Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Which position group are you most comfortable with going into the 2019 season?

2»

Comments

  • puppylove_sugarsteelpuppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker 5 Awesomes
    edited April 2019
    Bread said:

    Is this a test? Will everyone not picking TE be banished back to dawgman?

    Let's not pop corks over the CB room yet. Theres a combined 2 starts less Bryant. The only room to get excited about is too easy TE, center and both tackles and of course Haener. Guard is still a question mark. Has been for 2 years.
  • McLovinMcLovin Member Posts: 38
    5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes Photogenic
    TE (Janet Reno)
    This poll is pretty cool.
  • AlCzervikAlCzervik Member Posts: 1,774
    5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Anniversary First Answer
    Backup QB.

    Solid group behind Haener.
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 36,374
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes Combo Breaker
    Swaye's Wigwam
    CB (Janet Reno)

    Bread said:

    Is this a test? Will everyone not picking TE be banished back to dawgman?

    Let's not pop corks over the CB room yet. Theres a combined 2 starts less Bryant. The only room to get excited about is too easy TE, center and both tackles and of course Haener. Guard is still a question mark. Has been for 2 years.
    How will we replace Feeney and Littleton???
  • puppylove_sugarsteelpuppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker 5 Awesomes
    PurpleJ said:

    Bread said:

    Is this a test? Will everyone not picking TE be banished back to dawgman?

    Let's not pop corks over the CB room yet. Theres a combined 2 starts less Bryant. The only room to get excited about is too easy TE, center and both tackles and of course Haener. Guard is still a question mark. Has been for 2 years.
    How will we replace Feeney and Littleton???
    Ok J. You posted that exact same thing 3 years ago. You just keep getting brighter. Hint: theres been other backers since then haha
  • puppylove_sugarsteelpuppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker 5 Awesomes

    Bread said:

    Is this a test? Will everyone not picking TE be banished back to dawgman?

    Let's not pop corks over the CB room yet. Theres a combined 2 starts less Bryant. The only room to get excited about is too easy TE, center and both tackles and of course Haener. Guard is still a question mark. Has been for 2 years.
    Oh let's bury posts because they're objective. Suppose you fucking imbeciles think the defense is going to be better next year too??

    Just wait till Eastern obliterates our young DB's Sept 1st. We couldnt be facing a worse matchup out of the gates for 4 new starters in the secondary. But you guys didnt think of that huh? (Eastern will be a big test, they're good next year at qb and WR)

    Then Cal and BYU (not good opponents early for our new backers and Dline, db's in run support. They're pretty PHYSICAL ground teams with legit play action abilities. Garbers is a very good 2-way QB...basically Shane Fortney but with moxy and accuracy under pressure. Both will present big tests, especially BYU @ 6000 ft. We never get out of provo without a dawg fight. That's a dangerous game. Then a few weeks later Stanford. I see a home loss there potentially. Shaw is going to abuse our DL and shit backers (if Beavers isnt back by then)

    Go ahead and save. Could we be 5-0? Of course! But could we be 4-1? Absofuckinglutely! 3-2? Not likely. What I do know is we wont stop the run like we're accustomed to the last few years early, mostly vs pac12 teams and byu.
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,123
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker
    Swaye's Wigwam

    Bread said:

    Is this a test? Will everyone not picking TE be banished back to dawgman?

    Let's not pop corks over the CB room yet. Theres a combined 2 starts less Bryant. The only room to get excited about is too easy TE, center and both tackles and of course Haener. Guard is still a question mark. Has been for 2 years.
    Oh let's bury posts because they're objective. Suppose you fucking imbeciles think the defense is going to be better next year too??

    Just wait till Eastern obliterates our young DB's Sept 1st. We couldnt be facing a worse matchup out of the gates for 4 new starters in the secondary. But you guys didnt think of that huh? (Eastern will be a big test, they're good next year at qb and WR)

    Then Cal and BYU (not good opponents early for our new backers and Dline, db's in run support. They're pretty PHYSICAL ground teams with legit play action abilities. Garbers is a very good 2-way QB...basically Shane Fortney but with moxy and accuracy under pressure. Both will present big tests, especially BYU @ 6000 ft. We never get out of provo without a dawg fight. That's a dangerous game. Then a few weeks later Stanford. I see a home loss there potentially. Shaw is going to abuse our DL and shit backers (if Beavers isnt back by then)

    Go ahead and save. Could we be 5-0? Of course! But could we be 4-1? Absofuckinglutely! 3-2? Not likely. What I do know is we wont stop the run like we're accustomed to the last few years early, mostly vs pac12 teams and byu.
    I must not have watched Garbers single handily lose the bowl game vs TCU.
  • Pitchfork51Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 26,538
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker
    QB (Janet Reno)

    PurpleJ said:

    Bread said:

    Is this a test? Will everyone not picking TE be banished back to dawgman?

    Let's not pop corks over the CB room yet. Theres a combined 2 starts less Bryant. The only room to get excited about is too easy TE, center and both tackles and of course Haener. Guard is still a question mark. Has been for 2 years.
    How will we replace Feeney and Littleton???
    Ok J. You posted that exact same thing 3 years ago. You just keep getting brighter. Hint: theres been other backers since then haha
    J doesn't know shit huh pup
  • puppylove_sugarsteelpuppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker 5 Awesomes

    Bread said:

    Is this a test? Will everyone not picking TE be banished back to dawgman?

    Let's not pop corks over the CB room yet. Theres a combined 2 starts less Bryant. The only room to get excited about is too easy TE, center and both tackles and of course Haener. Guard is still a question mark. Has been for 2 years.
    Oh let's bury posts because they're objective. Suppose you fucking imbeciles think the defense is going to be better next year too??

    Just wait till Eastern obliterates our young DB's Sept 1st. We couldnt be facing a worse matchup out of the gates for 4 new starters in the secondary. But you guys didnt think of that huh? (Eastern will be a big test, they're good next year at qb and WR)

    Then Cal and BYU (not good opponents early for our new backers and Dline, db's in run support. They're pretty PHYSICAL ground teams with legit play action abilities. Garbers is a very good 2-way QB...basically Shane Fortney but with moxy and accuracy under pressure. Both will present big tests, especially BYU @ 6000 ft. We never get out of provo without a dawg fight. That's a dangerous game. Then a few weeks later Stanford. I see a home loss there potentially. Shaw is going to abuse our DL and shit backers (if Beavers isnt back by then)

    Go ahead and save. Could we be 5-0? Of course! But could we be 4-1? Absofuckinglutely! 3-2? Not likely. What I do know is we wont stop the run like we're accustomed to the last few years early, mostly vs pac12 teams and byu.
    I must not have watched Garbers single handily lose the bowl game vs TCU.
    Uhhhhh you fucking tard...he beat the best team in the pac12...and a few others. Jeez the retardation is contagious around this fuckhole
  • puppylove_sugarsteelpuppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker 5 Awesomes

    PurpleJ said:

    Bread said:

    Is this a test? Will everyone not picking TE be banished back to dawgman?

    Let's not pop corks over the CB room yet. Theres a combined 2 starts less Bryant. The only room to get excited about is too easy TE, center and both tackles and of course Haener. Guard is still a question mark. Has been for 2 years.
    How will we replace Feeney and Littleton???
    Ok J. You posted that exact same thing 3 years ago. You just keep getting brighter. Hint: theres been other backers since then haha
    J doesn't know shit huh pup
    And you do?
  • puppylove_sugarsteelpuppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker 5 Awesomes
    edited April 2019

    Bread said:

    Is this a test? Will everyone not picking TE be banished back to dawgman?

    Let's not pop corks over the CB room yet. Theres a combined 2 starts less Bryant. The only room to get excited about is too easy TE, center and both tackles and of course Haener. Guard is still a question mark. Has been for 2 years.
    Oh let's bury posts because they're objective. Suppose you fucking imbeciles think the defense is going to be better next year too??

    Just wait till Eastern obliterates our young DB's Sept 1st. We couldnt be facing a worse matchup out of the gates for 4 new starters in the secondary. But you guys didnt think of that huh? (Eastern will be a big test, they're good next year at qb and WR)

    Then Cal and BYU (not good opponents early for our new backers and Dline, db's in run support. They're pretty PHYSICAL ground teams with legit play action abilities. Garbers is a very good 2-way QB...basically Shane Fortney but with moxy and accuracy under pressure. Both will present big tests, especially BYU @ 6000 ft. We never get out of provo without a dawg fight. That's a dangerous game. Then a few weeks later Stanford. I see a home loss there potentially. Shaw is going to abuse our DL and shit backers (if Beavers isnt back by then)

    Go ahead and save. Could we be 5-0? Of course! But could we be 4-1? Absofuckinglutely! 3-2? Not likely. What I do know is we wont stop the run like we're accustomed to the last few years early, mostly vs pac12 teams and byu.
    It's like CNN. Just downvote the truth and objectivity. Of course dont rebut with anything, no counter argument, no debate, no opinion...just downvote. Fuck you guys..have a discussion. It's what a forum is for. If u disagree why? Wont hold breath. It's why dawgman forums work...and why the same 10 dipshits post here and they dont. Sorry Derek but fuuuuuck man!!
  • PurpleBazePurpleBaze Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 29,483
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Founders Club

    Bread said:

    Is this a test? Will everyone not picking TE be banished back to dawgman?

    Let's not pop corks over the CB room yet. Theres a combined 2 starts less Bryant. The only room to get excited about is too easy TE, center and both tackles and of course Haener. Guard is still a question mark. Has been for 2 years.
    Oh let's bury posts because they're objective. Suppose you fucking imbeciles think the defense is going to be better next year too??

    Just wait till Eastern obliterates our young DB's Sept 1st. We couldnt be facing a worse matchup out of the gates for 4 new starters in the secondary. But you guys didnt think of that huh? (Eastern will be a big test, they're good next year at qb and WR)

    Then Cal and BYU (not good opponents early for our new backers and Dline, db's in run support. They're pretty PHYSICAL ground teams with legit play action abilities. Garbers is a very good 2-way QB...basically Shane Fortney but with moxy and accuracy under pressure. Both will present big tests, especially BYU @ 6000 ft. We never get out of provo without a dawg fight. That's a dangerous game. Then a few weeks later Stanford. I see a home loss there potentially. Shaw is going to abuse our DL and shit backers (if Beavers isnt back by then)

    Go ahead and save. Could we be 5-0? Of course! But could we be 4-1? Absofuckinglutely! 3-2? Not likely. What I do know is we wont stop the run like we're accustomed to the last few years early, mostly vs pac12 teams and byu.
    I laughed out loud.
  • PurpleBazePurpleBaze Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 29,483
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Founders Club

    Bread said:

    Is this a test? Will everyone not picking TE be banished back to dawgman?

    Let's not pop corks over the CB room yet. Theres a combined 2 starts less Bryant. The only room to get excited about is too easy TE, center and both tackles and of course Haener. Guard is still a question mark. Has been for 2 years.
    Oh let's bury posts because they're objective. Suppose you fucking imbeciles think the defense is going to be better next year too??

    Just wait till Eastern obliterates our young DB's Sept 1st. We couldnt be facing a worse matchup out of the gates for 4 new starters in the secondary. But you guys didnt think of that huh? (Eastern will be a big test, they're good next year at qb and WR)

    Then Cal and BYU (not good opponents early for our new backers and Dline, db's in run support. They're pretty PHYSICAL ground teams with legit play action abilities. Garbers is a very good 2-way QB...basically Shane Fortney but with moxy and accuracy under pressure. Both will present big tests, especially BYU @ 6000 ft. We never get out of provo without a dawg fight. That's a dangerous game. Then a few weeks later Stanford. I see a home loss there potentially. Shaw is going to abuse our DL and shit backers (if Beavers isnt back by then)

    Go ahead and save. Could we be 5-0? Of course! But could we be 4-1? Absofuckinglutely! 3-2? Not likely. What I do know is we wont stop the run like we're accustomed to the last few years early, mostly vs pac12 teams and byu.
    It's like CNN. Just downvote the truth and objectivity. Of course dont rebut with anything, no counter argument, no debate, no opinion...just downvote. Fuck you guys..have a discussion. It's what a forum is for. If u disagree why? Wont hold breath. It's why dawgman forums work...and why the same 10 dipshits post here and they dont. Sorry Derek but fuuuuuck man!!
    I laughed out loud again.

    Thanks for making my day, pup.
  • Bedroom_RussBedroom_Russ Member Posts: 105
    First Comment Name Dropper First Anniversary 5 Awesomes
    LB (Janet Reno)

    Bread said:

    Is this a test? Will everyone not picking TE be banished back to dawgman?

    Let's not pop corks over the CB room yet. Theres a combined 2 starts less Bryant. The only room to get excited about is too easy TE, center and both tackles and of course Haener. Guard is still a question mark. Has been for 2 years.
    Oh let's bury posts because they're objective. Suppose you fucking imbeciles think the defense is going to be better next year too??

    Just wait till Eastern obliterates our young DB's Sept 1st. We couldnt be facing a worse matchup out of the gates for 4 new starters in the secondary. But you guys didnt think of that huh? (Eastern will be a big test, they're good next year at qb and WR)

    Then Cal and BYU (not good opponents early for our new backers and Dline, db's in run support. They're pretty PHYSICAL ground teams with legit play action abilities. Garbers is a very good 2-way QB...basically Shane Fortney but with moxy and accuracy under pressure. Both will present big tests, especially BYU @ 6000 ft. We never get out of provo without a dawg fight. That's a dangerous game. Then a few weeks later Stanford. I see a home loss there potentially. Shaw is going to abuse our DL and shit backers (if Beavers isnt back by then)

    Go ahead and save. Could we be 5-0? Of course! But could we be 4-1? Absofuckinglutely! 3-2? Not likely. What I do know is we wont stop the run like we're accustomed to the last few years early, mostly vs pac12 teams and byu.
    It's like CNN. Just downvote the truth and objectivity. Of course dont rebut with anything, no counter argument, no debate, no opinion...just downvote. Fuck you guys..have a discussion. It's what a forum is for. If u disagree why? Wont hold breath. It's why dawgman forums work...and why the same 10 dipshits post here and they dont. Sorry Derek but fuuuuuck man!!
    Ciara and I read this post together in bed.
  • puppylove_sugarsteelpuppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker 5 Awesomes

    Bread said:

    Is this a test? Will everyone not picking TE be banished back to dawgman?

    Let's not pop corks over the CB room yet. Theres a combined 2 starts less Bryant. The only room to get excited about is too easy TE, center and both tackles and of course Haener. Guard is still a question mark. Has been for 2 years.
    Oh let's bury posts because they're objective. Suppose you fucking imbeciles think the defense is going to be better next year too??

    Just wait till Eastern obliterates our young DB's Sept 1st. We couldnt be facing a worse matchup out of the gates for 4 new starters in the secondary. But you guys didnt think of that huh? (Eastern will be a big test, they're good next year at qb and WR)

    Then Cal and BYU (not good opponents early for our new backers and Dline, db's in run support. They're pretty PHYSICAL ground teams with legit play action abilities. Garbers is a very good 2-way QB...basically Shane Fortney but with moxy and accuracy under pressure. Both will present big tests, especially BYU @ 6000 ft. We never get out of provo without a dawg fight. That's a dangerous game. Then a few weeks later Stanford. I see a home loss there potentially. Shaw is going to abuse our DL and shit backers (if Beavers isnt back by then)

    Go ahead and save. Could we be 5-0? Of course! But could we be 4-1? Absofuckinglutely! 3-2? Not likely. What I do know is we wont stop the run like we're accustomed to the last few years early, mostly vs pac12 teams and byu.
    It's like CNN. Just downvote the truth and objectivity. Of course dont rebut with anything, no counter argument, no debate, no opinion...just downvote. Fuck you guys..have a discussion. It's what a forum is for. If u disagree why? Wont hold breath. It's why dawgman forums work...and why the same 10 dipshits post here and they dont. Sorry Derek but fuuuuuck man!!
    Ciara and I read this post together in bed.
    Crickets
Sign In or Register to comment.