The $20 Trail of Tears Continues
Comments
-
Lol.SFGbob said:
Got to love how they so smugly dump on people who reject evolution when their thinking is every bit as faith based as any fundamentalist Christian and just as doctrinaire.WilburHooksHands said:
Gender is entirely a social construct. Biological sex is not. Gender is a socially constructed set of norms and behaviors ascribed to the biological sexes. hthSFGbob said:
As that better or worse than being taught that gender is a choice and a social construct?WilburHooksHands said:
Move to the south, then you don't even have to worry about evolution.SFGbob said:
I read my kids history books and it's so painfully obvious that they are written by leftists pushing an agenda. It's indoctrination not education and they start on them early.YellowSnow said:
I agree with you. It's just a minor distraction to me in the big scheme of things.SFGbob said:I'm not saying that kids shouldn't learn about Tubman or Susan B. Anthony as well as Jane Addams and Emma Goldman, my complaint is the amount of attention these historical figures are given in comparison to Jefferson, Adams, Roosevelt and Grant. Harriet Tubman, while an interesting historical figure who should definitely be studied is given far more attention than her historical importance warrants.
-
@SFGbob I am reasonable man, but god damned it, this is one of the most fucktarded comments I’ve ever seen in in the history of the Tug. Evolution is scientific fact with the fossil record to back it up. Creationism has, well...Jack shit. Evolution is taken on faith? Poppycock.SFGbob said:
Got to love how they so smugly dump on people who reject evolution when their thinking is every bit as faith based as any fundamentalist Christian and just as doctrinaire.WilburHooksHands said:
Gender is entirely a social construct. Biological sex is not. Gender is a socially constructed set of norms and behaviors ascribed to the biological sexes. hthSFGbob said:
As that better or worse than being taught that gender is a choice and a social construct?WilburHooksHands said:
Move to the south, then you don't even have to worry about evolution.SFGbob said:
I read my kids history books and it's so painfully obvious that they are written by leftists pushing an agenda. It's indoctrination not education and they start on them early.YellowSnow said:
I agree with you. It's just a minor distraction to me in the big scheme of things.SFGbob said:I'm not saying that kids shouldn't learn about Tubman or Susan B. Anthony as well as Jane Addams and Emma Goldman, my complaint is the amount of attention these historical figures are given in comparison to Jefferson, Adams, Roosevelt and Grant. Harriet Tubman, while an interesting historical figure who should definitely be studied is given far more attention than her historical importance warrants.
-
Can't lay a fucking glove on what I said. Duly noted that it made your snatch hurt.allpurpleallgold said:
Lol.SFGbob said:
Got to love how they so smugly dump on people who reject evolution when their thinking is every bit as faith based as any fundamentalist Christian and just as doctrinaire.WilburHooksHands said:
Gender is entirely a social construct. Biological sex is not. Gender is a socially constructed set of norms and behaviors ascribed to the biological sexes. hthSFGbob said:
As that better or worse than being taught that gender is a choice and a social construct?WilburHooksHands said:
Move to the south, then you don't even have to worry about evolution.SFGbob said:
I read my kids history books and it's so painfully obvious that they are written by leftists pushing an agenda. It's indoctrination not education and they start on them early.YellowSnow said:
I agree with you. It's just a minor distraction to me in the big scheme of things.SFGbob said:I'm not saying that kids shouldn't learn about Tubman or Susan B. Anthony as well as Jane Addams and Emma Goldman, my complaint is the amount of attention these historical figures are given in comparison to Jefferson, Adams, Roosevelt and Grant. Harriet Tubman, while an interesting historical figure who should definitely be studied is given far more attention than her historical importance warrants.
-
And the "scientific fact" that gender is a social construct and has no basis in biology? Creationism is a faith based believe, every bit as much as gender is a social construct.YellowSnow said:
@SFGbob I am reasonable man, but god damned it, this is one of the most fucktarded comments I’ve ever seen in in the history of the Tug. Evolution is scientific fact with the fossil record to back it up. Creationism has, well...Jack shit. Evolution is taken on faith? Poppycock.SFGbob said:
Got to love how they so smugly dump on people who reject evolution when their thinking is every bit as faith based as any fundamentalist Christian and just as doctrinaire.WilburHooksHands said:
Gender is entirely a social construct. Biological sex is not. Gender is a socially constructed set of norms and behaviors ascribed to the biological sexes. hthSFGbob said:
As that better or worse than being taught that gender is a choice and a social construct?WilburHooksHands said:
Move to the south, then you don't even have to worry about evolution.SFGbob said:
I read my kids history books and it's so painfully obvious that they are written by leftists pushing an agenda. It's indoctrination not education and they start on them early.YellowSnow said:
I agree with you. It's just a minor distraction to me in the big scheme of things.SFGbob said:I'm not saying that kids shouldn't learn about Tubman or Susan B. Anthony as well as Jane Addams and Emma Goldman, my complaint is the amount of attention these historical figures are given in comparison to Jefferson, Adams, Roosevelt and Grant. Harriet Tubman, while an interesting historical figure who should definitely be studied is given far more attention than her historical importance warrants.
I initially believed you were brighter than this YS, do I need to reevaluate? -
Perhaps I misread your quote Bob. My apologies. I thought you were referring to evolution vs creationism and some sort of equivalence.SFGbob said:
And the "scientific fact" that gender is a social construct and has no basis in biology? Creationism is a faith based believe, every bit as much as gender is a social construct.YellowSnow said:
@SFGbob I am reasonable man, but god damned it, this is one of the most fucktarded comments I’ve ever seen in in the history of the Tug. Evolution is scientific fact with the fossil record to back it up. Creationism has, well...Jack shit. Evolution is taken on faith? Poppycock.SFGbob said:
Got to love how they so smugly dump on people who reject evolution when their thinking is every bit as faith based as any fundamentalist Christian and just as doctrinaire.WilburHooksHands said:
Gender is entirely a social construct. Biological sex is not. Gender is a socially constructed set of norms and behaviors ascribed to the biological sexes. hthSFGbob said:
As that better or worse than being taught that gender is a choice and a social construct?WilburHooksHands said:
Move to the south, then you don't even have to worry about evolution.SFGbob said:
I read my kids history books and it's so painfully obvious that they are written by leftists pushing an agenda. It's indoctrination not education and they start on them early.YellowSnow said:
I agree with you. It's just a minor distraction to me in the big scheme of things.SFGbob said:I'm not saying that kids shouldn't learn about Tubman or Susan B. Anthony as well as Jane Addams and Emma Goldman, my complaint is the amount of attention these historical figures are given in comparison to Jefferson, Adams, Roosevelt and Grant. Harriet Tubman, while an interesting historical figure who should definitely be studied is given far more attention than her historical importance warrants.
I initially believed you were brighter than this YS, do I need to reevaluate?
If we are talking about gender I don’t buy the progressive position that it’s all social construct. -
Just the way you like him. Fag.dflea said:Gaybob is all lathered up again.
lol -
Jfc.TurdBomber said:
Just the way you like him. Fag.dflea said:Gaybob is all lathered up again.
lol -
Closet case weighs in.CirrhosisDawg said:
Jfc.TurdBomber said:
Just the way you like him. Fag.dflea said:Gaybob is all lathered up again.
lol
Rent free, bitch. -
CNN’S DANA BASH VISIBLY UPSET THAT CURRENCY EXPERT WON’T BLAME TRUMP FOR TUBMAN $20 DELAY
https://dailycaller.com/2019/05/23/cnn-dana-bash-trump-harriet-tubman/
““I don’t like that there’s probably background reasons for it, and of course that’s a personal concern,” Miller replied. “I can also understand though that it is a slow process and the other problem that he brings up is the security, which [Trump] is right about. We are very behind the times on security for our paper money.” -
No, I was comparing the faith based belief "Creationism" to the faith based belief that gender is a societal construct and a choice. Neither are based on science. Yet the side the loves to smugly mock evangelical Christians for their "anti-Science" backwardness, have no problem embracing quackery like gender being a choice.YellowSnow said:
Perhaps I misread your quote Bob. My apologies. I thought you were referring to evolution vs creationism and some sort of equivalence.SFGbob said:
And the "scientific fact" that gender is a social construct and has no basis in biology? Creationism is a faith based believe, every bit as much as gender is a social construct.YellowSnow said:
@SFGbob I am reasonable man, but god damned it, this is one of the most fucktarded comments I’ve ever seen in in the history of the Tug. Evolution is scientific fact with the fossil record to back it up. Creationism has, well...Jack shit. Evolution is taken on faith? Poppycock.SFGbob said:
Got to love how they so smugly dump on people who reject evolution when their thinking is every bit as faith based as any fundamentalist Christian and just as doctrinaire.WilburHooksHands said:
Gender is entirely a social construct. Biological sex is not. Gender is a socially constructed set of norms and behaviors ascribed to the biological sexes. hthSFGbob said:
As that better or worse than being taught that gender is a choice and a social construct?WilburHooksHands said:
Move to the south, then you don't even have to worry about evolution.SFGbob said:
I read my kids history books and it's so painfully obvious that they are written by leftists pushing an agenda. It's indoctrination not education and they start on them early.YellowSnow said:
I agree with you. It's just a minor distraction to me in the big scheme of things.SFGbob said:I'm not saying that kids shouldn't learn about Tubman or Susan B. Anthony as well as Jane Addams and Emma Goldman, my complaint is the amount of attention these historical figures are given in comparison to Jefferson, Adams, Roosevelt and Grant. Harriet Tubman, while an interesting historical figure who should definitely be studied is given far more attention than her historical importance warrants.
I initially believed you were brighter than this YS, do I need to reevaluate?
If we are talking about gender I don’t buy the progressive position that it’s all social construct.
