Why are liberals such liars?

2001400ex

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

creepycoug said:

SFGbob said:

I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?

When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?

That I cannot answer.

And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.

I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.

We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.

I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.

See, he just lies.

Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.

Now answer how she's lying.

So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

creepycoug said:

SFGbob said:

I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?

When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?

That I cannot answer.

And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.

I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.

We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.

I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.

See, he just lies.

Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.

Now answer how she's lying.

So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.

Bob doesn't understand how you can get one part technically wrong and still be right in the actual point one is making.

So you were right about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it

So you can't answer how AOC is lying. Weird. Lil lyin Bob.

Why disappear Bob? It's an easy question and you have double and tripled down on the fact AOC lied. Post up how.

SFGbob

2001400ex said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

creepycoug said:

SFGbob said:

I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?

When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?

That I cannot answer.

And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.

I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.

We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.

I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.

See, he just lies.

Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.

Now answer how she's lying.

So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

creepycoug said:

SFGbob said:

I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?

When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?

That I cannot answer.

And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.

I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.

We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.

I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.

See, he just lies.

Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.

Now answer how she's lying.

So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.

Bob doesn't understand how you can get one part technically wrong and still be right in the actual point one is making.

So you were right about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it

So you can't answer how AOC is lying. Weird. Lil lyin Bob.

Why disappear Bob? It's an easy question and you have double and tripled down on the fact AOC lied. Post up how.

Asked and answered. Pathological lying pieces of shit who dodge questions from me don't get answers.

2001400ex

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

creepycoug said:

SFGbob said:

I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?

When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?

That I cannot answer.

And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.

I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.

We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.

I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.

See, he just lies.

Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.

Now answer how she's lying.

So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

creepycoug said:

SFGbob said:

I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?

When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?

That I cannot answer.

And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.

I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.

We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.

I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.

See, he just lies.

Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.

Now answer how she's lying.

So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.

Bob doesn't understand how you can get one part technically wrong and still be right in the actual point one is making.

So you were right about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it

So you can't answer how AOC is lying. Weird. Lil lyin Bob.

Why disappear Bob? It's an easy question and you have double and tripled down on the fact AOC lied. Post up how.

Asked and answered. Pathological lying pieces of shit who dodge questions from me don't get answers.

You have not answered how she lied. Read her tweet again. Lil lyin Bob.

SFGbob

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

creepycoug said:

SFGbob said:

I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?

When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?

That I cannot answer.

And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.

I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.

We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.

I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.

See, he just lies.

Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.

Now answer how she's lying.

So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

creepycoug said:

SFGbob said:

I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?

When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?

That I cannot answer.

And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.

I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.

We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.

I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.

See, he just lies.

Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.

Now answer how she's lying.

So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.

Bob doesn't understand how you can get one part technically wrong and still be right in the actual point one is making.

So you were right about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it

So you can't answer how AOC is lying. Weird. Lil lyin Bob.

Why disappear Bob? It's an easy question and you have double and tripled down on the fact AOC lied. Post up how.

Asked and answered. Pathological lying pieces of shit who dodge questions from me don't get answers.

You have not answered how she lied. Read her tweet again. Lil lyin Bob.

Sorry, pathological lying pieces of shit who dodge questions from me don't get a response.

HHusky

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

creepycoug said:

SFGbob said:

I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?

When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?

That I cannot answer.

And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.

I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.

We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.

I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.

See, he just lies.

Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.

Now answer how she's lying.

So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

creepycoug said:

SFGbob said:

I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?

When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?

That I cannot answer.

And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.

I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.

We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.

I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.

See, he just lies.

Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.

Now answer how she's lying.

So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.

Bob doesn't understand how you can get one part technically wrong and still be right in the actual point one is making.

So you were right about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it

So you can't answer how AOC is lying. Weird. Lil lyin Bob.

Why disappear Bob? It's an easy question and you have double and tripled down on the fact AOC lied. Post up how.

Asked and answered. Pathological lying pieces of shit who dodge questions from me don't get answers.

You have not answered how she lied. Read her tweet again. Lil lyin Bob.

Sorry, pathological lying pieces of shit who dodge questions from me don't get a response.

Only blob can simultaneously argue that he has answered and that he won't answer.

2001400ex

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

creepycoug said:

SFGbob said:

I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?

When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?

That I cannot answer.

And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.

I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.

We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.

I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.

See, he just lies.

Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.

Now answer how she's lying.

So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

creepycoug said:

SFGbob said:

I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?

When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?

That I cannot answer.

And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.

I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.

We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.

I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.

See, he just lies.

Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.

Now answer how she's lying.

So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.

Bob doesn't understand how you can get one part technically wrong and still be right in the actual point one is making.

So you were right about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it

So you can't answer how AOC is lying. Weird. Lil lyin Bob.

Why disappear Bob? It's an easy question and you have double and tripled down on the fact AOC lied. Post up how.

Asked and answered. Pathological lying pieces of shit who dodge questions from me don't get answers.

You have not answered how she lied. Read her tweet again. Lil lyin Bob.

Sorry, pathological lying pieces of shit who dodge questions from me don't get a response.

Only blob can simultaneously argue that he has answered and that he won't answer.

Oh man I was going to let him do it a couple more times before I called him out. Lol

Yet he still won't answer how AOC lied. It's super simple and he has argued the whole time she has. But not explained what the actual lie is.

RaceBannon

2001400ex said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

creepycoug said:

SFGbob said:

I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?

When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?

That I cannot answer.

And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.

I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.

We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.

I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.

See, he just lies.

Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.

Now answer how she's lying.

So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

creepycoug said:

SFGbob said:

I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?

When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?

That I cannot answer.

And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.

I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.

We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.

I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.

See, he just lies.

Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.

Now answer how she's lying.

So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.

Bob doesn't understand how you can get one part technically wrong and still be right in the actual point one is making.

So you were right about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it

So you can't answer how AOC is lying. Weird. Lil lyin Bob.

Why disappear Bob? It's an easy question and you have double and tripled down on the fact AOC lied. Post up how.

Asked and answered. Pathological lying pieces of shit who dodge questions from me don't get answers.

You have not answered how she lied. Read her tweet again. Lil lyin Bob.

Sorry, pathological lying pieces of shit who dodge questions from me don't get a response.

Only blob can simultaneously argue that he has answered and that he won't answer.

Oh man I was going to let him do it a couple more times before I called him out. Lol

Yet he still won't answer how AOC lied. It's super simple and he has argued the whole time she has. But not explained what the actual lie is.

Yes he did

2001400ex

RaceBannon said:

2001400ex said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

creepycoug said:

SFGbob said:

I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?

When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?

That I cannot answer.

And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.

I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.

We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.

I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.

See, he just lies.

Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.

Now answer how she's lying.

So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

creepycoug said:

SFGbob said:

I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?

When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?

That I cannot answer.

And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.

I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.

We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.

I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.

See, he just lies.

Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.

Now answer how she's lying.

So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.

Bob doesn't understand how you can get one part technically wrong and still be right in the actual point one is making.

So you were right about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it

So you can't answer how AOC is lying. Weird. Lil lyin Bob.

Why disappear Bob? It's an easy question and you have double and tripled down on the fact AOC lied. Post up how.

Asked and answered. Pathological lying pieces of shit who dodge questions from me don't get answers.

You have not answered how she lied. Read her tweet again. Lil lyin Bob.

Sorry, pathological lying pieces of shit who dodge questions from me don't get a response.

Only blob can simultaneously argue that he has answered and that he won't answer.

Oh man I was going to let him do it a couple more times before I called him out. Lol

Yet he still won't answer how AOC lied. It's super simple and he has argued the whole time she has. But not explained what the actual lie is.

Yes he did

Where is the lie in these words?

Alabama lawmakers are making all abortions a felony punishable w jailtime,incl women victimized by rape+incest.

Of course, no added punishments for rapists.

It’s going to
@GovernorKayIvey
‘s desk. She will decide the future of women’s rights in Alabama.

SFGbob

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

creepycoug said:

SFGbob said:

I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?

When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?

That I cannot answer.

And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.

I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.

We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.

I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.

See, he just lies.

Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.

Now answer how she's lying.

So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

creepycoug said:

SFGbob said:

I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?

When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?

That I cannot answer.

And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.

I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.

We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.

I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.

See, he just lies.

Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.

Now answer how she's lying.

So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.

Bob doesn't understand how you can get one part technically wrong and still be right in the actual point one is making.

So you were right about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it

So you can't answer how AOC is lying. Weird. Lil lyin Bob.

Why disappear Bob? It's an easy question and you have double and tripled down on the fact AOC lied. Post up how.

Asked and answered. Pathological lying pieces of shit who dodge questions from me don't get answers.

You have not answered how she lied. Read her tweet again. Lil lyin Bob.

Sorry, pathological lying pieces of shit who dodge questions from me don't get a response.

Only blob can simultaneously argue that he has answered and that he won't answer.

Would you care to help out your new ass munching pal on how AOC lied O'Keefed? It's the least you can do after all the sweet ass tonguing he has given to you.

2001400ex

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

creepycoug said:

SFGbob said:

I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?

When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?

That I cannot answer.

And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.

I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.

We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.

I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.

See, he just lies.

Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.

Now answer how she's lying.

So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

2001400ex said:

SFGbob said:

creepycoug said:

SFGbob said:

I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?

When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?

That I cannot answer.

And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.

I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.

We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.

I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.

See, he just lies.

Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.

Now answer how she's lying.

So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.

Bob doesn't understand how you can get one part technically wrong and still be right in the actual point one is making.

So you were right about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it

So you can't answer how AOC is lying. Weird. Lil lyin Bob.

Why disappear Bob? It's an easy question and you have double and tripled down on the fact AOC lied. Post up how.

Asked and answered. Pathological lying pieces of shit who dodge questions from me don't get answers.

You have not answered how she lied. Read her tweet again. Lil lyin Bob.

Sorry, pathological lying pieces of shit who dodge questions from me don't get a response.

Only blob can simultaneously argue that he has answered and that he won't answer.

Would you care to help out your new ass munching pal on how AOC lied O'Keefed? It's the least you can do after all the sweet ass tonguing he has given to you.

Use your words. Tell me how her words are a lie.