55 Million Babies Killed Since Roe v. Wade; 1/3 of a Generation.
Comments
-
I like to be d2dfs and complain about too many Americans in one thread then complain that we need 55 million more Americans in another thread.
I do that. -
Do you support the death penalty?DeepPurple said:I wonder what the crime rate would be in the US if it had 55 Million more unwanted and neglected children forced through society...
-
I think DNC covered this pretty well on page 1.DeepPurple said:I wonder what the crime rate would be in the US if it had 55 Million more unwanted and neglected children forced through society...
-
If I like my coat hanger abortions, can I keep them?
-
I'm sure someone has punched that whore who brought you into the world square in the mouth for not having met her obligation to use the shop vac after that homeless guy mounted her and you were thus conceived.death2ducks said:6 Million Jews? Try 55 Million American Babies. Who knows, one of them might have discovered a cure for cancer. 40 years ago today, Roe v. Wade was decided. It needs to be a day of reflection.
lifenews.com/2013/01/22/i-am-overwhelmed-by-55-million-babies-killed-since-roe-v-wade/
Punch her again for me anyway. She really should have had you scraped off the ute! Sorry. But it's true. -
Awesome'd, but that doesn't feel like enough.creepycoug said:
I'm sure someone has punched that whore who brought you into the world square in the mouth for not having met her obligation to use the shop vac after that homeless guy mounted her and you were thus conceived.death2ducks said:6 Million Jews? Try 55 Million American Babies. Who knows, one of them might have discovered a cure for cancer. 40 years ago today, Roe v. Wade was decided. It needs to be a day of reflection.
lifenews.com/2013/01/22/i-am-overwhelmed-by-55-million-babies-killed-since-roe-v-wade/
Punch her again for me anyway. She really should have had you scraped off the ute! Sorry. But it's true. -
I don't like abortion. But what I like and don't like is of little consequence to other people.
I am amused people who want the rights of women would throw blankets over what they find offensive. Freedom is a 2 way street.
I am amused Planned Parenthood no longer wants to call it pro-choice.
I wonder what is worse ... allowing an ill equipped woman to abort or having to deal with the issue of neglect and heartbreak those children would have to endure.
Freakanomics talks about the correlation between abortion and the drop in crime.
I happily married with two wonderful sons ... we made the right choice. I am sure those who chose to abort made the right choice for themselves. -
what the fuck does this have to do with the Affordable Care Act? get back on topic tops.topdawgnc said:I don't like abortion. But what I like and don't like is of little consequence to other people.
I am amused people who want the rights of women would throw blankets over what they find offensive. Freedom is a 2 way street.
I am amused Planned Parenthood no longer wants to call it pro-choice.
I wonder what is worse ... allowing an ill equipped woman to abort or having to deal with the issue of neglect and heartbreak those children would have to endure.
Freakanomics talks about the correlation between abortion and the drop in crime.
I happily married with two wonderful sons ... we made the right choice. I am sure those who chose to abort made the right choice for themselves. -
I think everyone with an IQ below 100 should be forced to have an abortion. Too many fucking idiots running around these days, posting in threads like this. We need lifeguards at the gene pool.
-
Yes.RaceBannon said:
Do you support the death penalty?DeepPurple said:I wonder what the crime rate would be in the US if it had 55 Million more unwanted and neglected children forced through society...
I also support sterilizing those that are unfit to be parents.
Contributing to the population should be limited to those that have the ability to not fuck it up. -
Sorry, I'm using a mobile device... must have missed it.allpurpleallgold said:
I think DNC covered this pretty well on page 1.DeepPurple said:I wonder what the crime rate would be in the US if it had 55 Million more unwanted and neglected children forced through society...
-
Now that's what I call comedic timing.DeepPurple said:
Sorry, I'm using a mobile device... must have missed it.allpurpleallgold said:
I think DNC covered this pretty well on page 1.DeepPurple said:I wonder what the crime rate would be in the US if it had 55 Million more unwanted and neglected children forced through society...
I literally laughed out loud here in my pretend lawyer office. -
when you get your first blow jobsarktastic said:
When you get your drivers licenseTravis Morris said:
Serious question: When does life begin?dnc said:
+1Travis Morris said:can you imagine if all 55 mill had been born?
I think this country has enough fucking problems already, dont you?
Why stop at birth? We should be able to kill babies in their first year. Think of all the problems we could solve.
and after you've had your last, life is effectively over. -
Let me put it terms that this Bored can understand... In the 55 Million babies killed, were there any 5 Star Commits to the UW?RaceBannon said:Can't we get back to talking about climate change?
Mods? Can this go onto the Football Bored now?
-
I notice that you spill your semen on the ground, especially after visiting this bored on Fridays. Don't lie - I'm watching.
Shit - I should get a job with the NSA. I wonder how many Talents they'd pay for my intel? -
It doesn't matter when life begins. It matters when humanity begins. I think the vast majority of people have no problem with killing things in general (like fish and carrots) but take offense to killing humans. I have done a fair amount of research to address this since I prefer to make informed decisions. In terms of typical abortion vernacular, the lumps of cells that have potential to eventually turn into a human actually begin to have a consciousness early in the third trimester. As such, as far as I am concerned, a fetus is a human starting in trimester number three. This is based on scientific studies, not some emotional feeling about what I think looks like a baby. If a woman wants an abortion in the first two trimesters she should be able to do whatever she wants with her own body. Once there is an actual cluster of cells that can reasonably classified as a human and not simply overgrown sperm that is when the right to an abortion should no longer be as casual as a whim, if someone so wants. From third trimester and on, a woman should only be able to have an abortion if the pregnancy is threatening her life OR if the fetus is not viable. There is no reason for a woman with family and friends to die so that a motherless infant with no connections to the world can come to be. To say that someone who has a place in this world and is loved has a lower priority than an unborn, unconnected, probably unloved except by the mother is ludicrous. Likewise, if a medical professional establishes that a fetus can not survive, it is stupid to subject a woman to the pain and prolonged heartache of a failed pregnancy.
TL;DR version:
Abortions for all in the first two trimesters.
Abortions only if the mother's life is threatened or the fetus is unviable in the third trimester. -
TL;DR the supreme court majority opinion in Roe v Wade.Mad_Son said:It doesn't matter when life begins. It matters when humanity begins. I think the vast majority of people have no problem with killing things in general (like fish and carrots) but take offense to killing humans. I have done a fair amount of research to address this since I prefer to make informed decisions. In terms of typical abortion vernacular, the lumps of cells that have potential to eventually turn into a human actually begin to have a consciousness early in the third trimester. As such, as far as I am concerned, a fetus is a human starting in trimester number three. This is based on scientific studies, not some emotional feeling about what I think looks like a baby. If a woman wants an abortion in the first two trimesters she should be able to do whatever she wants with her own body. Once there is an actual cluster of cells that can reasonably classified as a human and not simply overgrown sperm that is when the right to an abortion should no longer be as casual as a whim, if someone so wants. From third trimester and on, a woman should only be able to have an abortion if the pregnancy is threatening her life OR if the fetus is not viable. There is no reason for a woman with family and friends to die so that a motherless infant with no connections to the world can come to be. To say that someone who has a place in this world and is loved has a lower priority than an unborn, unconnected, probably unloved except by the mother is ludicrous. Likewise, if a medical professional establishes that a fetus can not survive, it is stupid to subject a woman to the pain and prolonged heartache of a failed pregnancy.
TL;DR version:
Abortions for all in the first two trimesters.
Abortions only if the mother's life is threatened or the fetus is unviable in the third trimester.
-
Well thought out argument.Mad_Son said:It doesn't matter when life begins. It matters when humanity begins. I think the vast majority of people have no problem with killing things in general (like fish and carrots) but take offense to killing humans. I have done a fair amount of research to address this since I prefer to make informed decisions. In terms of typical abortion vernacular, the lumps of cells that have potential to eventually turn into a human actually begin to have a consciousness early in the third trimester. As such, as far as I am concerned, a fetus is a human starting in trimester number three. This is based on scientific studies, not some emotional feeling about what I think looks like a baby. If a woman wants an abortion in the first two trimesters she should be able to do whatever she wants with her own body. Once there is an actual cluster of cells that can reasonably classified as a human and not simply overgrown sperm that is when the right to an abortion should no longer be as casual as a whim, if someone so wants. From third trimester and on, a woman should only be able to have an abortion if the pregnancy is threatening her life OR if the fetus is not viable. There is no reason for a woman with family and friends to die so that a motherless infant with no connections to the world can come to be. To say that someone who has a place in this world and is loved has a lower priority than an unborn, unconnected, probably unloved except by the mother is ludicrous. Likewise, if a medical professional establishes that a fetus can not survive, it is stupid to subject a woman to the pain and prolonged heartache of a failed pregnancy.
TL;DR version:
Abortions for all in the first two trimesters.
Abortions only if the mother's life is threatened or the fetus is unviable in the third trimester.
SCOTUS (Scrotum is a more apt term) needs to be obliterated. Of all the 3 branches of government, SCROTUM is the one that is most out of control and needs some mother fucking checks and balances shoved down their throats. 9 people shouldn't be deciding the moral pathway of an entire nation.CollegeDoog said: -
Hi there. I see you're unfamiliar with the petty, venal, shitstains that make up the United States congress.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Well thought out argument.Mad_Son said:It doesn't matter when life begins. It matters when humanity begins. I think the vast majority of people have no problem with killing things in general (like fish and carrots) but take offense to killing humans. I have done a fair amount of research to address this since I prefer to make informed decisions. In terms of typical abortion vernacular, the lumps of cells that have potential to eventually turn into a human actually begin to have a consciousness early in the third trimester. As such, as far as I am concerned, a fetus is a human starting in trimester number three. This is based on scientific studies, not some emotional feeling about what I think looks like a baby. If a woman wants an abortion in the first two trimesters she should be able to do whatever she wants with her own body. Once there is an actual cluster of cells that can reasonably classified as a human and not simply overgrown sperm that is when the right to an abortion should no longer be as casual as a whim, if someone so wants. From third trimester and on, a woman should only be able to have an abortion if the pregnancy is threatening her life OR if the fetus is not viable. There is no reason for a woman with family and friends to die so that a motherless infant with no connections to the world can come to be. To say that someone who has a place in this world and is loved has a lower priority than an unborn, unconnected, probably unloved except by the mother is ludicrous. Likewise, if a medical professional establishes that a fetus can not survive, it is stupid to subject a woman to the pain and prolonged heartache of a failed pregnancy.
TL;DR version:
Abortions for all in the first two trimesters.
Abortions only if the mother's life is threatened or the fetus is unviable in the third trimester.
SCOTUS (Scrotum is a more apt term) needs to be obliterated. Of all the 3 branches of government, SCROTUM is the one that is most out of control and needs some mother fucking checks and balances shoved down their throats. 9 people shouldn't be deciding the moral pathway of an entire nation.CollegeDoog said: -
Congress can't really fuck too much shit up until the President vetoes their legislation, whereas the Supremes have established that it's almost unheard of for their decisions to be overruled by acts of Congress (ie Constitutional amendments). Imo, obk is right that SCOTUS needs further checks. Say an age limit of 75.CollegeDoog said:
Hi there. I see you're unfamiliar with the petty, venal, shitstains that make up the United States congress.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Well thought out argument.Mad_Son said:It doesn't matter when life begins. It matters when humanity begins. I think the vast majority of people have no problem with killing things in general (like fish and carrots) but take offense to killing humans. I have done a fair amount of research to address this since I prefer to make informed decisions. In terms of typical abortion vernacular, the lumps of cells that have potential to eventually turn into a human actually begin to have a consciousness early in the third trimester. As such, as far as I am concerned, a fetus is a human starting in trimester number three. This is based on scientific studies, not some emotional feeling about what I think looks like a baby. If a woman wants an abortion in the first two trimesters she should be able to do whatever she wants with her own body. Once there is an actual cluster of cells that can reasonably classified as a human and not simply overgrown sperm that is when the right to an abortion should no longer be as casual as a whim, if someone so wants. From third trimester and on, a woman should only be able to have an abortion if the pregnancy is threatening her life OR if the fetus is not viable. There is no reason for a woman with family and friends to die so that a motherless infant with no connections to the world can come to be. To say that someone who has a place in this world and is loved has a lower priority than an unborn, unconnected, probably unloved except by the mother is ludicrous. Likewise, if a medical professional establishes that a fetus can not survive, it is stupid to subject a woman to the pain and prolonged heartache of a failed pregnancy.
TL;DR version:
Abortions for all in the first two trimesters.
Abortions only if the mother's life is threatened or the fetus is unviable in the third trimester.
SCOTUS (Scrotum is a more apt term) needs to be obliterated. Of all the 3 branches of government, SCROTUM is the one that is most out of control and needs some mother fucking checks and balances shoved down their throats. 9 people shouldn't be deciding the moral pathway of an entire nation.CollegeDoog said: -
Ehhh, I'd say SCOTUS was the purest of the three institutions before it became a highly politicized body like it is now.doogsinparadise said:
Congress can't really fuck too much shit up until the President vetoes their legislation, whereas the Supremes have established that it's almost unheard of for their decisions to be overruled by acts of Congress (ie Constitutional amendments). Imo, obk is right that SCOTUS needs further checks. Say an age limit of 75.CollegeDoog said:
Hi there. I see you're unfamiliar with the petty, venal, shitstains that make up the United States congress.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Well thought out argument.Mad_Son said:It doesn't matter when life begins. It matters when humanity begins. I think the vast majority of people have no problem with killing things in general (like fish and carrots) but take offense to killing humans. I have done a fair amount of research to address this since I prefer to make informed decisions. In terms of typical abortion vernacular, the lumps of cells that have potential to eventually turn into a human actually begin to have a consciousness early in the third trimester. As such, as far as I am concerned, a fetus is a human starting in trimester number three. This is based on scientific studies, not some emotional feeling about what I think looks like a baby. If a woman wants an abortion in the first two trimesters she should be able to do whatever she wants with her own body. Once there is an actual cluster of cells that can reasonably classified as a human and not simply overgrown sperm that is when the right to an abortion should no longer be as casual as a whim, if someone so wants. From third trimester and on, a woman should only be able to have an abortion if the pregnancy is threatening her life OR if the fetus is not viable. There is no reason for a woman with family and friends to die so that a motherless infant with no connections to the world can come to be. To say that someone who has a place in this world and is loved has a lower priority than an unborn, unconnected, probably unloved except by the mother is ludicrous. Likewise, if a medical professional establishes that a fetus can not survive, it is stupid to subject a woman to the pain and prolonged heartache of a failed pregnancy.
TL;DR version:
Abortions for all in the first two trimesters.
Abortions only if the mother's life is threatened or the fetus is unviable in the third trimester.
SCOTUS (Scrotum is a more apt term) needs to be obliterated. Of all the 3 branches of government, SCROTUM is the one that is most out of control and needs some mother fucking checks and balances shoved down their throats. 9 people shouldn't be deciding the moral pathway of an entire nation.CollegeDoog said: -
I've always been a big fan of the Justices that have gone away from the ideologies of the President that nominated them.
-
You guys blowing each other is so adorable.
-
THANK GOD!!!! Could you imagine 55 million more dead beats running around? I hope we double that number in the next fifty years!!!
-
Get real, I blow myself. Don't need any help with that thank you very much.
-
Does the Affordable Health Care Act pay for my concubines abortion?creepycoug said:
what the fuck does this have to do with the Affordable Care Act? get back on topic tops.topdawgnc said:I don't like abortion. But what I like and don't like is of little consequence to other people.
I am amused people who want the rights of women would throw blankets over what they find offensive. Freedom is a 2 way street.
I am amused Planned Parenthood no longer wants to call it pro-choice.
I wonder what is worse ... allowing an ill equipped woman to abort or having to deal with the issue of neglect and heartbreak those children would have to endure.
Freakanomics talks about the correlation between abortion and the drop in crime.
I happily married with two wonderful sons ... we made the right choice. I am sure those who chose to abort made the right choice for themselves.
If so I am in. -
Someone is begging for a citrus dropdeath2ducks said:You guys blowing each other is so adorable.
-
-
Jesus that was bad
-
It pays for EVERYTHING.topdawgnc said:
Does the Affordable Health Care Act pay for my concubines abortion?creepycoug said:
what the fuck does this have to do with the Affordable Care Act? get back on topic tops.topdawgnc said:I don't like abortion. But what I like and don't like is of little consequence to other people.
I am amused people who want the rights of women would throw blankets over what they find offensive. Freedom is a 2 way street.
I am amused Planned Parenthood no longer wants to call it pro-choice.
I wonder what is worse ... allowing an ill equipped woman to abort or having to deal with the issue of neglect and heartbreak those children would have to endure.
Freakanomics talks about the correlation between abortion and the drop in crime.
I happily married with two wonderful sons ... we made the right choice. I am sure those who chose to abort made the right choice for themselves.
If so I am in.
Look at it this way. If the Affordable Care Act had been in place when death2duck's whoring mother conceived him, she'd have had enough money to have him scraped off her ute and the world would be a slightly less shitty place.
![[Deleted User]](https://w0.vanillicon.com/0207c5b8d9863e3a221f61582bd6bfa3_100.png)
