VERDICT: Jury awards Gibson’s Bakery $11 million against Oberlin College
Comments
-
The university knew the claim of discrimination was false and injected itself into the dispute and on the side of the lie.ZoneUW said:
Well if there was discrimination that wouldn’t be good would it. To me it seems the actual people in the wrong here are the shoplifters who stole and then claimed discrimination. But sure let’s only get mad at the students... who while at the end, were incorrect, didn’t necessarily start out with the intentions to falsely accuse the shop.SFGbob said:
What are the two sides of this story that you can see? How would installing security cameras have prevented this and solved the problem? The people protesting and Oberlin weren't interested in justice. They wanted to smear innocent people as racists without any facts to support their charges. How is that justice?ZoneUW said:I can see both sides.
I mean black people are commonly falsely accused of shoplifting. And many shop owners are known for following black people around stores.
The bakery should have just installed security cameras.
Problem solved.
And why is social justice warrior an insult? In my view Justice is a good thing, even justice concerning social issues. -
You are delusionally sympathetic towards a mob of people who attempted to ruin a business and the owners' livelihoods. Whether they intentionally falsely accused them or not doesn't matter, they were wrong and they hurt people. I'm sure there were plenty in the Emmit Till mob who thought he actually raped a woman.ZoneUW said:
Well if there was discrimination that wouldn’t be good would it. To me it seems the actual people in the wrong here are the shoplifters who stole and then claimed discrimination. But sure let’s only get mad at the students... who while at the end, were incorrect, didn’t necessarily start out with the intentions to falsely accuse the shop.SFGbob said:
What are the two sides of this story that you can see? How would installing security cameras have prevented this and solved the problem? The people protesting and Oberlin weren't interested in justice. They wanted to smear innocent people as racists without any facts to support their charges. How is that justice?ZoneUW said:I can see both sides.
I mean black people are commonly falsely accused of shoplifting. And many shop owners are known for following black people around stores.
The bakery should have just installed security cameras.
Problem solved.
And why is social justice warrior an insult? In my view Justice is a good thing, even justice concerning social issues. -
SFGbob said:
Those are your people O'Keefed that's who you vote with and who you were supporting in Ferguson. Hands up don't shoot O'Keefed.HHusky said:
You don’t just allude to a made up “history of discrimination” in order to appease your students. This history didn’t exist. That’s defamation and Oberlin has earned this verdict.ZoneUW said:I can see both sides.
I mean black people are commonly falsely accused of shoplifting. And many shop owners are known for following black people around stores.
The bakery should have just installed security cameras.
Problem solved.
And why is social justice warrior an insult? In my view Justice is a good thing, even justice concerning social issues.
It’s no more okay for the left to make shit up than it is for Daddy to make shit up.
I realize your thought processes only allow for two opposite points of view. I’ve visited there twice. This case seems to confirm my impression on both occasions. I’m not part of their stupid any more than I’m part of yours. -
We get mad at them to teach them to not indiscriminately throw out accusations based on group think.ZoneUW said:
Well if there was discrimination that wouldn’t be good would it. To me it seems the actual people in the wrong here are the shoplifters who stole and then claimed discrimination. But sure let’s only get mad at the students... who while at the end, were incorrect, didn’t necessarily start out with the intentions to falsely accuse the shop.SFGbob said:
What are the two sides of this story that you can see? How would installing security cameras have prevented this and solved the problem? The people protesting and Oberlin weren't interested in justice. They wanted to smear innocent people as racists without any facts to support their charges. How is that justice?ZoneUW said:I can see both sides.
I mean black people are commonly falsely accused of shoplifting. And many shop owners are known for following black people around stores.
The bakery should have just installed security cameras.
Problem solved.
And why is social justice warrior an insult? In my view Justice is a good thing, even justice concerning social issues.
It's what their parents should have done years ago.
The rabble rousers are fortunate the bakery went after the deep pockets of the school instead of each one of them individually.
Student loans would be the least of their worries.
-
Yes, yes, the guy who swallowed like a bitch the lie that Mike Brown was shot in the back while running away and who claimed "credible" eyewitnesses said that Brown was shot point blank in the head while on his knees with his arms in the air is too smart for me.HHusky said:SFGbob said:
Those are your people O'Keefed that's who you vote with and who you were supporting in Ferguson. Hands up don't shoot O'Keefed.HHusky said:
You don’t just allude to a made up “history of discrimination” in order to appease your students. This history didn’t exist. That’s defamation and Oberlin has earned this verdict.ZoneUW said:I can see both sides.
I mean black people are commonly falsely accused of shoplifting. And many shop owners are known for following black people around stores.
The bakery should have just installed security cameras.
Problem solved.
And why is social justice warrior an insult? In my view Justice is a good thing, even justice concerning social issues.
It’s no more okay for the left to make shit up than it is for Daddy to make shit up.
I realize your thought processes only allow for two opposite points of view. I’ve visited there twice. This case seems to confirm my impression on both occasions. I’m not part of their stupid any more than I’m part of yours.
Remind me again how you got your name O'keefed? -
Weird how that wrongful death suit didn’t result in the defense verdict I kept hearing about.SFGbob said:
Yes, yes, the guy who swallowed like a bitch the lie that Mike Brown was shot in the back while running away and who claimed "credible" eyewitnesses said that Brown was shot point blank in the head while on his knees with his arms in the air is too smart for me.HHusky said:SFGbob said:
Those are your people O'Keefed that's who you vote with and who you were supporting in Ferguson. Hands up don't shoot O'Keefed.HHusky said:
You don’t just allude to a made up “history of discrimination” in order to appease your students. This history didn’t exist. That’s defamation and Oberlin has earned this verdict.ZoneUW said:I can see both sides.
I mean black people are commonly falsely accused of shoplifting. And many shop owners are known for following black people around stores.
The bakery should have just installed security cameras.
Problem solved.
And why is social justice warrior an insult? In my view Justice is a good thing, even justice concerning social issues.
It’s no more okay for the left to make shit up than it is for Daddy to make shit up.
I realize your thought processes only allow for two opposite points of view. I’ve visited there twice. This case seems to confirm my impression on both occasions. I’m not part of their stupid any more than I’m part of yours.
Remind me again how you got your name O'keefed? -
Seems like you and DJDuck beat off to the same shit.SFGbob said:
This was the first thread on this topic, but when does a lying dumbfuck like you ever get anything right?2001400ex said:Did this deserve a second thread.
https://hardcorehusky.com/discussion/59632/gibson-s-bakery-wins-11-million-award-against-oberlin-college/p1 -
They didn't really care about the facts at all. There was no discrimination. There were false accusations of discrimination with zero evidence to support those accusation. There are no "two sides" to this story. There is the truth and there are the lies the SJWs and the college told.ZoneUW said:
Well if there was discrimination that wouldn’t be good would it. To me it seems the actual people in the wrong here are the shoplifters who stole and then claimed discrimination. But sure let’s only get mad at the students... who while at the end, were incorrect, didn’t necessarily start out with the intentions to falsely accuse the shop.SFGbob said:
What are the two sides of this story that you can see? How would installing security cameras have prevented this and solved the problem? The people protesting and Oberlin weren't interested in justice. They wanted to smear innocent people as racists without any facts to support their charges. How is that justice?ZoneUW said:I can see both sides.
I mean black people are commonly falsely accused of shoplifting. And many shop owners are known for following black people around stores.
The bakery should have just installed security cameras.
Problem solved.
And why is social justice warrior an insult? In my view Justice is a good thing, even justice concerning social issues.
Liberals have been getting away with falsely smearing people for being racist for a long time now. Finally there's been a little pay back. Why I believe you were a lying Kunt calling me a racist just the other day. -
You are racist. You just don't know it.SFGbob said:
They didn't really care about the facts at all. There was no discrimination. There were false accusations of discrimination with zero evidence to support those accusation. There are no "two sides" to this story. There is the truth and there are the lies the SJWs and the college told.ZoneUW said:
Well if there was discrimination that wouldn’t be good would it. To me it seems the actual people in the wrong here are the shoplifters who stole and then claimed discrimination. But sure let’s only get mad at the students... who while at the end, were incorrect, didn’t necessarily start out with the intentions to falsely accuse the shop.SFGbob said:
What are the two sides of this story that you can see? How would installing security cameras have prevented this and solved the problem? The people protesting and Oberlin weren't interested in justice. They wanted to smear innocent people as racists without any facts to support their charges. How is that justice?ZoneUW said:I can see both sides.
I mean black people are commonly falsely accused of shoplifting. And many shop owners are known for following black people around stores.
The bakery should have just installed security cameras.
Problem solved.
And why is social justice warrior an insult? In my view Justice is a good thing, even justice concerning social issues.
Liberals have been getting away with falsely smearing people for being racist for a long time now. Finally there's been a little pay back. Why I believe you were a lying Kunt calling me a racist just the other day. -
“Pay back” explains blob’s and Deej’s interest in the story.SFGbob said:
They didn't really care about the facts at all. There was no discrimination. There were false accusations of discrimination with zero evidence to support those accusation. There are no "two sides" to this story. There is the truth and there are the lies the SJWs and the college told.ZoneUW said:
Well if there was discrimination that wouldn’t be good would it. To me it seems the actual people in the wrong here are the shoplifters who stole and then claimed discrimination. But sure let’s only get mad at the students... who while at the end, were incorrect, didn’t necessarily start out with the intentions to falsely accuse the shop.SFGbob said:
What are the two sides of this story that you can see? How would installing security cameras have prevented this and solved the problem? The people protesting and Oberlin weren't interested in justice. They wanted to smear innocent people as racists without any facts to support their charges. How is that justice?ZoneUW said:I can see both sides.
I mean black people are commonly falsely accused of shoplifting. And many shop owners are known for following black people around stores.
The bakery should have just installed security cameras.
Problem solved.
And why is social justice warrior an insult? In my view Justice is a good thing, even justice concerning social issues.
Liberals have been getting away with falsely smearing people for being racist for a long time now. Finally there's been a little pay back. Why I believe you were a lying Kunt calling me a racist just the other day.
