Gibson’s Bakery wins $11 million award against Oberlin College

DJDuck

VERDICT: Jury awards Gibson’s Bakery $11 million against Oberlin College
Comments Permalink

Punitive damage phase to start next Tuesday, which could increase the damages to $33 million

https://legalinsurrection.com/2019/06/verdict-jury-awards-gibsons-bakery-11-million-against-oberlin-college/

“The verdict sends a strong message that colleges and universities cannot simply wind up and set loose student social justice warriors and then wash their hands of the consequences. In this case, a wholly innocent 5th-generation bakery was falsely accused of being racist and having a history racial profiling after stopping three black Oberlin College students from shoplifting. The students eventually pleaded guilty, but not before large protests and boycotts intended to destroy the bakery and defame the owners. The jury appears to have accepted that Oberlin College facilitated the wrongful conduct against the bakery.”

HHusky

DJ sure is litigation happy today.

I’m sorry Peggy Noonan called you stupid btw. It’s not entirely your fault.

DJDuck

For bringing up one significant Verdict?

HHusky

True the Vote?

It really is whose ox you perceive as having been gored, ain’t it?

DJDuck

No that’s NOT the point. You claimed I was “Litigation Happy” for posting on one important jury verdict. How is that “litigation happy”? I know obfuscation is one of your favorite methods of avoiding answering. This is not tough.

DJDuck

Ohio jury awards $11 million to bakery owners targeted by Oberlin College student protests


https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/jun/7/ohio-jury-awards-11-million-to-bakery-owners-targe/

HHusky

All you understand about both (ie TWO) cases you brought up is that people who you think agree with you won. You would otherwise view a successful piece of litigation as “ambulance chasing”. Cuz that’s your depth, Deej.

DJDuck

You still didn’t answer the question. You have no idea of the depth of what I know except that you were regularly slapped around on The Woodshed by Bob me and others for Your lack of knowledge of any number of issues.

HHusky

DJDuck said:

You still didn’t answer the question. You have no idea of the depth of what I know except that you were regularly slapped around on The Woodshed by Bob me and others for Your lack of knowledge of any number of issues.

Said without irony.

That’s funny.

DJDuck

What was the other verdict? If there is does it mean someone is “litigation happy” which is my main question that you so cravenly avoid.

DJDuck

What is your definition of being “ Litigation Happy”?

HHusky

Please stop slapping me around, Deej.

DJDuck

You always have so much to add.

Why don’t you answer the questions I posed?


That is part of your Schtick. Not adding anything of substance, attacking your perceived enemies and cowardly avoiding questions posed to you. You haven’t changed.

HHusky

I didn’t mean to make you cry.

DJDuck

Not crying, just waiting for an answer Gentle Giant.

Still in avoidance mode I Guess.

HHusky

Hurtful

DJDuck

Still employing logical fallacies as you have in the past.

ramenduck

DJDuck said:

You still didn’t answer the question. You have no idea of the depth of what I know except that you were regularly slapped around on The Woodshed by Bob me and others for Your lack of knowledge of any number of issues.

This reminds me of the night in 1990 that Stacey King and Michael Jordan combined for 70 points to beat the Cleveland Cavaliers.

https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1990-03-29-sp-582-story,amp.html

RaceBannon

Why is H so angry?

HHusky

RaceBannon said:

Why is H so angry?

Slap happy, I guess.

DJDuck

Who knows Race? Hell I just posted about the Gibson verdict and foolishly thought it would be a great topic of conversation.

HHusky

Apology accepted! Thanks Deej!

DJDuck

No apology at all. Never have needed to debating an ignorant pussy like you. Maybe you should ask your partner for keys to your lockbox where he keeps your balls so you can muster up the courage to answer simple questions.

Delusions of winning an argument is a proven gambit of yours and your ilk that don’t really have the tools to actually formulate a logical argument or answer simple inconvenient question.

DJDuck

HHusky said:

Apology accepted! Thanks Deej!

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LQCU36pkH7c

DJDuck

Logically Fallacious

Avoiding the Issue
(also known as: avoiding the question [form of], missing the point, straying off the subject, digressing, distraction [form of])

Description: When an arguer responds to an argument by not addressing the points of the argument. Unlike the strawman fallacy, avoiding the issue does


https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/61/Avoiding-the-Issue

HHusky

I wonder why Peggy thinks you’re slow.

DJDuck

Nothing to ad and an example of another logical fallacy you employ quite often.

It is one of the “”Genetic” fallacies used by people that have nothing of substance with which to debate.

It’s “Attacking the Source”. Better known as a type of “Ad Hominem” fallacy.

https://springhole.net/logical-fallacies/attack-the-source.htm

HHusky

DJDuck said:

Nothing to ad and an example of another logical fallacy you employ quite often.

It is one of the “”Genetic” fallacies used by people that have nothing of substance with which to debate.

It’s “Attacking the Source”. Better known as a type of “Ad Hominem” fallacy.

https://springhole.net/logical-fallacies/attack-the-source.htm

There’s a debate? That sounds fun!