Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

VERDICT: Jury awards Gibson’s Bakery $11 million against Oberlin College

«1

Comments

  • ramenduck
    ramenduck Member Posts: 734
    Nah, The SJWs simply move on to the next thing while the college picks up the $11M tab, assuming it holds up (reasonable odds that it doesn't). Plus the indemnified employee named in the suit pays nothing.
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,313 Founders Club
    Well good. Serves them fucking right.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Did this deserve a second thread.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    2001400ex said:

    Did this deserve a second thread.

    This was the first thread on this topic, but when does a lying dumbfuck like you ever get anything right?
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,929
    SFGbob said:
    Having done the college visit to Oberlin with two of my kids, this is deliciously funny to me. I was very happy both decided to go elsewhere. The inmates are the asylum.
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,560
    edited June 2019
    Let the students dictate the culture and curriculum. What could go wrong?
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,662
    Why do students always think they are so fucking importanr
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,470 Founders Club

    Why do students always think they are so fucking importanr

    That is all they've been told by their helicopter parents growing up.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,041 Standard Supporter
    pawz said:

    Why do students always think they are so fucking importanr

    That is all they've been told by their bulldozer parents growing up.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,929

    Let the students dictate the culture and curriculum. What could go wrong?

    The school got hit for its direct involvement, not merely for what its students did.
  • ZoneUW
    ZoneUW Member Posts: 794
    I can see both sides.
    I mean black people are commonly falsely accused of shoplifting. And many shop owners are known for following black people around stores.
    The bakery should have just installed security cameras.
    Problem solved.
    And why is social justice warrior an insult? In my view Justice is a good thing, even justice concerning social issues.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    ZoneUW said:

    I can see both sides.
    I mean black people are commonly falsely accused of shoplifting. And many shop owners are known for following black people around stores.
    The bakery should have just installed security cameras.
    Problem solved.
    And why is social justice warrior an insult? In my view Justice is a good thing, even justice concerning social issues.

    But in this case they weren’t falsely accused, in fact they plead guilty to it. Still didn’t stop the SJWs from protesting. The people who were falsely accused was the store owner
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,662
    pawz said:

    Why do students always think they are so fucking importanr

    That is all they've been told by their helicopter parents growing up.
    Is that the problem though? I get it when they are like a football star or something


    But leftists and sjw types weren't the popular kids
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    ZoneUW said:

    I can see both sides.
    I mean black people are commonly falsely accused of shoplifting. And many shop owners are known for following black people around stores.
    The bakery should have just installed security cameras.
    Problem solved.
    And why is social justice warrior an insult? In my view Justice is a good thing, even justice concerning social issues.

    What are the two sides of this story that you can see? How would installing security cameras have prevented this and solved the problem? The people protesting and Oberlin weren't interested in justice. They wanted to smear innocent people as racists without any facts to support their charges. How is that justice?
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,097
    edited June 2019
    ZoneUW said:

    I can see both sides.
    I mean black people are commonly falsely accused of shoplifting. And many shop owners are known for following black people around stores.
    The bakery should have just installed security cameras.
    Problem solved.
    And why is social justice warrior an insult? In my view Justice is a good thing, even justice concerning social issues.

    Putting lipstick on a pig doesn't make it any less of a pig. "Social Justice Warrior"..christ.

    And the whole "they should have just installed security cameras' is a bullshit argument. With that line of thinking, we? are all going to be outfitted with government funded Go Pros to document our innocence against false accusations.

    Fuck that, Big Brother.

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,929
    ZoneUW said:

    I can see both sides.
    I mean black people are commonly falsely accused of shoplifting. And many shop owners are known for following black people around stores.
    The bakery should have just installed security cameras.
    Problem solved.
    And why is social justice warrior an insult? In my view Justice is a good thing, even justice concerning social issues.

    You don’t just allude to a made up “history of discrimination” in order to appease your students. This history didn’t exist. That’s defamation and Oberlin has earned this verdict.

    It’s no more okay for the left to make shit up than it is for Daddy to make shit up.
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913

    ZoneUW said:

    I can see both sides.
    I mean black people are commonly falsely accused of shoplifting. And many shop owners are known for following black people around stores.
    The bakery should have just installed security cameras.
    Problem solved.
    And why is social justice warrior an insult? In my view Justice is a good thing, even justice concerning social issues.

    Putting lipstick on a pig doesn't make it any less of a pig. "Social Justice Warrior"..christ.

    And the whole "they should have just installed security cameras' is a bullshit argument. With that line of thinking, we? are all going to be outfitted with government funded Go Pros to document our innocence against false accusations.

    Fuck that, Big Brother.

    This guys a real Beaut. He reminds me a lot of Aeropostal of Grief, just more naive and ignorant. If that was somehow possible.

    He is definitely what you would call a throwback resistor circa December 2016. He doesn’t really read the news and hasnt realized that 81% of his so called social injustices have proven to be bullshit.
  • GreenRiverGatorz
    GreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,165
    ZoneUW said:

    I can see both sides.
    I mean black people are commonly falsely accused of shoplifting. And many shop owners are known for following black people around stores.
    The bakery should have just installed security cameras.
    Problem solved.
    And why is social justice warrior an insult? In my view Justice is a good thing, even justice concerning social issues.

    They should've installed security cameras? That's some damn fine victim blaming.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HHusky said:

    ZoneUW said:

    I can see both sides.
    I mean black people are commonly falsely accused of shoplifting. And many shop owners are known for following black people around stores.
    The bakery should have just installed security cameras.
    Problem solved.
    And why is social justice warrior an insult? In my view Justice is a good thing, even justice concerning social issues.

    You don’t just allude to a made up “history of discrimination” in order to appease your students. This history didn’t exist. That’s defamation and Oberlin has earned this verdict.

    It’s no more okay for the left to make shit up than it is for Daddy to make shit up.
    Those are your people O'Keefed that's who you vote with and who you were supporting in Ferguson. Hands up don't shoot O'Keefed.
  • ZoneUW
    ZoneUW Member Posts: 794
    SFGbob said:

    ZoneUW said:

    I can see both sides.
    I mean black people are commonly falsely accused of shoplifting. And many shop owners are known for following black people around stores.
    The bakery should have just installed security cameras.
    Problem solved.
    And why is social justice warrior an insult? In my view Justice is a good thing, even justice concerning social issues.

    What are the two sides of this story that you can see? How would installing security cameras have prevented this and solved the problem? The people protesting and Oberlin weren't interested in justice. They wanted to smear innocent people as racists without any facts to support their charges. How is that justice?
    Well if there was discrimination that wouldn’t be good would it. To me it seems the actual people in the wrong here are the shoplifters who stole and then claimed discrimination. But sure let’s only get mad at the students... who while at the end, were incorrect, didn’t necessarily start out with the intentions to falsely accuse the shop.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,929
    ZoneUW said:

    SFGbob said:

    ZoneUW said:

    I can see both sides.
    I mean black people are commonly falsely accused of shoplifting. And many shop owners are known for following black people around stores.
    The bakery should have just installed security cameras.
    Problem solved.
    And why is social justice warrior an insult? In my view Justice is a good thing, even justice concerning social issues.

    What are the two sides of this story that you can see? How would installing security cameras have prevented this and solved the problem? The people protesting and Oberlin weren't interested in justice. They wanted to smear innocent people as racists without any facts to support their charges. How is that justice?
    Well if there was discrimination that wouldn’t be good would it. To me it seems the actual people in the wrong here are the shoplifters who stole and then claimed discrimination. But sure let’s only get mad at the students... who while at the end, were incorrect, didn’t necessarily start out with the intentions to falsely accuse the shop.
    The university knew the claim of discrimination was false and injected itself into the dispute and on the side of the lie.
  • GreenRiverGatorz
    GreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,165
    ZoneUW said:

    SFGbob said:

    ZoneUW said:

    I can see both sides.
    I mean black people are commonly falsely accused of shoplifting. And many shop owners are known for following black people around stores.
    The bakery should have just installed security cameras.
    Problem solved.
    And why is social justice warrior an insult? In my view Justice is a good thing, even justice concerning social issues.

    What are the two sides of this story that you can see? How would installing security cameras have prevented this and solved the problem? The people protesting and Oberlin weren't interested in justice. They wanted to smear innocent people as racists without any facts to support their charges. How is that justice?
    Well if there was discrimination that wouldn’t be good would it. To me it seems the actual people in the wrong here are the shoplifters who stole and then claimed discrimination. But sure let’s only get mad at the students... who while at the end, were incorrect, didn’t necessarily start out with the intentions to falsely accuse the shop.
    You are delusionally sympathetic towards a mob of people who attempted to ruin a business and the owners' livelihoods. Whether they intentionally falsely accused them or not doesn't matter, they were wrong and they hurt people. I'm sure there were plenty in the Emmit Till mob who thought he actually raped a woman.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,929
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    ZoneUW said:

    I can see both sides.
    I mean black people are commonly falsely accused of shoplifting. And many shop owners are known for following black people around stores.
    The bakery should have just installed security cameras.
    Problem solved.
    And why is social justice warrior an insult? In my view Justice is a good thing, even justice concerning social issues.

    You don’t just allude to a made up “history of discrimination” in order to appease your students. This history didn’t exist. That’s defamation and Oberlin has earned this verdict.

    It’s no more okay for the left to make shit up than it is for Daddy to make shit up.
    Those are your people O'Keefed that's who you vote with and who you were supporting in Ferguson. Hands up don't shoot O'Keefed.

    I realize your thought processes only allow for two opposite points of view. I’ve visited there twice. This case seems to confirm my impression on both occasions. I’m not part of their stupid any more than I’m part of yours.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,097
    edited June 2019
    ZoneUW said:

    SFGbob said:

    ZoneUW said:

    I can see both sides.
    I mean black people are commonly falsely accused of shoplifting. And many shop owners are known for following black people around stores.
    The bakery should have just installed security cameras.
    Problem solved.
    And why is social justice warrior an insult? In my view Justice is a good thing, even justice concerning social issues.

    What are the two sides of this story that you can see? How would installing security cameras have prevented this and solved the problem? The people protesting and Oberlin weren't interested in justice. They wanted to smear innocent people as racists without any facts to support their charges. How is that justice?
    Well if there was discrimination that wouldn’t be good would it. To me it seems the actual people in the wrong here are the shoplifters who stole and then claimed discrimination. But sure let’s only get mad at the students... who while at the end, were incorrect, didn’t necessarily start out with the intentions to falsely accuse the shop.
    We get mad at them to teach them to not indiscriminately throw out accusations based on group think.

    It's what their parents should have done years ago.

    The rabble rousers are fortunate the bakery went after the deep pockets of the school instead of each one of them individually.

    Student loans would be the least of their worries.


  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    ZoneUW said:

    I can see both sides.
    I mean black people are commonly falsely accused of shoplifting. And many shop owners are known for following black people around stores.
    The bakery should have just installed security cameras.
    Problem solved.
    And why is social justice warrior an insult? In my view Justice is a good thing, even justice concerning social issues.

    You don’t just allude to a made up “history of discrimination” in order to appease your students. This history didn’t exist. That’s defamation and Oberlin has earned this verdict.

    It’s no more okay for the left to make shit up than it is for Daddy to make shit up.
    Those are your people O'Keefed that's who you vote with and who you were supporting in Ferguson. Hands up don't shoot O'Keefed.

    I realize your thought processes only allow for two opposite points of view. I’ve visited there twice. This case seems to confirm my impression on both occasions. I’m not part of their stupid any more than I’m part of yours.
    Yes, yes, the guy who swallowed like a bitch the lie that Mike Brown was shot in the back while running away and who claimed "credible" eyewitnesses said that Brown was shot point blank in the head while on his knees with his arms in the air is too smart for me.

    Remind me again how you got your name O'keefed?
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,929
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    ZoneUW said:

    I can see both sides.
    I mean black people are commonly falsely accused of shoplifting. And many shop owners are known for following black people around stores.
    The bakery should have just installed security cameras.
    Problem solved.
    And why is social justice warrior an insult? In my view Justice is a good thing, even justice concerning social issues.

    You don’t just allude to a made up “history of discrimination” in order to appease your students. This history didn’t exist. That’s defamation and Oberlin has earned this verdict.

    It’s no more okay for the left to make shit up than it is for Daddy to make shit up.
    Those are your people O'Keefed that's who you vote with and who you were supporting in Ferguson. Hands up don't shoot O'Keefed.

    I realize your thought processes only allow for two opposite points of view. I’ve visited there twice. This case seems to confirm my impression on both occasions. I’m not part of their stupid any more than I’m part of yours.
    Yes, yes, the guy who swallowed like a bitch the lie that Mike Brown was shot in the back while running away and who claimed "credible" eyewitnesses said that Brown was shot point blank in the head while on his knees with his arms in the air is too smart for me.

    Remind me again how you got your name O'keefed?
    Weird how that wrongful death suit didn’t result in the defense verdict I kept hearing about.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    Did this deserve a second thread.

    This was the first thread on this topic, but when does a lying dumbfuck like you ever get anything right?
    Seems like you and DJDuck beat off to the same shit.

    https://hardcorehusky.com/discussion/59632/gibson-s-bakery-wins-11-million-award-against-oberlin-college/p1
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    ZoneUW said:

    SFGbob said:

    ZoneUW said:

    I can see both sides.
    I mean black people are commonly falsely accused of shoplifting. And many shop owners are known for following black people around stores.
    The bakery should have just installed security cameras.
    Problem solved.
    And why is social justice warrior an insult? In my view Justice is a good thing, even justice concerning social issues.

    What are the two sides of this story that you can see? How would installing security cameras have prevented this and solved the problem? The people protesting and Oberlin weren't interested in justice. They wanted to smear innocent people as racists without any facts to support their charges. How is that justice?
    Well if there was discrimination that wouldn’t be good would it. To me it seems the actual people in the wrong here are the shoplifters who stole and then claimed discrimination. But sure let’s only get mad at the students... who while at the end, were incorrect, didn’t necessarily start out with the intentions to falsely accuse the shop.
    They didn't really care about the facts at all. There was no discrimination. There were false accusations of discrimination with zero evidence to support those accusation. There are no "two sides" to this story. There is the truth and there are the lies the SJWs and the college told.

    Liberals have been getting away with falsely smearing people for being racist for a long time now. Finally there's been a little pay back. Why I believe you were a lying Kunt calling me a racist just the other day.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    ZoneUW said:

    SFGbob said:

    ZoneUW said:

    I can see both sides.
    I mean black people are commonly falsely accused of shoplifting. And many shop owners are known for following black people around stores.
    The bakery should have just installed security cameras.
    Problem solved.
    And why is social justice warrior an insult? In my view Justice is a good thing, even justice concerning social issues.

    What are the two sides of this story that you can see? How would installing security cameras have prevented this and solved the problem? The people protesting and Oberlin weren't interested in justice. They wanted to smear innocent people as racists without any facts to support their charges. How is that justice?
    Well if there was discrimination that wouldn’t be good would it. To me it seems the actual people in the wrong here are the shoplifters who stole and then claimed discrimination. But sure let’s only get mad at the students... who while at the end, were incorrect, didn’t necessarily start out with the intentions to falsely accuse the shop.
    They didn't really care about the facts at all. There was no discrimination. There were false accusations of discrimination with zero evidence to support those accusation. There are no "two sides" to this story. There is the truth and there are the lies the SJWs and the college told.

    Liberals have been getting away with falsely smearing people for being racist for a long time now. Finally there's been a little pay back. Why I believe you were a lying Kunt calling me a racist just the other day.
    You are racist. You just don't know it.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,929
    SFGbob said:

    ZoneUW said:

    SFGbob said:

    ZoneUW said:

    I can see both sides.
    I mean black people are commonly falsely accused of shoplifting. And many shop owners are known for following black people around stores.
    The bakery should have just installed security cameras.
    Problem solved.
    And why is social justice warrior an insult? In my view Justice is a good thing, even justice concerning social issues.

    What are the two sides of this story that you can see? How would installing security cameras have prevented this and solved the problem? The people protesting and Oberlin weren't interested in justice. They wanted to smear innocent people as racists without any facts to support their charges. How is that justice?
    Well if there was discrimination that wouldn’t be good would it. To me it seems the actual people in the wrong here are the shoplifters who stole and then claimed discrimination. But sure let’s only get mad at the students... who while at the end, were incorrect, didn’t necessarily start out with the intentions to falsely accuse the shop.
    They didn't really care about the facts at all. There was no discrimination. There were false accusations of discrimination with zero evidence to support those accusation. There are no "two sides" to this story. There is the truth and there are the lies the SJWs and the college told.

    Liberals have been getting away with falsely smearing people for being racist for a long time now. Finally there's been a little pay back. Why I believe you were a lying Kunt calling me a racist just the other day.
    “Pay back” explains blob’s and Deej’s interest in the story.