Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Which position group are you most comfortable with going into the 2019 season?
Comments
-
Uhhhhh you fucking tard...he beat the best team in the pac12...and a few others. Jeez the retardation is contagious around this fuckholeRoadDawg55 said:
I must not have watched Garbers single handily lose the bowl game vs TCU.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Oh let's bury posts because they're objective. Suppose you fucking imbeciles think the defense is going to be better next year too??puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Let's not pop corks over the CB room yet. Theres a combined 2 starts less Bryant. The only room to get excited about is too easy TE, center and both tackles and of course Haener. Guard is still a question mark. Has been for 2 years.Bread said:Is this a test? Will everyone not picking TE be banished back to dawgman?
Just wait till Eastern obliterates our young DB's Sept 1st. We couldnt be facing a worse matchup out of the gates for 4 new starters in the secondary. But you guys didnt think of that huh? (Eastern will be a big test, they're good next year at qb and WR)
Then Cal and BYU (not good opponents early for our new backers and Dline, db's in run support. They're pretty PHYSICAL ground teams with legit play action abilities. Garbers is a very good 2-way QB...basically Shane Fortney but with moxy and accuracy under pressure. Both will present big tests, especially BYU @ 6000 ft. We never get out of provo without a dawg fight. That's a dangerous game. Then a few weeks later Stanford. I see a home loss there potentially. Shaw is going to abuse our DL and shit backers (if Beavers isnt back by then)
Go ahead and save. Could we be 5-0? Of course! But could we be 4-1? Absofuckinglutely! 3-2? Not likely. What I do know is we wont stop the run like we're accustomed to the last few years early, mostly vs pac12 teams and byu.
-
And you do?Pitchfork51 said:
J doesn't know shit huh puppuppylove_sugarsteel said:
Ok J. You posted that exact same thing 3 years ago. You just keep getting brighter. Hint: theres been other backers since then hahaPurpleJ said:
How will we replace Feeney and Littleton???puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Let's not pop corks over the CB room yet. Theres a combined 2 starts less Bryant. The only room to get excited about is too easy TE, center and both tackles and of course Haener. Guard is still a question mark. Has been for 2 years.Bread said:Is this a test? Will everyone not picking TE be banished back to dawgman?
-
It's like CNN. Just downvote the truth and objectivity. Of course dont rebut with anything, no counter argument, no debate, no opinion...just downvote. Fuck you guys..have a discussion. It's what a forum is for. If u disagree why? Wont hold breath. It's why dawgman forums work...and why the same 10 dipshits post here and they dont. Sorry Derek but fuuuuuck man!!puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Oh let's bury posts because they're objective. Suppose you fucking imbeciles think the defense is going to be better next year too??puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Let's not pop corks over the CB room yet. Theres a combined 2 starts less Bryant. The only room to get excited about is too easy TE, center and both tackles and of course Haener. Guard is still a question mark. Has been for 2 years.Bread said:Is this a test? Will everyone not picking TE be banished back to dawgman?
Just wait till Eastern obliterates our young DB's Sept 1st. We couldnt be facing a worse matchup out of the gates for 4 new starters in the secondary. But you guys didnt think of that huh? (Eastern will be a big test, they're good next year at qb and WR)
Then Cal and BYU (not good opponents early for our new backers and Dline, db's in run support. They're pretty PHYSICAL ground teams with legit play action abilities. Garbers is a very good 2-way QB...basically Shane Fortney but with moxy and accuracy under pressure. Both will present big tests, especially BYU @ 6000 ft. We never get out of provo without a dawg fight. That's a dangerous game. Then a few weeks later Stanford. I see a home loss there potentially. Shaw is going to abuse our DL and shit backers (if Beavers isnt back by then)
Go ahead and save. Could we be 5-0? Of course! But could we be 4-1? Absofuckinglutely! 3-2? Not likely. What I do know is we wont stop the run like we're accustomed to the last few years early, mostly vs pac12 teams and byu. -
I laughed out loud.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Oh let's bury posts because they're objective. Suppose you fucking imbeciles think the defense is going to be better next year too??puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Let's not pop corks over the CB room yet. Theres a combined 2 starts less Bryant. The only room to get excited about is too easy TE, center and both tackles and of course Haener. Guard is still a question mark. Has been for 2 years.Bread said:Is this a test? Will everyone not picking TE be banished back to dawgman?
Just wait till Eastern obliterates our young DB's Sept 1st. We couldnt be facing a worse matchup out of the gates for 4 new starters in the secondary. But you guys didnt think of that huh? (Eastern will be a big test, they're good next year at qb and WR)
Then Cal and BYU (not good opponents early for our new backers and Dline, db's in run support. They're pretty PHYSICAL ground teams with legit play action abilities. Garbers is a very good 2-way QB...basically Shane Fortney but with moxy and accuracy under pressure. Both will present big tests, especially BYU @ 6000 ft. We never get out of provo without a dawg fight. That's a dangerous game. Then a few weeks later Stanford. I see a home loss there potentially. Shaw is going to abuse our DL and shit backers (if Beavers isnt back by then)
Go ahead and save. Could we be 5-0? Of course! But could we be 4-1? Absofuckinglutely! 3-2? Not likely. What I do know is we wont stop the run like we're accustomed to the last few years early, mostly vs pac12 teams and byu. -
I laughed out loud again.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
It's like CNN. Just downvote the truth and objectivity. Of course dont rebut with anything, no counter argument, no debate, no opinion...just downvote. Fuck you guys..have a discussion. It's what a forum is for. If u disagree why? Wont hold breath. It's why dawgman forums work...and why the same 10 dipshits post here and they dont. Sorry Derek but fuuuuuck man!!puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Oh let's bury posts because they're objective. Suppose you fucking imbeciles think the defense is going to be better next year too??puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Let's not pop corks over the CB room yet. Theres a combined 2 starts less Bryant. The only room to get excited about is too easy TE, center and both tackles and of course Haener. Guard is still a question mark. Has been for 2 years.Bread said:Is this a test? Will everyone not picking TE be banished back to dawgman?
Just wait till Eastern obliterates our young DB's Sept 1st. We couldnt be facing a worse matchup out of the gates for 4 new starters in the secondary. But you guys didnt think of that huh? (Eastern will be a big test, they're good next year at qb and WR)
Then Cal and BYU (not good opponents early for our new backers and Dline, db's in run support. They're pretty PHYSICAL ground teams with legit play action abilities. Garbers is a very good 2-way QB...basically Shane Fortney but with moxy and accuracy under pressure. Both will present big tests, especially BYU @ 6000 ft. We never get out of provo without a dawg fight. That's a dangerous game. Then a few weeks later Stanford. I see a home loss there potentially. Shaw is going to abuse our DL and shit backers (if Beavers isnt back by then)
Go ahead and save. Could we be 5-0? Of course! But could we be 4-1? Absofuckinglutely! 3-2? Not likely. What I do know is we wont stop the run like we're accustomed to the last few years early, mostly vs pac12 teams and byu.
Thanks for making my day, pup. -
LB (Janet Reno)
Ciara and I read this post together in bed.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
It's like CNN. Just downvote the truth and objectivity. Of course dont rebut with anything, no counter argument, no debate, no opinion...just downvote. Fuck you guys..have a discussion. It's what a forum is for. If u disagree why? Wont hold breath. It's why dawgman forums work...and why the same 10 dipshits post here and they dont. Sorry Derek but fuuuuuck man!!puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Oh let's bury posts because they're objective. Suppose you fucking imbeciles think the defense is going to be better next year too??puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Let's not pop corks over the CB room yet. Theres a combined 2 starts less Bryant. The only room to get excited about is too easy TE, center and both tackles and of course Haener. Guard is still a question mark. Has been for 2 years.Bread said:Is this a test? Will everyone not picking TE be banished back to dawgman?
Just wait till Eastern obliterates our young DB's Sept 1st. We couldnt be facing a worse matchup out of the gates for 4 new starters in the secondary. But you guys didnt think of that huh? (Eastern will be a big test, they're good next year at qb and WR)
Then Cal and BYU (not good opponents early for our new backers and Dline, db's in run support. They're pretty PHYSICAL ground teams with legit play action abilities. Garbers is a very good 2-way QB...basically Shane Fortney but with moxy and accuracy under pressure. Both will present big tests, especially BYU @ 6000 ft. We never get out of provo without a dawg fight. That's a dangerous game. Then a few weeks later Stanford. I see a home loss there potentially. Shaw is going to abuse our DL and shit backers (if Beavers isnt back by then)
Go ahead and save. Could we be 5-0? Of course! But could we be 4-1? Absofuckinglutely! 3-2? Not likely. What I do know is we wont stop the run like we're accustomed to the last few years early, mostly vs pac12 teams and byu. -
CricketsBedroom_Russ said:
Ciara and I read this post together in bed.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
It's like CNN. Just downvote the truth and objectivity. Of course dont rebut with anything, no counter argument, no debate, no opinion...just downvote. Fuck you guys..have a discussion. It's what a forum is for. If u disagree why? Wont hold breath. It's why dawgman forums work...and why the same 10 dipshits post here and they dont. Sorry Derek but fuuuuuck man!!puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Oh let's bury posts because they're objective. Suppose you fucking imbeciles think the defense is going to be better next year too??puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Let's not pop corks over the CB room yet. Theres a combined 2 starts less Bryant. The only room to get excited about is too easy TE, center and both tackles and of course Haener. Guard is still a question mark. Has been for 2 years.Bread said:Is this a test? Will everyone not picking TE be banished back to dawgman?
Just wait till Eastern obliterates our young DB's Sept 1st. We couldnt be facing a worse matchup out of the gates for 4 new starters in the secondary. But you guys didnt think of that huh? (Eastern will be a big test, they're good next year at qb and WR)
Then Cal and BYU (not good opponents early for our new backers and Dline, db's in run support. They're pretty PHYSICAL ground teams with legit play action abilities. Garbers is a very good 2-way QB...basically Shane Fortney but with moxy and accuracy under pressure. Both will present big tests, especially BYU @ 6000 ft. We never get out of provo without a dawg fight. That's a dangerous game. Then a few weeks later Stanford. I see a home loss there potentially. Shaw is going to abuse our DL and shit backers (if Beavers isnt back by then)
Go ahead and save. Could we be 5-0? Of course! But could we be 4-1? Absofuckinglutely! 3-2? Not likely. What I do know is we wont stop the run like we're accustomed to the last few years early, mostly vs pac12 teams and byu.
