Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Explanation for the banning of Harvey Road
Comments
-
Disagree. He's the Coogliest.HillsboroDuck said:
Harv is many things, but a Coog is not one of them.He_Needs_More_Time said:
I'd argue this whole day has been cringe embarassing for everyone including myself. I mean the main topic we are discussing on a Husky board is a Coog getting banned.MikeDamone said:
*cringe. Embarrassing really.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Yes I did since he's been doing that all day. Also Mods I'd like to report that Damone is picking on me? Since we ban people now for picking on others apparently.MikeDamone said:
Did you just drop the equivalent of "I know I am but what are you"?He_Needs_More_Time said:
CouldTheKobeStopper said:
Could Harvs balls be any further down your throat?He_Needs_More_Time said:
No shit! Now we'll be talking about how Harv was banned instead of before. Either way this board is dominated by Harv.TierbsHsotBoobs said:It's a good thing we banned Harv. The bored is totally back on topic now.
Lather, rinse, repeat.
He still wins.
Lather, Rinse, Repeat.Dereks?RoadDawgs be any further down yours?
If you can't see how this banning then reaction is exactly what Harv wanted then I can't help you.
Good Christ. Stop.
-
No, I haven't. That's a lie.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Yes I did since he's been doing that all day. Also Mods I'd like to report that Damone is picking on me? Since we ban people now for picking on others apparently.MikeDamone said:
Did you just drop the equivalent of "I know I am but what are you"?He_Needs_More_Time said:
CouldTheKobeStopper said:
Could Harvs balls be any further down your throat?He_Needs_More_Time said:
No shit! Now we'll be talking about how Harv was banned instead of before. Either way this board is dominated by Harv.TierbsHsotBoobs said:It's a good thing we banned Harv. The bored is totally back on topic now.
Lather, rinse, repeat.
He still wins.
Lather, Rinse, Repeat.Dereks?RoadDawgs be any further down yours?
If you can't see how this banning then reaction is exactly what Harv wanted then I can't help you.
Good Christ. Stop. -
He_Needs_More_Time said:
RoadDawg was practically bending over inviting everyone to run a train on him. Did you see his posts the last 24 hours?HillsboroDuck said:
A little Harv goes a long way. Boards are best when Harv is lurking and pops in every couple or months or things to liven things up and make his presence felt. If Derek takes Harv off his leash come September it will be interesting. If he does not, it will be less interesting.He_Needs_More_Time said:Every board is better off with Harv than without it. Derek, I think banning him just opens up a can of worms.
Also a bit hypocritical since we all complain how Kim is ban happy.
And while I agree with the sentiment about Harv making newbies his own personal millcreekcoog, Harv wasn't exactly running a train on RoadDawg by himself.
Derek look at your original message for this board though. Your advice was for those who don't get it to lurk for a while so they aren't exposed. RoadDawg clearly doesn't get it.
Harv is what he is. Anyone who takes his baiting seriously this forum is better off without them. I mean he basically ran that Bert Winthrop guy. Judging by his posts that was a good thing not a bad thing too.
This also sets a bad precedent which you always complained about Kim. If you aren't toeing the company line you get banned. Harv wasn't toeing your company line so he was banned. Sets a terrible precedent going forward. Just like dawgboard did when they banned Harv's "cfetters" account but allowed other fake accounts on there.
Everyone draws the line somewhere, but we've shown just about everything is fair game here. As we've said before, if someone posts porn, people's personal info or outright slander, that can't happen. RoadDawg has certainly struggled to grasp certain basics, but RoadDawg was but a small part of this decision. I've been getting feedback from several people who said they're looking for a new place to hang out but wouldn't do it with Harvey here... When I told Harv that he could be an asset around here I meant it, and I do think it's a shame. I enjoyed a lot of his posts.
I can understand some of the angst but I'm comfortable with the decision. Time will show there is no slippery slope because that's not where we're at in terms of a philosophy.
-
I am overjoyed that after a pleasant (and long) vacation I came back and the cuntwaffle name was dutifully taken by some UW patriot.CuntWaffle said:Everyone just needs some cheap liquor and hookers and all will be well.
Noble work.
-
Harv is funny and has strangely good points at times... but it has to be in moderation. At least to people who aren't 50% Harv themselves. I actually really like RD55's posts as they relate to Husky football and prefer him to be attacked on the merit of his posts rather than whatever he was being prison-raped over today.
-
Obligatory "RIP Harv."
T's and P's and all that jazz. -
The problem at Dawgman is that assholes and idiots were running the show. I've had limited dealings with DJ but so far he seems like neither of those things. Although the Tebow article didn't help.DerekJohnson said:There's no hypocrisy. Everyone in life draws the line somewhere.
If someone kept posting child pornHe_Needs_More_Time said:
RoadDawg was practically bending over inviting everyone to run a train on him. Did you see his posts the last 24 hours?HillsboroDuck said:
A little Harv goes a long way. Boards are best when Harv is lurking and pops in every couple or months or things to liven things up and make his presence felt. If Derek takes Harv off his leash come September it will be interesting. If he does not, it will be less interesting.He_Needs_More_Time said:Every board is better off with Harv than without it. Derek, I think banning him just opens up a can of worms.
Also a bit hypocritical since we all complain how Kim is ban happy.
And while I agree with the sentiment about Harv making newbies his own personal millcreekcoog, Harv wasn't exactly running a train on RoadDawg by himself.
Derek look at your original message for this board though. Your advice was for those who don't get it to lurk for a while so they aren't exposed. RoadDawg clearly doesn't get it.
Harv is what he is. Anyone who takes his baiting seriously this forum is better off without them. I mean he basically ran that Bert Winthrop guy. Judging by his posts that was a good thing not a bad thing too.
This also sets a bad precedent which you always complained about Kim. If you aren't toeing the company line you get banned. Harv wasn't toeing your company line so he was banned. Sets a terrible precedent going forward. Just like dawgboard did when they banned Harv's "cfetters" account but allowed other fake accounts on there.
Everyone draws the line somewhere, but we've shown just about everything is fair game here. As we've said before, if someone posts porn, people's personal info or outright slander, that can't happen. RoadDawg has certainly struggled to grasp certain basics, but RoadDawg was but a small part of this decision. I've been getting feedback from several people who said they're looking for a new place to hang out but wouldn't do it with Harvey here... When I told Harv that he could be an asset around here I meant it, and I do think it's a shame. I enjoyed a lot of his posts.
I can understand some of the angst but I'm comfortable with the decision. Time will show there is no slippery slope because that's not where we're at in terms of a philosophy. -
No offense Derek but that sounds like something Kim would say when banning someone. I trust that you won't turn this into dawgman but like I said I like the idea of everyone policing themselves.DerekJohnson said:He_Needs_More_Time said:
RoadDawg was practically bending over inviting everyone to run a train on him. Did you see his posts the last 24 hours?HillsboroDuck said:
A little Harv goes a long way. Boards are best when Harv is lurking and pops in every couple or months or things to liven things up and make his presence felt. If Derek takes Harv off his leash come September it will be interesting. If he does not, it will be less interesting.He_Needs_More_Time said:Every board is better off with Harv than without it. Derek, I think banning him just opens up a can of worms.
Also a bit hypocritical since we all complain how Kim is ban happy.
And while I agree with the sentiment about Harv making newbies his own personal millcreekcoog, Harv wasn't exactly running a train on RoadDawg by himself.
Derek look at your original message for this board though. Your advice was for those who don't get it to lurk for a while so they aren't exposed. RoadDawg clearly doesn't get it.
Harv is what he is. Anyone who takes his baiting seriously this forum is better off without them. I mean he basically ran that Bert Winthrop guy. Judging by his posts that was a good thing not a bad thing too.
This also sets a bad precedent which you always complained about Kim. If you aren't toeing the company line you get banned. Harv wasn't toeing your company line so he was banned. Sets a terrible precedent going forward. Just like dawgboard did when they banned Harv's "cfetters" account but allowed other fake accounts on there.
I've been getting feedback from several people who said they're looking for a new place to hang out but wouldn't do it with Harvey here...
DAO wasn't a problem as that account was getting attacked and people weren't putting up with it. In fact Harv wasn't a problem until Road Dawg's recent struggles and continuing of taking Harv's bait.
If these guys would stop taking the bait and simply relax then there is no need to ban anyone. -
I walk with Derek Johnston.DerekJohnson said:He_Needs_More_Time said:
RoadDawg was practically bending over inviting everyone to run a train on him. Did you see his posts the last 24 hours?HillsboroDuck said:
A little Harv goes a long way. Boards are best when Harv is lurking and pops in every couple or months or things to liven things up and make his presence felt. If Derek takes Harv off his leash come September it will be interesting. If he does not, it will be less interesting.He_Needs_More_Time said:Every board is better off with Harv than without it. Derek, I think banning him just opens up a can of worms.
Also a bit hypocritical since we all complain how Kim is ban happy.
And while I agree with the sentiment about Harv making newbies his own personal millcreekcoog, Harv wasn't exactly running a train on RoadDawg by himself.
Derek look at your original message for this board though. Your advice was for those who don't get it to lurk for a while so they aren't exposed. RoadDawg clearly doesn't get it.
Harv is what he is. Anyone who takes his baiting seriously this forum is better off without them. I mean he basically ran that Bert Winthrop guy. Judging by his posts that was a good thing not a bad thing too.
This also sets a bad precedent which you always complained about Kim. If you aren't toeing the company line you get banned. Harv wasn't toeing your company line so he was banned. Sets a terrible precedent going forward. Just like dawgboard did when they banned Harv's "cfetters" account but allowed other fake accounts on there.
Everyone draws the line somewhere, but we've shown just about everything is fair game here. As we've said before, if someone posts porn, people's personal info or outright slander, that can't happen. RoadDawg has certainly struggled to grasp certain basics, but RoadDawg was but a small part of this decision. I've been getting feedback from several people who said they're looking for a new place to hang out but wouldn't do it with Harvey here... When I told Harv that he could be an asset around here I meant it, and I do think it's a shame. I enjoyed a lot of his posts.
I can understand some of the angst but I'm comfortable with the decision. Time will show there is no slippery slope because that's not where we're at in terms of a philosophy. -
Fuck Harvey Road. That guy is an idiot.
-
I think we should all try answering your emails, PMs, and phone calls for a day.DerekJohnson said:He_Needs_More_Time said:
RoadDawg was practically bending over inviting everyone to run a train on him. Did you see his posts the last 24 hours?HillsboroDuck said:
A little Harv goes a long way. Boards are best when Harv is lurking and pops in every couple or months or things to liven things up and make his presence felt. If Derek takes Harv off his leash come September it will be interesting. If he does not, it will be less interesting.He_Needs_More_Time said:Every board is better off with Harv than without it. Derek, I think banning him just opens up a can of worms.
Also a bit hypocritical since we all complain how Kim is ban happy.
And while I agree with the sentiment about Harv making newbies his own personal millcreekcoog, Harv wasn't exactly running a train on RoadDawg by himself.
Derek look at your original message for this board though. Your advice was for those who don't get it to lurk for a while so they aren't exposed. RoadDawg clearly doesn't get it.
Harv is what he is. Anyone who takes his baiting seriously this forum is better off without them. I mean he basically ran that Bert Winthrop guy. Judging by his posts that was a good thing not a bad thing too.
This also sets a bad precedent which you always complained about Kim. If you aren't toeing the company line you get banned. Harv wasn't toeing your company line so he was banned. Sets a terrible precedent going forward. Just like dawgboard did when they banned Harv's "cfetters" account but allowed other fake accounts on there.
Everyone draws the line somewhere, but we've shown just about everything is fair game here. As we've said before, if someone posts porn, people's personal info or outright slander, that can't happen. RoadDawg has certainly struggled to grasp certain basics, but RoadDawg was but a small part of this decision. I've been getting feedback from several people who said they're looking for a new place to hang out but wouldn't do it with Harvey here... When I told Harv that he could be an asset around here I meant it, and I do think it's a shame. I enjoyed a lot of his posts.
I can understand some of the angst but I'm comfortable with the decision. Time will show there is no slippery slope because that's not where we're at in terms of a philosophy. -
The fact that DJs Tebow article was the Outrage of The Day, proves the point of the article. Despite the fact that some were cool with the article, just a bit annoyed it was on the front page.
-
Good Christ. I'm starting to feel sorry for you.He_Needs_More_Time said:
No offense Derek but that sounds like something Kim would say when banning someone. I trust that you won't turn this into dawgman but like I said I like the idea of everyone policing themselves.DerekJohnson said:He_Needs_More_Time said:
RoadDawg was practically bending over inviting everyone to run a train on him. Did you see his posts the last 24 hours?HillsboroDuck said:
A little Harv goes a long way. Boards are best when Harv is lurking and pops in every couple or months or things to liven things up and make his presence felt. If Derek takes Harv off his leash come September it will be interesting. If he does not, it will be less interesting.He_Needs_More_Time said:Every board is better off with Harv than without it. Derek, I think banning him just opens up a can of worms.
Also a bit hypocritical since we all complain how Kim is ban happy.
And while I agree with the sentiment about Harv making newbies his own personal millcreekcoog, Harv wasn't exactly running a train on RoadDawg by himself.
Derek look at your original message for this board though. Your advice was for those who don't get it to lurk for a while so they aren't exposed. RoadDawg clearly doesn't get it.
Harv is what he is. Anyone who takes his baiting seriously this forum is better off without them. I mean he basically ran that Bert Winthrop guy. Judging by his posts that was a good thing not a bad thing too.
This also sets a bad precedent which you always complained about Kim. If you aren't toeing the company line you get banned. Harv wasn't toeing your company line so he was banned. Sets a terrible precedent going forward. Just like dawgboard did when they banned Harv's "cfetters" account but allowed other fake accounts on there.
I've been getting feedback from several people who said they're looking for a new place to hang out but wouldn't do it with Harvey here...
DAO wasn't a problem as that account was getting attacked and people weren't putting up with it. In fact Harv wasn't a problem until Road Dawg's recent struggles and continuing of taking Harv's bait.
If these guys would stop taking the bait and simply relax then there is no need to ban anyone. -
Hate to say it but I thought the same exact thing.He_Needs_More_Time said:DerekJohnson said:He_Needs_More_Time said:
RoadDawg was practically bending over inviting everyone to run a train on him. Did you see his posts the last 24 hours?HillsboroDuck said:
A little Harv goes a long way. Boards are best when Harv is lurking and pops in every couple or months or things to liven things up and make his presence felt. If Derek takes Harv off his leash come September it will be interesting. If he does not, it will be less interesting.He_Needs_More_Time said:Every board is better off with Harv than without it. Derek, I think banning him just opens up a can of worms.
Also a bit hypocritical since we all complain how Kim is ban happy.
And while I agree with the sentiment about Harv making newbies his own personal millcreekcoog, Harv wasn't exactly running a train on RoadDawg by himself.
Derek look at your original message for this board though. Your advice was for those who don't get it to lurk for a while so they aren't exposed. RoadDawg clearly doesn't get it.
Harv is what he is. Anyone who takes his baiting seriously this forum is better off without them. I mean he basically ran that Bert Winthrop guy. Judging by his posts that was a good thing not a bad thing too.
This also sets a bad precedent which you always complained about Kim. If you aren't toeing the company line you get banned. Harv wasn't toeing your company line so he was banned. Sets a terrible precedent going forward. Just like dawgboard did when they banned Harv's "cfetters" account but allowed other fake accounts on there.
I've been getting feedback from several people who said they're looking for a new place to hang out but wouldn't do it with Harvey here...
No offense Derek but that sounds like something Kim would say when banning someone. I trust that you won't turn this into dawgman but like I said I like the idea of everyone policing themselves.
DAO wasn't a problem as that account was getting attacked and people weren't putting up with it. In fact Harv wasn't a problem until Road Dawg's recent struggles and continuing of taking Harv's bait.
If these guys would stop taking the bait and simply relax then there is no need to ban anyone.
Also, and more importantly, to whichever posters are complaining to Derek, NUT UP AND SAY IT ON THE BOARDS FOR YOURSELF.
If this place is going to turn into an alleged "silent majority" who does nothing but bitch about other posters but never have the balls to ever actually voice their opinion for all to see then let's just save everyone the trouble and blow it up now.
-
Agree. We had enough of the "silent majority" bullshit at Doogman.HillsboroDuck said:
Hate to say it but I thought the same exact thing.He_Needs_More_Time said:DerekJohnson said:He_Needs_More_Time said:
RoadDawg was practically bending over inviting everyone to run a train on him. Did you see his posts the last 24 hours?HillsboroDuck said:
A little Harv goes a long way. Boards are best when Harv is lurking and pops in every couple or months or things to liven things up and make his presence felt. If Derek takes Harv off his leash come September it will be interesting. If he does not, it will be less interesting.He_Needs_More_Time said:Every board is better off with Harv than without it. Derek, I think banning him just opens up a can of worms.
Also a bit hypocritical since we all complain how Kim is ban happy.
And while I agree with the sentiment about Harv making newbies his own personal millcreekcoog, Harv wasn't exactly running a train on RoadDawg by himself.
Derek look at your original message for this board though. Your advice was for those who don't get it to lurk for a while so they aren't exposed. RoadDawg clearly doesn't get it.
Harv is what he is. Anyone who takes his baiting seriously this forum is better off without them. I mean he basically ran that Bert Winthrop guy. Judging by his posts that was a good thing not a bad thing too.
This also sets a bad precedent which you always complained about Kim. If you aren't toeing the company line you get banned. Harv wasn't toeing your company line so he was banned. Sets a terrible precedent going forward. Just like dawgboard did when they banned Harv's "cfetters" account but allowed other fake accounts on there.
I've been getting feedback from several people who said they're looking for a new place to hang out but wouldn't do it with Harvey here...
No offense Derek but that sounds like something Kim would say when banning someone. I trust that you won't turn this into dawgman but like I said I like the idea of everyone policing themselves.
DAO wasn't a problem as that account was getting attacked and people weren't putting up with it. In fact Harv wasn't a problem until Road Dawg's recent struggles and continuing of taking Harv's bait.
If these guys would stop taking the bait and simply relax then there is no need to ban anyone.
Also, and more importantly, to whichever posters are complaining to Derek, NUT UP AND SAY IT ON THE BOARDS FOR YOURSELF.
If this place is going to turn into an alleged "silent majority" who does nothing but bitch about other posters but never have the balls to ever actually voice their opinion for all to see then let's just save everyone the trouble and blow it up now. -
No offense taken.He_Needs_More_Time said:
No offense Derek but that sounds like something Kim would say when banning someone. I trust that you won't turn this into dawgman but like I said I like the idea of everyone policing themselves.DerekJohnson said:He_Needs_More_Time said:
RoadDawg was practically bending over inviting everyone to run a train on him. Did you see his posts the last 24 hours?HillsboroDuck said:
A little Harv goes a long way. Boards are best when Harv is lurking and pops in every couple or months or things to liven things up and make his presence felt. If Derek takes Harv off his leash come September it will be interesting. If he does not, it will be less interesting.He_Needs_More_Time said:Every board is better off with Harv than without it. Derek, I think banning him just opens up a can of worms.
Also a bit hypocritical since we all complain how Kim is ban happy.
And while I agree with the sentiment about Harv making newbies his own personal millcreekcoog, Harv wasn't exactly running a train on RoadDawg by himself.
Derek look at your original message for this board though. Your advice was for those who don't get it to lurk for a while so they aren't exposed. RoadDawg clearly doesn't get it.
Harv is what he is. Anyone who takes his baiting seriously this forum is better off without them. I mean he basically ran that Bert Winthrop guy. Judging by his posts that was a good thing not a bad thing too.
This also sets a bad precedent which you always complained about Kim. If you aren't toeing the company line you get banned. Harv wasn't toeing your company line so he was banned. Sets a terrible precedent going forward. Just like dawgboard did when they banned Harv's "cfetters" account but allowed other fake accounts on there.
I've been getting feedback from several people who said they're looking for a new place to hang out but wouldn't do it with Harvey here...
DAO wasn't a problem as that account was getting attacked and people weren't putting up with it. In fact Harv wasn't a problem until Road Dawg's recent struggles and continuing of taking Harv's bait.
If these guys would stop taking the bait and simply relax then there is no need to ban anyone. -
I know you would LOVE to think that I was fuming over Derek's short opinion piece. That would really make your day. But the simple truth is that it doesn't belong on the front page. That was my problem. Content? Whatever.MikeDamone said:The fact that DJs Tebow article was the Outrage of The Day, proves the point of the article. Despite the fact that some were cool with the article, just a bit annoyed it was on the front page.
-
I read stuff 81 times more offensive than that all day long at my jerbTheKobeStopper said:
I know you would LOVE to think that I was fuming over Derek's short opinion piece. That would really make your day. But the simple truth is that it doesn't belong on the front page. That was my problem. Content? Whatever.MikeDamone said:The fact that DJs Tebow article was the Outrage of The Day, proves the point of the article. Despite the fact that some were cool with the article, just a bit annoyed it was on the front page.
-
When reading that comment I felt like I was on doogman. "Hearing complaints about you". Well Derek start name dropping these fucks. It's the internet, they are adults they can fend for themselves.HillsboroDuck said:
Hate to say it but I thought the same exact thing.He_Needs_More_Time said:DerekJohnson said:He_Needs_More_Time said:
RoadDawg was practically bending over inviting everyone to run a train on him. Did you see his posts the last 24 hours?HillsboroDuck said:
A little Harv goes a long way. Boards are best when Harv is lurking and pops in every couple or months or things to liven things up and make his presence felt. If Derek takes Harv off his leash come September it will be interesting. If he does not, it will be less interesting.He_Needs_More_Time said:Every board is better off with Harv than without it. Derek, I think banning him just opens up a can of worms.
Also a bit hypocritical since we all complain how Kim is ban happy.
And while I agree with the sentiment about Harv making newbies his own personal millcreekcoog, Harv wasn't exactly running a train on RoadDawg by himself.
Derek look at your original message for this board though. Your advice was for those who don't get it to lurk for a while so they aren't exposed. RoadDawg clearly doesn't get it.
Harv is what he is. Anyone who takes his baiting seriously this forum is better off without them. I mean he basically ran that Bert Winthrop guy. Judging by his posts that was a good thing not a bad thing too.
This also sets a bad precedent which you always complained about Kim. If you aren't toeing the company line you get banned. Harv wasn't toeing your company line so he was banned. Sets a terrible precedent going forward. Just like dawgboard did when they banned Harv's "cfetters" account but allowed other fake accounts on there.
I've been getting feedback from several people who said they're looking for a new place to hang out but wouldn't do it with Harvey here...
No offense Derek but that sounds like something Kim would say when banning someone. I trust that you won't turn this into dawgman but like I said I like the idea of everyone policing themselves.
DAO wasn't a problem as that account was getting attacked and people weren't putting up with it. In fact Harv wasn't a problem until Road Dawg's recent struggles and continuing of taking Harv's bait.
If these guys would stop taking the bait and simply relax then there is no need to ban anyone.
Also, and more importantly, to whichever posters are complaining to Derek, NUT UP AND SAY IT ON THE BOARDS FOR YOURSELF.
If this place is going to turn into an alleged "silent majority" who does nothing but bitch about other posters but never have the balls to ever actually voice their opinion for all to see then let's just save everyone the trouble and blow it up now.
So if a bunch of people start messaging you privately about a user to ban them will you do that as well? -
Are you required to toe the company line around here all the time? Good christ what happened to you? You used to have some edge in your posts.MikeDamone said:
Good Christ. I'm starting to feel sorry for you.He_Needs_More_Time said:
No offense Derek but that sounds like something Kim would say when banning someone. I trust that you won't turn this into dawgman but like I said I like the idea of everyone policing themselves.DerekJohnson said:He_Needs_More_Time said:
RoadDawg was practically bending over inviting everyone to run a train on him. Did you see his posts the last 24 hours?HillsboroDuck said:
A little Harv goes a long way. Boards are best when Harv is lurking and pops in every couple or months or things to liven things up and make his presence felt. If Derek takes Harv off his leash come September it will be interesting. If he does not, it will be less interesting.He_Needs_More_Time said:Every board is better off with Harv than without it. Derek, I think banning him just opens up a can of worms.
Also a bit hypocritical since we all complain how Kim is ban happy.
And while I agree with the sentiment about Harv making newbies his own personal millcreekcoog, Harv wasn't exactly running a train on RoadDawg by himself.
Derek look at your original message for this board though. Your advice was for those who don't get it to lurk for a while so they aren't exposed. RoadDawg clearly doesn't get it.
Harv is what he is. Anyone who takes his baiting seriously this forum is better off without them. I mean he basically ran that Bert Winthrop guy. Judging by his posts that was a good thing not a bad thing too.
This also sets a bad precedent which you always complained about Kim. If you aren't toeing the company line you get banned. Harv wasn't toeing your company line so he was banned. Sets a terrible precedent going forward. Just like dawgboard did when they banned Harv's "cfetters" account but allowed other fake accounts on there.
I've been getting feedback from several people who said they're looking for a new place to hang out but wouldn't do it with Harvey here...
DAO wasn't a problem as that account was getting attacked and people weren't putting up with it. In fact Harv wasn't a problem until Road Dawg's recent struggles and continuing of taking Harv's bait.
If these guys would stop taking the bait and simply relax then there is no need to ban anyone. -
Obviously, I knew the Tebow piece would anger some people, and others would think, "what is he doing?" But I like the idea of periodically taking risks and shaking things up when done sincerely.TheKobeStopper said:
I know you would LOVE to think that I was fuming over Derek's short opinion piece. That would really make your day. But the simple truth is that it doesn't belong on the front page. That was my problem. Content? Whatever.MikeDamone said:The fact that DJs Tebow article was the Outrage of The Day, proves the point of the article. Despite the fact that some were cool with the article, just a bit annoyed it was on the front page.
-
Disagree. Damone had the nuts to stand up to Harv for himself rather than rely on a whisper campaign.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Are you required to toe the company line around here all the time? Good christ what happened to you? You used to have some edge in your posts.MikeDamone said:
Good Christ. I'm starting to feel sorry for you.He_Needs_More_Time said:
No offense Derek but that sounds like something Kim would say when banning someone. I trust that you won't turn this into dawgman but like I said I like the idea of everyone policing themselves.DerekJohnson said:He_Needs_More_Time said:
RoadDawg was practically bending over inviting everyone to run a train on him. Did you see his posts the last 24 hours?HillsboroDuck said:
A little Harv goes a long way. Boards are best when Harv is lurking and pops in every couple or months or things to liven things up and make his presence felt. If Derek takes Harv off his leash come September it will be interesting. If he does not, it will be less interesting.He_Needs_More_Time said:Every board is better off with Harv than without it. Derek, I think banning him just opens up a can of worms.
Also a bit hypocritical since we all complain how Kim is ban happy.
And while I agree with the sentiment about Harv making newbies his own personal millcreekcoog, Harv wasn't exactly running a train on RoadDawg by himself.
Derek look at your original message for this board though. Your advice was for those who don't get it to lurk for a while so they aren't exposed. RoadDawg clearly doesn't get it.
Harv is what he is. Anyone who takes his baiting seriously this forum is better off without them. I mean he basically ran that Bert Winthrop guy. Judging by his posts that was a good thing not a bad thing too.
This also sets a bad precedent which you always complained about Kim. If you aren't toeing the company line you get banned. Harv wasn't toeing your company line so he was banned. Sets a terrible precedent going forward. Just like dawgboard did when they banned Harv's "cfetters" account but allowed other fake accounts on there.
I've been getting feedback from several people who said they're looking for a new place to hang out but wouldn't do it with Harvey here...
DAO wasn't a problem as that account was getting attacked and people weren't putting up with it. In fact Harv wasn't a problem until Road Dawg's recent struggles and continuing of taking Harv's bait.
If these guys would stop taking the bait and simply relax then there is no need to ban anyone.
I don't agree with everything Damone's saying but he's no coward, unlike apparently a lot of people here.
allegedly
-
81 times more offensive? That wouldn't even move the needle on my "offense-meter".HillsboroDuck said:
I read stuff 81 times more offensive than that all day long at my jerbTheKobeStopper said:
I know you would LOVE to think that I was fuming over Derek's short opinion piece. That would really make your day. But the simple truth is that it doesn't belong on the front page. That was my problem. Content? Whatever.MikeDamone said:The fact that DJs Tebow article was the Outrage of The Day, proves the point of the article. Despite the fact that some were cool with the article, just a bit annoyed it was on the front page.
-
Besides Passion who was truly angered by that piece?DerekJohnson said:
Obviously, I knew the Tebow piece would anger some people, and others would think, "what is he doing?" But I like the idea of periodically taking risks and shaking things up when done sincerely.TheKobeStopper said:
I know you would LOVE to think that I was fuming over Derek's short opinion piece. That would really make your day. But the simple truth is that it doesn't belong on the front page. That was my problem. Content? Whatever.MikeDamone said:The fact that DJs Tebow article was the Outrage of The Day, proves the point of the article. Despite the fact that some were cool with the article, just a bit annoyed it was on the front page.
-
He_Needs_More_Time said:HillsboroDuck said:
Hate to say it but I thought the same exact thing.He_Needs_More_Time said:DerekJohnson said:He_Needs_More_Time said:
RoadDawg was practically bending over inviting everyone to run a train on him. Did you see his posts the last 24 hours?HillsboroDuck said:
A little Harv goes a long way. Boards are best when Harv is lurking and pops in every couple or months or things to liven things up and make his presence felt. If Derek takes Harv off his leash come September it will be interesting. If he does not, it will be less interesting.He_Needs_More_Time said:Every board is better off with Harv than without it. Derek, I think banning him just opens up a can of worms.
Also a bit hypocritical since we all complain how Kim is ban happy.
And while I agree with the sentiment about Harv making newbies his own personal millcreekcoog, Harv wasn't exactly running a train on RoadDawg by himself.
Derek look at your original message for this board though. Your advice was for those who don't get it to lurk for a while so they aren't exposed. RoadDawg clearly doesn't get it.
Harv is what he is. Anyone who takes his baiting seriously this forum is better off without them. I mean he basically ran that Bert Winthrop guy. Judging by his posts that was a good thing not a bad thing too.
This also sets a bad precedent which you always complained about Kim. If you aren't toeing the company line you get banned. Harv wasn't toeing your company line so he was banned. Sets a terrible precedent going forward. Just like dawgboard did when they banned Harv's "cfetters" account but allowed other fake accounts on there.
I've been getting feedback from several people who said they're looking for a new place to hang out but wouldn't do it with Harvey here...
No offense Derek but that sounds like something Kim would say when banning someone. I trust that you won't turn this into dawgman but like I said I like the idea of everyone policing themselves.
DAO wasn't a problem as that account was getting attacked and people weren't putting up with it. In fact Harv wasn't a problem until Road Dawg's recent struggles and continuing of taking Harv's bait.
If these guys would stop taking the bait and simply relax then there is no need to ban anyone.
Also, and more importantly, to whichever posters are complaining to Derek, NUT UP AND SAY IT ON THE BOARDS FOR YOURSELF.
If this place is going to turn into an alleged "silent majority" who does nothing but bitch about other posters but never have the balls to ever actually voice their opinion for all to see then let's just save everyone the trouble and blow it up now.
So if a bunch of people start messaging you privately about a user to ban them will you do that as well?
Of course not. There are a few posters on here that I think are morons and that I don't enjoy reading. But they're not openly trying to sabotage our efforts, and I am happy that they are here and enjoying themselves and contributing. -
I wasn't angry but I strongly disagreed with the content. It is the same thing that kept me from getting Bow Down to Willingham.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Besides Passion who was truly angered by that piece?DerekJohnson said:
Obviously, I knew the Tebow piece would anger some people, and others would think, "what is he doing?" But I like the idea of periodically taking risks and shaking things up when done sincerely.TheKobeStopper said:
I know you would LOVE to think that I was fuming over Derek's short opinion piece. That would really make your day. But the simple truth is that it doesn't belong on the front page. That was my problem. Content? Whatever.MikeDamone said:The fact that DJs Tebow article was the Outrage of The Day, proves the point of the article. Despite the fact that some were cool with the article, just a bit annoyed it was on the front page.
-
I didn't care for the Tebow article myself. I wasn't angry or out raged by it. I also know Derek's political beliefs and come to expect these type of pieces from him. I wasn't at all surprised just a tad disappointed is all.Mad_Son said:
I wasn't angry but I strongly disagreed with the content. It is the same thing that kept me from getting Bow Down to Willingham.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Besides Passion who was truly angered by that piece?DerekJohnson said:
Obviously, I knew the Tebow piece would anger some people, and others would think, "what is he doing?" But I like the idea of periodically taking risks and shaking things up when done sincerely.TheKobeStopper said:
I know you would LOVE to think that I was fuming over Derek's short opinion piece. That would really make your day. But the simple truth is that it doesn't belong on the front page. That was my problem. Content? Whatever.MikeDamone said:The fact that DJs Tebow article was the Outrage of The Day, proves the point of the article. Despite the fact that some were cool with the article, just a bit annoyed it was on the front page.
Like I said though besides Passion was anyone actually upset with the article? I'm going to say no. -
I'm hearing you deal with stuff you find much more offensive on a daily basis.TheKobeStopper said:
I know you would LOVE to think that I was fuming over Derek's short opinion piece. That would really make your day. But the simple truth is that it doesn't belong on the front page. That was my problem. Content? Whatever.MikeDamone said:The fact that DJs Tebow article was the Outrage of The Day, proves the point of the article. Despite the fact that some were cool with the article, just a bit annoyed it was on the front page.
-
Yeah I did!He_Needs_More_Time said:
Are you required to toe the company line around here all the time? Good christ what happened to you? You used to have some edge in your posts.MikeDamone said:
Good Christ. I'm starting to feel sorry for you.He_Needs_More_Time said:
No offense Derek but that sounds like something Kim would say when banning someone. I trust that you won't turn this into dawgman but like I said I like the idea of everyone policing themselves.DerekJohnson said:He_Needs_More_Time said:
RoadDawg was practically bending over inviting everyone to run a train on him. Did you see his posts the last 24 hours?HillsboroDuck said:
A little Harv goes a long way. Boards are best when Harv is lurking and pops in every couple or months or things to liven things up and make his presence felt. If Derek takes Harv off his leash come September it will be interesting. If he does not, it will be less interesting.He_Needs_More_Time said:Every board is better off with Harv than without it. Derek, I think banning him just opens up a can of worms.
Also a bit hypocritical since we all complain how Kim is ban happy.
And while I agree with the sentiment about Harv making newbies his own personal millcreekcoog, Harv wasn't exactly running a train on RoadDawg by himself.
Derek look at your original message for this board though. Your advice was for those who don't get it to lurk for a while so they aren't exposed. RoadDawg clearly doesn't get it.
Harv is what he is. Anyone who takes his baiting seriously this forum is better off without them. I mean he basically ran that Bert Winthrop guy. Judging by his posts that was a good thing not a bad thing too.
This also sets a bad precedent which you always complained about Kim. If you aren't toeing the company line you get banned. Harv wasn't toeing your company line so he was banned. Sets a terrible precedent going forward. Just like dawgboard did when they banned Harv's "cfetters" account but allowed other fake accounts on there.
I've been getting feedback from several people who said they're looking for a new place to hang out but wouldn't do it with Harvey here...
DAO wasn't a problem as that account was getting attacked and people weren't putting up with it. In fact Harv wasn't a problem until Road Dawg's recent struggles and continuing of taking Harv's bait.
If these guys would stop taking the bait and simply relax then there is no need to ban anyone. -
Is it wrong that I want to drop some citrus in this thread just to clarify what is offensive and what isn't?
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
