Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Speaking of Nazi's
Comments
-
Why didn’t you quote my answer?PurpleThrobber said:HHusky said:
I answered your question hours ago. It remains an irrelevant question to the subject at hand.PurpleThrobber said:
You've made that point. Deflecting to firearms now? Focus on the answering the question at hand.HHusky said:
Hysteria from the party of the well armed is amusing. Aren’t you the girls itching for a civil war? Public records are so public. Home of the brave.PurpleThrobber said:
Dox anybody today yet?HHusky said:
All the information he “disclosed” is public. Daddy won Texas. It should be very good for business to have donated to Daddy.Bendintheriver said:
So we can understand your approval of this incredibly dangerous action by a lib elected official: He calls everyone who voted or supported Donald Trump a racist against "brown skinned" people. Then he lists their names, businesses and the amounts given and you equate that action with simple public record access. The scumbag was trying to hurt these people and their businesses and he is an elected official but again all you can argue is that the information is public access.HHusky said:The information is a matter of public record. Maybe this will backfire and it will be good for business.
You truly are a low life lib.
Answer the question. Are you in favor of doxing or not?
Hysteria from the party of the well armed is amusing. Aren’t you the girls itching for a civil war? Public records are so public. Home of the brave.
Dodge answer -yes or no on doxing?
All the information he “disclosed” is public. Daddy won Texas. It should be very good for business to have donated to Daddy.
Dodge answer -yes or no on doxing?
It’s on the FEC website. You really are struggling.
Dodge answer -yes or no on doxing?
It's fucking available with a simple search. I'm all for people recognizing when and under what circumstances they have a reasonable expectation of anonymity. Campaign contributions ain't one of those places. Hasn't been one of those places in many years.
Dodge answer -yes or no on doxing?
There's not a single "yes" or "no" answer in all your dodges.
It's very simple: all you have to do is answer: "I am in favor of doxing" or "I am against doxing".
Go for it.
-
Why don't you?HHusky said:
Why didn’t you quote my answer?PurpleThrobber said:HHusky said:
I answered your question hours ago. It remains an irrelevant question to the subject at hand.PurpleThrobber said:
You've made that point. Deflecting to firearms now? Focus on the answering the question at hand.HHusky said:
Hysteria from the party of the well armed is amusing. Aren’t you the girls itching for a civil war? Public records are so public. Home of the brave.PurpleThrobber said:
Dox anybody today yet?HHusky said:
All the information he “disclosed” is public. Daddy won Texas. It should be very good for business to have donated to Daddy.Bendintheriver said:
So we can understand your approval of this incredibly dangerous action by a lib elected official: He calls everyone who voted or supported Donald Trump a racist against "brown skinned" people. Then he lists their names, businesses and the amounts given and you equate that action with simple public record access. The scumbag was trying to hurt these people and their businesses and he is an elected official but again all you can argue is that the information is public access.HHusky said:The information is a matter of public record. Maybe this will backfire and it will be good for business.
You truly are a low life lib.
Answer the question. Are you in favor of doxing or not?
Hysteria from the party of the well armed is amusing. Aren’t you the girls itching for a civil war? Public records are so public. Home of the brave.
Dodge answer -yes or no on doxing?
All the information he “disclosed” is public. Daddy won Texas. It should be very good for business to have donated to Daddy.
Dodge answer -yes or no on doxing?
It’s on the FEC website. You really are struggling.
Dodge answer -yes or no on doxing?
It's fucking available with a simple search. I'm all for people recognizing when and under what circumstances they have a reasonable expectation of anonymity. Campaign contributions ain't one of those places. Hasn't been one of those places in many years.
Dodge answer -yes or no on doxing?
There's not a single "yes" or "no" answer in all your dodges.
It's very simple: all you have to do is answer: "I am in favor of doxing" or "I am against doxing".
Go for it.
There was not an instance of "yes" or "no" in any of your replies.
Go for it.
Yes or no
-
Actually you used the word "yes" with regard to information being public record. There I am with my address and everything. Yes, it is a matter of public record.PurpleThrobber said:
Why don't you?HHusky said:
Why didn’t you quote my answer?PurpleThrobber said:HHusky said:
I answered your question hours ago. It remains an irrelevant question to the subject at hand.PurpleThrobber said:
You've made that point. Deflecting to firearms now? Focus on the answering the question at hand.HHusky said:
Hysteria from the party of the well armed is amusing. Aren’t you the girls itching for a civil war? Public records are so public. Home of the brave.PurpleThrobber said:
Dox anybody today yet?HHusky said:
All the information he “disclosed” is public. Daddy won Texas. It should be very good for business to have donated to Daddy.Bendintheriver said:
So we can understand your approval of this incredibly dangerous action by a lib elected official: He calls everyone who voted or supported Donald Trump a racist against "brown skinned" people. Then he lists their names, businesses and the amounts given and you equate that action with simple public record access. The scumbag was trying to hurt these people and their businesses and he is an elected official but again all you can argue is that the information is public access.HHusky said:The information is a matter of public record. Maybe this will backfire and it will be good for business.
You truly are a low life lib.
Answer the question. Are you in favor of doxing or not?
Hysteria from the party of the well armed is amusing. Aren’t you the girls itching for a civil war? Public records are so public. Home of the brave.
Dodge answer -yes or no on doxing?
All the information he “disclosed” is public. Daddy won Texas. It should be very good for business to have donated to Daddy.
Dodge answer -yes or no on doxing?
It’s on the FEC website. You really are struggling.
Dodge answer -yes or no on doxing?
It's fucking available with a simple search. I'm all for people recognizing when and under what circumstances they have a reasonable expectation of anonymity. Campaign contributions ain't one of those places. Hasn't been one of those places in many years.
Dodge answer -yes or no on doxing?
There's not a single "yes" or "no" answer in all your dodges.
It's very simple: all you have to do is answer: "I am in favor of doxing" or "I am against doxing".
Go for it.
There was not an instance of "yes" or "no" in any of your replies.
Go for it.
Yes or no
So, that means you are in favor of doxing? Seeking clarity. You're not a technically gifted writer.
-
For Purple:
“Whether I'm in favor of doxing would depend on the facts of the matter.”
Said hours ago, in this very thread. Still irrelevant because this thread isn’t about doxing. -
So you are in favor of doxing when it benefits your ideology. But are against it when it doesn't.HHusky said:For Purple:
“Whether I'm in favor of doxing would depend on the facts of the matter.”
Said hours ago, in this very thread. Still irrelevant because this thread isn’t about doxing.
This thread is entirely about doxing. That's what the dude in El Paso did.
But you already know that.
Deny and dodge. Play two in the progressive handbook behind 'you just don't understand'.
Bring in the nickle back.
VERB
doxing (present participle)
search for and publish private or identifying information about (a particular individual) on the Internet, typically with malicious intent.
-
The information was already on the internet, in a handy, public database. It’s been that way for years. Sorry it came as news to you.PurpleThrobber said:
So you are in favor of doxing when it benefits your ideology. But are against it when it doesn't.HHusky said:For Purple:
“Whether I'm in favor of doxing would depend on the facts of the matter.”
Said hours ago, in this very thread. Still irrelevant because this thread isn’t about doxing.
This thread is entirely about doxing. That's what the dude in El Paso did.
But you already know that.
Deny and dodge. Play two in the progressive handbook behind 'you just don't understand'.
Bring in the nickle back.
VERB
doxing (present participle)
search for and publish private or identifying information about (a particular individual) on the Internet, typically with malicious intent. -
It would shock you if you actually knew up close and personal how much I know about campaign finance, particularly in one of the states in the Pacific/Mountain time zones.HHusky said:
The information was already on the internet, in a handy, public database. It’s been that way for years. Sorry it came as news to you.PurpleThrobber said:
So you are in favor of doxing when it benefits your ideology. But are against it when it doesn't.HHusky said:For Purple:
“Whether I'm in favor of doxing would depend on the facts of the matter.”
Said hours ago, in this very thread. Still irrelevant because this thread isn’t about doxing.
This thread is entirely about doxing. That's what the dude in El Paso did.
But you already know that.
Deny and dodge. Play two in the progressive handbook behind 'you just don't understand'.
Bring in the nickle back.
VERB
doxing (present participle)
search for and publish private or identifying information about (a particular individual) on the Internet, typically with malicious intent.
But i'm not going to dox myself.
-
To be shocked would probably require me to be interested.PurpleThrobber said:
It would shock you if you actually knew up close and personal how much I know about campaign finance, particularly in one of the states in the Pacific/Mountain time zones.HHusky said:
The information was already on the internet, in a handy, public database. It’s been that way for years. Sorry it came as news to you.PurpleThrobber said:
So you are in favor of doxing when it benefits your ideology. But are against it when it doesn't.HHusky said:For Purple:
“Whether I'm in favor of doxing would depend on the facts of the matter.”
Said hours ago, in this very thread. Still irrelevant because this thread isn’t about doxing.
This thread is entirely about doxing. That's what the dude in El Paso did.
But you already know that.
Deny and dodge. Play two in the progressive handbook behind 'you just don't understand'.
Bring in the nickle back.
VERB
doxing (present participle)
search for and publish private or identifying information about (a particular individual) on the Internet, typically with malicious intent.
But i'm not going to dox myself. -
A nice spin on the 'too dumb to understand'. But same old 8 in the box defense.HHusky said:
To be shocked would probably require me to be interested.PurpleThrobber said:
It would shock you if you actually knew up close and personal how much I know about campaign finance, particularly in one of the states in the Pacific/Mountain time zones.HHusky said:
The information was already on the internet, in a handy, public database. It’s been that way for years. Sorry it came as news to you.PurpleThrobber said:
So you are in favor of doxing when it benefits your ideology. But are against it when it doesn't.HHusky said:For Purple:
“Whether I'm in favor of doxing would depend on the facts of the matter.”
Said hours ago, in this very thread. Still irrelevant because this thread isn’t about doxing.
This thread is entirely about doxing. That's what the dude in El Paso did.
But you already know that.
Deny and dodge. Play two in the progressive handbook behind 'you just don't understand'.
Bring in the nickle back.
VERB
doxing (present participle)
search for and publish private or identifying information about (a particular individual) on the Internet, typically with malicious intent.
But i'm not going to dox myself.
-
Well in 2 of the 3 cases the one who was being called out was the actual owner of the business. The other was a realtor who probably has her own private clientsPurpleThrobber said:
Uh...no it's not. Individual contributions are disclosed. Addresses are NOT disclosed.HHusky said:The information is a matter of public record. Maybe this will backfire and it will be good for business.
There is absolutely NO reason employers need to be named. Is the next step to call for these people to be fired? Or perhaps boycotts on the business? Does your employment contract tell you who you can and can't vote for? Or prohibit to whom you can or can't spend your money? Or donate to an 'offensive' religious group?
Let's just all get long knives and ransack their shops. Burn them!!! BURN THEM!!!
This is absolute bullshit. The fact you can't draw the connection is mind-boggling. Truly.
So yeah I think it's fair to name the business. Grow up.
