Why are liberals such liars?

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

creepycoug said:

SFGbob said:

I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?

When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?

That I cannot answer.

And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.

I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.

We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.

I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.

See, he just lies.

Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.

Now answer how she's lying.

So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

creepycoug said:

SFGbob said:

I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?

When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?

That I cannot answer.

And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.

I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.

We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.

I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.

See, he just lies.

Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.

Now answer how she's lying.

So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.

Bob doesn't understand how you can get one part technically wrong and still be right in the actual point one is making.

So you were right about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it

So you can't answer how AOC is lying. Weird. Lil lyin Bob.

Why disappear Bob? It's an easy question and you have double and tripled down on the fact AOC lied. Post up how.

Asked and answered. Pathological lying pieces of shit who dodge questions from me don't get answers.

You have not answered how she lied. Read her tweet again. Lil lyin Bob.

Sorry, pathological lying pieces of shit who dodge questions from me don't get a response.

Only blob can simultaneously argue that he has answered and that he won't answer.

RaceBannon said:

2001400ex said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

creepycoug said:

SFGbob said:

I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?

When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?

That I cannot answer.

And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.

I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.

We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.

I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.

See, he just lies.

Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.

Now answer how she's lying.

So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

creepycoug said:

SFGbob said:

I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?

When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?

That I cannot answer.

And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.

I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.

We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.

I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.

See, he just lies.

Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.

Now answer how she's lying.

So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.

Bob doesn't understand how you can get one part technically wrong and still be right in the actual point one is making.

So you were right about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it

So you can't answer how AOC is lying. Weird. Lil lyin Bob.

Why disappear Bob? It's an easy question and you have double and tripled down on the fact AOC lied. Post up how.

Asked and answered. Pathological lying pieces of shit who dodge questions from me don't get answers.

You have not answered how she lied. Read her tweet again. Lil lyin Bob.

Sorry, pathological lying pieces of shit who dodge questions from me don't get a response.

Only blob can simultaneously argue that he has answered and that he won't answer.

Oh man I was going to let him do it a couple more times before I called him out. Lol

Yet he still won't answer how AOC lied. It's super simple and he has argued the whole time she has. But not explained what the actual lie is.

Yes he did

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

creepycoug said:

SFGbob said:

I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?

When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?

That I cannot answer.

And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.

I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.

We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.

I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.

See, he just lies.

Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.

Now answer how she's lying.

So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

creepycoug said:

SFGbob said:

I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?

When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?

That I cannot answer.

And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.

I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.

We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.

I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.

See, he just lies.

Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.

Now answer how she's lying.

So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.

Bob doesn't understand how you can get one part technically wrong and still be right in the actual point one is making.

So you were right about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it

So you can't answer how AOC is lying. Weird. Lil lyin Bob.

Why disappear Bob? It's an easy question and you have double and tripled down on the fact AOC lied. Post up how.

Asked and answered. Pathological lying pieces of shit who dodge questions from me don't get answers.

You have not answered how she lied. Read her tweet again. Lil lyin Bob.

Sorry, pathological lying pieces of shit who dodge questions from me don't get a response.

Only blob can simultaneously argue that he has answered and that he won't answer.

Would you care to help out your new ass munching pal on how AOC lied O'Keefed? It's the least you can do after all the sweet ass tonguing he has given to you.

Bendintheriver said:

And POOF(!) just like that Hondo and HHusky are gone!

RaceBannon said:

2001400ex said:

USMChawk said:

2001400ex said:

RaceBannon said:

2001400ex said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

creepycoug said:

SFGbob said:

I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?

When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?

That I cannot answer.

And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.

I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.

We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.

I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.

See, he just lies.

Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.

Now answer how she's lying.

So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

creepycoug said:

SFGbob said:

I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?

When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?

That I cannot answer.

And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.

I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.

We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.

I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.

See, he just lies.

Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.

Now answer how she's lying.

So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.

Bob doesn't understand how you can get one part technically wrong and still be right in the actual point one is making.

So you were right about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it

So you can't answer how AOC is lying. Weird. Lil lyin Bob.

Why disappear Bob? It's an easy question and you have double and tripled down on the fact AOC lied. Post up how.

Asked and answered. Pathological lying pieces of shit who dodge questions from me don't get answers.

You have not answered how she lied. Read her tweet again. Lil lyin Bob.

Sorry, pathological lying pieces of shit who dodge questions from me don't get a response.

Only blob can simultaneously argue that he has answered and that he won't answer.

Oh man I was going to let him do it a couple more times before I called him out. Lol

Yet he still won't answer how AOC lied. It's super simple and he has argued the whole time she has. But not explained what the actual lie is.

Yes he did

Where is the lie in these words?

Alabama lawmakers are making all abortions a felony punishable w jailtime,incl women victimized by rape+incest.

Of course, no added punishments for rapists.

It’s going to
@GovernorKayIvey
‘s desk. She will decide the future of women’s rights in Alabama.

Women who have abortions won’t be jailed and won’t receive felony charges.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.buzzfeednews.com/amphtml/janelytvynenko/alabama-abortion-ban-misinformation

Read her quote again. For comprehension this time. It doesn't say that "women will be punishable". The "including" language doesn't mean the women, it means the act of rape does not give an out for a punishable offense.

But I do applaud your effort to do what Bob is too much of a pussy to do himself.

Does anyone speak dumbshit liar and want to take a stab at this?

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

Bendintheriver said:

And POOF(!) just like that Hondo and HHusky are gone!

Not being a moron, O'Keefed already admitted AOC lied. Hondo because he is dumb as dog shit still can't figure it out.

Shocking that you can't read either. Lil lyin Bob.

"women will be punishable".

Yeah, few can read and write as well as you Hondo.

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

Bendintheriver said:

And POOF(!) just like that Hondo and HHusky are gone!

Not being a moron, O'Keefed already admitted AOC lied. Hondo because he is dumb as dog shit still can't figure it out.

Shocking that you can't read either. Lil lyin Bob.

"women will be punishable".

Yeah, few can read and write as well as you Hondo.

Well I just double checked Lil lyin Bob. Where did AOC say "women will be punishable"?

She didn't, you did you barely literate fucking moron.

So you lied. Thanks for admitting it.

I never claimed that was what she said. I just quoted a fucking moron who wrote it right after he tried to give me shit about not being able to read.

At least it finally admit you are lying and not AOC. Big step buddy.

No, I said you're a dumbfuck. I didn't lie about anything. I'm quoting you with the "women will be punishable" line, I'm not quoting AOC.

Immediately after you were trying and give me shit about not being able to read you pen some fucking gibberish like this: "women will be punishable" and demand that I quote AOC saying it. AOC isn't very bright but she isn't so fucking dumb that she sounds like you Hondo.