Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Speaking of Nazi's

123578

Comments

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,495
    USMChawk said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    https://classic.fec.gov/finance/disclosure/norindsea.shtml

    Here's your link. Search any name you want. Your gonna see a lot of employers listed.

    I meant your own.

    There's no problem with that, right?

    If I wanted to chat with your employer or maybe arrange a boycott of your goods and services?

    Post it.
    You’re chatting with my employer.
    Great - post the address and phone. Or is your privacy worth something?







    It’s on the FEC website. You really are struggling.
    Dodge dodge dodge.

    Typical leftist hypocrite.

    Look. If you're hiring an attorney and you want to eliminate the "leftists", just type the potential attorneys' names into the search engine. I've already exposed myself to the loss of your business. Imagine my sadness!
    Answer the question.

    Do you support doxing and those who participate in such activity?

    It's fucking available with a simple search. I'm all for people recognizing when and under what circumstances they have a reasonable expectation of anonymity. Campaign contributions ain't one of those places. Hasn't been one of those places in many years.
    Doxing. In favor?

    We're not discussing doxing. Your question is irrelevant.
    You’re choosing to avoid answering.

    It’s very simple. In favor of doxing or not?



    Whether I'm in favor of doxing would depend on the facts of the matter.

    Whether I favor doxing is irrelevant in the context of entirely public information, which is the subject here.

    Get a grip man!
    I’m only posting to fix the quote.

    You're doing the Lord's work! Bless you!
  • Bendintheriver
    Bendintheriver Member Posts: 7,219 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    The information is a matter of public record. Maybe this will backfire and it will be good for business.

    So we can understand your approval of this incredibly dangerous action by a lib elected official: He calls everyone who voted or supported Donald Trump a racist against "brown skinned" people. Then he lists their names, businesses and the amounts given and you equate that action with simple public record access. The scumbag was trying to hurt these people and their businesses and he is an elected official but again all you can argue is that the information is public access.

    You truly are a low life lib.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,495

    HHusky said:

    The information is a matter of public record. Maybe this will backfire and it will be good for business.

    So we can understand your approval of this incredibly dangerous action by a lib elected official: He calls everyone who voted or supported Donald Trump a racist against "brown skinned" people. Then he lists their names, businesses and the amounts given and you equate that action with simple public record access. The scumbag was trying to hurt these people and their businesses and he is an elected official but again all you can argue is that the information is public access.

    You truly are a low life lib.
    All the information he “disclosed” is public. Daddy won Texas. It should be very good for business to have donated to Daddy.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,495

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    The information is a matter of public record. Maybe this will backfire and it will be good for business.

    So we can understand your approval of this incredibly dangerous action by a lib elected official: He calls everyone who voted or supported Donald Trump a racist against "brown skinned" people. Then he lists their names, businesses and the amounts given and you equate that action with simple public record access. The scumbag was trying to hurt these people and their businesses and he is an elected official but again all you can argue is that the information is public access.

    You truly are a low life lib.
    All the information he “disclosed” is public. Daddy won Texas. It should be very good for business to have donated to Daddy.
    Dox anybody today yet?

    Hysteria from the party of the well armed is amusing. Aren’t you the girls itching for a civil war? Public records are so public. Home of the brave.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,495
    edited August 2019

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    The information is a matter of public record. Maybe this will backfire and it will be good for business.

    So we can understand your approval of this incredibly dangerous action by a lib elected official: He calls everyone who voted or supported Donald Trump a racist against "brown skinned" people. Then he lists their names, businesses and the amounts given and you equate that action with simple public record access. The scumbag was trying to hurt these people and their businesses and he is an elected official but again all you can argue is that the information is public access.

    You truly are a low life lib.
    All the information he “disclosed” is public. Daddy won Texas. It should be very good for business to have donated to Daddy.
    Dox anybody today yet?

    Hysteria from the party of the well armed is amusing. Aren’t you the girls itching for a civil war? Public records are so public. Home of the brave.
    You've made that point. Deflecting to firearms now? Focus on the answering the question at hand.

    Answer the question. Are you in favor of doxing or not?









    I answered your question hours ago. It remains an irrelevant question to the subject at hand.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,764 Standard Supporter
    edited August 2019
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    The information is a matter of public record. Maybe this will backfire and it will be good for business.

    So we can understand your approval of this incredibly dangerous action by a lib elected official: He calls everyone who voted or supported Donald Trump a racist against "brown skinned" people. Then he lists their names, businesses and the amounts given and you equate that action with simple public record access. The scumbag was trying to hurt these people and their businesses and he is an elected official but again all you can argue is that the information is public access.

    You truly are a low life lib.
    All the information he “disclosed” is public. Daddy won Texas. It should be very good for business to have donated to Daddy.
    Dox anybody today yet?

    Hysteria from the party of the well armed is amusing. Aren’t you the girls itching for a civil war? Public records are so public. Home of the brave.
    You've made that point. Deflecting to firearms now? Focus on the answering the question at hand.

    Answer the question. Are you in favor of doxing or not?









    I answered your question hours ago. It remains an irrelevant question to the subject at hand.


    Hysteria from the party of the well armed is amusing. Aren’t you the girls itching for a civil war? Public records are so public. Home of the brave.

    Dodge answer -yes or no on doxing?

    All the information he “disclosed” is public. Daddy won Texas. It should be very good for business to have donated to Daddy.


    Dodge answer -yes or no on doxing?

    It’s on the FEC website. You really are struggling.

    Dodge answer -yes or no on doxing?

    It's fucking available with a simple search. I'm all for people recognizing when and under what circumstances they have a reasonable expectation of anonymity. Campaign contributions ain't one of those places. Hasn't been one of those places in many years.

    Dodge answer -yes or no on doxing?

    There's not a single "yes" or "no" answer in all your dodges.

    It's very simple: all you have to do is answer: "I am in favor of doxing" or "I am against doxing".

    Go for it.

  • Bendintheriver
    Bendintheriver Member Posts: 7,219 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    The information is a matter of public record. Maybe this will backfire and it will be good for business.

    So we can understand your approval of this incredibly dangerous action by a lib elected official: He calls everyone who voted or supported Donald Trump a racist against "brown skinned" people. Then he lists their names, businesses and the amounts given and you equate that action with simple public record access. The scumbag was trying to hurt these people and their businesses and he is an elected official but again all you can argue is that the information is public access.

    You truly are a low life lib.
    All the information he “disclosed” is public. Daddy won Texas. It should be very good for business to have donated to Daddy.
    Blah blah blah, obfuscate, obfuscate, obfuscate.

    You got upset when Palin used a map with bullseyes on it but run for cover when one of yours accuses people of being racist and then publishes their identities.

    You are not good at this when dealing with facts HH.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,764 Standard Supporter

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    The information is a matter of public record. Maybe this will backfire and it will be good for business.

    So we can understand your approval of this incredibly dangerous action by a lib elected official: He calls everyone who voted or supported Donald Trump a racist against "brown skinned" people. Then he lists their names, businesses and the amounts given and you equate that action with simple public record access. The scumbag was trying to hurt these people and their businesses and he is an elected official but again all you can argue is that the information is public access.

    You truly are a low life lib.
    All the information he “disclosed” is public. Daddy won Texas. It should be very good for business to have donated to Daddy.
    Blah blah blah, obfuscate, obfuscate, obfuscate.

    You got upset when Palin used a map with bullseyes on it but run for cover when one of yours accuses people of being racist and then publishes their identities.

    You are not good at this when dealing with facts HH.