So the majority of Muslims are peaceful but neither one of these Kunts can identify a majority Muslim country that lives peacefully with a minority Jewish population. Weird.
Holy fucking shit. Islam is as barbaric as Christianity was in like 700 AD.
How anyone can argue otherwise is fucking insane
Christians were burning Jews and heretics in the Middle Ages. Is it a math or a history deficiency?
Still, proves the point I was making, so thanks for that.
Have you checked the Calendar lately? We're 1200 years beyond your grasp, apparently.
Apparently it's both math and history in Turd's case.
Luther and Calvin didn't live 1200 years ago.
Luther burned heretics?
He only advised burning the homes, businesses and places of worship of Jews. And executing rabbis should they persist in teaching. He was a moderate.
Blasphemy was a capital crime in much of Europe up to and into the modern age.
Yawn. You and sarcasm are not friends.
That you could possibly think Chritianity is violent in the modern world shows how warped that mind of yours is.
But but but Crusades!
History has shown exactly what the mooselimb religion is and continues to be. Your using them as pawns is laughable.
But your argument is that Islam is inherently more violent. Centuries of Christian inspired, Biblically justified slaughter apparently don't count in this theological seminar.
Please to poont out your slaughters? Wars started by mooselimbs don't count. Defending ones self is a God given right.
Point out the Christian inspired slaughters? You must be fucking kidding! Did you ever attend school?
Both religions have inspired people to violence, non-violence and moderated violence.
Which falls under the heading "Current Events?" Maybe we should aspire for relevancy.
Though I am intrigued by the term "moderated violence." Do tell.
I think people can fight wars without wiping out civilian populations.
But if you want to tell people that Islam is an inherently violent religion and Christianity is not, you don't just point to "current events". Both have lots of history to live down.
Equivocating all religions in the modern world as the same, high level argument you've got there.
Christianity in the Western world uniquely developed an important sense of spiritual privacy, right to one's own beliefs/conscience, and the separation of church and state. "Render unto Caesar." Sure, all of those things were bought with blood over a long history. Maybe Islam just needs tim to get its reads down.
Christians fought each other with tremendous brutality to get to whatever point Christians would argue Christianity has reached today. Islam is not yet as old as Christianity was when the Thirty Years War was waged. The separation of Church and State was an ebb and flow that grew out of some idealism and some pragmatism in Western Europe in the 1200s and 1300s--it didn't arise spontaneously out of the Bible and it sure as shit didn't happen and hasn't happened everywhere in the Christian world. (For the first 1000 - 1200 years of its existence, there were vastly more Asian Christians than European.)
So I guess you are arguing we should just give Islam tim to get it's reads down.
Sorry, not sorry, preventing a few abortions = / = declaring an Islamist State and beheading the infidels.
I don't feel the need to adjust the score for historical context.
Gee, I'd prefer everyone became actually modern and left all religious nonsense behind. But since that's not to be, it seems reasonable to point out that all religions seem to produce homicidal fanatics. At different rates at different times, but they all do it.
And there it is in spades. The canned leftist response to any criticism of Islam or its murderous adherents.
What should a few centuries matter?
And there it is in spades. The canned response to any suggestion of shared humanity: "Islam makes people murderous."
I expect Islam to hold the same respect for Human Rights specifically because of my shared humanity. You are the one arguing for grading on a curve and that victims human rights don't matter.
You're full of shit. I expect individuals to respect Human Rights and I don't deny individuals respect because some fucking nuts justify their bloody deeds using the cloak of a religion for cover.
The KKK is a bigtime Christian organization, or so they say.
No, no Kunt you claimed there weren't any Jews left in Europe and that they'll all either moved to Israel or were murdered.
Christians lived so peacefully with Jews in 20th century Europe that there aren’t any left.
Come on Kunt, run that ignorant fucking mouth of yours some more. Flea and O'Keefed will still tongue your ass.
There’s the white flag!
Kunt is sore. Won’t answer the question.
Yeah, you stick your head up your ass and claim that there are no Jew living in Europe today that they were all either murdered or moved to Israel and I'm hoisting a white flag?
I'll add that there's a genocide going on right now in China of the Uighur Muslim Minority. Millions of people in concentration camps and some extra dystopian nightmare of organ harvesting is happening. If your view of Human Rights is actually universal and not simply a useful ideological tool maybe spend some time finding out about it. Funny how few if any Muslim majority countries have brought it up on the human rights council in the UN.
I'll add that there's a genocide going on right now in China of the Uighur Muslim Minority. Millions of people in concentration camps and some extra dystopian nightmare of organ harvesting is happening. If your view of Human Rights is actually universal and not simply a useful ideological tool maybe spend some time finding out about it. Funny how few if any Muslim majority countries have brought it up on the human rights council in the UN.
Maybe they could pretend that the Chinese were really Jews and then they could get upset.
Holy fucking shit. Islam is as barbaric as Christianity was in like 700 AD.
How anyone can argue otherwise is fucking insane
Christians were burning Jews and heretics in the Middle Ages. Is it a math or a history deficiency?
Still, proves the point I was making, so thanks for that.
Have you checked the Calendar lately? We're 1200 years beyond your grasp, apparently.
Apparently it's both math and history in Turd's case.
Luther and Calvin didn't live 1200 years ago.
Luther burned heretics?
He only advised burning the homes, businesses and places of worship of Jews. And executing rabbis should they persist in teaching. He was a moderate.
Blasphemy was a capital crime in much of Europe up to and into the modern age.
Yawn. You and sarcasm are not friends.
That you could possibly think Chritianity is violent in the modern world shows how warped that mind of yours is.
But but but Crusades!
History has shown exactly what the mooselimb religion is and continues to be. Your using them as pawns is laughable.
But your argument is that Islam is inherently more violent. Centuries of Christian inspired, Biblically justified slaughter apparently don't count in this theological seminar.
Please to poont out your slaughters? Wars started by mooselimbs don't count. Defending ones self is a God given right.
Point out the Christian inspired slaughters? You must be fucking kidding! Did you ever attend school?
Both religions have inspired people to violence, non-violence and moderated violence.
Which falls under the heading "Current Events?" Maybe we should aspire for relevancy.
Though I am intrigued by the term "moderated violence." Do tell.
I think people can fight wars without wiping out civilian populations.
But if you want to tell people that Islam is an inherently violent religion and Christianity is not, you don't just point to "current events". Both have lots of history to live down.
Equivocating all religions in the modern world as the same, high level argument you've got there.
Christianity in the Western world uniquely developed an important sense of spiritual privacy, right to one's own beliefs/conscience, and the separation of church and state. "Render unto Caesar." Sure, all of those things were bought with blood over a long history. Maybe Islam just needs tim to get its reads down.
Christians fought each other with tremendous brutality to get to whatever point Christians would argue Christianity has reached today. Islam is not yet as old as Christianity was when the Thirty Years War was waged. The separation of Church and State was an ebb and flow that grew out of some idealism and some pragmatism in Western Europe in the 1200s and 1300s--it didn't arise spontaneously out of the Bible and it sure as shit didn't happen and hasn't happened everywhere in the Christian world. (For the first 1000 - 1200 years of its existence, there were vastly more Asian Christians than European.)
So I guess you are arguing we should just give Islam tim to get it's reads down.
Sorry, not sorry, preventing a few abortions = / = declaring an Islamist State and beheading the infidels.
I don't feel the need to adjust the score for historical context.
Gee, I'd prefer everyone became actually modern and left all religious nonsense behind. But since that's not to be, it seems reasonable to point out that all religions seem to produce homicidal fanatics. At different rates at different times, but they all do it.
And there it is in spades. The canned leftist response to any criticism of Islam or its murderous adherents.
What should a few centuries matter?
And there it is in spades. The canned response to any suggestion of shared humanity: "Islam makes people murderous."
I expect Islam to hold the same respect for Human Rights specifically because of my shared humanity. You are the one arguing for grading on a curve and that victims human rights don't matter.
You're full of shit. I expect individuals to respect Human Rights and I don't deny individuals respect because some fucking nuts justify their bloody deeds using the cloak of a religion for cover.
The KKK is a bigtime Christian organization, or so they say.
But if the majority of Muslims are peaceful as you claim O'Keefed, why is it there isn't a Muslim country that has a significant Jewish population? The used to, what happened? Yes there were some Christian countries that murdered Jews I've already seen your dodge O'Keefed. But not all Christian counties did and there are many majority Christian countries today that live peacefully with the Jews. Where are those Muslim countries O'Keefed?
No, no Kunt you claimed there weren't any Jews left in Europe and that they'll all either moved to Israel or were murdered.
Christians lived so peacefully with Jews in 20th century Europe that there aren’t any left.
Come on Kunt, run that ignorant fucking mouth of yours some more. Flea and O'Keefed will still tongue your ass.
There’s the white flag!
Kunt is sore. Won’t answer the question.
Yeah, you stick your head up your ass and claim that there are no Jew living in Europe today that they were all either murdered or moved to Israel and I'm hoisting a white flag?
There were 9.5 million Jews in Europe in 1933. There are 85% fewer, but not 100% fewer today. Big win for blob!
No, no Kunt you claimed there weren't any Jews left in Europe and that they'll all either moved to Israel or were murdered.
Christians lived so peacefully with Jews in 20th century Europe that there aren’t any left.
Come on Kunt, run that ignorant fucking mouth of yours some more. Flea and O'Keefed will still tongue your ass.
There’s the white flag!
Kunt is sore. Won’t answer the question.
Yeah, you stick your head up your ass and claim that there are no Jew living in Europe today that they were all either murdered or moved to Israel and I'm hoisting a white flag?
There were 9.5 million Jews in Europe in 1933. There are 85% fewer, but not 100% fewer today. Big win for blob!
No, no Kunt you claimed there weren't any Jews left in Europe and that they'll all either moved to Israel or were murdered.
Christians lived so peacefully with Jews in 20th century Europe that there aren’t any left.
Come on Kunt, run that ignorant fucking mouth of yours some more. Flea and O'Keefed will still tongue your ass.
There’s the white flag!
Kunt is sore. Won’t answer the question.
Yeah, you stick your head up your ass and claim that there are no Jew living in Europe today that they were all either murdered or moved to Israel and I'm hoisting a white flag?
There were 9.5 million Jews in Europe in 1933. There are 85% fewer, but not 100% fewer today. Big win for blob!
No, no Kunt you claimed there weren't any Jews left in Europe and that they'll all either moved to Israel or were murdered.
Christians lived so peacefully with Jews in 20th century Europe that there aren’t any left.
Come on Kunt, run that ignorant fucking mouth of yours some more. Flea and O'Keefed will still tongue your ass.
There’s the white flag!
Kunt is sore. Won’t answer the question.
Yeah, you stick your head up your ass and claim that there are no Jew living in Europe today that they were all either murdered or moved to Israel and I'm hoisting a white flag?
There were 9.5 million Jews in Europe in 1933. There are 85% fewer, but not 100% fewer today. Big win for blob!
He’s too big of a pussy to answer the question.
You guys proved your point. It's still whataboutism. Lmk when you actually care about human rights.
Holy fucking shit. Islam is as barbaric as Christianity was in like 700 AD.
How anyone can argue otherwise is fucking insane
Christians were burning Jews and heretics in the Middle Ages. Is it a math or a history deficiency?
Still, proves the point I was making, so thanks for that.
Have you checked the Calendar lately? We're 1200 years beyond your grasp, apparently.
Apparently it's both math and history in Turd's case.
Luther and Calvin didn't live 1200 years ago.
Luther burned heretics?
He only advised burning the homes, businesses and places of worship of Jews. And executing rabbis should they persist in teaching. He was a moderate.
Blasphemy was a capital crime in much of Europe up to and into the modern age.
Yawn. You and sarcasm are not friends.
That you could possibly think Chritianity is violent in the modern world shows how warped that mind of yours is.
But but but Crusades!
History has shown exactly what the mooselimb religion is and continues to be. Your using them as pawns is laughable.
But your argument is that Islam is inherently more violent. Centuries of Christian inspired, Biblically justified slaughter apparently don't count in this theological seminar.
Please to poont out your slaughters? Wars started by mooselimbs don't count. Defending ones self is a God given right.
Point out the Christian inspired slaughters? You must be fucking kidding! Did you ever attend school?
Both religions have inspired people to violence, non-violence and moderated violence.
Which falls under the heading "Current Events?" Maybe we should aspire for relevancy.
Though I am intrigued by the term "moderated violence." Do tell.
I think people can fight wars without wiping out civilian populations.
But if you want to tell people that Islam is an inherently violent religion and Christianity is not, you don't just point to "current events". Both have lots of history to live down.
Equivocating all religions in the modern world as the same, high level argument you've got there.
Christianity in the Western world uniquely developed an important sense of spiritual privacy, right to one's own beliefs/conscience, and the separation of church and state. "Render unto Caesar." Sure, all of those things were bought with blood over a long history. Maybe Islam just needs tim to get its reads down.
Christians fought each other with tremendous brutality to get to whatever point Christians would argue Christianity has reached today. Islam is not yet as old as Christianity was when the Thirty Years War was waged. The separation of Church and State was an ebb and flow that grew out of some idealism and some pragmatism in Western Europe in the 1200s and 1300s--it didn't arise spontaneously out of the Bible and it sure as shit didn't happen and hasn't happened everywhere in the Christian world. (For the first 1000 - 1200 years of its existence, there were vastly more Asian Christians than European.)
So I guess you are arguing we should just give Islam tim to get it's reads down.
Sorry, not sorry, preventing a few abortions = / = declaring an Islamist State and beheading the infidels.
I don't feel the need to adjust the score for historical context.
Gee, I'd prefer everyone became actually modern and left all religious nonsense behind. But since that's not to be, it seems reasonable to point out that all religions seem to produce homicidal fanatics. At different rates at different times, but they all do it.
And there it is in spades. The canned leftist response to any criticism of Islam or its murderous adherents.
What should a few centuries matter?
And there it is in spades. The canned response to any suggestion of shared humanity: "Islam makes people murderous."
I expect Islam to hold the same respect for Human Rights specifically because of my shared humanity. You are the one arguing for grading on a curve and that victims human rights don't matter.
You're full of shit. I expect individuals to respect Human Rights and I don't deny individuals respect because some fucking nuts justify their bloody deeds using the cloak of a religion for cover.
The KKK is a bigtime Christian organization, or so they say.
But if the majority of Muslims are peaceful as you claim O'Keefed, why is it there isn't a Muslim country that has a significant Jewish population? The used to, what happened? Yes there were some Christian countries that murdered Jews I've already seen your dodge O'Keefed. But not all Christian counties did and there are many majority Christian countries today that live peacefully with the Jews. Where are those Muslim countries O'Keefed?
Israel happened. It was probably a terrible mistake. It was certainly a blow to Jewish-Muslim relations and anyone who ever opposed "social engineering" (e.g. mandatory busing, affirmative action) in the US should easily understand why.
Holy fucking shit. Islam is as barbaric as Christianity was in like 700 AD.
How anyone can argue otherwise is fucking insane
Christians were burning Jews and heretics in the Middle Ages. Is it a math or a history deficiency?
Still, proves the point I was making, so thanks for that.
If only Christianity had a reformation and Islam didn’t. If only...
If only Islam had rejected salvation by faith alone and Vatican corruption. Potd.
If only Christians would stop mass murder on a daily basis in 2019
I just wish those right-wing Christians would stop cutting off people's heads and tossing gays off of buildings and stoning women.
Sodomy was punished by death in England less than 200 years ago. Nothing to do with Christianity, of course.
Okay so at best Islam is 200 years behind.
How fucking glorious
It's 600 years younger. But more to the point, religious people will always justify their barbarism.
The vast majority of Muslims just want a good life in peace. They're almost human.
What a shitty fucking argument. They still live in this world do they not O'Keefed? Because their religion is 600 years younger than Christianity you excuse their barbarism today? I guess the Mormons can start lopping off heads and tossing gays off building and you'll come running here to excuse their behavior.
Interestingly, I'm not the poaster who chose to harken back to yesteryear to make some sort of historically laughable argument. Anyone who thinks I'm defending any religion isn't reading terribly closely.
You’re trying to pretend that the vast majority of religious violence today isn’t from Islam. That’s all
I’m saying no such thing. The vast majority of the victims are also Muslims, btw.
Holy fucking shit. Islam is as barbaric as Christianity was in like 700 AD.
How anyone can argue otherwise is fucking insane
Christians were burning Jews and heretics in the Middle Ages. Is it a math or a history deficiency?
Still, proves the point I was making, so thanks for that.
If only Christianity had a reformation and Islam didn’t. If only...
If only Islam had rejected salvation by faith alone and Vatican corruption. Potd.
If only Christians would stop mass murder on a daily basis in 2019
I just wish those right-wing Christians would stop cutting off people's heads and tossing gays off of buildings and stoning women.
Sodomy was punished by death in England less than 200 years ago. Nothing to do with Christianity, of course.
Okay so at best Islam is 200 years behind.
How fucking glorious
It's 600 years younger. But more to the point, religious people will always justify their barbarism.
The vast majority of Muslims just want a good life in peace. They're almost human.
What a shitty fucking argument. They still live in this world do they not O'Keefed? Because their religion is 600 years younger than Christianity you excuse their barbarism today? I guess the Mormons can start lopping off heads and tossing gays off building and you'll come running here to excuse their behavior.
Interestingly, I'm not the poaster who chose to harken back to yesteryear to make some sort of historically laughable argument. Anyone who thinks I'm defending any religion isn't reading terribly closely.
You’re trying to pretend that the vast majority of religious violence today isn’t from Islam. That’s all
Almost seems like you should be able to quote me doing that if that's what I'm doing.
Good then. We are in agreement. Islam is responsible for the vast majority of religious violence today. That’s all.
No, no Kunt you claimed there weren't any Jews left in Europe and that they'll all either moved to Israel or were murdered.
Christians lived so peacefully with Jews in 20th century Europe that there aren’t any left.
Come on Kunt, run that ignorant fucking mouth of yours some more. Flea and O'Keefed will still tongue your ass.
There’s the white flag!
Kunt is sore. Won’t answer the question.
Yeah, you stick your head up your ass and claim that there are no Jew living in Europe today that they were all either murdered or moved to Israel and I'm hoisting a white flag?
There were 9.5 million Jews in Europe in 1933. There are 85% fewer, but not 100% fewer today. Big win for blob!
I told ya he'd tongue your ass CD. The debate wasn't over whether fewer Jews live in Europe today Kunt. The debate was over if they've all either been murdered and or moved to Israel. Now get back in there and tongue CD's ass.
No, no Kunt you claimed there weren't any Jews left in Europe and that they'll all either moved to Israel or were murdered.
Christians lived so peacefully with Jews in 20th century Europe that there aren’t any left.
Come on Kunt, run that ignorant fucking mouth of yours some more. Flea and O'Keefed will still tongue your ass.
There’s the white flag!
Kunt is sore. Won’t answer the question.
Yeah, you stick your head up your ass and claim that there are no Jew living in Europe today that they were all either murdered or moved to Israel and I'm hoisting a white flag?
There were 9.5 million Jews in Europe in 1933. There are 85% fewer, but not 100% fewer today. Big win for blob!
I told ya he'd tongue your ass CD. The debate wasn't over whether fewer Jews live in Europe today Kunt. The debate was over if they've all either been murdered and or moved to Israel. Now get back in there and tongue CD's ass.
blob's oral fixation is at least as strong as his lust for straw.
Holy fucking shit. Islam is as barbaric as Christianity was in like 700 AD.
How anyone can argue otherwise is fucking insane
Christians were burning Jews and heretics in the Middle Ages. Is it a math or a history deficiency?
Still, proves the point I was making, so thanks for that.
Have you checked the Calendar lately? We're 1200 years beyond your grasp, apparently.
Apparently it's both math and history in Turd's case.
Luther and Calvin didn't live 1200 years ago.
Luther burned heretics?
He only advised burning the homes, businesses and places of worship of Jews. And executing rabbis should they persist in teaching. He was a moderate.
Blasphemy was a capital crime in much of Europe up to and into the modern age.
Yawn. You and sarcasm are not friends.
That you could possibly think Chritianity is violent in the modern world shows how warped that mind of yours is.
But but but Crusades!
History has shown exactly what the mooselimb religion is and continues to be. Your using them as pawns is laughable.
But your argument is that Islam is inherently more violent. Centuries of Christian inspired, Biblically justified slaughter apparently don't count in this theological seminar.
Please to poont out your slaughters? Wars started by mooselimbs don't count. Defending ones self is a God given right.
Point out the Christian inspired slaughters? You must be fucking kidding! Did you ever attend school?
Both religions have inspired people to violence, non-violence and moderated violence.
Which falls under the heading "Current Events?" Maybe we should aspire for relevancy.
Though I am intrigued by the term "moderated violence." Do tell.
I think people can fight wars without wiping out civilian populations.
But if you want to tell people that Islam is an inherently violent religion and Christianity is not, you don't just point to "current events". Both have lots of history to live down.
Equivocating all religions in the modern world as the same, high level argument you've got there.
Christianity in the Western world uniquely developed an important sense of spiritual privacy, right to one's own beliefs/conscience, and the separation of church and state. "Render unto Caesar." Sure, all of those things were bought with blood over a long history. Maybe Islam just needs tim to get its reads down.
Christians fought each other with tremendous brutality to get to whatever point Christians would argue Christianity has reached today. Islam is not yet as old as Christianity was when the Thirty Years War was waged. The separation of Church and State was an ebb and flow that grew out of some idealism and some pragmatism in Western Europe in the 1200s and 1300s--it didn't arise spontaneously out of the Bible and it sure as shit didn't happen and hasn't happened everywhere in the Christian world. (For the first 1000 - 1200 years of its existence, there were vastly more Asian Christians than European.)
So I guess you are arguing we should just give Islam tim to get it's reads down.
Sorry, not sorry, preventing a few abortions = / = declaring an Islamist State and beheading the infidels.
I don't feel the need to adjust the score for historical context.
Gee, I'd prefer everyone became actually modern and left all religious nonsense behind. But since that's not to be, it seems reasonable to point out that all religions seem to produce homicidal fanatics. At different rates at different times, but they all do it.
And there it is in spades. The canned leftist response to any criticism of Islam or its murderous adherents.
What should a few centuries matter?
And there it is in spades. The canned response to any suggestion of shared humanity: "Islam makes people murderous."
I expect Islam to hold the same respect for Human Rights specifically because of my shared humanity. You are the one arguing for grading on a curve and that victims human rights don't matter.
You're full of shit. I expect individuals to respect Human Rights and I don't deny individuals respect because some fucking nuts justify their bloody deeds using the cloak of a religion for cover.
The KKK is a bigtime Christian organization, or so they say.
But if the majority of Muslims are peaceful as you claim O'Keefed, why is it there isn't a Muslim country that has a significant Jewish population? The used to, what happened? Yes there were some Christian countries that murdered Jews I've already seen your dodge O'Keefed. But not all Christian counties did and there are many majority Christian countries today that live peacefully with the Jews. Where are those Muslim countries O'Keefed?
Israel happened. It was probably a terrible mistake. It was certainly a blow to Jewish-Muslim relations and anyone who ever opposed "social engineering" (e.g. mandatory busing, affirmative action) in the US should easily understand why.
So creating Israel was a "terrible mistake." I love it when they drop the mask. But that doesn't explain why there are majority Christian countries that live peacefully with a minority Jewish population but there are no majority Muslim counties that do the same. If they are all so peaceful as you say O'Keefed, why not?
Holy fucking shit. Islam is as barbaric as Christianity was in like 700 AD.
How anyone can argue otherwise is fucking insane
Christians were burning Jews and heretics in the Middle Ages. Is it a math or a history deficiency?
Still, proves the point I was making, so thanks for that.
Have you checked the Calendar lately? We're 1200 years beyond your grasp, apparently.
Apparently it's both math and history in Turd's case.
Luther and Calvin didn't live 1200 years ago.
Luther burned heretics?
He only advised burning the homes, businesses and places of worship of Jews. And executing rabbis should they persist in teaching. He was a moderate.
Blasphemy was a capital crime in much of Europe up to and into the modern age.
Yawn. You and sarcasm are not friends.
That you could possibly think Chritianity is violent in the modern world shows how warped that mind of yours is.
But but but Crusades!
History has shown exactly what the mooselimb religion is and continues to be. Your using them as pawns is laughable.
But your argument is that Islam is inherently more violent. Centuries of Christian inspired, Biblically justified slaughter apparently don't count in this theological seminar.
Please to poont out your slaughters? Wars started by mooselimbs don't count. Defending ones self is a God given right.
Point out the Christian inspired slaughters? You must be fucking kidding! Did you ever attend school?
Both religions have inspired people to violence, non-violence and moderated violence.
Which falls under the heading "Current Events?" Maybe we should aspire for relevancy.
Though I am intrigued by the term "moderated violence." Do tell.
I think people can fight wars without wiping out civilian populations.
But if you want to tell people that Islam is an inherently violent religion and Christianity is not, you don't just point to "current events". Both have lots of history to live down.
Equivocating all religions in the modern world as the same, high level argument you've got there.
Christianity in the Western world uniquely developed an important sense of spiritual privacy, right to one's own beliefs/conscience, and the separation of church and state. "Render unto Caesar." Sure, all of those things were bought with blood over a long history. Maybe Islam just needs tim to get its reads down.
Christians fought each other with tremendous brutality to get to whatever point Christians would argue Christianity has reached today. Islam is not yet as old as Christianity was when the Thirty Years War was waged. The separation of Church and State was an ebb and flow that grew out of some idealism and some pragmatism in Western Europe in the 1200s and 1300s--it didn't arise spontaneously out of the Bible and it sure as shit didn't happen and hasn't happened everywhere in the Christian world. (For the first 1000 - 1200 years of its existence, there were vastly more Asian Christians than European.)
So I guess you are arguing we should just give Islam tim to get it's reads down.
Sorry, not sorry, preventing a few abortions = / = declaring an Islamist State and beheading the infidels.
I don't feel the need to adjust the score for historical context.
Gee, I'd prefer everyone became actually modern and left all religious nonsense behind. But since that's not to be, it seems reasonable to point out that all religions seem to produce homicidal fanatics. At different rates at different times, but they all do it.
And there it is in spades. The canned leftist response to any criticism of Islam or its murderous adherents.
What should a few centuries matter?
And there it is in spades. The canned response to any suggestion of shared humanity: "Islam makes people murderous."
I expect Islam to hold the same respect for Human Rights specifically because of my shared humanity. You are the one arguing for grading on a curve and that victims human rights don't matter.
You're full of shit. I expect individuals to respect Human Rights and I don't deny individuals respect because some fucking nuts justify their bloody deeds using the cloak of a religion for cover.
The KKK is a bigtime Christian organization, or so they say.
But if the majority of Muslims are peaceful as you claim O'Keefed, why is it there isn't a Muslim country that has a significant Jewish population? The used to, what happened? Yes there were some Christian countries that murdered Jews I've already seen your dodge O'Keefed. But not all Christian counties did and there are many majority Christian countries today that live peacefully with the Jews. Where are those Muslim countries O'Keefed?
Israel happened. It was probably a terrible mistake. It was certainly a blow to Jewish-Muslim relations and anyone who ever opposed "social engineering" (e.g. mandatory busing, affirmative action) in the US should easily understand why.
So creating Israel was a "terrible mistake." I love it when they drop the mask. But that doesn't explain why there are majority Christian countries that live peacefully with a minority Jewish population but there are no majority Muslim counties that do the same. If they are all so peaceful as you say O'Keefed, why not?
It was a terrible mistake. Feel free to explain why you think it wasn't.
No, no Kunt you claimed there weren't any Jews left in Europe and that they'll all either moved to Israel or were murdered.
Christians lived so peacefully with Jews in 20th century Europe that there aren’t any left.
Come on Kunt, run that ignorant fucking mouth of yours some more. Flea and O'Keefed will still tongue your ass.
There’s the white flag!
Kunt is sore. Won’t answer the question.
Yeah, you stick your head up your ass and claim that there are no Jew living in Europe today that they were all either murdered or moved to Israel and I'm hoisting a white flag?
There were 9.5 million Jews in Europe in 1933. There are 85% fewer, but not 100% fewer today. Big win for blob!
I told ya he'd tongue your ass CD. The debate wasn't over whether fewer Jews live in Europe today Kunt. The debate was over if they've all either been murdered and or moved to Israel. Now get back in there and tongue CD's ass.
blob's oral fixation is at least as strong as his lust for straw.
Holy fucking shit. Islam is as barbaric as Christianity was in like 700 AD.
How anyone can argue otherwise is fucking insane
Christians were burning Jews and heretics in the Middle Ages. Is it a math or a history deficiency?
Still, proves the point I was making, so thanks for that.
Have you checked the Calendar lately? We're 1200 years beyond your grasp, apparently.
Apparently it's both math and history in Turd's case.
Luther and Calvin didn't live 1200 years ago.
Luther burned heretics?
He only advised burning the homes, businesses and places of worship of Jews. And executing rabbis should they persist in teaching. He was a moderate.
Blasphemy was a capital crime in much of Europe up to and into the modern age.
Yawn. You and sarcasm are not friends.
That you could possibly think Chritianity is violent in the modern world shows how warped that mind of yours is.
But but but Crusades!
History has shown exactly what the mooselimb religion is and continues to be. Your using them as pawns is laughable.
But your argument is that Islam is inherently more violent. Centuries of Christian inspired, Biblically justified slaughter apparently don't count in this theological seminar.
Please to poont out your slaughters? Wars started by mooselimbs don't count. Defending ones self is a God given right.
Point out the Christian inspired slaughters? You must be fucking kidding! Did you ever attend school?
Both religions have inspired people to violence, non-violence and moderated violence.
Which falls under the heading "Current Events?" Maybe we should aspire for relevancy.
Though I am intrigued by the term "moderated violence." Do tell.
I think people can fight wars without wiping out civilian populations.
But if you want to tell people that Islam is an inherently violent religion and Christianity is not, you don't just point to "current events". Both have lots of history to live down.
Equivocating all religions in the modern world as the same, high level argument you've got there.
Christianity in the Western world uniquely developed an important sense of spiritual privacy, right to one's own beliefs/conscience, and the separation of church and state. "Render unto Caesar." Sure, all of those things were bought with blood over a long history. Maybe Islam just needs tim to get its reads down.
Christians fought each other with tremendous brutality to get to whatever point Christians would argue Christianity has reached today. Islam is not yet as old as Christianity was when the Thirty Years War was waged. The separation of Church and State was an ebb and flow that grew out of some idealism and some pragmatism in Western Europe in the 1200s and 1300s--it didn't arise spontaneously out of the Bible and it sure as shit didn't happen and hasn't happened everywhere in the Christian world. (For the first 1000 - 1200 years of its existence, there were vastly more Asian Christians than European.)
So I guess you are arguing we should just give Islam tim to get it's reads down.
Sorry, not sorry, preventing a few abortions = / = declaring an Islamist State and beheading the infidels.
I don't feel the need to adjust the score for historical context.
Gee, I'd prefer everyone became actually modern and left all religious nonsense behind. But since that's not to be, it seems reasonable to point out that all religions seem to produce homicidal fanatics. At different rates at different times, but they all do it.
And there it is in spades. The canned leftist response to any criticism of Islam or its murderous adherents.
What should a few centuries matter?
And there it is in spades. The canned response to any suggestion of shared humanity: "Islam makes people murderous."
I expect Islam to hold the same respect for Human Rights specifically because of my shared humanity. You are the one arguing for grading on a curve and that victims human rights don't matter.
You're full of shit. I expect individuals to respect Human Rights and I don't deny individuals respect because some fucking nuts justify their bloody deeds using the cloak of a religion for cover.
The KKK is a bigtime Christian organization, or so they say.
But if the majority of Muslims are peaceful as you claim O'Keefed, why is it there isn't a Muslim country that has a significant Jewish population? The used to, what happened? Yes there were some Christian countries that murdered Jews I've already seen your dodge O'Keefed. But not all Christian counties did and there are many majority Christian countries today that live peacefully with the Jews. Where are those Muslim countries O'Keefed?
Israel happened. It was probably a terrible mistake. It was certainly a blow to Jewish-Muslim relations and anyone who ever opposed "social engineering" (e.g. mandatory busing, affirmative action) in the US should easily understand why.
So creating Israel was a "terrible mistake." I love it when they drop the mask. But that doesn't explain why there are majority Christian countries that live peacefully with a minority Jewish population but there are no majority Muslim counties that do the same. If they are all so peaceful as you say O'Keefed, why not?
It was a terrible mistake. Feel free to explain why you think it wasn't.
We can discuss that later. Lets deal with the fucking questions you're dodging like a Kunt first.
Comments
Kunt is sore.
Won’t answer the question.
The KKK is a bigtime Christian organization, or so they say.
Are all the Jews in Europe dead O'Keefed?
Most Muslims are not Arabs.