Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Chris Petersen is by far the best thing to ever happen to UW in my lifetime
Comments
-
Shut the fuck up alreadypuppylove_sugarsteel said:
Uh, imagine how good the D would be without walkons manning the interior DL and 1/2 the inside linebacking core. But Pup told u this would happen, 100 times, in 2017. Funny, that Pup guy kinda knows what he was talking about. Get used to repeated 7-8 yard gashes off guard-center...all year long. Then no linebacker like BBK to clean up the mess. Been warned...go ahead and save I assume you will.YellowSnow said:
Who’s queefing nonsense? Imagine how good our defense would have looked if the offense had done its jerb.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
No that's assbackwards 55. Defense the question mark as much as the offenseRoadDawg55 said:
That’s basically what Yella posted. Our offense sucks. Our defense is good.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Yellow, just when I give you a compliment you queef this nonsense out.. The only problem last year was Browning, inconstant WR play and no Bryant. Add in a little lackluster guard play and that's it. Nothing to do with Pete or coaches.YellowSnow said:
Our OKG church school kids on defense that Pete has recruited are good enuff to play for a NT with or without Smalls. The reason we’re not there yet is all on the offensive side of the football. Shitty QB, over complicated offense, sins of shitty o line and WR crooting in years passed.Baphomet said:
I don't think anybody is saying only Sark recruits can play with fire, but that there is an archetype of recruit that both Sark and James would bring in (and Lambo and Neuheisel) -- that Pete won't bring in because they aren't OKG choir kids -- and that some of our best players on the 2016 team were in that archetype -- recruited by Sark, not by Pete.YellowSnow said:
Entman was an under the radar 2 star white boy. I’m not buying into the notion that only Sark type recruits can play with fire just yet.jecornel said:
Emtman disagrees.YellowSnow said:I’ve been to a CFP game and the Rose Bowl in the past 3 years. I want a fucking NT badly but this doesn’t hinge on Smalls.
And that this approach is hurting us with guys that might be OKGs but see our inherent recruiting bias and are scared off that they might not fit in.
Ale and Kirkland are future all conference guards. We will run at will soon enough. With a qb it will be obvious coaching had nothing to do with it. Pup's HDB lays all this out for you laymen.
Pup is on a different level for a reason. I guess I could just say 'fuck off' 18k times like Baze but then HH wouldnt be here. It's why Pup keeps this place on the map. Otherwise Dawgman would have 99% of the market share instead of 90. Fetters actually comes here for most of his article ideas. Its blatant. Chrissy, please put Pup's ° trademark symbol next to your articles you fucking thieving bastard -
Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Yellow, just when I give you a compliment you queef this nonsense out.. The only problem last year was Browning, inconstant WR play and no Bryant. Add in a little lackluster guard play and that's it. Nothing to do with Pete or coaches.YellowSnow said:
Our OKG church school kids on defense that Pete has recruited are good enuff to play for a NT with or without Smalls. The reason we’re not there yet is all on the offensive side of the football. Shitty QB, over complicated offense, sins of shitty o line and WR crooting in years passed.Baphomet said:
I don't think anybody is saying only Sark recruits can play with fire, but that there is an archetype of recruit that both Sark and James would bring in (and Lambo and Neuheisel) -- that Pete won't bring in because they aren't OKG choir kids -- and that some of our best players on the 2016 team were in that archetype -- recruited by Sark, not by Pete.YellowSnow said:
Entman was an under the radar 2 star white boy. I’m not buying into the notion that only Sark type recruits can play with fire just yet.jecornel said:
Emtman disagrees.YellowSnow said:I’ve been to a CFP game and the Rose Bowl in the past 3 years. I want a fucking NT badly but this doesn’t hinge on Smalls.
And that this approach is hurting us with guys that might be OKGs but see our inherent recruiting bias and are scared off that they might not fit in.
Ale and Kirkland are future all conference guards. We will run at will soon enough. With a qb it will be obvious coaching had nothing to do with it. Pup's HDB lays all this out for you laymen. -
UW defense reloads. Our DL and ILB will be fine, especially after warming up against EWU, Cal, Hawaii, and BYU. And our walk-ons? Don't forget that many of our walk-ons are turning down Pac-12 and MWC scholarships to play for UW.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Uh, imagine how good the D would be without walkons manning the interior DL and 1/2 the inside linebacking core. But Pup told u this would happen, 100 times, in 2017. Funny, that Pup guy kinda knows what he was talking about. Get used to repeated 7-8 yard gashes off guard-center...all year long. Then no linebacker like BBK to clean up the mess. Been warned...go ahead and save I assume you will.YellowSnow said:
Who’s queefing nonsense? Imagine how good our defense would have looked if the offense had done its jerb.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
No that's assbackwards 55. Defense the question mark as much as the offenseRoadDawg55 said:
That’s basically what Yella posted. Our offense sucks. Our defense is good.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Yellow, just when I give you a compliment you queef this nonsense out.. The only problem last year was Browning, inconstant WR play and no Bryant. Add in a little lackluster guard play and that's it. Nothing to do with Pete or coaches.YellowSnow said:
Our OKG church school kids on defense that Pete has recruited are good enuff to play for a NT with or without Smalls. The reason we’re not there yet is all on the offensive side of the football. Shitty QB, over complicated offense, sins of shitty o line and WR crooting in years passed.Baphomet said:
I don't think anybody is saying only Sark recruits can play with fire, but that there is an archetype of recruit that both Sark and James would bring in (and Lambo and Neuheisel) -- that Pete won't bring in because they aren't OKG choir kids -- and that some of our best players on the 2016 team were in that archetype -- recruited by Sark, not by Pete.YellowSnow said:
Entman was an under the radar 2 star white boy. I’m not buying into the notion that only Sark type recruits can play with fire just yet.jecornel said:
Emtman disagrees.YellowSnow said:I’ve been to a CFP game and the Rose Bowl in the past 3 years. I want a fucking NT badly but this doesn’t hinge on Smalls.
And that this approach is hurting us with guys that might be OKGs but see our inherent recruiting bias and are scared off that they might not fit in.
Ale and Kirkland are future all conference guards. We will run at will soon enough. With a qb it will be obvious coaching had nothing to do with it. Pup's HDB lays all this out for you laymen.
Pup is on a different level for a reason. I guess I could just say 'fuck off' 18k times like Baze but then HH wouldnt be here. It's why Pup keeps this place on the map. Otherwise Dawgman would have 99% of the market share instead of 90. Fetters actually comes here for most of his article ideas. Its blatant. Chrissy, please put Pup's ° trademark symbol next to your articles you fucking thieving bastard
Pup is on a different level than everyone else; you have the remarkable ability to be so incredibly wrong in everything football you post. Like how you predicted 6-6 in 2018 and we go to the Rose Bowl instead. Just how do you do it? -
Congrats on being 14. And a fag.Gladstone said:I'm as angst-ridden as everyone else over the Smalls failure, but it needs to be said. Fucking hell. Fuck all of you.
Our program has gone from a piece of gum on the sidewalk to a high 4 star waterfront restaurant.
Commit seppuku. All of you.
I’m old enough to remember when UW actually won bowl games. -
fag. ROFL!!!!!!!!!!!
Crusty old guy debate team captain in the house -
Contrast this with being a Cuog.jecornel said:
The early 80's had a good stretch. The 84' team was amazing.Alexis said:
Technically us old farts have seen one better 3 year stretch, that led to the coach committing suicide and the program being put on crippling sanctions. So LIPO I guess.jecornel said:Glady? I'm sorry buddy but your were born in the wrong era. Us old farts have seen better.
Don't forget Gil Dobie. People forget that.
The 91' NT team was one of the all time teams in the 20th century. That team will never be matched again at Washington. Smalls/Huard future squad has real potential if they can scoop up in state talent.
I love being a Husky. Improves the life experience by quite a lot.
-
Will be fine? Pup gets paid to make this critical analysis. No, wont be 'just fine'. More like 'just a sieve '. BYU going to gash UW. I could see a loss here, 50/50 tilt in provo. Hard place to win. But you have no idea it is. So trust Pup on this. Hard place to win.whatshouldicareabout said:
UW defense reloads. Our DL and ILB will be fine, especially after warming up against EWU, Cal, Hawaii, and BYU. And our walk-ons? Don't forget that many of our walk-ons are turning down Pac-12 and MWC scholarships to play for UW.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Uh, imagine how good the D would be without walkons manning the interior DL and 1/2 the inside linebacking core. But Pup told u this would happen, 100 times, in 2017. Funny, that Pup guy kinda knows what he was talking about. Get used to repeated 7-8 yard gashes off guard-center...all year long. Then no linebacker like BBK to clean up the mess. Been warned...go ahead and save I assume you will.YellowSnow said:
Who’s queefing nonsense? Imagine how good our defense would have looked if the offense had done its jerb.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
No that's assbackwards 55. Defense the question mark as much as the offenseRoadDawg55 said:
That’s basically what Yella posted. Our offense sucks. Our defense is good.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Yellow, just when I give you a compliment you queef this nonsense out.. The only problem last year was Browning, inconstant WR play and no Bryant. Add in a little lackluster guard play and that's it. Nothing to do with Pete or coaches.YellowSnow said:
Our OKG church school kids on defense that Pete has recruited are good enuff to play for a NT with or without Smalls. The reason we’re not there yet is all on the offensive side of the football. Shitty QB, over complicated offense, sins of shitty o line and WR crooting in years passed.Baphomet said:
I don't think anybody is saying only Sark recruits can play with fire, but that there is an archetype of recruit that both Sark and James would bring in (and Lambo and Neuheisel) -- that Pete won't bring in because they aren't OKG choir kids -- and that some of our best players on the 2016 team were in that archetype -- recruited by Sark, not by Pete.YellowSnow said:
Entman was an under the radar 2 star white boy. I’m not buying into the notion that only Sark type recruits can play with fire just yet.jecornel said:
Emtman disagrees.YellowSnow said:I’ve been to a CFP game and the Rose Bowl in the past 3 years. I want a fucking NT badly but this doesn’t hinge on Smalls.
And that this approach is hurting us with guys that might be OKGs but see our inherent recruiting bias and are scared off that they might not fit in.
Ale and Kirkland are future all conference guards. We will run at will soon enough. With a qb it will be obvious coaching had nothing to do with it. Pup's HDB lays all this out for you laymen.
Pup is on a different level for a reason. I guess I could just say 'fuck off' 18k times like Baze but then HH wouldnt be here. It's why Pup keeps this place on the map. Otherwise Dawgman would have 99% of the market share instead of 90. Fetters actually comes here for most of his article ideas. Its blatant. Chrissy, please put Pup's ° trademark symbol next to your articles you fucking thieving bastard
Pup is on a different level than everyone else; you have the remarkable ability to be so incredibly wrong in everything football you post. Like how you predicted 6-6 in 2018 and we go to the Rose Bowl instead. Just how do you do it?
Btw, pup never predicted 6-6. 9-5 was my prediction. Just 1 off from 10-4.. you on the other hand you said 12-1. Again Pup always right. -
BYU marked as a W now.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Will be fine? Pup gets paid to make this critical analysis. No, wont be 'just fine'. More like 'just a sieve '. BYU going to gash UW. I could see a loss here, 50/50 tilt in provo. Hard place to win. But you have no idea it is. So trust Pup on this. Hard place to winwhatshouldicareabout said:
UW defense reloads. Our DL and ILB will be fine, especially after warming up against EWU, Cal, Hawaii, and BYU. And our walk-ons? Don't forget that many of our walk-ons are turning down Pac-12 and MWC scholarships to play for UW.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Uh, imagine how good the D would be without walkons manning the interior DL and 1/2 the inside linebacking core. But Pup told u this would happen, 100 times, in 2017. Funny, that Pup guy kinda knows what he was talking about. Get used to repeated 7-8 yard gashes off guard-center...all year long. Then no linebacker like BBK to clean up the mess. Been warned...go ahead and save I assume you will.YellowSnow said:
Who’s queefing nonsense? Imagine how good our defense would have looked if the offense had done its jerb.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
No that's assbackwards 55. Defense the question mark as much as the offenseRoadDawg55 said:
That’s basically what Yella posted. Our offense sucks. Our defense is good.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Yellow, just when I give you a compliment you queef this nonsense out.. The only problem last year was Browning, inconstant WR play and no Bryant. Add in a little lackluster guard play and that's it. Nothing to do with Pete or coaches.YellowSnow said:
Our OKG church school kids on defense that Pete has recruited are good enuff to play for a NT with or without Smalls. The reason we’re not there yet is all on the offensive side of the football. Shitty QB, over complicated offense, sins of shitty o line and WR crooting in years passed.Baphomet said:
I don't think anybody is saying only Sark recruits can play with fire, but that there is an archetype of recruit that both Sark and James would bring in (and Lambo and Neuheisel) -- that Pete won't bring in because they aren't OKG choir kids -- and that some of our best players on the 2016 team were in that archetype -- recruited by Sark, not by Pete.YellowSnow said:
Entman was an under the radar 2 star white boy. I’m not buying into the notion that only Sark type recruits can play with fire just yet.jecornel said:
Emtman disagrees.YellowSnow said:I’ve been to a CFP game and the Rose Bowl in the past 3 years. I want a fucking NT badly but this doesn’t hinge on Smalls.
And that this approach is hurting us with guys that might be OKGs but see our inherent recruiting bias and are scared off that they might not fit in.
Ale and Kirkland are future all conference guards. We will run at will soon enough. With a qb it will be obvious coaching had nothing to do with it. Pup's HDB lays all this out for you laymen.
Pup is on a different level for a reason. I guess I could just say 'fuck off' 18k times like Baze but then HH wouldnt be here. It's why Pup keeps this place on the map. Otherwise Dawgman would have 99% of the market share instead of 90. Fetters actually comes here for most of his article ideas. Its blatant. Chrissy, please put Pup's ° trademark symbol next to your articles you fucking thieving bastard
Pup is on a different level than everyone else; you have the remarkable ability to be so incredibly wrong in everything football you post. Like how you predicted 6-6 in 2018 and we go to the Rose Bowl instead. Just how do you do it?
#arizona123 -
Who posted this then?puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Will be fine? Pup gets paid to make this critical analysis. No, wont be 'just fine'. More like 'just a sieve '. BYU going to gash UW. I could see a loss here, 50/50 tilt in provo. Hard place to win. But you have no idea it is. So trust Pup on this. Hard place to win.whatshouldicareabout said:
UW defense reloads. Our DL and ILB will be fine, especially after warming up against EWU, Cal, Hawaii, and BYU. And our walk-ons? Don't forget that many of our walk-ons are turning down Pac-12 and MWC scholarships to play for UW.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Uh, imagine how good the D would be without walkons manning the interior DL and 1/2 the inside linebacking core. But Pup told u this would happen, 100 times, in 2017. Funny, that Pup guy kinda knows what he was talking about. Get used to repeated 7-8 yard gashes off guard-center...all year long. Then no linebacker like BBK to clean up the mess. Been warned...go ahead and save I assume you will.YellowSnow said:
Who’s queefing nonsense? Imagine how good our defense would have looked if the offense had done its jerb.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
No that's assbackwards 55. Defense the question mark as much as the offenseRoadDawg55 said:
That’s basically what Yella posted. Our offense sucks. Our defense is good.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Yellow, just when I give you a compliment you queef this nonsense out.. The only problem last year was Browning, inconstant WR play and no Bryant. Add in a little lackluster guard play and that's it. Nothing to do with Pete or coaches.YellowSnow said:
Our OKG church school kids on defense that Pete has recruited are good enuff to play for a NT with or without Smalls. The reason we’re not there yet is all on the offensive side of the football. Shitty QB, over complicated offense, sins of shitty o line and WR crooting in years passed.Baphomet said:
I don't think anybody is saying only Sark recruits can play with fire, but that there is an archetype of recruit that both Sark and James would bring in (and Lambo and Neuheisel) -- that Pete won't bring in because they aren't OKG choir kids -- and that some of our best players on the 2016 team were in that archetype -- recruited by Sark, not by Pete.YellowSnow said:
Entman was an under the radar 2 star white boy. I’m not buying into the notion that only Sark type recruits can play with fire just yet.jecornel said:
Emtman disagrees.YellowSnow said:I’ve been to a CFP game and the Rose Bowl in the past 3 years. I want a fucking NT badly but this doesn’t hinge on Smalls.
And that this approach is hurting us with guys that might be OKGs but see our inherent recruiting bias and are scared off that they might not fit in.
Ale and Kirkland are future all conference guards. We will run at will soon enough. With a qb it will be obvious coaching had nothing to do with it. Pup's HDB lays all this out for you laymen.
Pup is on a different level for a reason. I guess I could just say 'fuck off' 18k times like Baze but then HH wouldnt be here. It's why Pup keeps this place on the map. Otherwise Dawgman would have 99% of the market share instead of 90. Fetters actually comes here for most of his article ideas. Its blatant. Chrissy, please put Pup's ° trademark symbol next to your articles you fucking thieving bastard
Pup is on a different level than everyone else; you have the remarkable ability to be so incredibly wrong in everything football you post. Like how you predicted 6-6 in 2018 and we go to the Rose Bowl instead. Just how do you do it?
Btw, pup never predicted 6-6. 9-5 was my prediction. Just 1 off from 10-4.. you on the other hand you said 12-1. Again Pup always right.
I saved it. Want a link? https://hardcorehusky.com/discussion/41604/as-i-said-pre-season/p1puppylove_sugarsteel said:On a side note, Pup has been clear for the last 2 years about Petersen's negligent recruiting at NG and DT. I've been clear for 2 years that UW will go 8-4, 7-5, maybe 6-6 in '18 due to that. Save it.
Also, I predicted Rose in 2018. Here's the link to that: https://hardcorehusky.com/discussion/49627/time-to-embarrass-yourself-again-predict-uws-2018-team-record/p1 -
8-4 ? As I said, Pup spot on. You just proved Pup's point and consequently his brilliance fuckass... LOFUCKINGL ' MAYBE 6-6' pretty much denotes 'unlikely' How dumb are you really Careabout? Youd be a great prosecutor (sarc)
Wheres your win-loss prediction? Lofl -
The defense was mediocre in areas. The rose bowl a pretty good indicator. CAL, Not UW had the best pass defense in the PacYellowSnow said:
Who’s queefing nonsense? Imagine how good our defense would have looked if the offense had done its jerb.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
No that's assbackwards 55. Defense the question mark as much as the offenseRoadDawg55 said:
That’s basically what Yella posted. Our offense sucks. Our defense is good.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Yellow, just when I give you a compliment you queef this nonsense out.. The only problem last year was Browning, inconstant WR play and no Bryant. Add in a little lackluster guard play and that's it. Nothing to do with Pete or coaches.YellowSnow said:
Our OKG church school kids on defense that Pete has recruited are good enuff to play for a NT with or without Smalls. The reason we’re not there yet is all on the offensive side of the football. Shitty QB, over complicated offense, sins of shitty o line and WR crooting in years passed.Baphomet said:
I don't think anybody is saying only Sark recruits can play with fire, but that there is an archetype of recruit that both Sark and James would bring in (and Lambo and Neuheisel) -- that Pete won't bring in because they aren't OKG choir kids -- and that some of our best players on the 2016 team were in that archetype -- recruited by Sark, not by Pete.YellowSnow said:
Entman was an under the radar 2 star white boy. I’m not buying into the notion that only Sark type recruits can play with fire just yet.jecornel said:
Emtman disagrees.YellowSnow said:I’ve been to a CFP game and the Rose Bowl in the past 3 years. I want a fucking NT badly but this doesn’t hinge on Smalls.
And that this approach is hurting us with guys that might be OKGs but see our inherent recruiting bias and are scared off that they might not fit in.
Ale and Kirkland are future all conference guards. We will run at will soon enough. With a qb it will be obvious coaching had nothing to do with it. Pup's HDB lays all this out for you laymen. -
You can't have it both ways puppy. You posted 3 records. If you were confident in 8-4, you would've stuck with 8-4. But you weren't. You listed 7-5. But you weren't confident in that either. But you were confident enough to post 6-6. That was the last time you made a prediction for 2018. You never made ANY corrections after 6-6.puppylove_sugarsteel said:8-4 ? As I said, Pup spot on. You just proved Pup's point and consequently his brilliance fuckass... LOFUCKINGL ' MAYBE 6-6' pretty much denotes 'unlikely' How dumb are you really Careabout? Youd be a great prosecutor (sarc)
Wheres your win-loss prediction? Lofl
My win-loss prediction is in that thread. -
Pup listed 8-4 1st...in that order of likelyhood. You 12-1. You predicted nothing, zero win-loss. Make a prediction for this year for a 2nd time who's going to win conference? As I said.. Make a call. Pup has Oregon for obvious reasons. Spit out the pearl jam and answer . I'll get it Nov 21st from you like usual.whatshouldicareabout said:
You can't have it both ways puppy. You posted 3 records. If you were confident in 8-4, you would've stuck with 8-4. But you weren't. You listed 7-5. But you weren't confident in that either. But you were confident enough to post 6-6. That was the last time you made a prediction for 2018. You never made ANY corrections after 6-6.puppylove_sugarsteel said:8-4 ? As I said, Pup spot on. You just proved Pup's point and consequently his brilliance fuckass... LOFUCKINGL ' MAYBE 6-6' pretty much denotes 'unlikely' How dumb are you really Careabout? Youd be a great prosecutor (sarc)
Wheres your win-loss prediction? Lofl
My win-loss prediction is in that thread.
-
???
-
Careabout? Cat got your cunt? Who is it? Not Nov 21st but now. What I thought;)
-
You stalk puppy 24-7 but when on the spot suddenly no Careabout on HH? I know your not out with the ladies so where are you ? Speak bitch lofl. Pup will lay out big10, big12 predictions too right now. Give me yours too Care. Lay em on the line ...lofl
-
Holy shit. 4 posts in a row and they all had to be edited? You just spent 40 minutes in this thread talking to yourself.
I never imagined that you'd be this flustered over someone calling you out for your awful football takes.
This is hilarious. -
So your predictions?whatshouldicareabout said:Holy shit. 4 posts in a row and they all had to be edited? You just spent 40 minutes in this thread talking to yourself.
I never imagined that you'd be this flustered over someone calling you out for your awful football takes.
This is hilarious. -
Pup you are pathetic
-
As a millennial doog it was fucking funny as fuck in 2013 when Beavlet thought they were good and personally being at Potato Salad stadium in Corvallis watching, to the horror of @BennyBeaver Sark absolutely pushing their shit in and sending them forever to the MWC by running the ball down their worthless faces to usher in the Pat Haden miracle upon our program.
-
You meant revered? You Pitch? IgnoredPitchfork51 said:Pup you are pathetic
-
-
Pumpeii never walks back a shitty prediction.
-
-
PurpleBaze said:
I'm new here. What does "mods" mean? Are tying to have my post deleted for being too dense in factual content? -
Baze, just make one then commentPurpleBaze said: -
Huh?!puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Baze, just make one then commentPurpleBaze said:
I thought you were going to ignore me. -
Trying to get a prediction from someone. Thought I'd give u a chance b4 you become entirely irrelevant. Your last chance to get your board cred back after Pup took it in 2 posts.PurpleBaze said:
Huh?!puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Baze, just make one then commentPurpleBaze said:
I thought you were going to ignore me. -
SEC all the way...puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Trying to get a prediction from someone. Thought I'd give u a chance b4 you become entirely irrelevant. Your last chance to get your board cred back after Pup took it in 2 posts.PurpleBaze said:
Huh?!puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Baze, just make one then commentPurpleBaze said:
I thought you were going to ignore me. -
Oh Jesus not pump daring everyone to make a prediction and then when they do ignoring it
