The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change

dhdawg said:

greenblood said:

dhdawg said:

greenblood said:

PurpleThrobber said:

Ax yourself:

Your very existence is dependent on grant-funding and corporate or gubmint support to put food on the table. You have no appreciable job skills or other means of making money than 'research'. Take any topic - climate, agriculture, drug research....who cares? Same concept.

It is not logical to assume benevolence and truthiness uber alles. You gots to eat. Are you going to bite the hand that feeds you? Or your family? Remember - you can't do shit other than sit in a lab or interpret data. You can't swing a hammer, you can't close a deal, you can't produce a product.....

That 3% that aren't in your 97% consensus....maybe THAT'S the group that says "Fuck all" and isn't beholden to the Money Grab and are pure scientists for the science of it.

But that's not in the interest of the Money Grabbers....so you're considered a heretic.

And the crazy part is - the Money Grabbers sit on both the left and the right. They just have a comfort in either direction on who they want to whore out their 'science'.

It gets really hot. It gets really cold. Same as it ever was.

Exactly

These scientist not only rely on funding for research, but also for wages as well. The climate change hysteria has to continue or a lot of these scientist are out of a job.

Scientists can make an absolute boatload shilling for oil companies if they want.

Not really. The academia community is a lot like Hollywood, if you go against the liberal agenda you get blackballed.

There's no money in academia. Industry will gladly hire or fund their "research"

HAHAHAHAHAHA...fucking oblivious.

Michael Mann, the author of the fraudulent hockey stick temperature reconstruction, brags on his resume in getting something like $5MM in govt grants...for something that literally is a fraud (his hockey stick in various forms). F*ck...he even got something like $2.4MM in "stimulus funds" from Obama for his fraudulent shite. Gives a new meaning to "shovel ready jobs"...

Add to that $10k/speech, 2 published books, and a bunch of other stuff. All for something even legit GW scientists admit is fraudulent.

Yeah...no money.

HoustonHusky said:

The author of that drivel and you can't even read. Its claim is "97% of published papers agree". Which means literally nothing, especially since they are published in journals focusing on that. Add to that most of the papers aren't even related to global warming but because they somehow have a identifying term and don't explicitly say they think there is a bunch of bad science in it then they are grouped into the 97%.

https://friendsofscience.org/assets/documents/97_Consensus_Myth.pdf

Keep lying...

Figures never lie. But liars figure.