Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Why are liberals such liars?
Comments
-
Women who have abortions won’t be jailed and won’t receive felony charges.2001400ex said:
Where is the lie in these words?RaceBannon said:
Yes he did2001400ex said:
Oh man I was going to let him do it a couple more times before I called him out. LolHHusky said:
Only blob can simultaneously argue that he has answered and that he won't answer.SFGbob said:
Sorry, pathological lying pieces of shit who dodge questions from me don't get a response.2001400ex said:
You have not answered how she lied. Read her tweet again. Lil lyin Bob.SFGbob said:
Asked and answered. Pathological lying pieces of shit who dodge questions from me don't get answers.2001400ex said:
Why disappear Bob? It's an easy question and you have double and tripled down on the fact AOC lied. Post up how.2001400ex said:
So you can't answer how AOC is lying. Weird. Lil lyin Bob.SFGbob said:
So you were right about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it2001400ex said:SFGbob said:
So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.2001400ex said:
Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.SFGbob said:
See, he just lies.2001400ex said:
I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.SFGbob said:
I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.creepycoug said:SFGbob said:I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?
When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?
That I cannot answer.
And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.
We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.
Now answer how she's lying.
Bob doesn't understand how you can get one part technically wrong and still be right in the actual point one is making.SFGbob said:
So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.2001400ex said:
Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.SFGbob said:
See, he just lies.2001400ex said:
I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.SFGbob said:
I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.creepycoug said:SFGbob said:I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?
When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?
That I cannot answer.
And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.
We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.
Now answer how she's lying.
Yet he still won't answer how AOC lied. It's super simple and he has argued the whole time she has. But not explained what the actual lie is.
Alabama lawmakers are making all abortions a felony punishable w jailtime,incl women victimized by rape+incest.
Of course, no added punishments for rapists.
It’s going to
@GovernorKayIvey
‘s desk. She will decide the future of women’s rights in Alabama.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.buzzfeednews.com/amphtml/janelytvynenko/alabama-abortion-ban-misinformation -
And POOF(!) just like that Hondo and HHusky are gone!
-
Read her quote again. For comprehension this time. It doesn't say that "women will be punishable". The "including" language doesn't mean the women, it means the act of rape does not give an out for a punishable offense.USMChawk said:
Women who have abortions won’t be jailed and won’t receive felony charges.2001400ex said:
Where is the lie in these words?RaceBannon said:
Yes he did2001400ex said:
Oh man I was going to let him do it a couple more times before I called him out. LolHHusky said:
Only blob can simultaneously argue that he has answered and that he won't answer.SFGbob said:
Sorry, pathological lying pieces of shit who dodge questions from me don't get a response.2001400ex said:
You have not answered how she lied. Read her tweet again. Lil lyin Bob.SFGbob said:
Asked and answered. Pathological lying pieces of shit who dodge questions from me don't get answers.2001400ex said:
Why disappear Bob? It's an easy question and you have double and tripled down on the fact AOC lied. Post up how.2001400ex said:
So you can't answer how AOC is lying. Weird. Lil lyin Bob.SFGbob said:
So you were right about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it2001400ex said:SFGbob said:
So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.2001400ex said:
Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.SFGbob said:
See, he just lies.2001400ex said:
I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.SFGbob said:
I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.creepycoug said:SFGbob said:I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?
When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?
That I cannot answer.
And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.
We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.
Now answer how she's lying.
Bob doesn't understand how you can get one part technically wrong and still be right in the actual point one is making.SFGbob said:
So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.2001400ex said:
Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.SFGbob said:
See, he just lies.2001400ex said:
I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.SFGbob said:
I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.creepycoug said:SFGbob said:I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?
When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?
That I cannot answer.
And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.
We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.
Now answer how she's lying.
Yet he still won't answer how AOC lied. It's super simple and he has argued the whole time she has. But not explained what the actual lie is.
Alabama lawmakers are making all abortions a felony punishable w jailtime,incl women victimized by rape+incest.
Of course, no added punishments for rapists.
It’s going to
@GovernorKayIvey
‘s desk. She will decide the future of women’s rights in Alabama.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.buzzfeednews.com/amphtml/janelytvynenko/alabama-abortion-ban-misinformation
But I do applaud your effort to do what Bob is too much of a pussy to do himself. -
Bendintheriver said:
And POOF(!) just like that Hondo and HHusky are gone!
Hi there! -
Does anyone speak dumbshit liar and want to take a stab at this?2001400ex said:
Read her quote again. For comprehension this time. It doesn't say that "women will be punishable". The "including" language doesn't mean the women, it means the act of rape does not give an out for a punishable offense.USMChawk said:
Women who have abortions won’t be jailed and won’t receive felony charges.2001400ex said:
Where is the lie in these words?RaceBannon said:
Yes he did2001400ex said:
Oh man I was going to let him do it a couple more times before I called him out. LolHHusky said:
Only blob can simultaneously argue that he has answered and that he won't answer.SFGbob said:
Sorry, pathological lying pieces of shit who dodge questions from me don't get a response.2001400ex said:
You have not answered how she lied. Read her tweet again. Lil lyin Bob.SFGbob said:
Asked and answered. Pathological lying pieces of shit who dodge questions from me don't get answers.2001400ex said:
Why disappear Bob? It's an easy question and you have double and tripled down on the fact AOC lied. Post up how.2001400ex said:
So you can't answer how AOC is lying. Weird. Lil lyin Bob.SFGbob said:
So you were right about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it2001400ex said:SFGbob said:
So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.2001400ex said:
Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.SFGbob said:
See, he just lies.2001400ex said:
I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.SFGbob said:
I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.creepycoug said:SFGbob said:I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?
When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?
That I cannot answer.
And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.
We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.
Now answer how she's lying.
Bob doesn't understand how you can get one part technically wrong and still be right in the actual point one is making.SFGbob said:
So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.2001400ex said:
Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.SFGbob said:
See, he just lies.2001400ex said:
I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.SFGbob said:
I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.creepycoug said:SFGbob said:I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?
When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?
That I cannot answer.
And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.
We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.
Now answer how she's lying.
Yet he still won't answer how AOC lied. It's super simple and he has argued the whole time she has. But not explained what the actual lie is.
Alabama lawmakers are making all abortions a felony punishable w jailtime,incl women victimized by rape+incest.
Of course, no added punishments for rapists.
It’s going to
@GovernorKayIvey
‘s desk. She will decide the future of women’s rights in Alabama.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.buzzfeednews.com/amphtml/janelytvynenko/alabama-abortion-ban-misinformation
But I do applaud your effort to do what Bob is too much of a pussy to do himself. -
Why am I not surprised that you don't understand?RaceBannon said:
Does anyone speak dumbshit liar and want to take a stab at this?2001400ex said:
Read her quote again. For comprehension this time. It doesn't say that "women will be punishable". The "including" language doesn't mean the women, it means the act of rape does not give an out for a punishable offense.USMChawk said:
Women who have abortions won’t be jailed and won’t receive felony charges.2001400ex said:
Where is the lie in these words?RaceBannon said:
Yes he did2001400ex said:
Oh man I was going to let him do it a couple more times before I called him out. LolHHusky said:
Only blob can simultaneously argue that he has answered and that he won't answer.SFGbob said:
Sorry, pathological lying pieces of shit who dodge questions from me don't get a response.2001400ex said:
You have not answered how she lied. Read her tweet again. Lil lyin Bob.SFGbob said:
Asked and answered. Pathological lying pieces of shit who dodge questions from me don't get answers.2001400ex said:
Why disappear Bob? It's an easy question and you have double and tripled down on the fact AOC lied. Post up how.2001400ex said:
So you can't answer how AOC is lying. Weird. Lil lyin Bob.SFGbob said:
So you were right about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it2001400ex said:SFGbob said:
So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.2001400ex said:
Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.SFGbob said:
See, he just lies.2001400ex said:
I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.SFGbob said:
I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.creepycoug said:SFGbob said:I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?
When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?
That I cannot answer.
And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.
We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.
Now answer how she's lying.
Bob doesn't understand how you can get one part technically wrong and still be right in the actual point one is making.SFGbob said:
So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.2001400ex said:
Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.SFGbob said:
See, he just lies.2001400ex said:
I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.SFGbob said:
I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.creepycoug said:SFGbob said:I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?
When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?
That I cannot answer.
And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.
We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.
Now answer how she's lying.
Yet he still won't answer how AOC lied. It's super simple and he has argued the whole time she has. But not explained what the actual lie is.
Alabama lawmakers are making all abortions a felony punishable w jailtime,incl women victimized by rape+incest.
Of course, no added punishments for rapists.
It’s going to
@GovernorKayIvey
‘s desk. She will decide the future of women’s rights in Alabama.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.buzzfeednews.com/amphtml/janelytvynenko/alabama-abortion-ban-misinformation
But I do applaud your effort to do what Bob is too much of a pussy to do himself. -
Not being a moron, O'Keefed already admitted AOC lied. Hondo because he is dumb as dog shit still can't figure it out.Bendintheriver said:And POOF(!) just like that Hondo and HHusky are gone!
-
Understand your stupid as fuck attempt to deny what she said in plain English? Nope I don't2001400ex said:
Why am I not surprised that you don't understand?RaceBannon said:
Does anyone speak dumbshit liar and want to take a stab at this?2001400ex said:
Read her quote again. For comprehension this time. It doesn't say that "women will be punishable". The "including" language doesn't mean the women, it means the act of rape does not give an out for a punishable offense.USMChawk said:
Women who have abortions won’t be jailed and won’t receive felony charges.2001400ex said:
Where is the lie in these words?RaceBannon said:
Yes he did2001400ex said:
Oh man I was going to let him do it a couple more times before I called him out. LolHHusky said:
Only blob can simultaneously argue that he has answered and that he won't answer.SFGbob said:
Sorry, pathological lying pieces of shit who dodge questions from me don't get a response.2001400ex said:
You have not answered how she lied. Read her tweet again. Lil lyin Bob.SFGbob said:
Asked and answered. Pathological lying pieces of shit who dodge questions from me don't get answers.2001400ex said:
Why disappear Bob? It's an easy question and you have double and tripled down on the fact AOC lied. Post up how.2001400ex said:
So you can't answer how AOC is lying. Weird. Lil lyin Bob.SFGbob said:
So you were right about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it2001400ex said:SFGbob said:
So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.2001400ex said:
Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.SFGbob said:
See, he just lies.2001400ex said:
I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.SFGbob said:
I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.creepycoug said:SFGbob said:I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?
When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?
That I cannot answer.
And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.
We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.
Now answer how she's lying.
Bob doesn't understand how you can get one part technically wrong and still be right in the actual point one is making.SFGbob said:
So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.2001400ex said:
Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.SFGbob said:
See, he just lies.2001400ex said:
I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.SFGbob said:
I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.creepycoug said:SFGbob said:I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?
When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?
That I cannot answer.
And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.
We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.
Now answer how she's lying.
Yet he still won't answer how AOC lied. It's super simple and he has argued the whole time she has. But not explained what the actual lie is.
Alabama lawmakers are making all abortions a felony punishable w jailtime,incl women victimized by rape+incest.
Of course, no added punishments for rapists.
It’s going to
@GovernorKayIvey
‘s desk. She will decide the future of women’s rights in Alabama.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.buzzfeednews.com/amphtml/janelytvynenko/alabama-abortion-ban-misinformation
But I do applaud your effort to do what Bob is too much of a pussy to do himself. -
Shocking that you can't read either. Lil lyin Bob.SFGbob said:
Not being a moron, O'Keefed already admitted AOC lied. Hondo because he is dumb as dog shit still can't figure it out.Bendintheriver said:And POOF(!) just like that Hondo and HHusky are gone!
-
"women will be punishable".2001400ex said:
Shocking that you can't read either. Lil lyin Bob.SFGbob said:
Not being a moron, O'Keefed already admitted AOC lied. Hondo because he is dumb as dog shit still can't figure it out.Bendintheriver said:And POOF(!) just like that Hondo and HHusky are gone!
Yeah, few can read and write as well as you Hondo.
