Speaking of Nazi's

PurpleThrobber said:

HHusky said:

For Purple:

“Whether I'm in favor of doxing would depend on the facts of the matter.”

Said hours ago, in this very thread. Still irrelevant because this thread isn’t about doxing.

So you are in favor of doxing when it benefits your ideology. But are against it when it doesn't.

This thread is entirely about doxing. That's what the dude in El Paso did.

But you already know that.

Deny and dodge. Play two in the progressive handbook behind 'you just don't understand'.

Bring in the nickle back.



VERB
doxing (present participle)

search for and publish private or identifying information about (a particular individual) on the Internet, typically with malicious intent.

HHusky said:

Blu82 said:

PurpleThrobber said:

HHusky said:

For Purple:

“Whether I'm in favor of doxing would depend on the facts of the matter.”

Said hours ago, in this very thread. Still irrelevant because this thread isn’t about doxing.

So you are in favor of doxing when it benefits your ideology. But are against it when it doesn't.

This thread is entirely about doxing. That's what the dude in El Paso did.

But you already know that.

Deny and dodge. Play two in the progressive handbook behind 'you just don't understand'.

Bring in the nickle back.



VERB
doxing (present participle)

search for and publish private or identifying information about (a particular individual) on the Internet, typically with malicious intent.

Obviously this faggot has no intention of answering the question. The blood loss from vag bleeding would render her unconscious.

In the mean time, real men are willing to stand up.

Soy Boys #1 thru #10 on this site will continue to lie their asses off and cower when cornered.

MoneyBags is such an angry drunk.

Blu82 said:

HHusky said:

Blu82 said:

PurpleThrobber said:

HHusky said:

For Purple:

“Whether I'm in favor of doxing would depend on the facts of the matter.”

Said hours ago, in this very thread. Still irrelevant because this thread isn’t about doxing.

So you are in favor of doxing when it benefits your ideology. But are against it when it doesn't.

This thread is entirely about doxing. That's what the dude in El Paso did.

But you already know that.

Deny and dodge. Play two in the progressive handbook behind 'you just don't understand'.

Bring in the nickle back.



VERB
doxing (present participle)

search for and publish private or identifying information about (a particular individual) on the Internet, typically with malicious intent.

Obviously this faggot has no intention of answering the question. The blood loss from vag bleeding would render her unconscious.

In the mean time, real men are willing to stand up.

Soy Boys #1 thru #10 on this site will continue to lie their asses off and cower when cornered.

MoneyBags is such an angry drunk.

I'll get sober but you will always be leftist SoyBoy.

Sledog said:

HHusky said:

Blu82 said:

HHusky said:

Blu82 said:

PurpleThrobber said:

HHusky said:

For Purple:

“Whether I'm in favor of doxing would depend on the facts of the matter.”

Said hours ago, in this very thread. Still irrelevant because this thread isn’t about doxing.

So you are in favor of doxing when it benefits your ideology. But are against it when it doesn't.

This thread is entirely about doxing. That's what the dude in El Paso did.

But you already know that.

Deny and dodge. Play two in the progressive handbook behind 'you just don't understand'.

Bring in the nickle back.



VERB
doxing (present participle)

search for and publish private or identifying information about (a particular individual) on the Internet, typically with malicious intent.

Obviously this faggot has no intention of answering the question. The blood loss from vag bleeding would render her unconscious.

In the mean time, real men are willing to stand up.

Soy Boys #1 thru #10 on this site will continue to lie their asses off and cower when cornered.

MoneyBags is such an angry drunk.

I'll get sober but you will always be leftist SoyBoy.

Man! If I knew what that means I'd probably be really offended.

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

The information is a matter of public record. Maybe this will backfire and it will be good for business.

I’m sure somewhere there exists on a public document your home address and phone number. Certainly you’d be okay with me posting it here.

It’s always been clear to me that my donations to a political candidate appear in the public record. That’s not a particularly new thing. You’re free to hold my Ed Murray, Kshama Sawant and Pramila Jayapal donations against me.

Bendintheriver said:

HHusky said:

Bendintheriver said:

HHusky said:

The information is a matter of public record. Maybe this will backfire and it will be good for business.

So we can understand your approval of this incredibly dangerous action by a lib elected official: He calls everyone who voted or supported Donald Trump a racist against "brown skinned" people. Then he lists their names, businesses and the amounts given and you equate that action with simple public record access. The scumbag was trying to hurt these people and their businesses and he is an elected official but again all you can argue is that the information is public access.

You truly are a low life lib.

All the information he “disclosed” is public. Daddy won Texas. It should be very good for business to have donated to Daddy.

Blah blah blah, obfuscate, obfuscate, obfuscate.

You got upset when Palin used a map with bullseyes on it but run for cover when one of yours accuses people of being racist and then publishes their identities.

You are not good at this when dealing with facts HH.

Sledog said:

HHusky said:

Sledog said:

HHusky said:

Blu82 said:

HHusky said:

Blu82 said:

PurpleThrobber said:

HHusky said:

For Purple:

“Whether I'm in favor of doxing would depend on the facts of the matter.”

Said hours ago, in this very thread. Still irrelevant because this thread isn’t about doxing.

So you are in favor of doxing when it benefits your ideology. But are against it when it doesn't.

This thread is entirely about doxing. That's what the dude in El Paso did.

But you already know that.

Deny and dodge. Play two in the progressive handbook behind 'you just don't understand'.

Bring in the nickle back.



VERB
doxing (present participle)

search for and publish private or identifying information about (a particular individual) on the Internet, typically with malicious intent.

Obviously this faggot has no intention of answering the question. The blood loss from vag bleeding would render her unconscious.

In the mean time, real men are willing to stand up.

Soy Boys #1 thru #10 on this site will continue to lie their asses off and cower when cornered.

MoneyBags is such an angry drunk.

I'll get sober but you will always be leftist SoyBoy.

Man! If I knew what that means I'd probably be really offended.

Well, I'm a big enough man to admit when I'm wrong.

Turns out I don't care.

CirrhosisDawg said:

Holy shit what a trumptard meltdown that I missed over the last 24 hours.
Campaign contributions are public information.
The law is specific on this precisely for the reason that the public deserves to know who is trying to influence elections.
It applies to all candidates and all parties.
If you are ashamed to have your name associated with a candidate then don’t contribute to that candidate. That’s what these laws are intended to do.
The leap from highlighting public information and linking it to doxing is a new leap into the depths of mental retardation from s poster that I previously thought knew better. Guess not.