Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Chris Steele grilled by DOJ IG investigators in June for 16 hrs.

DJDuck
DJDuck Member Posts: 5,970
edited July 2019 in Tug Tavern
Trump dossier author Steele gets 16-hour DOJ grilling
The interview was contentious at first, according to two people familiar with the matter, but investigators ultimately found his testimony credible and even surprising.


https://www.politico.com/story/2019/07/09/christopher-steele-trump-dossier-doj-1403318
«134

Comments

  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,861 Standard Supporter
    DJDuck said:

    Trump dossier author Steele gets 16-hour DOJ grilling
    The interview was contentious at first, according to two people familiar with the matter, but investigators ultimately found his testimony credible and even surprising.


    https://www.politico.com/story/2019/07/09/christopher-steele-trump-dossier-doj-1403318

    Surprising when he admitted he made it all up?
  • GDS
    GDS Member Posts: 1,470
    The takeaway has irked some U.S. officials interviewed as part of the probe — they argue that it shouldn’t have taken a foreign national to convince the inspector general that the FBI acted properly in 2016.


    Sounds like Trumptards won’t like the results of this investigation...
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,861 Standard Supporter
    GDS said:

    The takeaway has irked some U.S. officials interviewed as part of the probe — they argue that it shouldn’t have taken a foreign national to convince the inspector general that the FBI acted properly in 2016.


    Sounds like Trumptards won’t like the results of this investigation...

    Oh I disagree I think we are really going to like it.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    El oh El. Looking like the fox news and Brietbart crowd have been lied to by their news organization. Again. For years.
  • DJDuck
    DJDuck Member Posts: 5,970
    edited July 2019
    GDS said:

    The takeaway has irked some U.S. officials interviewed as part of the probe — they argue that it shouldn’t have taken a foreign national to convince the inspector general that the FBI acted properly in 2016.


    Sounds like Trumptards won’t like the results of this investigation...

    So I guess that Scott, AKA Mr. Republican,
    is on the record as “The FBI acted ‘properly’”😂😂😂
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,112 Founders Club
    GDS said:

    The takeaway has irked some U.S. officials interviewed as part of the probe — they argue that it shouldn’t have taken a foreign national to convince the inspector general that the FBI acted properly in 2016.


    Sounds like Trumptards won’t like the results of this investigation...

    How did the Muellertards like theirs?
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    2001400ex said:

    El oh El. Looking like the fox news and Brietbart crowd have been lied to by their news organization. Again. For years.

    Which news organization told you this Hondo?

    And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump.
  • Bendintheriver
    Bendintheriver Member Posts: 7,046 Standard Supporter
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    El oh El. Looking like the fox news and Brietbart crowd have been lied to by their news organization. Again. For years.

    Which news organization told you this Hondo?

    And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump.
    Priceless.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    El oh El. Looking like the fox news and Brietbart crowd have been lied to by their news organization. Again. For years.

    Which news organization told you this Hondo?

    And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump.
    Priceless.
    Got to love how Hondo is the biggest purveyor of pure bullshit here on this board loves to complain about other people's news organizations lying to them.

    So you really think teachers across the country are primarily liberal? You do realize that their demographic is probably pretty close to the same as the general population, right?
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    El oh El. Looking like the fox news and Brietbart crowd have been lied to by their news organization. Again. For years.

    Which news organization told you this Hondo?

    And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump.
    Take the time to actually read the Mueller report.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    El oh El. Looking like the fox news and Brietbart crowd have been lied to by their news organization. Again. For years.

    Which news organization told you this Hondo?

    And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump.
    Take the time to actually read the Mueller report.
    Read it and you're lying. Btw, you made that statement before the Mueller report was even released and of course you're still lying about the Mueller Report supporting your lie.
  • Bendintheriver
    Bendintheriver Member Posts: 7,046 Standard Supporter
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    El oh El. Looking like the fox news and Brietbart crowd have been lied to by their news organization. Again. For years.

    Which news organization told you this Hondo?

    And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump.
    Priceless.
    Got to love how Hondo is the biggest purveyor of pure bullshit here on this board loves to complain about other people's news organizations lying to them.

    So you really think teachers across the country are primarily liberal? You do realize that their demographic is probably pretty close to the same as the general population, right?
    And the priceless quotes just keep on delivering.

    Hilarious.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    El oh El. Looking like the fox news and Brietbart crowd have been lied to by their news organization. Again. For years.

    Which news organization told you this Hondo?

    And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump.
    Priceless.
    Got to love how Hondo is the biggest purveyor of pure bullshit here on this board loves to complain about other people's news organizations lying to them.

    So you really think teachers across the country are primarily liberal? You do realize that their demographic is probably pretty close to the same as the general population, right?
    And the priceless quotes just keep on delivering.

    Hilarious.
    Yes quotes taken out of context. And you are stroking your dick reading it. Idiot
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    El oh El. Looking like the fox news and Brietbart crowd have been lied to by their news organization. Again. For years.

    Which news organization told you this Hondo?

    And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump.
    Priceless.
    Got to love how Hondo is the biggest purveyor of pure bullshit here on this board loves to complain about other people's news organizations lying to them.

    So you really think teachers across the country are primarily liberal? You do realize that their demographic is probably pretty close to the same as the general population, right?
    And the priceless quotes just keep on delivering.

    Hilarious.
    Yes quotes taken out of context. And you are stroking your dick reading it. Idiot
    Yeah, every time you're quoted sticking your head up your ass it was always "taken out of context."


  • Bendintheriver
    Bendintheriver Member Posts: 7,046 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    El oh El. Looking like the fox news and Brietbart crowd have been lied to by their news organization. Again. For years.

    Which news organization told you this Hondo?

    And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump.
    Priceless.
    Got to love how Hondo is the biggest purveyor of pure bullshit here on this board loves to complain about other people's news organizations lying to them.

    So you really think teachers across the country are primarily liberal? You do realize that their demographic is probably pretty close to the same as the general population, right?
    And the priceless quotes just keep on delivering.

    Hilarious.
    Yes quotes taken out of context. And you are stroking your dick reading it. Idiot
    Sure they are hondo. Sure they are........
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    Full context of what Hondo said can be found here.

    https://hardcorehusky.com/discussion/58986/what-got-you-into-talking-interested-in-politics/p4

    Shocking, Hondo the pathological liar lies.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,112 Founders Club
    Muellertards

    What a bunch of buffoons
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    Full context of what Hondo said can be found here.

    https://hardcorehusky.com/discussion/58986/what-got-you-into-talking-interested-in-politics/p4

    Shocking, Hondo the pathological liar lies.

    And you can see that I was responding to shitdicks like you who think almost all teachers are liberal. Which is bullshit.
  • GDS
    GDS Member Posts: 1,470

    GDS said:

    The takeaway has irked some U.S. officials interviewed as part of the probe — they argue that it shouldn’t have taken a foreign national to convince the inspector general that the FBI acted properly in 2016.


    Sounds like Trumptards won’t like the results of this investigation...

    How did the Muellertards like theirs?
    We've been through this countless times but we can always revisit. No doubt many were disappointed that Mueller felt his scope was so limited he investigated a pre-agreed conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the GRU, something no one alleged happened. The fact he investigated something no one alleged happened and found enough evidence that he couldn't exonerate members of the campaign is very concerning for the country. That he found countless examples of collusion and documents multiple instances of obstruction of justice are extremely concerning. Shocking that not a single word in the report was redacted for counter-intel purposes so the ongoing counter-intel investigation as well as the multiple other investigations spawned from the SC investigation will hopefully lead us closer to the truth this president and his team continue to try and conceal.

    Found this part of the article particularly compelling. Bertrand is a good journalist and has written many good pieces on the ongoing investigation.

    But the extensive interview with Steele, and the investigators’ sense that he offered new and important information, may dampen expectations among the president’s allies who’ve claimed that Steele’s sensational dossier was used improperly by the bureau to “spy” on the campaign.

    Page had been on the FBI’s radar since 2013, when he interacted with undercover Russian intelligence agents in New York City. A trip to Moscow in the summer of 2016 further aroused the bureau’s suspicions, according to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant the FBI got approved in October 2016, allowing the bureau to intercept his electronic communications.

    Steele’s defenders have noted that the information he provided which made it into the FISA warrant application to monitor Page was not far off. According to Steele’s sources, Page met with high-level Russian officials while in Moscow in July 2016, including the CEO of Russia’s state-owned oil giant Rosneft.

    Page denied the claim publicly until pressed under oath by lawmakers in 2017, when he acknowledged meeting “senior members of the presidential administration” during his trip, as well as the head of investor relations at Rosneft. Page had originally claimed only that he went to Moscow to give the commencement address at the New Economic School.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,112 Founders Club
    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    The takeaway has irked some U.S. officials interviewed as part of the probe — they argue that it shouldn’t have taken a foreign national to convince the inspector general that the FBI acted properly in 2016.


    Sounds like Trumptards won’t like the results of this investigation...

    How did the Muellertards like theirs?
    We've been through this countless times but we can always revisit. No doubt many were disappointed that Mueller felt his scope was so limited he investigated a pre-agreed conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the GRU, something no one alleged happened. The fact he investigated something no one alleged happened and found enough evidence that he couldn't exonerate members of the campaign is very concerning for the country. That he found countless examples of collusion and documents multiple instances of obstruction of justice are extremely concerning. Shocking that not a single word in the report was redacted for counter-intel purposes so the ongoing counter-intel investigation as well as the multiple other investigations spawned from the SC investigation will hopefully lead us closer to the truth this president and his team continue to try and conceal.

    Found this part of the article particularly compelling. Bertrand is a good journalist and has written many good pieces on the ongoing investigation.

    But the extensive interview with Steele, and the investigators’ sense that he offered new and important information, may dampen expectations among the president’s allies who’ve claimed that Steele’s sensational dossier was used improperly by the bureau to “spy” on the campaign.

    Page had been on the FBI’s radar since 2013, when he interacted with undercover Russian intelligence agents in New York City. A trip to Moscow in the summer of 2016 further aroused the bureau’s suspicions, according to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant the FBI got approved in October 2016, allowing the bureau to intercept his electronic communications.

    Steele’s defenders have noted that the information he provided which made it into the FISA warrant application to monitor Page was not far off. According to Steele’s sources, Page met with high-level Russian officials while in Moscow in July 2016, including the CEO of Russia’s state-owned oil giant Rosneft.

    Page denied the claim publicly until pressed under oath by lawmakers in 2017, when he acknowledged meeting “senior members of the presidential administration” during his trip, as well as the head of investor relations at Rosneft. Page had originally claimed only that he went to Moscow to give the commencement address at the New Economic School.
    Yeah no

    Tl,dr

    No collusion

    No obstruction

    No nothing

    Muellertards
  • GDS
    GDS Member Posts: 1,470

    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    The takeaway has irked some U.S. officials interviewed as part of the probe — they argue that it shouldn’t have taken a foreign national to convince the inspector general that the FBI acted properly in 2016.


    Sounds like Trumptards won’t like the results of this investigation...

    How did the Muellertards like theirs?
    We've been through this countless times but we can always revisit. No doubt many were disappointed that Mueller felt his scope was so limited he investigated a pre-agreed conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the GRU, something no one alleged happened. The fact he investigated something no one alleged happened and found enough evidence that he couldn't exonerate members of the campaign is very concerning for the country. That he found countless examples of collusion and documents multiple instances of obstruction of justice are extremely concerning. Shocking that not a single word in the report was redacted for counter-intel purposes so the ongoing counter-intel investigation as well as the multiple other investigations spawned from the SC investigation will hopefully lead us closer to the truth this president and his team continue to try and conceal.

    Found this part of the article particularly compelling. Bertrand is a good journalist and has written many good pieces on the ongoing investigation.

    But the extensive interview with Steele, and the investigators’ sense that he offered new and important information, may dampen expectations among the president’s allies who’ve claimed that Steele’s sensational dossier was used improperly by the bureau to “spy” on the campaign.

    Page had been on the FBI’s radar since 2013, when he interacted with undercover Russian intelligence agents in New York City. A trip to Moscow in the summer of 2016 further aroused the bureau’s suspicions, according to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant the FBI got approved in October 2016, allowing the bureau to intercept his electronic communications.

    Steele’s defenders have noted that the information he provided which made it into the FISA warrant application to monitor Page was not far off. According to Steele’s sources, Page met with high-level Russian officials while in Moscow in July 2016, including the CEO of Russia’s state-owned oil giant Rosneft.

    Page denied the claim publicly until pressed under oath by lawmakers in 2017, when he acknowledged meeting “senior members of the presidential administration” during his trip, as well as the head of investor relations at Rosneft. Page had originally claimed only that he went to Moscow to give the commencement address at the New Economic School.
    Yeah no

    Tl,dr

    No collusion

    No obstruction

    No nothing

    Muellertards
    Cmon Race - If you really try harder you can jam your head further up your own ass. Put some effort into it by god!
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    Full context of what Hondo said can be found here.

    https://hardcorehusky.com/discussion/58986/what-got-you-into-talking-interested-in-politics/p4

    Shocking, Hondo the pathological liar lies.

    And you can see that I was responding to shitdicks like you who think almost all teachers are liberal. Which is bullshit.
    The majority of all public school teachers are Rat party supporters. You being the pathological liar you are claim otherwise while you also lie about the demographics of teachers being "pretty close" to the general population. Here's the demographic that Hondo the lying dipshit claims is "pretty close" to the general population.


    About 77 percent of public school teachers today are female.

    Despite the attention given to the need to recruit more teachers of color, little progress has been made in diversifying the profession. Overall, the percentage of White teachers has declined slightly from 84 percent in 1999-2000. In 2015–16, about 80 percent of public school teachers were White, 9 percent were Hispanic (an increase of 3 percent since 2000), 7 percent were Black, 2 percent were Asian, and 1 percent were of two or more races.



    This is why you're a pathological liar Hondo and not just a guy who gets things wrong. Even now after all these months you're still lying your ass off about this.



  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,112 Founders Club
    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    The takeaway has irked some U.S. officials interviewed as part of the probe — they argue that it shouldn’t have taken a foreign national to convince the inspector general that the FBI acted properly in 2016.


    Sounds like Trumptards won’t like the results of this investigation...

    How did the Muellertards like theirs?
    We've been through this countless times but we can always revisit. No doubt many were disappointed that Mueller felt his scope was so limited he investigated a pre-agreed conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the GRU, something no one alleged happened. The fact he investigated something no one alleged happened and found enough evidence that he couldn't exonerate members of the campaign is very concerning for the country. That he found countless examples of collusion and documents multiple instances of obstruction of justice are extremely concerning. Shocking that not a single word in the report was redacted for counter-intel purposes so the ongoing counter-intel investigation as well as the multiple other investigations spawned from the SC investigation will hopefully lead us closer to the truth this president and his team continue to try and conceal.

    Found this part of the article particularly compelling. Bertrand is a good journalist and has written many good pieces on the ongoing investigation.

    But the extensive interview with Steele, and the investigators’ sense that he offered new and important information, may dampen expectations among the president’s allies who’ve claimed that Steele’s sensational dossier was used improperly by the bureau to “spy” on the campaign.

    Page had been on the FBI’s radar since 2013, when he interacted with undercover Russian intelligence agents in New York City. A trip to Moscow in the summer of 2016 further aroused the bureau’s suspicions, according to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant the FBI got approved in October 2016, allowing the bureau to intercept his electronic communications.

    Steele’s defenders have noted that the information he provided which made it into the FISA warrant application to monitor Page was not far off. According to Steele’s sources, Page met with high-level Russian officials while in Moscow in July 2016, including the CEO of Russia’s state-owned oil giant Rosneft.

    Page denied the claim publicly until pressed under oath by lawmakers in 2017, when he acknowledged meeting “senior members of the presidential administration” during his trip, as well as the head of investor relations at Rosneft. Page had originally claimed only that he went to Moscow to give the commencement address at the New Economic School.
    Yeah no

    Tl,dr

    No collusion

    No obstruction

    No nothing

    Muellertards
    Cmon Race - If you really try harder you can jam your head further up your own ass. Put some effort into it by god!
    Post jibberish get bitch slapped in return

    You got played Muellertard

    Nothing. Zero. Zip. Nada
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    Full context of what Hondo said can be found here.

    https://hardcorehusky.com/discussion/58986/what-got-you-into-talking-interested-in-politics/p4

    Shocking, Hondo the pathological liar lies.

    And you can see that I was responding to shitdicks like you who think almost all teachers are liberal. Which is bullshit.
    The majority of all public school teachers are Rat party supporters. You being the pathological liar you are claim otherwise while you also lie about the demographics of teachers being "pretty close" to the general population. Here's the demographic that Hondo the lying dipshit claims is "pretty close" to the general population.


    About 77 percent of public school teachers today are female.

    Despite the attention given to the need to recruit more teachers of color, little progress has been made in diversifying the profession. Overall, the percentage of White teachers has declined slightly from 84 percent in 1999-2000. In 2015–16, about 80 percent of public school teachers were White, 9 percent were Hispanic (an increase of 3 percent since 2000), 7 percent were Black, 2 percent were Asian, and 1 percent were of two or more races.



    This is why you're a pathological liar Hondo and not just a guy who gets things wrong. Even now after all these months you're still lying your ass off about this.



    You are fucking stupid. And racist and sexist.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    Full context of what Hondo said can be found here.

    https://hardcorehusky.com/discussion/58986/what-got-you-into-talking-interested-in-politics/p4

    Shocking, Hondo the pathological liar lies.

    And you can see that I was responding to shitdicks like you who think almost all teachers are liberal. Which is bullshit.
    The majority of all public school teachers are Rat party supporters. You being the pathological liar you are claim otherwise while you also lie about the demographics of teachers being "pretty close" to the general population. Here's the demographic that Hondo the lying dipshit claims is "pretty close" to the general population.


    About 77 percent of public school teachers today are female.

    Despite the attention given to the need to recruit more teachers of color, little progress has been made in diversifying the profession. Overall, the percentage of White teachers has declined slightly from 84 percent in 1999-2000. In 2015–16, about 80 percent of public school teachers were White, 9 percent were Hispanic (an increase of 3 percent since 2000), 7 percent were Black, 2 percent were Asian, and 1 percent were of two or more races.



    This is why you're a pathological liar Hondo and not just a guy who gets things wrong. Even now after all these months you're still lying your ass off about this.



    You are fucking stupid. And racist and sexist.
    Which is the kind of response you get when a pathological liar can't back up his mouth and can't admit they were wrong. What happen to your claim that you were taken "out of context" Hondo you lying worthless piece of shit?
  • GDS
    GDS Member Posts: 1,470

    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    The takeaway has irked some U.S. officials interviewed as part of the probe — they argue that it shouldn’t have taken a foreign national to convince the inspector general that the FBI acted properly in 2016.


    Sounds like Trumptards won’t like the results of this investigation...

    How did the Muellertards like theirs?
    We've been through this countless times but we can always revisit. No doubt many were disappointed that Mueller felt his scope was so limited he investigated a pre-agreed conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the GRU, something no one alleged happened. The fact he investigated something no one alleged happened and found enough evidence that he couldn't exonerate members of the campaign is very concerning for the country. That he found countless examples of collusion and documents multiple instances of obstruction of justice are extremely concerning. Shocking that not a single word in the report was redacted for counter-intel purposes so the ongoing counter-intel investigation as well as the multiple other investigations spawned from the SC investigation will hopefully lead us closer to the truth this president and his team continue to try and conceal.

    Found this part of the article particularly compelling. Bertrand is a good journalist and has written many good pieces on the ongoing investigation.

    But the extensive interview with Steele, and the investigators’ sense that he offered new and important information, may dampen expectations among the president’s allies who’ve claimed that Steele’s sensational dossier was used improperly by the bureau to “spy” on the campaign.

    Page had been on the FBI’s radar since 2013, when he interacted with undercover Russian intelligence agents in New York City. A trip to Moscow in the summer of 2016 further aroused the bureau’s suspicions, according to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant the FBI got approved in October 2016, allowing the bureau to intercept his electronic communications.

    Steele’s defenders have noted that the information he provided which made it into the FISA warrant application to monitor Page was not far off. According to Steele’s sources, Page met with high-level Russian officials while in Moscow in July 2016, including the CEO of Russia’s state-owned oil giant Rosneft.

    Page denied the claim publicly until pressed under oath by lawmakers in 2017, when he acknowledged meeting “senior members of the presidential administration” during his trip, as well as the head of investor relations at Rosneft. Page had originally claimed only that he went to Moscow to give the commencement address at the New Economic School.
    Yeah no

    Tl,dr

    No collusion

    No obstruction

    No nothing

    Muellertards
    Cmon Race - If you really try harder you can jam your head further up your own ass. Put some effort into it by god!
    Post jibberish get bitch slapped in return

    You got played Muellertard

    Nothing. Zero. Zip. Nada
    Keep trying - I'm sure you can jam that thing further up there.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    Full context of what Hondo said can be found here.

    https://hardcorehusky.com/discussion/58986/what-got-you-into-talking-interested-in-politics/p4

    Shocking, Hondo the pathological liar lies.

    And you can see that I was responding to shitdicks like you who think almost all teachers are liberal. Which is bullshit.
    The majority of all public school teachers are Rat party supporters. You being the pathological liar you are claim otherwise while you also lie about the demographics of teachers being "pretty close" to the general population. Here's the demographic that Hondo the lying dipshit claims is "pretty close" to the general population.


    About 77 percent of public school teachers today are female.

    Despite the attention given to the need to recruit more teachers of color, little progress has been made in diversifying the profession. Overall, the percentage of White teachers has declined slightly from 84 percent in 1999-2000. In 2015–16, about 80 percent of public school teachers were White, 9 percent were Hispanic (an increase of 3 percent since 2000), 7 percent were Black, 2 percent were Asian, and 1 percent were of two or more races.



    This is why you're a pathological liar Hondo and not just a guy who gets things wrong. Even now after all these months you're still lying your ass off about this.



    You are fucking stupid. And racist and sexist.
    Which is the kind of response you get when a pathological liar can't back up his mouth and can't admit they were wrong. What happen to your claim that you were taken "out of context" Hondo you lying worthless piece of shit?
    Do you realize how stupid you even are? By trying to say that since 77% of teachers are white women, of course the vast majority of teacher are liberal. That's the dumbest argument I've ever heard.

    You realize the majority of school districts are in conservative areas right? You've seen the red/blue map of the country.... Yes teachers are a little more liberal than the general population. But it's not the vast majority shitdick like you think it is.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    The takeaway has irked some U.S. officials interviewed as part of the probe — they argue that it shouldn’t have taken a foreign national to convince the inspector general that the FBI acted properly in 2016.


    Sounds like Trumptards won’t like the results of this investigation...

    How did the Muellertards like theirs?
    We've been through this countless times but we can always revisit. No doubt many were disappointed that Mueller felt his scope was so limited he investigated a pre-agreed conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the GRU, something no one alleged happened. The fact he investigated something no one alleged happened and found enough evidence that he couldn't exonerate members of the campaign is very concerning for the country. That he found countless examples of collusion and documents multiple instances of obstruction of justice are extremely concerning. Shocking that not a single word in the report was redacted for counter-intel purposes so the ongoing counter-intel investigation as well as the multiple other investigations spawned from the SC investigation will hopefully lead us closer to the truth this president and his team continue to try and conceal.

    Found this part of the article particularly compelling. Bertrand is a good journalist and has written many good pieces on the ongoing investigation.

    But the extensive interview with Steele, and the investigators’ sense that he offered new and important information, may dampen expectations among the president’s allies who’ve claimed that Steele’s sensational dossier was used improperly by the bureau to “spy” on the campaign.

    Page had been on the FBI’s radar since 2013, when he interacted with undercover Russian intelligence agents in New York City. A trip to Moscow in the summer of 2016 further aroused the bureau’s suspicions, according to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant the FBI got approved in October 2016, allowing the bureau to intercept his electronic communications.

    Steele’s defenders have noted that the information he provided which made it into the FISA warrant application to monitor Page was not far off. According to Steele’s sources, Page met with high-level Russian officials while in Moscow in July 2016, including the CEO of Russia’s state-owned oil giant Rosneft.

    Page denied the claim publicly until pressed under oath by lawmakers in 2017, when he acknowledged meeting “senior members of the presidential administration” during his trip, as well as the head of investor relations at Rosneft. Page had originally claimed only that he went to Moscow to give the commencement address at the New Economic School.
    And yet Page, the target of the wiretap and spying was never charged with anything. Mueller was charged with looking into Russian interference with our election, not just a pre-agreed conspiracy between Trump and the Russian. You pulled that claim squarely out of your ass.

    What we do know for certain is that Hillary paid a foreign national, who received what we're now told was most likely Russian disinformation, from Russians who were connected to the Kremlin in order to impact the campaign and Mueller never looked into any of that.

    We already know that the FBI acted inappropriately in their investigation of Trump. There have been people fired and demoted on account of their inappropriate actions. What we still don't know is how big a role the Russian disinformation, paid for by Hillary and the DNC, played in the investigation of Trump's campaign.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,112 Founders Club
    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    The takeaway has irked some U.S. officials interviewed as part of the probe — they argue that it shouldn’t have taken a foreign national to convince the inspector general that the FBI acted properly in 2016.


    Sounds like Trumptards won’t like the results of this investigation...

    How did the Muellertards like theirs?
    We've been through this countless times but we can always revisit. No doubt many were disappointed that Mueller felt his scope was so limited he investigated a pre-agreed conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the GRU, something no one alleged happened. The fact he investigated something no one alleged happened and found enough evidence that he couldn't exonerate members of the campaign is very concerning for the country. That he found countless examples of collusion and documents multiple instances of obstruction of justice are extremely concerning. Shocking that not a single word in the report was redacted for counter-intel purposes so the ongoing counter-intel investigation as well as the multiple other investigations spawned from the SC investigation will hopefully lead us closer to the truth this president and his team continue to try and conceal.

    Found this part of the article particularly compelling. Bertrand is a good journalist and has written many good pieces on the ongoing investigation.

    But the extensive interview with Steele, and the investigators’ sense that he offered new and important information, may dampen expectations among the president’s allies who’ve claimed that Steele’s sensational dossier was used improperly by the bureau to “spy” on the campaign.

    Page had been on the FBI’s radar since 2013, when he interacted with undercover Russian intelligence agents in New York City. A trip to Moscow in the summer of 2016 further aroused the bureau’s suspicions, according to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant the FBI got approved in October 2016, allowing the bureau to intercept his electronic communications.

    Steele’s defenders have noted that the information he provided which made it into the FISA warrant application to monitor Page was not far off. According to Steele’s sources, Page met with high-level Russian officials while in Moscow in July 2016, including the CEO of Russia’s state-owned oil giant Rosneft.

    Page denied the claim publicly until pressed under oath by lawmakers in 2017, when he acknowledged meeting “senior members of the presidential administration” during his trip, as well as the head of investor relations at Rosneft. Page had originally claimed only that he went to Moscow to give the commencement address at the New Economic School.
    Yeah no

    Tl,dr

    No collusion

    No obstruction

    No nothing

    Muellertards
    Cmon Race - If you really try harder you can jam your head further up your own ass. Put some effort into it by god!
    Post jibberish get bitch slapped in return

    You got played Muellertard

    Nothing. Zero. Zip. Nada
    Keep trying - I'm sure you can jam that thing further up there.
    What thing?

    Your lack of anything?

    Muellertards. Idiots
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    GDS said:

    GDS said:

    The takeaway has irked some U.S. officials interviewed as part of the probe — they argue that it shouldn’t have taken a foreign national to convince the inspector general that the FBI acted properly in 2016.


    Sounds like Trumptards won’t like the results of this investigation...

    How did the Muellertards like theirs?
    We've been through this countless times but we can always revisit. No doubt many were disappointed that Mueller felt his scope was so limited he investigated a pre-agreed conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the GRU, something no one alleged happened. The fact he investigated something no one alleged happened and found enough evidence that he couldn't exonerate members of the campaign is very concerning for the country. That he found countless examples of collusion and documents multiple instances of obstruction of justice are extremely concerning. Shocking that not a single word in the report was redacted for counter-intel purposes so the ongoing counter-intel investigation as well as the multiple other investigations spawned from the SC investigation will hopefully lead us closer to the truth this president and his team continue to try and conceal.

    Found this part of the article particularly compelling. Bertrand is a good journalist and has written many good pieces on the ongoing investigation.

    But the extensive interview with Steele, and the investigators’ sense that he offered new and important information, may dampen expectations among the president’s allies who’ve claimed that Steele’s sensational dossier was used improperly by the bureau to “spy” on the campaign.

    Page had been on the FBI’s radar since 2013, when he interacted with undercover Russian intelligence agents in New York City. A trip to Moscow in the summer of 2016 further aroused the bureau’s suspicions, according to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant the FBI got approved in October 2016, allowing the bureau to intercept his electronic communications.

    Steele’s defenders have noted that the information he provided which made it into the FISA warrant application to monitor Page was not far off. According to Steele’s sources, Page met with high-level Russian officials while in Moscow in July 2016, including the CEO of Russia’s state-owned oil giant Rosneft.

    Page denied the claim publicly until pressed under oath by lawmakers in 2017, when he acknowledged meeting “senior members of the presidential administration” during his trip, as well as the head of investor relations at Rosneft. Page had originally claimed only that he went to Moscow to give the commencement address at the New Economic School.
    And yet Page, the target of the wiretap and spying was never charged with anything. Mueller was charged with looking into Russian interference with our election, not just a pre-agreed conspiracy between Trump and the Russian. You pulled that claim squarely out of your ass.

    What we do know for certain is that Hillary paid a foreign national, who received what we're now told was most likely Russian disinformation, from Russians who were connected to the Kremlin in order to impact the campaign and Mueller never looked into any of that.

    We already know that the FBI acted inappropriately in their investigation of Trump. There have been people fired and demoted on account of their inappropriate actions. What we still don't know is how big a role the Russian disinformation, paid for by Hillary and the DNC, played in the investigation of Trump's campaign.
    If I were a shitbird like you. I'd spam the board with this quote every fucking post you have for the next couple years. Lil lyin Bob.