress have to see the Complaint that would over ride EP?HHusky said:
I completely understand that you wish to hang your hat on positions taken by those who are acting outside of the law. I know will ignore the fact that the law does not provide them any legal right to block providing the complaint to Congress. That’s how you roll.SFGbob said:
And the Justice Department, and the DNI are saying the complaint isn't covered by the laws applying to intelligence whistleblowers. The law can't compel a President to give up EP. What kind of fucking lawyer are you?HHusky said:
IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!Sledog said:
No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.HHusky said:
Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.Sledog said:
It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.insinceredawg said:
You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?SFGbob said:
Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?insinceredawg said:
of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.HHusky said:
blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
I'm saying let them fight it out in court. You're the one lying claiming the Biden didn't do anything.
Conservative, undefined magic term: Executive Privilege -
I'm sure you raged at Obama doing that with Fast and Furious. A program with more than 125 deaths to it's credit including Brian Terry of the US Border Patrol.HHusky said:
Liberal, undefined magic term: DiversitySFGbob said:
Can congress pass a law that takes away the Executive Privilege O'Keefed? If the whistle blower isn't covered by the law, then by what authority does Congress have to see the Complaint that would over ride EP?HHusky said:
I completely understand that you wish to hang your hat on positions taken by those who are acting outside of the law. I know will ignore the fact that the law does not provide them any legal right to block providing the complaint to Congress. That’s how you roll.SFGbob said:
And the Justice Department, and the DNI are saying the complaint isn't covered by the laws applying to intelligence whistleblowers. The law can't compel a President to give up EP. What kind of fucking lawyer are you?HHusky said:
IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!Sledog said:
No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.HHusky said:
Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.Sledog said:
It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.insinceredawg said:
You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?SFGbob said:
Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?insinceredawg said:
of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.HHusky said:
blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
I'm saying let them fight it out in court. You're the one lying claiming the Biden didn't do anything.
Conservative, undefined magic term: Executive Privilege
I'm sure you were outraged. -
In this case EP isn't undefined. Why do you lie? This isn't like Clinton claiming EP over Lewinsky. Private conversations had with foreign leaders are a text book example of things covered by EP.HHusky said:
Liberal, undefined magic term: DiversitySFGbob said:
Can congress pass a law that takes away the Executive Privilege O'Keefed? If the whistle blower isn't covered by the law, then by what authority does Congress have to see the Complaint that would over ride EP?HHusky said:
I completely understand that you wish to hang your hat on positions taken by those who are acting outside of the law. I know will ignore the fact that the law does not provide them any legal right to block providing the complaint to Congress. That’s how you roll.SFGbob said:
And the Justice Department, and the DNI are saying the complaint isn't covered by the laws applying to intelligence whistleblowers. The law can't compel a President to give up EP. What kind of fucking lawyer are you?HHusky said:
IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!Sledog said:
No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.HHusky said:
Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.Sledog said:
It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.insinceredawg said:
You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?SFGbob said:
Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?insinceredawg said:
of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.HHusky said:
blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
I'm saying let them fight it out in court. You're the one lying claiming the Biden didn't do anything.
Conservative, undefined magic term: Executive Privilege
Where did you go to law school? If it goes to court the Congress with lose.
-
I.e., What about Obama?!?!Sledog said:
I'm sure you raged at Obama doing that with Fast and Furious. A program with more than 125 deaths to it's credit including Brian Terry of the US Border Patrol.HHusky said:
Liberal, undefined magic term: DiversitySFGbob said:
Can congress pass a law that takes away the Executive Privilege O'Keefed? If the whistle blower isn't covered by the law, then by what authority does Congress have to see the Complaint that would over ride EP?HHusky said:
I completely understand that you wish to hang your hat on positions taken by those who are acting outside of the law. I know will ignore the fact that the law does not provide them any legal right to block providing the complaint to Congress. That’s how you roll.SFGbob said:
And the Justice Department, and the DNI are saying the complaint isn't covered by the laws applying to intelligence whistleblowers. The law can't compel a President to give up EP. What kind of fucking lawyer are you?HHusky said:
IG says credible and urgent. Law says you hand it over. You gals are the ones saying but, but, but . . . Biden!Sledog said:
No I did no such thing. It's going through the proper channels and process but since they won't hand it over your upset. Why do rules and procedures not apply to democrats? Oh yeah they're actually communists and we know how communists deal with rules.HHusky said:
Sled simply prefers to define the whistle blower complaint out of existence. Very Orwellian.Sledog said:
It's being looked at but since they won't hand it over to the commies it's not OK. It's not a whistle blower complaint. Get over it.insinceredawg said:
You want him investigated based off of circumstantial evidence at best but you have expressed zero interest in digging deeper into the whistleblower complaint and Trump withholding aid. Why is that?SFGbob said:
Where did I call for Biden's head you lying sack of shit? I just want it investigated. Why are you such a fucking liar Kunt?insinceredawg said:
of course. yet he's calling for Biden's head off of flimsy circumstantial evidence then gets offended for being called a bitchass partisan kunt. gay bob's hypocrisy knows no bounds but he's too unaware (or stupid) to realize it.HHusky said:
blob will require that GOP wrong-doing be proven beyond a metaphysical doubt, as per usual.insinceredawg said:
Bullshit. You'll find a way to spin it and rationalize that Trump did no wrong. That's what bitchass partisan kunts do.SFGbob said:
Stawman ass fucking very big deal.HHusky said:Anonymous chick very scary. POTUS abuse of office, no big deal.
I've already said that if it can be shown that he told them he was going to withhold the money unless and until they investigated Biden that he should be impeached. But please return to your strawman's asshole.
I'm saying let them fight it out in court. You're the one lying claiming the Biden didn't do anything.
Conservative, undefined magic term: Executive Privilege
I'm sure you were outraged.