Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Chris Petersen is by far the best thing to ever happen to UW in my lifetime
Comments
-
Poor folk sniff glue...pup the finest powder only not the chunky soft cut shit...#puppylove_cokesteel. Boy I miss the coke days
-
So does BDTW.compuppylove_sugarsteel said:Poor folk sniff glue...pup the finest powder only not the chunky soft cut shit...#puppylove_cokesteel. Boy I miss the coke days
-
Our OKG church school kids on defense that Pete has recruited are good enuff to play for a NT with or without Smalls. The reason we’re not there yet is all on the offensive side of the football. Shitty QB, over complicated offense, sins of shitty o line and WR crooting in years passed.Baphomet said:
I don't think anybody is saying only Sark recruits can play with fire, but that there is an archetype of recruit that both Sark and James would bring in (and Lambo and Neuheisel) -- that Pete won't bring in because they aren't OKG choir kids -- and that some of our best players on the 2016 team were in that archetype -- recruited by Sark, not by Pete.YellowSnow said:
Entman was an under the radar 2 star white boy. I’m not buying into the notion that only Sark type recruits can play with fire just yet.jecornel said:
Emtman disagrees.YellowSnow said:I’ve been to a CFP game and the Rose Bowl in the past 3 years. I want a fucking NT badly but this doesn’t hinge on Smalls.
And that this approach is hurting us with guys that might be OKGs but see our inherent recruiting bias and are scared off that they might not fit in. -
disagree
-
Yellow, just when I give you a compliment you queef this nonsense out.. The only problem last year was Browning, inconstant WR play and no Bryant. Add in a little lackluster guard play and that's it. Nothing to do with Pete or coaches.YellowSnow said:
Our OKG church school kids on defense that Pete has recruited are good enuff to play for a NT with or without Smalls. The reason we’re not there yet is all on the offensive side of the football. Shitty QB, over complicated offense, sins of shitty o line and WR crooting in years passed.Baphomet said:
I don't think anybody is saying only Sark recruits can play with fire, but that there is an archetype of recruit that both Sark and James would bring in (and Lambo and Neuheisel) -- that Pete won't bring in because they aren't OKG choir kids -- and that some of our best players on the 2016 team were in that archetype -- recruited by Sark, not by Pete.YellowSnow said:
Entman was an under the radar 2 star white boy. I’m not buying into the notion that only Sark type recruits can play with fire just yet.jecornel said:
Emtman disagrees.YellowSnow said:I’ve been to a CFP game and the Rose Bowl in the past 3 years. I want a fucking NT badly but this doesn’t hinge on Smalls.
And that this approach is hurting us with guys that might be OKGs but see our inherent recruiting bias and are scared off that they might not fit in.
Ale and Kirkland are future all conference guards. We will run at will soon enough. With a qb it will be obvious coaching had nothing to do with it. Pup's HDB lays all this out for you laymen. -
And we are an education-based football program. Get used to it...it ain't changing
-
That’s basically what Yella posted. Our offense sucks. Our defense is good.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Yellow, just when I give you a compliment you queef this nonsense out.. The only problem last year was Browning, inconstant WR play and no Bryant. Add in a little lackluster guard play and that's it. Nothing to do with Pete or coaches.YellowSnow said:
Our OKG church school kids on defense that Pete has recruited are good enuff to play for a NT with or without Smalls. The reason we’re not there yet is all on the offensive side of the football. Shitty QB, over complicated offense, sins of shitty o line and WR crooting in years passed.Baphomet said:
I don't think anybody is saying only Sark recruits can play with fire, but that there is an archetype of recruit that both Sark and James would bring in (and Lambo and Neuheisel) -- that Pete won't bring in because they aren't OKG choir kids -- and that some of our best players on the 2016 team were in that archetype -- recruited by Sark, not by Pete.YellowSnow said:
Entman was an under the radar 2 star white boy. I’m not buying into the notion that only Sark type recruits can play with fire just yet.jecornel said:
Emtman disagrees.YellowSnow said:I’ve been to a CFP game and the Rose Bowl in the past 3 years. I want a fucking NT badly but this doesn’t hinge on Smalls.
And that this approach is hurting us with guys that might be OKGs but see our inherent recruiting bias and are scared off that they might not fit in.
Ale and Kirkland are future all conference guards. We will run at will soon enough. With a qb it will be obvious coaching had nothing to do with it. Pup's HDB lays all this out for you laymen. -
No that's assbackwards 55. Defense the question mark as much as the offenseRoadDawg55 said:
That’s basically what Yella posted. Our offense sucks. Our defense is good.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Yellow, just when I give you a compliment you queef this nonsense out.. The only problem last year was Browning, inconstant WR play and no Bryant. Add in a little lackluster guard play and that's it. Nothing to do with Pete or coaches.YellowSnow said:
Our OKG church school kids on defense that Pete has recruited are good enuff to play for a NT with or without Smalls. The reason we’re not there yet is all on the offensive side of the football. Shitty QB, over complicated offense, sins of shitty o line and WR crooting in years passed.Baphomet said:
I don't think anybody is saying only Sark recruits can play with fire, but that there is an archetype of recruit that both Sark and James would bring in (and Lambo and Neuheisel) -- that Pete won't bring in because they aren't OKG choir kids -- and that some of our best players on the 2016 team were in that archetype -- recruited by Sark, not by Pete.YellowSnow said:
Entman was an under the radar 2 star white boy. I’m not buying into the notion that only Sark type recruits can play with fire just yet.jecornel said:
Emtman disagrees.YellowSnow said:I’ve been to a CFP game and the Rose Bowl in the past 3 years. I want a fucking NT badly but this doesn’t hinge on Smalls.
And that this approach is hurting us with guys that might be OKGs but see our inherent recruiting bias and are scared off that they might not fit in.
Ale and Kirkland are future all conference guards. We will run at will soon enough. With a qb it will be obvious coaching had nothing to do with it. Pup's HDB lays all this out for you laymen. -
Who’s queefing nonsense? Imagine how good our defense would have looked if the offense had done its jerb.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
No that's assbackwards 55. Defense the question mark as much as the offenseRoadDawg55 said:
That’s basically what Yella posted. Our offense sucks. Our defense is good.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Yellow, just when I give you a compliment you queef this nonsense out.. The only problem last year was Browning, inconstant WR play and no Bryant. Add in a little lackluster guard play and that's it. Nothing to do with Pete or coaches.YellowSnow said:
Our OKG church school kids on defense that Pete has recruited are good enuff to play for a NT with or without Smalls. The reason we’re not there yet is all on the offensive side of the football. Shitty QB, over complicated offense, sins of shitty o line and WR crooting in years passed.Baphomet said:
I don't think anybody is saying only Sark recruits can play with fire, but that there is an archetype of recruit that both Sark and James would bring in (and Lambo and Neuheisel) -- that Pete won't bring in because they aren't OKG choir kids -- and that some of our best players on the 2016 team were in that archetype -- recruited by Sark, not by Pete.YellowSnow said:
Entman was an under the radar 2 star white boy. I’m not buying into the notion that only Sark type recruits can play with fire just yet.jecornel said:
Emtman disagrees.YellowSnow said:I’ve been to a CFP game and the Rose Bowl in the past 3 years. I want a fucking NT badly but this doesn’t hinge on Smalls.
And that this approach is hurting us with guys that might be OKGs but see our inherent recruiting bias and are scared off that they might not fit in.
Ale and Kirkland are future all conference guards. We will run at will soon enough. With a qb it will be obvious coaching had nothing to do with it. Pup's HDB lays all this out for you laymen. -
Uh, imagine how good the D would be without walkons manning the interior DL and 1/2 the inside linebacking core. But Pup told u this would happen, 100 times, in 2017. Funny, that Pup guy kinda knows what he was talking about. Get used to repeated 7-8 yard gashes off guard-center...all year long. Then no linebacker like BBK to clean up the mess. Been warned...go ahead and save I assume you will.YellowSnow said:
Who’s queefing nonsense? Imagine how good our defense would have looked if the offense had done its jerb.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
No that's assbackwards 55. Defense the question mark as much as the offenseRoadDawg55 said:
That’s basically what Yella posted. Our offense sucks. Our defense is good.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Yellow, just when I give you a compliment you queef this nonsense out.. The only problem last year was Browning, inconstant WR play and no Bryant. Add in a little lackluster guard play and that's it. Nothing to do with Pete or coaches.YellowSnow said:
Our OKG church school kids on defense that Pete has recruited are good enuff to play for a NT with or without Smalls. The reason we’re not there yet is all on the offensive side of the football. Shitty QB, over complicated offense, sins of shitty o line and WR crooting in years passed.Baphomet said:
I don't think anybody is saying only Sark recruits can play with fire, but that there is an archetype of recruit that both Sark and James would bring in (and Lambo and Neuheisel) -- that Pete won't bring in because they aren't OKG choir kids -- and that some of our best players on the 2016 team were in that archetype -- recruited by Sark, not by Pete.YellowSnow said:
Entman was an under the radar 2 star white boy. I’m not buying into the notion that only Sark type recruits can play with fire just yet.jecornel said:
Emtman disagrees.YellowSnow said:I’ve been to a CFP game and the Rose Bowl in the past 3 years. I want a fucking NT badly but this doesn’t hinge on Smalls.
And that this approach is hurting us with guys that might be OKGs but see our inherent recruiting bias and are scared off that they might not fit in.
Ale and Kirkland are future all conference guards. We will run at will soon enough. With a qb it will be obvious coaching had nothing to do with it. Pup's HDB lays all this out for you laymen.
Pup is on a different level for a reason. I guess I could just say 'fuck off' 18k times like Baze but then HH wouldnt be here. It's why Pup keeps this place on the map. Otherwise Dawgman would have 99% of the market share instead of 90. Fetters actually comes here for most of his article ideas. Its blatant. Chrissy, please put Pup's ° trademark symbol next to your articles you fucking thieving bastard
