Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Why are liberals such liars?

24

Comments

  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    Even the Planned Parenthood representative is calling you a liar O'Keefed.

    Planned Parenthood’s Staci Fox told The Post on Friday.

    HB 481 could not be used to successfully prosecute women, she argued. But if a woman had a miscarriage, she could be pulled into an investigation looking at whether someone performed an illegal abortion on her.

    Lil lyin Bob. Where is the lie in AOCs tweet?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,904
    SFGbob said:

    Even the Planned Parenthood representative is calling you a liar O'Keefed.

    Planned Parenthood’s Staci Fox told The Post on Friday.

    HB 481 could not be used to successfully prosecute women, she argued. But if a woman had a miscarriage, she could be pulled into an investigation looking at whether someone performed an illegal abortion on her.

    I read the bill. You and a Planned Parenthood rep may agree, but my question stands and you don’t appear to have an explanation for the presence of the affirmative defense. Maybe you can ask Planned Parenthood.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    Even the Planned Parenthood representative is calling you a liar O'Keefed.

    Planned Parenthood’s Staci Fox told The Post on Friday.

    HB 481 could not be used to successfully prosecute women, she argued. But if a woman had a miscarriage, she could be pulled into an investigation looking at whether someone performed an illegal abortion on her.

    Lil lyin Bob. Where is the lie in AOCs tweet?
    Maybe you can get O'Keefed to help you out, even he knows AOC was lying.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Even the Planned Parenthood representative is calling you a liar O'Keefed.

    Planned Parenthood’s Staci Fox told The Post on Friday.

    HB 481 could not be used to successfully prosecute women, she argued. But if a woman had a miscarriage, she could be pulled into an investigation looking at whether someone performed an illegal abortion on her.

    I read the bill. You and a Planned Parenthood rep may agree, but my question stands and you don’t appear to have an explanation for the presence of the affirmative defense. Maybe you can ask Planned Parenthood.
    Okay, you read it and you still lied about it.

    Georgia wants to prosecute women who return to the state having had an abortion
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    Even the Planned Parenthood representative is calling you a liar O'Keefed.

    Planned Parenthood’s Staci Fox told The Post on Friday.

    HB 481 could not be used to successfully prosecute women, she argued. But if a woman had a miscarriage, she could be pulled into an investigation looking at whether someone performed an illegal abortion on her.

    Lil lyin Bob. Where is the lie in AOCs tweet?
    Maybe you can get O'Keefed to help you out, even he knows AOC was lying.
    Then explain it Bob. Why are you ignoring the question?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    edited May 2019
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    Even the Planned Parenthood representative is calling you a liar O'Keefed.

    Planned Parenthood’s Staci Fox told The Post on Friday.

    HB 481 could not be used to successfully prosecute women, she argued. But if a woman had a miscarriage, she could be pulled into an investigation looking at whether someone performed an illegal abortion on her.

    Lil lyin Bob. Where is the lie in AOCs tweet?
    Maybe you can get O'Keefed to help you out, even he knows AOC was lying.
    Then explain it Bob. Why are you ignoring the question?
    Because you're a worthless piece of shit and obviously a fucking moron. Explaining to you why what she said is a lie is a waste of time. You're either too stupid to understand or too dishonest to admit it so why bother?

    Ask O'Keefed to explain it to you, all of that ass tonguing you've done for him may have bought you a favor.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    Even the Planned Parenthood representative is calling you a liar O'Keefed.

    Planned Parenthood’s Staci Fox told The Post on Friday.

    HB 481 could not be used to successfully prosecute women, she argued. But if a woman had a miscarriage, she could be pulled into an investigation looking at whether someone performed an illegal abortion on her.

    Lil lyin Bob. Where is the lie in AOCs tweet?
    Maybe you can get O'Keefed to help you out, even he knows AOC was lying.
    Then explain it Bob. Why are you ignoring the question?
    Because you're a worthless piece of shit and obviously a fucking moron. Explaining to you why what she said is a lie is a waste of time. You're either too stupid to understand or too dishonest to admit it so why bother?

    Ask O'Keefed to explain it to you, all of that ass tonguing you've done for him may have bought you a favor.
    So you can't explain it Lil lyin Bob.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,047
    edited May 2019
    SFGbob said:

    O'Keefed was pushing this same lie yesterday. When presented with evidence that he was wrong he did the same thing AOC ended up doing.


    Here's a question: what does it matter?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    creepycoug said:

    SFGbob said:

    O'Keefed was pushing this same lie yesterday. When presented with evidence that he was wrong he did the same thing AOC ended up doing.


    Here's a question: what does it matter?
    That liberals are liars?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,047
    edited May 2019
    SFGbob said:

    creepycoug said:

    SFGbob said:

    O'Keefed was pushing this same lie yesterday. When presented with evidence that he was wrong he did the same thing AOC ended up doing.


    Here's a question: what does it matter?
    That liberals are liars?
    No. That the bill in Alabama doesn't make it a crime for a woman to receive an abortion, but criminalizes the doctor performing it.

    If there are no MDs willing to do it (and I suspect there won't be), then abortion is effectively not available w/o a back-alley helper.

    So who cares? Who cares that some guy on this board who you don't know got that wrong? That and crazy AOC's rhetoric translates to liberals lie? OK!

    It just doesn't seem that interesting from where I sit, give what the bill does do. But please, don't let me interrupt your flow.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    creepycoug said:

    SFGbob said:

    O'Keefed was pushing this same lie yesterday. When presented with evidence that he was wrong he did the same thing AOC ended up doing.


    Here's a question: what does it matter?
    That liberals are liars?
    How Bob. Explain how that tweet is a lie in your words.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

    Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

    Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?

    Three pages in and you are unwilling to answer the most basic question Bob. What are you afraid of?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    Kunt's that dodge questions from me don't get answers Hondo.

    Get O'Keefed to tell you why she is a liar.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    Kunt's that dodge questions from me don't get answers Hondo.

    Get O'Keefed to tell you why she is a liar.

    You are the one dodging. I have never once dodged a question from you. They being said, what are you afraid of? Pussy. Answer the question. It's simple. Probably can be done in one sentence.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,047
    SFGbob said:

    I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

    Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?


    When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?

    That I cannot answer.

    And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

    I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    creepycoug said:

    SFGbob said:

    I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

    Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?


    When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?

    That I cannot answer.

    And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

    I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.
    I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.

    We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    creepycoug said:

    SFGbob said:

    I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

    Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?


    When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?

    That I cannot answer.

    And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

    I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.
    I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.

    We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.
    I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot. That being said, how do it explain Houston "revenues did go up"? After being shown the facts. Time after Time.

    Now answer how what AOC said is a lie.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    edited May 2019
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    creepycoug said:

    SFGbob said:

    I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

    Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?


    When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?

    That I cannot answer.

    And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

    I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.
    I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.

    We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.
    I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.
    See, he just lies.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    creepycoug said:

    SFGbob said:

    I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

    Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?


    When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?

    That I cannot answer.

    And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

    I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.
    I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.

    We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.
    I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.
    See, he just lies.
    Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.

    Now answer how she's lying.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    creepycoug said:

    SFGbob said:

    I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

    Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?


    When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?

    That I cannot answer.

    And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

    I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.
    I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.

    We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.
    I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.
    See, he just lies.
    Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.

    Now answer how she's lying.
    So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    edited May 2019
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    creepycoug said:

    SFGbob said:

    I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

    Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?


    When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?

    That I cannot answer.

    And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

    I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.
    I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.

    We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.
    I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.
    See, he just lies.
    Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.

    Now answer how she's lying.
    So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    creepycoug said:

    SFGbob said:

    I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

    Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?


    When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?

    That I cannot answer.

    And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

    I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.
    I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.

    We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.
    I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.
    See, he just lies.
    Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.

    Now answer how she's lying.
    So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.
    Bob doesn't understand how you can get one part technically wrong and still be right in the actual point one is making.

    How answer how she is lying. Lil lyin Bob.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,041 Standard Supporter
    RaceBannon said:

    The money is still on this going through courts back to the Supremes who will uphold Roe.

    I'm of the opinion that this can hurt GOP candidates including Trump. Britt Hume thinks the 60 million abortions since Roe are not what people had in mind. We've gone from safe, legal, and rare to birth control.

    LIPO.

    I wonder how those pussy hat wearing “shout your abortion” radical feminists are feeling right about now.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    creepycoug said:

    SFGbob said:

    I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

    Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?


    When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?

    That I cannot answer.

    And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

    I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.
    I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.

    We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.
    I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.
    See, he just lies.
    Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.

    Now answer how she's lying.
    So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    creepycoug said:

    SFGbob said:

    I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

    Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?


    When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?

    That I cannot answer.

    And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

    I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.
    I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.

    We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.
    I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.
    See, he just lies.
    Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.

    Now answer how she's lying.
    So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.
    Bob doesn't understand how you can get one part technically wrong and still be right in the actual point one is making.
    So you were right about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    creepycoug said:

    SFGbob said:

    I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

    Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?


    When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?

    That I cannot answer.

    And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

    I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.
    I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.

    We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.
    I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.
    See, he just lies.
    Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.

    Now answer how she's lying.
    So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    creepycoug said:

    SFGbob said:

    I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

    Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?


    When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?

    That I cannot answer.

    And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

    I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.
    I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.

    We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.
    I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.
    See, he just lies.
    Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.

    Now answer how she's lying.
    So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.
    Bob doesn't understand how you can get one part technically wrong and still be right in the actual point one is making.
    So you were right about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it
    Do you can't answer how AOC is lying. Weird. Lil lyin Bob.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,789 Standard Supporter
    I'm a conservative and you all know exactly where I stand on abortion.

    As I have said many times I am for retroactive abortions and I am the lone decider of who it applies to.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • UWhuskytskeet
    UWhuskytskeet Member Posts: 7,113
    Sledog said:

    I'm a conservative and you all know exactly where I stand on abortion.

    As I have said many times I am for retroactive abortions and I am the lone decider of who it applies to.

    Yourself?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    edited May 2019
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    creepycoug said:

    SFGbob said:

    I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

    Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?


    When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?

    That I cannot answer.

    And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

    I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.
    I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.

    We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.
    I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.
    See, he just lies.
    Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.

    Now answer how she's lying.
    So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    creepycoug said:

    SFGbob said:

    I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

    Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?


    When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?

    That I cannot answer.

    And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?

    I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.
    I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.

    We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.
    I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.
    See, he just lies.
    Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.

    Now answer how she's lying.
    So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.
    Bob doesn't understand how you can get one part technically wrong and still be right in the actual point one is making.
    So you were right about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it
    So you can't answer how AOC is lying. Weird. Lil lyin Bob.
    Bump for Bob.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,662
    I don't get the argument against abortions

    I don't want these ghetto fags raising ugly girls and criminal sons

    Abort that shit
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,047
    Pitchfork51 said:

    I don't get the argument against abortions

    I don't want these ghetto fags raising ugly girls and criminal sons

    Abort that shit

    I nominate @Pitchfork51 for SCOTUS.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter