Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

The $20 Trail of Tears Continues

24567…10

Comments

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,994 Founders Club
    WilburHooksHands said:

    SFGbob said:

    WilburHooksHands said:

    SFGbob said:

    YellowSnow said:

    SFGbob said:

    I'm not saying that kids shouldn't learn about Tubman or Susan B. Anthony as well as Jane Addams and Emma Goldman, my complaint is the amount of attention these historical figures are given in comparison to Jefferson, Adams, Roosevelt and Grant. Harriet Tubman, while an interesting historical figure who should definitely be studied is given far more attention than her historical importance warrants.

    I agree with you. It's just a minor distraction to me in the big scheme of things.
    I read my kids history books and it's so painfully obvious that they are written by leftists pushing an agenda. It's indoctrination not education and they start on them early.


    Move to the south, then you don't even have to worry about evolution.
    As that better or worse than being taught that gender is a choice and a social construct?
    Gender is entirely a social construct. Biological sex is not. Gender is a socially constructed set of norms and behaviors ascribed to the biological sexes. hth
    Look who got indoctrinated
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WilburHooksHands
    WilburHooksHands Member Posts: 6,804
    RaceBannon said:

    WilburHooksHands said:

    SFGbob said:

    WilburHooksHands said:

    SFGbob said:

    YellowSnow said:

    SFGbob said:

    I'm not saying that kids shouldn't learn about Tubman or Susan B. Anthony as well as Jane Addams and Emma Goldman, my complaint is the amount of attention these historical figures are given in comparison to Jefferson, Adams, Roosevelt and Grant. Harriet Tubman, while an interesting historical figure who should definitely be studied is given far more attention than her historical importance warrants.

    I agree with you. It's just a minor distraction to me in the big scheme of things.
    I read my kids history books and it's so painfully obvious that they are written by leftists pushing an agenda. It's indoctrination not education and they start on them early.


    Move to the south, then you don't even have to worry about evolution.
    As that better or worse than being taught that gender is a choice and a social construct?
    Gender is entirely a social construct. Biological sex is not. Gender is a socially constructed set of norms and behaviors ascribed to the biological sexes. hth
    Look who got indoctrinated
    RaceBannon said:

    WilburHooksHands said:

    SFGbob said:

    WilburHooksHands said:

    SFGbob said:

    YellowSnow said:

    SFGbob said:

    I'm not saying that kids shouldn't learn about Tubman or Susan B. Anthony as well as Jane Addams and Emma Goldman, my complaint is the amount of attention these historical figures are given in comparison to Jefferson, Adams, Roosevelt and Grant. Harriet Tubman, while an interesting historical figure who should definitely be studied is given far more attention than her historical importance warrants.

    I agree with you. It's just a minor distraction to me in the big scheme of things.
    I read my kids history books and it's so painfully obvious that they are written by leftists pushing an agenda. It's indoctrination not education and they start on them early.


    Move to the south, then you don't even have to worry about evolution.
    As that better or worse than being taught that gender is a choice and a social construct?
    Gender is entirely a social construct. Biological sex is not. Gender is a socially constructed set of norms and behaviors ascribed to the biological sexes. hth
    Look who got indoctrinated

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,204
    WilburHooksHands said:

    SFGbob said:

    WilburHooksHands said:

    SFGbob said:

    YellowSnow said:

    SFGbob said:

    I'm not saying that kids shouldn't learn about Tubman or Susan B. Anthony as well as Jane Addams and Emma Goldman, my complaint is the amount of attention these historical figures are given in comparison to Jefferson, Adams, Roosevelt and Grant. Harriet Tubman, while an interesting historical figure who should definitely be studied is given far more attention than her historical importance warrants.

    I agree with you. It's just a minor distraction to me in the big scheme of things.
    I read my kids history books and it's so painfully obvious that they are written by leftists pushing an agenda. It's indoctrination not education and they start on them early.


    Move to the south, then you don't even have to worry about evolution.
    As that better or worse than being taught that gender is a choice and a social construct?
    Gender is entirely a social construct. Biological sex is not. Gender is a socially constructed set of norms and behaviors ascribed to the biological sexes. hth
    Got to love how they so smugly dump on people who reject evolution when their thinking is every bit as faith based as any fundamentalist Christian and just as doctrinaire.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,204
    CirrhosisDawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    WilburHooksHands said:

    SFGbob said:

    YellowSnow said:

    SFGbob said:

    I'm not saying that kids shouldn't learn about Tubman or Susan B. Anthony as well as Jane Addams and Emma Goldman, my complaint is the amount of attention these historical figures are given in comparison to Jefferson, Adams, Roosevelt and Grant. Harriet Tubman, while an interesting historical figure who should definitely be studied is given far more attention than her historical importance warrants.

    I agree with you. It's just a minor distraction to me in the big scheme of things.
    I read my kids history books and it's so painfully obvious that they are written by leftists pushing an agenda. It's indoctrination not education and they start on them early.


    Move to the south, then you don't even have to worry about evolution.
    As that better or worse than being taught that gender is a choice and a social construct?
    Move to the south and then you can answer your own question.
    Sweet Geezus are you a worthless Kunt.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WilburHooksHands
    WilburHooksHands Member Posts: 6,804
    edited May 2019
    SFGbob said:

    WilburHooksHands said:

    SFGbob said:

    WilburHooksHands said:

    SFGbob said:

    YellowSnow said:

    SFGbob said:

    I'm not saying that kids shouldn't learn about Tubman or Susan B. Anthony as well as Jane Addams and Emma Goldman, my complaint is the amount of attention these historical figures are given in comparison to Jefferson, Adams, Roosevelt and Grant. Harriet Tubman, while an interesting historical figure who should definitely be studied is given far more attention than her historical importance warrants.

    I agree with you. It's just a minor distraction to me in the big scheme of things.
    I read my kids history books and it's so painfully obvious that they are written by leftists pushing an agenda. It's indoctrination not education and they start on them early.


    Move to the south, then you don't even have to worry about evolution.
    As that better or worse than being taught that gender is a choice and a social construct?
    Gender is entirely a social construct. Biological sex is not. Gender is a socially constructed set of norms and behaviors ascribed to the biological sexes. hth
    Got to love how they so smugly dump on people who reject evolution when their thinking is every bit as faith based as any fundamentalist Christian and just as doctrinaire.
    I have a dick and yet I can wear dresses and fuck dudes. The gender behavior of a male doesnt seem very hard wired to my actual biology?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,994 Founders Club
    WilburHooksHands said:

    RaceBannon said:

    WilburHooksHands said:

    SFGbob said:

    WilburHooksHands said:

    SFGbob said:

    YellowSnow said:

    SFGbob said:

    I'm not saying that kids shouldn't learn about Tubman or Susan B. Anthony as well as Jane Addams and Emma Goldman, my complaint is the amount of attention these historical figures are given in comparison to Jefferson, Adams, Roosevelt and Grant. Harriet Tubman, while an interesting historical figure who should definitely be studied is given far more attention than her historical importance warrants.

    I agree with you. It's just a minor distraction to me in the big scheme of things.
    I read my kids history books and it's so painfully obvious that they are written by leftists pushing an agenda. It's indoctrination not education and they start on them early.


    Move to the south, then you don't even have to worry about evolution.
    As that better or worse than being taught that gender is a choice and a social construct?
    Gender is entirely a social construct. Biological sex is not. Gender is a socially constructed set of norms and behaviors ascribed to the biological sexes. hth
    Look who got indoctrinated
    RaceBannon said:

    WilburHooksHands said:

    SFGbob said:

    WilburHooksHands said:

    SFGbob said:

    YellowSnow said:

    SFGbob said:

    I'm not saying that kids shouldn't learn about Tubman or Susan B. Anthony as well as Jane Addams and Emma Goldman, my complaint is the amount of attention these historical figures are given in comparison to Jefferson, Adams, Roosevelt and Grant. Harriet Tubman, while an interesting historical figure who should definitely be studied is given far more attention than her historical importance warrants.

    I agree with you. It's just a minor distraction to me in the big scheme of things.
    I read my kids history books and it's so painfully obvious that they are written by leftists pushing an agenda. It's indoctrination not education and they start on them early.


    Move to the south, then you don't even have to worry about evolution.
    As that better or worse than being taught that gender is a choice and a social construct?
    Gender is entirely a social construct. Biological sex is not. Gender is a socially constructed set of norms and behaviors ascribed to the biological sexes. hth
    Look who got indoctrinated

    That's the level of science involved
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • UW_Doog_Bot
    UW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,622 Founders Club
    WilburHooksHands said:

    SFGbob said:

    WilburHooksHands said:

    SFGbob said:

    YellowSnow said:

    SFGbob said:

    I'm not saying that kids shouldn't learn about Tubman or Susan B. Anthony as well as Jane Addams and Emma Goldman, my complaint is the amount of attention these historical figures are given in comparison to Jefferson, Adams, Roosevelt and Grant. Harriet Tubman, while an interesting historical figure who should definitely be studied is given far more attention than her historical importance warrants.

    I agree with you. It's just a minor distraction to me in the big scheme of things.
    I read my kids history books and it's so painfully obvious that they are written by leftists pushing an agenda. It's indoctrination not education and they start on them early.


    Move to the south, then you don't even have to worry about evolution.
    As that better or worse than being taught that gender is a choice and a social construct?
    Gender is entirely a social construct. Biological sex is not. Gender is a socially constructed set of norms and behaviors ascribed to the biological sexes. hth
    If you follow this reasoning through then their is no biological justification for transgenderism unless you are one of the rare individuals who isn't either a XY or XX chromosome.

    Which is counter to what is generally accepted that being trans has a biological component. "They are born that way. It's not a choice."

    I guess you are a TERF?

    Of course there's plenty of scientific evidence that there is a biological link between behavior and biological sex but that's why you have feminist activists shouting down biology professors in colleges. #marchforscience

    So which is it?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,204
    WilburHooksHands said:

    SFGbob said:

    WilburHooksHands said:

    SFGbob said:

    WilburHooksHands said:

    SFGbob said:

    YellowSnow said:

    SFGbob said:

    I'm not saying that kids shouldn't learn about Tubman or Susan B. Anthony as well as Jane Addams and Emma Goldman, my complaint is the amount of attention these historical figures are given in comparison to Jefferson, Adams, Roosevelt and Grant. Harriet Tubman, while an interesting historical figure who should definitely be studied is given far more attention than her historical importance warrants.

    I agree with you. It's just a minor distraction to me in the big scheme of things.
    I read my kids history books and it's so painfully obvious that they are written by leftists pushing an agenda. It's indoctrination not education and they start on them early.


    Move to the south, then you don't even have to worry about evolution.
    As that better or worse than being taught that gender is a choice and a social construct?
    Gender is entirely a social construct. Biological sex is not. Gender is a socially constructed set of norms and behaviors ascribed to the biological sexes. hth
    Got to love how they so smugly dump on people who reject evolution when their thinking is every bit as faith based as any fundamentalist Christian and just as doctrinaire.
    I have a dick and yet I can wear dresses and fuck dudes. The gender behavior of a male doesnt seem very hard wired to my actual biology?
    Great, that still doesn't make you a chick.

    The party of Science!!!!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WilburHooksHands
    WilburHooksHands Member Posts: 6,804
    edited May 2019
    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    WilburHooksHands said:

    SFGbob said:

    WilburHooksHands said:

    SFGbob said:

    YellowSnow said:

    SFGbob said:

    I'm not saying that kids shouldn't learn about Tubman or Susan B. Anthony as well as Jane Addams and Emma Goldman, my complaint is the amount of attention these historical figures are given in comparison to Jefferson, Adams, Roosevelt and Grant. Harriet Tubman, while an interesting historical figure who should definitely be studied is given far more attention than her historical importance warrants.

    I agree with you. It's just a minor distraction to me in the big scheme of things.
    I read my kids history books and it's so painfully obvious that they are written by leftists pushing an agenda. It's indoctrination not education and they start on them early.


    Move to the south, then you don't even have to worry about evolution.
    As that better or worse than being taught that gender is a choice and a social construct?
    Gender is entirely a social construct. Biological sex is not. Gender is a socially constructed set of norms and behaviors ascribed to the biological sexes. hth
    If you follow this reasoning through then their is no biological justification for transgenderism unless you are one of the rare individuals who isn't either a XY or XX chromosome.

    Which is counter to what is generally accepted that being trans has a biological component. "They are born that way. It's not a choice."

    I guess you are a TERF?

    Of course there's plenty of scientific evidence that there is a biological link between behavior and biological sex but that's why you have feminist activists shouting down biology professors in colleges. #marchforscience

    So which is it?
    You are talking about Transsexuality. Transgender and Transsexual are two different things. Transgender is when a person “keeps” their sexual biology and changes their appearance, behavior, etc otherwise. Transsexual is when somebody physically alters their sexual biology (genitals, hormones, etc). I dont know enough about the process, but I dont think anything is alterable at the chromosomal level.

    In that way, I dont think you can ever truly change your biological sex, and Ive never said otherwise. You can definitely change your gender because thats shit we made up. There are obviously some behavioral things driven by biology/hormones that define some behaviors, but those don’t cover all the bases like society and culture.

    A lot of the discussion goes off the rails when people don’t acknowledge sex and gender as two different things, which I don’t find that difficult conceptually.

    At this point I don’t believe there is an easily identifiable biological component to what makes someone want to change their sex or gender, it seems psychological (which still imo doesn't make it any more of a choice). If you want to get into the weeds, how does biology affect psychology (outside of hard wired hormonal behaviors)? I have no idea and I dont think anybody does at the level proof would require.


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,994 Founders Club
    Its abnormal behavior in the classic scientific definition of normal or abnormal behavior base on numbers but we don't want to hurt anyone's feelings so the party of science will pretend that its normal to want to cut your dick off

    And teach it in grade school

    Don't let me stop you. Its working out great
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter