Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!





Show your support for what this community means to you:


Choose a Donation Amount
Username (required for credit)



Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. If you dare criticize Jimmy Lake, you won't last long.

Which position group are you most comfortable with going into the 2019 season?

2»

Comments

  • puppylove_sugarsteelpuppylove_sugarsteel Posts: 8,150
    5000 Comments 250 Answers Fifth Anniversary 500 Awesomes
    edited April 14
    Bread said:

    Is this a test? Will everyone not picking TE be banished back to dawgman?

    Let's not pop corks over the CB room yet. Theres a combined 2 starts less Bryant. The only room to get excited about is too easy TE, center and both tackles and of course Haener. Guard is still a question mark. Has been for 2 years.
    chuckbackthepackPurpleBazeDennis_DeYounghaie
  • McLovinMcLovin Posts: 8
    25 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment Photogenic
    TE (Janet Reno)
    This poll is pretty cool.
    GladstonebackthepackDennis_DeYoung
  • AlCzervikAlCzervik Posts: 1,740
    Sixth Anniversary 250 Answers 1000 Comments 500 Awesomes
    Backup QB.

    Solid group behind Haener.
    BennyBeaverFremontTrolltheLSkid
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Posts: 30,240
    Butler Cabin Supporter 25000 Comments 250 Answers Fifth Anniversary
    CB (Janet Reno)

    Bread said:

    Is this a test? Will everyone not picking TE be banished back to dawgman?

    Let's not pop corks over the CB room yet. Theres a combined 2 starts less Bryant. The only room to get excited about is too easy TE, center and both tackles and of course Haener. Guard is still a question mark. Has been for 2 years.
    How will we replace Feeney and Littleton???
    GrundleStiltzkinDennis_DeYoung
  • PurpleJ said:

    Bread said:

    Is this a test? Will everyone not picking TE be banished back to dawgman?

    Let's not pop corks over the CB room yet. Theres a combined 2 starts less Bryant. The only room to get excited about is too easy TE, center and both tackles and of course Haener. Guard is still a question mark. Has been for 2 years.
    How will we replace Feeney and Littleton???
    Ok J. You posted that exact same thing 3 years ago. You just keep getting brighter. Hint: theres been other backers since then haha
    WeakarmCobraPitchfork51
  • PurpleBazePurpleBaze Posts: 17,978
    Swaye's Wigwam 10000 Comments 250 Answers Sixth Anniversary

    Bread said:

    Is this a test? Will everyone not picking TE be banished back to dawgman?

    Let's not pop corks over the CB room yet. Theres a combined 2 starts less Bryant. The only room to get excited about is too easy TE, center and both tackles and of course Haener. Guard is still a question mark. Has been for 2 years.

    GrundleStiltzkinDerekJohnsonRaceBannonCuntWaffle
  • Bread said:

    Is this a test? Will everyone not picking TE be banished back to dawgman?

    Let's not pop corks over the CB room yet. Theres a combined 2 starts less Bryant. The only room to get excited about is too easy TE, center and both tackles and of course Haener. Guard is still a question mark. Has been for 2 years.
    Oh let's bury posts because they're objective. Suppose you fucking imbeciles think the defense is going to be better next year too??

    Just wait till Eastern obliterates our young DB's Sept 1st. We couldnt be facing a worse matchup out of the gates for 4 new starters in the secondary. But you guys didnt think of that huh? (Eastern will be a big test, they're good next year at qb and WR)

    Then Cal and BYU (not good opponents early for our new backers and Dline, db's in run support. They're pretty PHYSICAL ground teams with legit play action abilities. Garbers is a very good 2-way QB...basically Shane Fortney but with moxy and accuracy under pressure. Both will present big tests, especially BYU @ 6000 ft. We never get out of provo without a dawg fight. That's a dangerous game. Then a few weeks later Stanford. I see a home loss there potentially. Shaw is going to abuse our DL and shit backers (if Beavers isnt back by then)

    Go ahead and save. Could we be 5-0? Of course! But could we be 4-1? Absofuckinglutely! 3-2? Not likely. What I do know is we wont stop the run like we're accustomed to the last few years early, mostly vs pac12 teams and byu.
    MikeDamoneRaceBannonPurpleBaze
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Posts: 20,313
    10000 Comments Sixth Anniversary 250 Answers 500 Awesomes

    Bread said:

    Is this a test? Will everyone not picking TE be banished back to dawgman?

    Let's not pop corks over the CB room yet. Theres a combined 2 starts less Bryant. The only room to get excited about is too easy TE, center and both tackles and of course Haener. Guard is still a question mark. Has been for 2 years.
    Oh let's bury posts because they're objective. Suppose you fucking imbeciles think the defense is going to be better next year too??

    Just wait till Eastern obliterates our young DB's Sept 1st. We couldnt be facing a worse matchup out of the gates for 4 new starters in the secondary. But you guys didnt think of that huh? (Eastern will be a big test, they're good next year at qb and WR)

    Then Cal and BYU (not good opponents early for our new backers and Dline, db's in run support. They're pretty PHYSICAL ground teams with legit play action abilities. Garbers is a very good 2-way QB...basically Shane Fortney but with moxy and accuracy under pressure. Both will present big tests, especially BYU @ 6000 ft. We never get out of provo without a dawg fight. That's a dangerous game. Then a few weeks later Stanford. I see a home loss there potentially. Shaw is going to abuse our DL and shit backers (if Beavers isnt back by then)

    Go ahead and save. Could we be 5-0? Of course! But could we be 4-1? Absofuckinglutely! 3-2? Not likely. What I do know is we wont stop the run like we're accustomed to the last few years early, mostly vs pac12 teams and byu.
    I must not have watched Garbers single handily lose the bowl game vs TCU.
    GrundleStiltzkinAlexisPurpleBaze
  • Pitchfork51Pitchfork51 Posts: 12,443
    Standard Supporter 10000 Comments 250 Answers 500 Up Votes
    QB (Janet Reno)

    PurpleJ said:

    Bread said:

    Is this a test? Will everyone not picking TE be banished back to dawgman?

    Let's not pop corks over the CB room yet. Theres a combined 2 starts less Bryant. The only room to get excited about is too easy TE, center and both tackles and of course Haener. Guard is still a question mark. Has been for 2 years.
    How will we replace Feeney and Littleton???
    Ok J. You posted that exact same thing 3 years ago. You just keep getting brighter. Hint: theres been other backers since then haha
    J doesn't know shit huh pup
  • Bread said:

    Is this a test? Will everyone not picking TE be banished back to dawgman?

    Let's not pop corks over the CB room yet. Theres a combined 2 starts less Bryant. The only room to get excited about is too easy TE, center and both tackles and of course Haener. Guard is still a question mark. Has been for 2 years.
    Oh let's bury posts because they're objective. Suppose you fucking imbeciles think the defense is going to be better next year too??

    Just wait till Eastern obliterates our young DB's Sept 1st. We couldnt be facing a worse matchup out of the gates for 4 new starters in the secondary. But you guys didnt think of that huh? (Eastern will be a big test, they're good next year at qb and WR)

    Then Cal and BYU (not good opponents early for our new backers and Dline, db's in run support. They're pretty PHYSICAL ground teams with legit play action abilities. Garbers is a very good 2-way QB...basically Shane Fortney but with moxy and accuracy under pressure. Both will present big tests, especially BYU @ 6000 ft. We never get out of provo without a dawg fight. That's a dangerous game. Then a few weeks later Stanford. I see a home loss there potentially. Shaw is going to abuse our DL and shit backers (if Beavers isnt back by then)

    Go ahead and save. Could we be 5-0? Of course! But could we be 4-1? Absofuckinglutely! 3-2? Not likely. What I do know is we wont stop the run like we're accustomed to the last few years early, mostly vs pac12 teams and byu.
    I must not have watched Garbers single handily lose the bowl game vs TCU.
    Uhhhhh you fucking tard...he beat the best team in the pac12...and a few others. Jeez the retardation is contagious around this fuckhole
  • PurpleJ said:

    Bread said:

    Is this a test? Will everyone not picking TE be banished back to dawgman?

    Let's not pop corks over the CB room yet. Theres a combined 2 starts less Bryant. The only room to get excited about is too easy TE, center and both tackles and of course Haener. Guard is still a question mark. Has been for 2 years.
    How will we replace Feeney and Littleton???
    Ok J. You posted that exact same thing 3 years ago. You just keep getting brighter. Hint: theres been other backers since then haha
    J doesn't know shit huh pup
    And you do?
    Pitchfork51
  • puppylove_sugarsteelpuppylove_sugarsteel Posts: 8,150
    5000 Comments 250 Answers Fifth Anniversary 500 Awesomes
    edited April 17

    Bread said:

    Is this a test? Will everyone not picking TE be banished back to dawgman?

    Let's not pop corks over the CB room yet. Theres a combined 2 starts less Bryant. The only room to get excited about is too easy TE, center and both tackles and of course Haener. Guard is still a question mark. Has been for 2 years.
    Oh let's bury posts because they're objective. Suppose you fucking imbeciles think the defense is going to be better next year too??

    Just wait till Eastern obliterates our young DB's Sept 1st. We couldnt be facing a worse matchup out of the gates for 4 new starters in the secondary. But you guys didnt think of that huh? (Eastern will be a big test, they're good next year at qb and WR)

    Then Cal and BYU (not good opponents early for our new backers and Dline, db's in run support. They're pretty PHYSICAL ground teams with legit play action abilities. Garbers is a very good 2-way QB...basically Shane Fortney but with moxy and accuracy under pressure. Both will present big tests, especially BYU @ 6000 ft. We never get out of provo without a dawg fight. That's a dangerous game. Then a few weeks later Stanford. I see a home loss there potentially. Shaw is going to abuse our DL and shit backers (if Beavers isnt back by then)

    Go ahead and save. Could we be 5-0? Of course! But could we be 4-1? Absofuckinglutely! 3-2? Not likely. What I do know is we wont stop the run like we're accustomed to the last few years early, mostly vs pac12 teams and byu.
    It's like CNN. Just downvote the truth and objectivity. Of course dont rebut with anything, no counter argument, no debate, no opinion...just downvote. Fuck you guys..have a discussion. It's what a forum is for. If u disagree why? Wont hold breath. It's why dawgman forums work...and why the same 10 dipshits post here and they dont. Sorry Derek but fuuuuuck man!!
    Mad_SonGrundleStiltzkinGladstone
  • PurpleBazePurpleBaze Posts: 17,978
    Swaye's Wigwam 10000 Comments 250 Answers Sixth Anniversary

    Bread said:

    Is this a test? Will everyone not picking TE be banished back to dawgman?

    Let's not pop corks over the CB room yet. Theres a combined 2 starts less Bryant. The only room to get excited about is too easy TE, center and both tackles and of course Haener. Guard is still a question mark. Has been for 2 years.
    Oh let's bury posts because they're objective. Suppose you fucking imbeciles think the defense is going to be better next year too??

    Just wait till Eastern obliterates our young DB's Sept 1st. We couldnt be facing a worse matchup out of the gates for 4 new starters in the secondary. But you guys didnt think of that huh? (Eastern will be a big test, they're good next year at qb and WR)

    Then Cal and BYU (not good opponents early for our new backers and Dline, db's in run support. They're pretty PHYSICAL ground teams with legit play action abilities. Garbers is a very good 2-way QB...basically Shane Fortney but with moxy and accuracy under pressure. Both will present big tests, especially BYU @ 6000 ft. We never get out of provo without a dawg fight. That's a dangerous game. Then a few weeks later Stanford. I see a home loss there potentially. Shaw is going to abuse our DL and shit backers (if Beavers isnt back by then)

    Go ahead and save. Could we be 5-0? Of course! But could we be 4-1? Absofuckinglutely! 3-2? Not likely. What I do know is we wont stop the run like we're accustomed to the last few years early, mostly vs pac12 teams and byu.
    I laughed out loud.
    GrundleStiltzkin
  • PurpleBazePurpleBaze Posts: 17,978
    Swaye's Wigwam 10000 Comments 250 Answers Sixth Anniversary

    Bread said:

    Is this a test? Will everyone not picking TE be banished back to dawgman?

    Let's not pop corks over the CB room yet. Theres a combined 2 starts less Bryant. The only room to get excited about is too easy TE, center and both tackles and of course Haener. Guard is still a question mark. Has been for 2 years.
    Oh let's bury posts because they're objective. Suppose you fucking imbeciles think the defense is going to be better next year too??

    Just wait till Eastern obliterates our young DB's Sept 1st. We couldnt be facing a worse matchup out of the gates for 4 new starters in the secondary. But you guys didnt think of that huh? (Eastern will be a big test, they're good next year at qb and WR)

    Then Cal and BYU (not good opponents early for our new backers and Dline, db's in run support. They're pretty PHYSICAL ground teams with legit play action abilities. Garbers is a very good 2-way QB...basically Shane Fortney but with moxy and accuracy under pressure. Both will present big tests, especially BYU @ 6000 ft. We never get out of provo without a dawg fight. That's a dangerous game. Then a few weeks later Stanford. I see a home loss there potentially. Shaw is going to abuse our DL and shit backers (if Beavers isnt back by then)

    Go ahead and save. Could we be 5-0? Of course! But could we be 4-1? Absofuckinglutely! 3-2? Not likely. What I do know is we wont stop the run like we're accustomed to the last few years early, mostly vs pac12 teams and byu.
    It's like CNN. Just downvote the truth and objectivity. Of course dont rebut with anything, no counter argument, no debate, no opinion...just downvote. Fuck you guys..have a discussion. It's what a forum is for. If u disagree why? Wont hold breath. It's why dawgman forums work...and why the same 10 dipshits post here and they dont. Sorry Derek but fuuuuuck man!!
    I laughed out loud again.

    Thanks for making my day, pup.
  • LB (Janet Reno)

    Bread said:

    Is this a test? Will everyone not picking TE be banished back to dawgman?

    Let's not pop corks over the CB room yet. Theres a combined 2 starts less Bryant. The only room to get excited about is too easy TE, center and both tackles and of course Haener. Guard is still a question mark. Has been for 2 years.
    Oh let's bury posts because they're objective. Suppose you fucking imbeciles think the defense is going to be better next year too??

    Just wait till Eastern obliterates our young DB's Sept 1st. We couldnt be facing a worse matchup out of the gates for 4 new starters in the secondary. But you guys didnt think of that huh? (Eastern will be a big test, they're good next year at qb and WR)

    Then Cal and BYU (not good opponents early for our new backers and Dline, db's in run support. They're pretty PHYSICAL ground teams with legit play action abilities. Garbers is a very good 2-way QB...basically Shane Fortney but with moxy and accuracy under pressure. Both will present big tests, especially BYU @ 6000 ft. We never get out of provo without a dawg fight. That's a dangerous game. Then a few weeks later Stanford. I see a home loss there potentially. Shaw is going to abuse our DL and shit backers (if Beavers isnt back by then)

    Go ahead and save. Could we be 5-0? Of course! But could we be 4-1? Absofuckinglutely! 3-2? Not likely. What I do know is we wont stop the run like we're accustomed to the last few years early, mostly vs pac12 teams and byu.
    It's like CNN. Just downvote the truth and objectivity. Of course dont rebut with anything, no counter argument, no debate, no opinion...just downvote. Fuck you guys..have a discussion. It's what a forum is for. If u disagree why? Wont hold breath. It's why dawgman forums work...and why the same 10 dipshits post here and they dont. Sorry Derek but fuuuuuck man!!
    Ciara and I read this post together in bed.
  • Bread said:

    Is this a test? Will everyone not picking TE be banished back to dawgman?

    Let's not pop corks over the CB room yet. Theres a combined 2 starts less Bryant. The only room to get excited about is too easy TE, center and both tackles and of course Haener. Guard is still a question mark. Has been for 2 years.
    Oh let's bury posts because they're objective. Suppose you fucking imbeciles think the defense is going to be better next year too??

    Just wait till Eastern obliterates our young DB's Sept 1st. We couldnt be facing a worse matchup out of the gates for 4 new starters in the secondary. But you guys didnt think of that huh? (Eastern will be a big test, they're good next year at qb and WR)

    Then Cal and BYU (not good opponents early for our new backers and Dline, db's in run support. They're pretty PHYSICAL ground teams with legit play action abilities. Garbers is a very good 2-way QB...basically Shane Fortney but with moxy and accuracy under pressure. Both will present big tests, especially BYU @ 6000 ft. We never get out of provo without a dawg fight. That's a dangerous game. Then a few weeks later Stanford. I see a home loss there potentially. Shaw is going to abuse our DL and shit backers (if Beavers isnt back by then)

    Go ahead and save. Could we be 5-0? Of course! But could we be 4-1? Absofuckinglutely! 3-2? Not likely. What I do know is we wont stop the run like we're accustomed to the last few years early, mostly vs pac12 teams and byu.
    It's like CNN. Just downvote the truth and objectivity. Of course dont rebut with anything, no counter argument, no debate, no opinion...just downvote. Fuck you guys..have a discussion. It's what a forum is for. If u disagree why? Wont hold breath. It's why dawgman forums work...and why the same 10 dipshits post here and they dont. Sorry Derek but fuuuuuck man!!
    Ciara and I read this post together in bed.
    Crickets
    DooglesRaceBannon
Sign In or Register to comment.