Why are liberals such liars?
Comments
-
Lil lyin Bob. Where is the lie in AOCs tweet?SFGbob said:Even the Planned Parenthood representative is calling you a liar O'Keefed.
Planned Parenthood’s Staci Fox told The Post on Friday.
HB 481 could not be used to successfully prosecute women, she argued. But if a woman had a miscarriage, she could be pulled into an investigation looking at whether someone performed an illegal abortion on her. -
I read the bill. You and a Planned Parenthood rep may agree, but my question stands and you don’t appear to have an explanation for the presence of the affirmative defense. Maybe you can ask Planned Parenthood.SFGbob said:Even the Planned Parenthood representative is calling you a liar O'Keefed.
Planned Parenthood’s Staci Fox told The Post on Friday.
HB 481 could not be used to successfully prosecute women, she argued. But if a woman had a miscarriage, she could be pulled into an investigation looking at whether someone performed an illegal abortion on her. -
Maybe you can get O'Keefed to help you out, even he knows AOC was lying.2001400ex said:
Lil lyin Bob. Where is the lie in AOCs tweet?SFGbob said:Even the Planned Parenthood representative is calling you a liar O'Keefed.
Planned Parenthood’s Staci Fox told The Post on Friday.
HB 481 could not be used to successfully prosecute women, she argued. But if a woman had a miscarriage, she could be pulled into an investigation looking at whether someone performed an illegal abortion on her. -
Okay, you read it and you still lied about it.HHusky said:
I read the bill. You and a Planned Parenthood rep may agree, but my question stands and you don’t appear to have an explanation for the presence of the affirmative defense. Maybe you can ask Planned Parenthood.SFGbob said:Even the Planned Parenthood representative is calling you a liar O'Keefed.
Planned Parenthood’s Staci Fox told The Post on Friday.
HB 481 could not be used to successfully prosecute women, she argued. But if a woman had a miscarriage, she could be pulled into an investigation looking at whether someone performed an illegal abortion on her.
Georgia wants to prosecute women who return to the state having had an abortion -
Then explain it Bob. Why are you ignoring the question?SFGbob said:
Maybe you can get O'Keefed to help you out, even he knows AOC was lying.2001400ex said:
Lil lyin Bob. Where is the lie in AOCs tweet?SFGbob said:Even the Planned Parenthood representative is calling you a liar O'Keefed.
Planned Parenthood’s Staci Fox told The Post on Friday.
HB 481 could not be used to successfully prosecute women, she argued. But if a woman had a miscarriage, she could be pulled into an investigation looking at whether someone performed an illegal abortion on her. -
Because you're a worthless piece of shit and obviously a fucking moron. Explaining to you why what she said is a lie is a waste of time. You're either too stupid to understand or too dishonest to admit it so why bother?2001400ex said:
Then explain it Bob. Why are you ignoring the question?SFGbob said:
Maybe you can get O'Keefed to help you out, even he knows AOC was lying.2001400ex said:
Lil lyin Bob. Where is the lie in AOCs tweet?SFGbob said:Even the Planned Parenthood representative is calling you a liar O'Keefed.
Planned Parenthood’s Staci Fox told The Post on Friday.
HB 481 could not be used to successfully prosecute women, she argued. But if a woman had a miscarriage, she could be pulled into an investigation looking at whether someone performed an illegal abortion on her.
Ask O'Keefed to explain it to you, all of that ass tonguing you've done for him may have bought you a favor. -
So you can't explain it Lil lyin Bob.SFGbob said:
Because you're a worthless piece of shit and obviously a fucking moron. Explaining to you why what she said is a lie is a waste of time. You're either too stupid to understand or too dishonest to admit it so why bother?2001400ex said:
Then explain it Bob. Why are you ignoring the question?SFGbob said:
Maybe you can get O'Keefed to help you out, even he knows AOC was lying.2001400ex said:
Lil lyin Bob. Where is the lie in AOCs tweet?SFGbob said:Even the Planned Parenthood representative is calling you a liar O'Keefed.
Planned Parenthood’s Staci Fox told The Post on Friday.
HB 481 could not be used to successfully prosecute women, she argued. But if a woman had a miscarriage, she could be pulled into an investigation looking at whether someone performed an illegal abortion on her.
Ask O'Keefed to explain it to you, all of that ass tonguing you've done for him may have bought you a favor. -
Here's a question: what does it matter?SFGbob said:O'Keefed was pushing this same lie yesterday. When presented with evidence that he was wrong he did the same thing AOC ended up doing.
-
That liberals are liars?creepycoug said:
Here's a question: what does it matter?SFGbob said:O'Keefed was pushing this same lie yesterday. When presented with evidence that he was wrong he did the same thing AOC ended up doing.
-
No. That the bill in Alabama doesn't make it a crime for a woman to receive an abortion, but criminalizes the doctor performing it.SFGbob said:
That liberals are liars?creepycoug said:
Here's a question: what does it matter?SFGbob said:O'Keefed was pushing this same lie yesterday. When presented with evidence that he was wrong he did the same thing AOC ended up doing.
If there are no MDs willing to do it (and I suspect there won't be), then abortion is effectively not available w/o a back-alley helper.
So who cares? Who cares that some guy on this board who you don't know got that wrong? That and crazy AOC's rhetoric translates to liberals lie? OK!
It just doesn't seem that interesting from where I sit, give what the bill does do. But please, don't let me interrupt your flow. -
How Bob. Explain how that tweet is a lie in your words.SFGbob said:
That liberals are liars?creepycoug said:
Here's a question: what does it matter?SFGbob said:O'Keefed was pushing this same lie yesterday. When presented with evidence that he was wrong he did the same thing AOC ended up doing.
-
I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject? -
Three pages in and you are unwilling to answer the most basic question Bob. What are you afraid of?SFGbob said:I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject? -
Kunt's that dodge questions from me don't get answers Hondo.
Get O'Keefed to tell you why she is a liar. -
You are the one dodging. I have never once dodged a question from you. They being said, what are you afraid of? Pussy. Answer the question. It's simple. Probably can be done in one sentence.SFGbob said:Kunt's that dodge questions from me don't get answers Hondo.
Get O'Keefed to tell you why she is a liar. -
SFGbob said:
I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?
When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?
That I cannot answer.
And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway. -
I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.creepycoug said:SFGbob said:I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?
When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?
That I cannot answer.
And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.
We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it. -
I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot. That being said, how do it explain Houston "revenues did go up"? After being shown the facts. Time after Time.SFGbob said:
I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.creepycoug said:SFGbob said:I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?
When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?
That I cannot answer.
And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.
We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.
Now answer how what AOC said is a lie. -
See, he just lies.2001400ex said:
I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.SFGbob said:
I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.creepycoug said:SFGbob said:I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?
When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?
That I cannot answer.
And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.
We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it. -
Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.SFGbob said:
See, he just lies.2001400ex said:
I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.SFGbob said:
I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.creepycoug said:SFGbob said:I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?
When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?
That I cannot answer.
And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.
We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.
Now answer how she's lying. -
So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.2001400ex said:
Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.SFGbob said:
See, he just lies.2001400ex said:
I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.SFGbob said:
I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.creepycoug said:SFGbob said:I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?
When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?
That I cannot answer.
And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.
We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.
Now answer how she's lying. -
SFGbob said:
So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.2001400ex said:
Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.SFGbob said:
See, he just lies.2001400ex said:
I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.SFGbob said:
I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.creepycoug said:SFGbob said:I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?
When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?
That I cannot answer.
And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.
We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.
Now answer how she's lying.
Bob doesn't understand how you can get one part technically wrong and still be right in the actual point one is making.SFGbob said:
So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.2001400ex said:
Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.SFGbob said:
See, he just lies.2001400ex said:
I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.SFGbob said:
I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.creepycoug said:SFGbob said:I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?
When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?
That I cannot answer.
And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.
We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.
Now answer how she's lying.
How answer how she is lying. Lil lyin Bob. -
I wonder how those pussy hat wearing “shout your abortion” radical feminists are feeling right about now.RaceBannon said:The money is still on this going through courts back to the Supremes who will uphold Roe.
I'm of the opinion that this can hurt GOP candidates including Trump. Britt Hume thinks the 60 million abortions since Roe are not what people had in mind. We've gone from safe, legal, and rare to birth control.
LIPO. -
So you were right about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it2001400ex said:SFGbob said:
So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.2001400ex said:
Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.SFGbob said:
See, he just lies.2001400ex said:
I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.SFGbob said:
I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.creepycoug said:SFGbob said:I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?
When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?
That I cannot answer.
And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.
We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.
Now answer how she's lying.
Bob doesn't understand how you can get one part technically wrong and still be right in the actual point one is making.SFGbob said:
So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.2001400ex said:
Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.SFGbob said:
See, he just lies.2001400ex said:
I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.SFGbob said:
I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.creepycoug said:SFGbob said:I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?
When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?
That I cannot answer.
And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.
We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.
Now answer how she's lying. -
Do you can't answer how AOC is lying. Weird. Lil lyin Bob.SFGbob said:
So you were right about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it2001400ex said:SFGbob said:
So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.2001400ex said:
Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.SFGbob said:
See, he just lies.2001400ex said:
I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.SFGbob said:
I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.creepycoug said:SFGbob said:I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?
When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?
That I cannot answer.
And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.
We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.
Now answer how she's lying.
Bob doesn't understand how you can get one part technically wrong and still be right in the actual point one is making.SFGbob said:
So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.2001400ex said:
Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.SFGbob said:
See, he just lies.2001400ex said:
I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.SFGbob said:
I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.creepycoug said:SFGbob said:I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?
When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?
That I cannot answer.
And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.
We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.
Now answer how she's lying. -
I'm a conservative and you all know exactly where I stand on abortion.
As I have said many times I am for retroactive abortions and I am the lone decider of who it applies to. -
Yourself?Sledog said:I'm a conservative and you all know exactly where I stand on abortion.
As I have said many times I am for retroactive abortions and I am the lone decider of who it applies to. -
Bump for Bob.2001400ex said:
So you can't answer how AOC is lying. Weird. Lil lyin Bob.SFGbob said:
So you were right about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it2001400ex said:SFGbob said:
So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.2001400ex said:
Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.SFGbob said:
See, he just lies.2001400ex said:
I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.SFGbob said:
I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.creepycoug said:SFGbob said:I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?
When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?
That I cannot answer.
And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.
We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.
Now answer how she's lying.
Bob doesn't understand how you can get one part technically wrong and still be right in the actual point one is making.SFGbob said:
So you were just "technically wrong" about Social Security not existing in the 1950s. Got it. Thanks for providing a real time example of what I was talking about Hondo.2001400ex said:
Link? Bob after I looked it up and saw it was under 2%, I said the point I was making was still correct. Even tho I was technically wrong on that point.SFGbob said:
See, he just lies.2001400ex said:
I didn't say it was technically correct. Idiot.SFGbob said:
I'll agree with you that there are plenty of people on both sides who are ill informed, the difference I find is when you confront the person with making the false statements with the facts and how they then respond to the facts.creepycoug said:SFGbob said:I think you need to turn the question around. When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong? Will he melt if he admits it? And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
Pretty simple really, if you're unwilling to admit an error even after it's obvious that you've made one and you're willing to lie about it, why should your word be taken on any other subject?
When the stakes are so low, why can't O'Keefed just admit that he was wrong?
That I cannot answer.
And why is it, that I find this trait so often in liberals?
I can't answer that either, except to say it's not my experience. I find just as many bullshit propaganda paper hangers out there on the right as I do on the left. There is no shortage of ill-informed partisan bananas of every stripe. Just my experience anyway.
We all make errors. Hondo claiming that Social Security didn't exist in the 1950s and then still trying to claim that he was "technically" correct after was shown that he had his head up his ass is not a behavior I've ever seen in a Conservative. Not saying there isn't one out there but I've never seen it.
Now answer how she's lying. -
I don't get the argument against abortions
I don't want these ghetto fags raising ugly girls and criminal sons
Abort that shit -
I nominate @Pitchfork51 for SCOTUS.Pitchfork51 said:I don't get the argument against abortions
I don't want these ghetto fags raising ugly girls and criminal sons
Abort that shit
