Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Why so many mass shootings?
Comments
-
It's clear that you only read the first line and then shit poasted. And didn't really even comprehend that well.ZoneUW said:
There’s absolutely no data linking video games to violencesalemcoog said:
Certainly not solely, but a kid who plays a first person shooter 10 hours a day will be impacted.allpurpleallgold said:I think it’s video games.
Really it's about the desensitizing of people due to technology. Many if most young people now, don't talk to other people unless they have to. It's all via SMS and social media. Life isn't real to a lot of young people today.
I watched a townhall on teenage suicide and mass violence last week. And the overarching cause that came down from both the "experts" and the kids was the isolation that technology has allowed. Be it social media, smart phones, video games, message boards and what have you. People do not know how to A: Converse in a healthy manner anymore and B: Do so respectfully. I give you the Tug as exhibit A. Imagine the Tug but a bunch 15 y/o's on it.
Nice try old man
Can you tell me about the time when you begged Derek to ban you from the board last time around and the consequence that led to it?
Because at least 81% of the board would like to help you to get back to that place again. -
Your premise that some increase in crime in the late 80s compares to the increase from 1963 into the 1970s is laughable. And the explosion in the mid-60s is very easy to explain: the oldest baby boomers were entering their prime crime committing years.SFGbob said:
If poverty caused crime to increase how do you explain that crime during the Great Depression dropped? And how do you explain the explosion in crime in the 1960s during a period of time when the poverty rate was falling? Crime also exploded in the late 80s and early 90s again during a period of declining poverty rates. So how do you explain it?ZoneUW said:
Rich people have less need to commit crimes. Because they have, you know, money.MikeDamone said:
Huh? Hondo was just saying poor neighborhoods are awesome. Best people live there. No?ZoneUW said:
Any loser creep can go to a public school. Private schools usually do some vetting.MikeDamone said:
You might be on to something.ZoneUW said:
You’re losing it raceRaceBannon said:Cartoons of Mohammed caused a mass shooting in France
Maybe take the religion OUT of schools then? Or only Christianity prevents mass shootings?
https://www.cato.org/blog/are-shootings-more-likely-occur-public-schools
No shit shootings are way more likely at public schools. Next you’re going to tell me there’s more violent crime in big crowded cities than small gated communities?
So what you’re saying is rich people who have a sense of right and wrong send their kids to religious schools were those kids don’t mass murder their classmates? Crazy theory, but you might be onto something.
-
Take it up Zone Kunt, he claims that increase in crime is caused by low school funding and poverty. What's even more laughable is your misrepresentation of what I said.HHusky said:
Your premise that some increase in crime in the late 80s compares to the increase from 1963 into the 1970s is laughable. And the explosion in the mid-60s is very easy to explain: the oldest baby boomers were entering their prime crime committing years.SFGbob said:
If poverty caused crime to increase how do you explain that crime during the Great Depression dropped? And how do you explain the explosion in crime in the 1960s during a period of time when the poverty rate was falling? Crime also exploded in the late 80s and early 90s again during a period of declining poverty rates. So how do you explain it?ZoneUW said:
Rich people have less need to commit crimes. Because they have, you know, money.MikeDamone said:
Huh? Hondo was just saying poor neighborhoods are awesome. Best people live there. No?ZoneUW said:
Any loser creep can go to a public school. Private schools usually do some vetting.MikeDamone said:
You might be on to something.ZoneUW said:
You’re losing it raceRaceBannon said:Cartoons of Mohammed caused a mass shooting in France
Maybe take the religion OUT of schools then? Or only Christianity prevents mass shootings?
https://www.cato.org/blog/are-shootings-more-likely-occur-public-schools
No shit shootings are way more likely at public schools. Next you’re going to tell me there’s more violent crime in big crowded cities than small gated communities?
So what you’re saying is rich people who have a sense of right and wrong send their kids to religious schools were those kids don’t mass murder their classmates? Crazy theory, but you might be onto something. -
"Crime also exploded in the late 80s and early 90s"SFGbob said:
Take it up Zone Kunt, he claims that increase in crime is caused by low school funding and poverty. What's even more laughable is your misrepresentation of what I said.HHusky said:
Your premise that some increase in crime in the late 80s compares to the increase from 1963 into the 1970s is laughable. And the explosion in the mid-60s is very easy to explain: the oldest baby boomers were entering their prime crime committing years.SFGbob said:
If poverty caused crime to increase how do you explain that crime during the Great Depression dropped? And how do you explain the explosion in crime in the 1960s during a period of time when the poverty rate was falling? Crime also exploded in the late 80s and early 90s again during a period of declining poverty rates. So how do you explain it?ZoneUW said:
Rich people have less need to commit crimes. Because they have, you know, money.MikeDamone said:
Huh? Hondo was just saying poor neighborhoods are awesome. Best people live there. No?ZoneUW said:
Any loser creep can go to a public school. Private schools usually do some vetting.MikeDamone said:
You might be on to something.ZoneUW said:
You’re losing it raceRaceBannon said:Cartoons of Mohammed caused a mass shooting in France
Maybe take the religion OUT of schools then? Or only Christianity prevents mass shootings?
https://www.cato.org/blog/are-shootings-more-likely-occur-public-schools
No shit shootings are way more likely at public schools. Next you’re going to tell me there’s more violent crime in big crowded cities than small gated communities?
So what you’re saying is rich people who have a sense of right and wrong send their kids to religious schools were those kids don’t mass murder their classmates? Crazy theory, but you might be onto something. -
Did it increase due to low school funding O'Keefed? Funny how you're all OUTRAGED over my description about how crime increasing late 80s and 90s and yet you say nothing about the complete bullshit about poor school funding being it's cause.HHusky said:
"Crime also exploded in the late 80s and early 90s"SFGbob said:
Take it up Zone Kunt, he claims that increase in crime is caused by low school funding and poverty. What's even more laughable is your misrepresentation of what I said.HHusky said:
Your premise that some increase in crime in the late 80s compares to the increase from 1963 into the 1970s is laughable. And the explosion in the mid-60s is very easy to explain: the oldest baby boomers were entering their prime crime committing years.SFGbob said:
If poverty caused crime to increase how do you explain that crime during the Great Depression dropped? And how do you explain the explosion in crime in the 1960s during a period of time when the poverty rate was falling? Crime also exploded in the late 80s and early 90s again during a period of declining poverty rates. So how do you explain it?ZoneUW said:
Rich people have less need to commit crimes. Because they have, you know, money.MikeDamone said:
Huh? Hondo was just saying poor neighborhoods are awesome. Best people live there. No?ZoneUW said:
Any loser creep can go to a public school. Private schools usually do some vetting.MikeDamone said:
You might be on to something.ZoneUW said:
You’re losing it raceRaceBannon said:Cartoons of Mohammed caused a mass shooting in France
Maybe take the religion OUT of schools then? Or only Christianity prevents mass shootings?
https://www.cato.org/blog/are-shootings-more-likely-occur-public-schools
No shit shootings are way more likely at public schools. Next you’re going to tell me there’s more violent crime in big crowded cities than small gated communities?
So what you’re saying is rich people who have a sense of right and wrong send their kids to religious schools were those kids don’t mass murder their classmates? Crazy theory, but you might be onto something.
Did crime increase in the late 80s and 90s O'Keefed? Did it increase during a period of falling poverty rates? My comparison wasn't to equate the rise in crime in the 1960s to the rise in crime in the late 80s it was to show that crime has increased during periods of falling poverty rates.
-
I didn't mean to upset you, blob.SFGbob said:
Did it increase due to low school funding O'Keefed? Funny how you're all OUTRAGED over my description about how crime increasing late 80s and 90s and yet you say nothing about the complete bullshit about poor school funding being it's cause.HHusky said:
"Crime also exploded in the late 80s and early 90s"SFGbob said:
Take it up Zone Kunt, he claims that increase in crime is caused by low school funding and poverty. What's even more laughable is your misrepresentation of what I said.HHusky said:
Your premise that some increase in crime in the late 80s compares to the increase from 1963 into the 1970s is laughable. And the explosion in the mid-60s is very easy to explain: the oldest baby boomers were entering their prime crime committing years.SFGbob said:
If poverty caused crime to increase how do you explain that crime during the Great Depression dropped? And how do you explain the explosion in crime in the 1960s during a period of time when the poverty rate was falling? Crime also exploded in the late 80s and early 90s again during a period of declining poverty rates. So how do you explain it?ZoneUW said:
Rich people have less need to commit crimes. Because they have, you know, money.MikeDamone said:
Huh? Hondo was just saying poor neighborhoods are awesome. Best people live there. No?ZoneUW said:
Any loser creep can go to a public school. Private schools usually do some vetting.MikeDamone said:
You might be on to something.ZoneUW said:
You’re losing it raceRaceBannon said:Cartoons of Mohammed caused a mass shooting in France
Maybe take the religion OUT of schools then? Or only Christianity prevents mass shootings?
https://www.cato.org/blog/are-shootings-more-likely-occur-public-schools
No shit shootings are way more likely at public schools. Next you’re going to tell me there’s more violent crime in big crowded cities than small gated communities?
So what you’re saying is rich people who have a sense of right and wrong send their kids to religious schools were those kids don’t mass murder their classmates? Crazy theory, but you might be onto something.
Did crime increase in the late 80s and 90s O'Keefed? Did it increase during a period of falling poverty rates? My comparison wasn't to equate the rise in crime in the 1960s to the rise in crime in the late 80s it was to show that crime has increased during periods of falling poverty rates. -
There's the passive aggressive Kunt act.HHusky said:
I didn't mean to upset you, blob.SFGbob said:
Did it increase due to low school funding O'Keefed? Funny how you're all OUTRAGED over my description about how crime increasing late 80s and 90s and yet you say nothing about the complete bullshit about poor school funding being it's cause.HHusky said:
"Crime also exploded in the late 80s and early 90s"SFGbob said:
Take it up Zone Kunt, he claims that increase in crime is caused by low school funding and poverty. What's even more laughable is your misrepresentation of what I said.HHusky said:
Your premise that some increase in crime in the late 80s compares to the increase from 1963 into the 1970s is laughable. And the explosion in the mid-60s is very easy to explain: the oldest baby boomers were entering their prime crime committing years.SFGbob said:
If poverty caused crime to increase how do you explain that crime during the Great Depression dropped? And how do you explain the explosion in crime in the 1960s during a period of time when the poverty rate was falling? Crime also exploded in the late 80s and early 90s again during a period of declining poverty rates. So how do you explain it?ZoneUW said:
Rich people have less need to commit crimes. Because they have, you know, money.MikeDamone said:
Huh? Hondo was just saying poor neighborhoods are awesome. Best people live there. No?ZoneUW said:
Any loser creep can go to a public school. Private schools usually do some vetting.MikeDamone said:
You might be on to something.ZoneUW said:
You’re losing it raceRaceBannon said:Cartoons of Mohammed caused a mass shooting in France
Maybe take the religion OUT of schools then? Or only Christianity prevents mass shootings?
https://www.cato.org/blog/are-shootings-more-likely-occur-public-schools
No shit shootings are way more likely at public schools. Next you’re going to tell me there’s more violent crime in big crowded cities than small gated communities?
So what you’re saying is rich people who have a sense of right and wrong send their kids to religious schools were those kids don’t mass murder their classmates? Crazy theory, but you might be onto something.
Did crime increase in the late 80s and 90s O'Keefed? Did it increase during a period of falling poverty rates? My comparison wasn't to equate the rise in crime in the 1960s to the rise in crime in the late 80s it was to show that crime has increased during periods of falling poverty rates.
Were the questions too fucking tough for you O'Keefed, and why no OUTRAGE over the bullshit claim about school funding being tied to violent crime rates? Did crime increase in the late 80s O'Keefed? Your dodge of the question provides the answer.
So really the entire purpose of your response was over my use of the word "explosion" and over a comparison I wasn't making.
Bravo O'Keefed, one of your better head up the ass moments. -
Words matter.SFGbob said:
There's the passive aggressive Kunt act.HHusky said:
I didn't mean to upset you, blob.SFGbob said:
Did it increase due to low school funding O'Keefed? Funny how you're all OUTRAGED over my description about how crime increasing late 80s and 90s and yet you say nothing about the complete bullshit about poor school funding being it's cause.HHusky said:
"Crime also exploded in the late 80s and early 90s"SFGbob said:
Take it up Zone Kunt, he claims that increase in crime is caused by low school funding and poverty. What's even more laughable is your misrepresentation of what I said.HHusky said:
Your premise that some increase in crime in the late 80s compares to the increase from 1963 into the 1970s is laughable. And the explosion in the mid-60s is very easy to explain: the oldest baby boomers were entering their prime crime committing years.SFGbob said:
If poverty caused crime to increase how do you explain that crime during the Great Depression dropped? And how do you explain the explosion in crime in the 1960s during a period of time when the poverty rate was falling? Crime also exploded in the late 80s and early 90s again during a period of declining poverty rates. So how do you explain it?ZoneUW said:
Rich people have less need to commit crimes. Because they have, you know, money.MikeDamone said:
Huh? Hondo was just saying poor neighborhoods are awesome. Best people live there. No?ZoneUW said:
Any loser creep can go to a public school. Private schools usually do some vetting.MikeDamone said:
You might be on to something.ZoneUW said:
You’re losing it raceRaceBannon said:Cartoons of Mohammed caused a mass shooting in France
Maybe take the religion OUT of schools then? Or only Christianity prevents mass shootings?
https://www.cato.org/blog/are-shootings-more-likely-occur-public-schools
No shit shootings are way more likely at public schools. Next you’re going to tell me there’s more violent crime in big crowded cities than small gated communities?
So what you’re saying is rich people who have a sense of right and wrong send their kids to religious schools were those kids don’t mass murder their classmates? Crazy theory, but you might be onto something.
Did crime increase in the late 80s and 90s O'Keefed? Did it increase during a period of falling poverty rates? My comparison wasn't to equate the rise in crime in the 1960s to the rise in crime in the late 80s it was to show that crime has increased during periods of falling poverty rates.
Were the questions too fucking tough for you O'Keefed, and why no OUTRAGE over the bullshit claim about school funding being tied to violent crime rates? Did crime increase in the late 80s O'Keefed? Your dodge of the question provides the answer.
So really the entire purpose of your response was over my use of the word "explosion" and over a comparison I wasn't making.
Bravo O'Keefed, one of your better head up the ass moments. -
They certainly do. Now you just need to show where I was comparing the rise in crime in the 1960s to the rise in crime in the late 80s. Your head is up your ass O'Keefed. The comparison was between two periods of time with declining poverty rates but with increasing crime rates. It wasn't a comparison of how much crime rose during each period.HHusky said:
Words matter.SFGbob said:
There's the passive aggressive Kunt act.HHusky said:
I didn't mean to upset you, blob.SFGbob said:
Did it increase due to low school funding O'Keefed? Funny how you're all OUTRAGED over my description about how crime increasing late 80s and 90s and yet you say nothing about the complete bullshit about poor school funding being it's cause.HHusky said:
"Crime also exploded in the late 80s and early 90s"SFGbob said:
Take it up Zone Kunt, he claims that increase in crime is caused by low school funding and poverty. What's even more laughable is your misrepresentation of what I said.HHusky said:
Your premise that some increase in crime in the late 80s compares to the increase from 1963 into the 1970s is laughable. And the explosion in the mid-60s is very easy to explain: the oldest baby boomers were entering their prime crime committing years.SFGbob said:
If poverty caused crime to increase how do you explain that crime during the Great Depression dropped? And how do you explain the explosion in crime in the 1960s during a period of time when the poverty rate was falling? Crime also exploded in the late 80s and early 90s again during a period of declining poverty rates. So how do you explain it?ZoneUW said:
Rich people have less need to commit crimes. Because they have, you know, money.MikeDamone said:
Huh? Hondo was just saying poor neighborhoods are awesome. Best people live there. No?ZoneUW said:
Any loser creep can go to a public school. Private schools usually do some vetting.MikeDamone said:
You might be on to something.ZoneUW said:
You’re losing it raceRaceBannon said:Cartoons of Mohammed caused a mass shooting in France
Maybe take the religion OUT of schools then? Or only Christianity prevents mass shootings?
https://www.cato.org/blog/are-shootings-more-likely-occur-public-schools
No shit shootings are way more likely at public schools. Next you’re going to tell me there’s more violent crime in big crowded cities than small gated communities?
So what you’re saying is rich people who have a sense of right and wrong send their kids to religious schools were those kids don’t mass murder their classmates? Crazy theory, but you might be onto something.
Did crime increase in the late 80s and 90s O'Keefed? Did it increase during a period of falling poverty rates? My comparison wasn't to equate the rise in crime in the 1960s to the rise in crime in the late 80s it was to show that crime has increased during periods of falling poverty rates.
Were the questions too fucking tough for you O'Keefed, and why no OUTRAGE over the bullshit claim about school funding being tied to violent crime rates? Did crime increase in the late 80s O'Keefed? Your dodge of the question provides the answer.
So really the entire purpose of your response was over my use of the word "explosion" and over a comparison I wasn't making.
Bravo O'Keefed, one of your better head up the ass moments.
But I enjoyed watching you shove your head up your ass and dance around for my entertainment.
-
Still upset?SFGbob said:
They certainly do. Now you just need to show where I was comparing the rise in crime in the 1960s to the rise in crime in the late 80s. Your head is up your ass O'Keefed. The comparison was between two periods of time with declining poverty rates but with increasing crime rates. It wasn't a comparison of how much crime rose during each period.HHusky said:
Words matter.SFGbob said:
There's the passive aggressive Kunt act.HHusky said:
I didn't mean to upset you, blob.SFGbob said:
Did it increase due to low school funding O'Keefed? Funny how you're all OUTRAGED over my description about how crime increasing late 80s and 90s and yet you say nothing about the complete bullshit about poor school funding being it's cause.HHusky said:
"Crime also exploded in the late 80s and early 90s"SFGbob said:
Take it up Zone Kunt, he claims that increase in crime is caused by low school funding and poverty. What's even more laughable is your misrepresentation of what I said.HHusky said:
Your premise that some increase in crime in the late 80s compares to the increase from 1963 into the 1970s is laughable. And the explosion in the mid-60s is very easy to explain: the oldest baby boomers were entering their prime crime committing years.SFGbob said:
If poverty caused crime to increase how do you explain that crime during the Great Depression dropped? And how do you explain the explosion in crime in the 1960s during a period of time when the poverty rate was falling? Crime also exploded in the late 80s and early 90s again during a period of declining poverty rates. So how do you explain it?ZoneUW said:
Rich people have less need to commit crimes. Because they have, you know, money.MikeDamone said:
Huh? Hondo was just saying poor neighborhoods are awesome. Best people live there. No?ZoneUW said:
Any loser creep can go to a public school. Private schools usually do some vetting.MikeDamone said:
You might be on to something.ZoneUW said:
You’re losing it raceRaceBannon said:Cartoons of Mohammed caused a mass shooting in France
Maybe take the religion OUT of schools then? Or only Christianity prevents mass shootings?
https://www.cato.org/blog/are-shootings-more-likely-occur-public-schools
No shit shootings are way more likely at public schools. Next you’re going to tell me there’s more violent crime in big crowded cities than small gated communities?
So what you’re saying is rich people who have a sense of right and wrong send their kids to religious schools were those kids don’t mass murder their classmates? Crazy theory, but you might be onto something.
Did crime increase in the late 80s and 90s O'Keefed? Did it increase during a period of falling poverty rates? My comparison wasn't to equate the rise in crime in the 1960s to the rise in crime in the late 80s it was to show that crime has increased during periods of falling poverty rates.
Were the questions too fucking tough for you O'Keefed, and why no OUTRAGE over the bullshit claim about school funding being tied to violent crime rates? Did crime increase in the late 80s O'Keefed? Your dodge of the question provides the answer.
So really the entire purpose of your response was over my use of the word "explosion" and over a comparison I wasn't making.
Bravo O'Keefed, one of your better head up the ass moments.
But I enjoyed watching you shove your head up your ass and dance around for my entertainment. -
Still have your head up your ass?HHusky said:
Still upset?SFGbob said:
They certainly do. Now you just need to show where I was comparing the rise in crime in the 1960s to the rise in crime in the late 80s. Your head is up your ass O'Keefed. The comparison was between two periods of time with declining poverty rates but with increasing crime rates. It wasn't a comparison of how much crime rose during each period.HHusky said:
Words matter.SFGbob said:
There's the passive aggressive Kunt act.HHusky said:
I didn't mean to upset you, blob.SFGbob said:
Did it increase due to low school funding O'Keefed? Funny how you're all OUTRAGED over my description about how crime increasing late 80s and 90s and yet you say nothing about the complete bullshit about poor school funding being it's cause.HHusky said:
"Crime also exploded in the late 80s and early 90s"SFGbob said:
Take it up Zone Kunt, he claims that increase in crime is caused by low school funding and poverty. What's even more laughable is your misrepresentation of what I said.HHusky said:
Your premise that some increase in crime in the late 80s compares to the increase from 1963 into the 1970s is laughable. And the explosion in the mid-60s is very easy to explain: the oldest baby boomers were entering their prime crime committing years.SFGbob said:
If poverty caused crime to increase how do you explain that crime during the Great Depression dropped? And how do you explain the explosion in crime in the 1960s during a period of time when the poverty rate was falling? Crime also exploded in the late 80s and early 90s again during a period of declining poverty rates. So how do you explain it?ZoneUW said:
Rich people have less need to commit crimes. Because they have, you know, money.MikeDamone said:
Huh? Hondo was just saying poor neighborhoods are awesome. Best people live there. No?ZoneUW said:
Any loser creep can go to a public school. Private schools usually do some vetting.MikeDamone said:
You might be on to something.ZoneUW said:
You’re losing it raceRaceBannon said:Cartoons of Mohammed caused a mass shooting in France
Maybe take the religion OUT of schools then? Or only Christianity prevents mass shootings?
https://www.cato.org/blog/are-shootings-more-likely-occur-public-schools
No shit shootings are way more likely at public schools. Next you’re going to tell me there’s more violent crime in big crowded cities than small gated communities?
So what you’re saying is rich people who have a sense of right and wrong send their kids to religious schools were those kids don’t mass murder their classmates? Crazy theory, but you might be onto something.
Did crime increase in the late 80s and 90s O'Keefed? Did it increase during a period of falling poverty rates? My comparison wasn't to equate the rise in crime in the 1960s to the rise in crime in the late 80s it was to show that crime has increased during periods of falling poverty rates.
Were the questions too fucking tough for you O'Keefed, and why no OUTRAGE over the bullshit claim about school funding being tied to violent crime rates? Did crime increase in the late 80s O'Keefed? Your dodge of the question provides the answer.
So really the entire purpose of your response was over my use of the word "explosion" and over a comparison I wasn't making.
Bravo O'Keefed, one of your better head up the ass moments.
But I enjoyed watching you shove your head up your ass and dance around for my entertainment.
I thought you were going to show how I was making a comparison in how much crime rose in the 1960s when compared to the late 1980s O'Keefed?
Come on O'Keefed, words matter, show where I made that comparison. -
Clever!
-
I guess words no longer matter.HHusky said:Clever!
Come on Kunt, show where I compared how much crime rose in the 1960s to how much it rose in the late 1980s? You started this jackass dance O'Keefed why don't you want to now back up your mouth? -
You Tube video = Benghazi violenceZoneUW said:
There’s absolutely no data linking video games to violencesalemcoog said:
Certainly not solely, but a kid who plays a first person shooter 10 hours a day will be impacted.allpurpleallgold said:I think it’s video games.
Really it's about the desensitizing of people due to technology. Many if most young people now, don't talk to other people unless they have to. It's all via SMS and social media. Life isn't real to a lot of young people today.
I watched a townhall on teenage suicide and mass violence last week. And the overarching cause that came down from both the "experts" and the kids was the isolation that technology has allowed. Be it social media, smart phones, video games, message boards and what have you. People do not know how to A: Converse in a healthy manner anymore and B: Do so respectfully. I give you the Tug as exhibit A. Imagine the Tug but a bunch 15 y/o's on it.
Nice try old man
Mohammed cartoons = French mass murder
Giving a brain damaged youth a gun is as bad an idea as filling his damaged brain with violent imagery that desensitizes him
Both are protected by a constitutional right. But to claim that it has no effect is badly misinformed.
-
Full Kunt, you still got it O'Keefed. Words matter until O'Keefed realizes he put his head up his ass, then they no longer matter.HHusky said: -
Fully Kunt? What's the matter O'Keefed, here's your big opportunity to school me. Show where I was making the comparison you claimed I was making? You realized you put your head up your ass didn't you O'Keefed, and now your only option is to continue the jackass dance.HHusky said:
Sad, words matter, until O'Keefed realizes he shoved his head up his ass, and then they no longer matter. -
Winning bigly?SFGbob said:
Fully Kunt? What's the matter O'Keefed, here's your big opportunity to school me. Show where I was making the comparison you claimed I was making? You realized you put your head up your ass didn't you O'Keefed, and now your only option is to continue the jackass dance.HHusky said:
Sad, words matter, until O'Keefed realizes he shoved his head up his ass, and then they no longer matter. -
There's no winning with a Kunt who refusing to back their mouth O'Keefee. Funny how you came running to the board to breathlessly call me out for my "false" claim an now you don't want to even discuss it. You'll go on for hours with this little passive aggressive Kunt act of yours buy you won't even take a few seconds to quote where you claim I was making the comparison you said I was making.HHusky said:
Winning bigly?SFGbob said:
Fully Kunt? What's the matter O'Keefed, here's your big opportunity to school me. Show where I was making the comparison you claimed I was making? You realized you put your head up your ass didn't you O'Keefed, and now your only option is to continue the jackass dance.HHusky said:
Sad, words matter, until O'Keefed realizes he shoved his head up his ass, and then they no longer matter. -
I discussed it. You denied it. I quoted it directly. You wanted to change the subject.SFGbob said:
There's no winning with a Kunt who refusing to back their mouth O'Keefee. Funny how you came running to the board to breathlessly call me out for my "false" claim an now you don't want to even discuss it. You'll go on for hours with this little passive aggressive Kunt act of yours buy you won't even take a few seconds to quote where you claim I was making the comparison you said I was making.HHusky said:
Winning bigly?SFGbob said:
Fully Kunt? What's the matter O'Keefed, here's your big opportunity to school me. Show where I was making the comparison you claimed I was making? You realized you put your head up your ass didn't you O'Keefed, and now your only option is to continue the jackass dance.HHusky said:
Sad, words matter, until O'Keefed realizes he shoved his head up his ass, and then they no longer matter.
-
You misread what I said. I never made any comparison between the crime rates in the 1960s and the crime rates in the late 1980s. What you quoted doesn't come even close to supporting that claim. Now an honest person would just admit they had misread or not understood the point the other person was making. A person with a fragile ego like you O"keefed who would rather chew off your own pecker before you admitted to making even the most simple error would do what you just did over the past hour.HHusky said:
I discussed it. You denied it. I quoted it directly. You wanted to change the subject.SFGbob said:
There's no winning with a Kunt who refusing to back their mouth O'Keefee. Funny how you came running to the board to breathlessly call me out for my "false" claim an now you don't want to even discuss it. You'll go on for hours with this little passive aggressive Kunt act of yours buy you won't even take a few seconds to quote where you claim I was making the comparison you said I was making.HHusky said:
Winning bigly?SFGbob said:
Fully Kunt? What's the matter O'Keefed, here's your big opportunity to school me. Show where I was making the comparison you claimed I was making? You realized you put your head up your ass didn't you O'Keefed, and now your only option is to continue the jackass dance.HHusky said:
Sad, words matter, until O'Keefed realizes he shoved his head up his ass, and then they no longer matter.
Far from wanting to change the subject I was fucking begging you to discuss the subject. Your problem is that you only wanted to discuss what you feel I said and not what I actually said.
-
You misspelled, "The two things I described as the same weren't remotely comparable."SFGbob said:
You misread what I said. I never made any comparison between the crime rates in the 1960s and the crime rates in the late 1980s. What you quoted doesn't come even close to supporting that claim. Now an honest person would just admit they had misread or not understood the point the other person was making. A person with a fragile ego like you O"keefed who would rather chew off your own pecker before you admitted to making even the most simple error would do what you just did over the past hour.HHusky said:
I discussed it. You denied it. I quoted it directly. You wanted to change the subject.SFGbob said:
There's no winning with a Kunt who refusing to back their mouth O'Keefee. Funny how you came running to the board to breathlessly call me out for my "false" claim an now you don't want to even discuss it. You'll go on for hours with this little passive aggressive Kunt act of yours buy you won't even take a few seconds to quote where you claim I was making the comparison you said I was making.HHusky said:
Winning bigly?SFGbob said:
Fully Kunt? What's the matter O'Keefed, here's your big opportunity to school me. Show where I was making the comparison you claimed I was making? You realized you put your head up your ass didn't you O'Keefed, and now your only option is to continue the jackass dance.HHusky said:
Sad, words matter, until O'Keefed realizes he shoved his head up his ass, and then they no longer matter.
Far from wanting to change the subject I was fucking begging you to discuss the subject. Your problem is that you only wanted to discuss what you feel I said and not what I actually said. -
What you claimed I said: Your premise that some increase in crime in the late 80s compares to the increase from 1963 into the 1970s is laughable
What you quoted me saying:
Crime also exploded in the late 80s and early 90s"
And for some odd reason, not really, we both know why you left out the context of what I was saying:
You didn't quote the entire statement I made:
And how do you explain the explosion in crime in the 1960s during a period of time when the poverty rate was falling? Crime also exploded in the late 80s and early 90s again during a period of declining poverty rates.
Why it's like you're nothing more than a dishonest Kunt O'Keefed. The comparison was between two periods of time that had increasing crime rates and declining poverty rates.
Did crime increase during the late 80s O"keefed? Was the poverty rate falling during that time period?
Will you run and hide like a Kunt? Yes, yes and yes.
-
The two things I described were two separate periods in our recent history that had falling poverty rates and increasing crime rates. They are directly comparable. What a fucking lying little Kunt you've turned into O'Keefed.HHusky said:
You misspelled, "The two things I described as the same weren't remotely comparable."SFGbob said:
You misread what I said. I never made any comparison between the crime rates in the 1960s and the crime rates in the late 1980s. What you quoted doesn't come even close to supporting that claim. Now an honest person would just admit they had misread or not understood the point the other person was making. A person with a fragile ego like you O"keefed who would rather chew off your own pecker before you admitted to making even the most simple error would do what you just did over the past hour.HHusky said:
I discussed it. You denied it. I quoted it directly. You wanted to change the subject.SFGbob said:
There's no winning with a Kunt who refusing to back their mouth O'Keefee. Funny how you came running to the board to breathlessly call me out for my "false" claim an now you don't want to even discuss it. You'll go on for hours with this little passive aggressive Kunt act of yours buy you won't even take a few seconds to quote where you claim I was making the comparison you said I was making.HHusky said:
Winning bigly?SFGbob said:
Fully Kunt? What's the matter O'Keefed, here's your big opportunity to school me. Show where I was making the comparison you claimed I was making? You realized you put your head up your ass didn't you O'Keefed, and now your only option is to continue the jackass dance.HHusky said:
Sad, words matter, until O'Keefed realizes he shoved his head up his ass, and then they no longer matter.
Far from wanting to change the subject I was fucking begging you to discuss the subject. Your problem is that you only wanted to discuss what you feel I said and not what I actually said.
