Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Explanation for the banning of Harvey Road
Comments
-
Disagree. He's the Coogliest.HillsboroDuck said:
Harv is many things, but a Coog is not one of them.He_Needs_More_Time said:
I'd argue this whole day has been cringe embarassing for everyone including myself. I mean the main topic we are discussing on a Husky board is a Coog getting banned.MikeDamone said:
*cringe. Embarrassing really.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Yes I did since he's been doing that all day. Also Mods I'd like to report that Damone is picking on me? Since we ban people now for picking on others apparently.MikeDamone said:
Did you just drop the equivalent of "I know I am but what are you"?He_Needs_More_Time said:
CouldTheKobeStopper said:
Could Harvs balls be any further down your throat?He_Needs_More_Time said:
No shit! Now we'll be talking about how Harv was banned instead of before. Either way this board is dominated by Harv.TierbsHsotBoobs said:It's a good thing we banned Harv. The bored is totally back on topic now.
Lather, rinse, repeat.
He still wins.
Lather, Rinse, Repeat.Dereks?RoadDawgs be any further down yours?
If you can't see how this banning then reaction is exactly what Harv wanted then I can't help you.
Good Christ. Stop.
-
No, I haven't. That's a lie.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Yes I did since he's been doing that all day. Also Mods I'd like to report that Damone is picking on me? Since we ban people now for picking on others apparently.MikeDamone said:
Did you just drop the equivalent of "I know I am but what are you"?He_Needs_More_Time said:
CouldTheKobeStopper said:
Could Harvs balls be any further down your throat?He_Needs_More_Time said:
No shit! Now we'll be talking about how Harv was banned instead of before. Either way this board is dominated by Harv.TierbsHsotBoobs said:It's a good thing we banned Harv. The bored is totally back on topic now.
Lather, rinse, repeat.
He still wins.
Lather, Rinse, Repeat.Dereks?RoadDawgs be any further down yours?
If you can't see how this banning then reaction is exactly what Harv wanted then I can't help you.
Good Christ. Stop. -
He_Needs_More_Time said:
RoadDawg was practically bending over inviting everyone to run a train on him. Did you see his posts the last 24 hours?HillsboroDuck said:
A little Harv goes a long way. Boards are best when Harv is lurking and pops in every couple or months or things to liven things up and make his presence felt. If Derek takes Harv off his leash come September it will be interesting. If he does not, it will be less interesting.He_Needs_More_Time said:Every board is better off with Harv than without it. Derek, I think banning him just opens up a can of worms.
Also a bit hypocritical since we all complain how Kim is ban happy.
And while I agree with the sentiment about Harv making newbies his own personal millcreekcoog, Harv wasn't exactly running a train on RoadDawg by himself.
Derek look at your original message for this board though. Your advice was for those who don't get it to lurk for a while so they aren't exposed. RoadDawg clearly doesn't get it.
Harv is what he is. Anyone who takes his baiting seriously this forum is better off without them. I mean he basically ran that Bert Winthrop guy. Judging by his posts that was a good thing not a bad thing too.
This also sets a bad precedent which you always complained about Kim. If you aren't toeing the company line you get banned. Harv wasn't toeing your company line so he was banned. Sets a terrible precedent going forward. Just like dawgboard did when they banned Harv's "cfetters" account but allowed other fake accounts on there.
Everyone draws the line somewhere, but we've shown just about everything is fair game here. As we've said before, if someone posts porn, people's personal info or outright slander, that can't happen. RoadDawg has certainly struggled to grasp certain basics, but RoadDawg was but a small part of this decision. I've been getting feedback from several people who said they're looking for a new place to hang out but wouldn't do it with Harvey here... When I told Harv that he could be an asset around here I meant it, and I do think it's a shame. I enjoyed a lot of his posts.
I can understand some of the angst but I'm comfortable with the decision. Time will show there is no slippery slope because that's not where we're at in terms of a philosophy.
-
I am overjoyed that after a pleasant (and long) vacation I came back and the cuntwaffle name was dutifully taken by some UW patriot.CuntWaffle said:Everyone just needs some cheap liquor and hookers and all will be well.
Noble work.
-
Harv is funny and has strangely good points at times... but it has to be in moderation. At least to people who aren't 50% Harv themselves. I actually really like RD55's posts as they relate to Husky football and prefer him to be attacked on the merit of his posts rather than whatever he was being prison-raped over today.
-
Obligatory "RIP Harv."
T's and P's and all that jazz. -
The problem at Dawgman is that assholes and idiots were running the show. I've had limited dealings with DJ but so far he seems like neither of those things. Although the Tebow article didn't help.DerekJohnson said:There's no hypocrisy. Everyone in life draws the line somewhere.
If someone kept posting child pornHe_Needs_More_Time said:
RoadDawg was practically bending over inviting everyone to run a train on him. Did you see his posts the last 24 hours?HillsboroDuck said:
A little Harv goes a long way. Boards are best when Harv is lurking and pops in every couple or months or things to liven things up and make his presence felt. If Derek takes Harv off his leash come September it will be interesting. If he does not, it will be less interesting.He_Needs_More_Time said:Every board is better off with Harv than without it. Derek, I think banning him just opens up a can of worms.
Also a bit hypocritical since we all complain how Kim is ban happy.
And while I agree with the sentiment about Harv making newbies his own personal millcreekcoog, Harv wasn't exactly running a train on RoadDawg by himself.
Derek look at your original message for this board though. Your advice was for those who don't get it to lurk for a while so they aren't exposed. RoadDawg clearly doesn't get it.
Harv is what he is. Anyone who takes his baiting seriously this forum is better off without them. I mean he basically ran that Bert Winthrop guy. Judging by his posts that was a good thing not a bad thing too.
This also sets a bad precedent which you always complained about Kim. If you aren't toeing the company line you get banned. Harv wasn't toeing your company line so he was banned. Sets a terrible precedent going forward. Just like dawgboard did when they banned Harv's "cfetters" account but allowed other fake accounts on there.
Everyone draws the line somewhere, but we've shown just about everything is fair game here. As we've said before, if someone posts porn, people's personal info or outright slander, that can't happen. RoadDawg has certainly struggled to grasp certain basics, but RoadDawg was but a small part of this decision. I've been getting feedback from several people who said they're looking for a new place to hang out but wouldn't do it with Harvey here... When I told Harv that he could be an asset around here I meant it, and I do think it's a shame. I enjoyed a lot of his posts.
I can understand some of the angst but I'm comfortable with the decision. Time will show there is no slippery slope because that's not where we're at in terms of a philosophy. -
No offense Derek but that sounds like something Kim would say when banning someone. I trust that you won't turn this into dawgman but like I said I like the idea of everyone policing themselves.DerekJohnson said:He_Needs_More_Time said:
RoadDawg was practically bending over inviting everyone to run a train on him. Did you see his posts the last 24 hours?HillsboroDuck said:
A little Harv goes a long way. Boards are best when Harv is lurking and pops in every couple or months or things to liven things up and make his presence felt. If Derek takes Harv off his leash come September it will be interesting. If he does not, it will be less interesting.He_Needs_More_Time said:Every board is better off with Harv than without it. Derek, I think banning him just opens up a can of worms.
Also a bit hypocritical since we all complain how Kim is ban happy.
And while I agree with the sentiment about Harv making newbies his own personal millcreekcoog, Harv wasn't exactly running a train on RoadDawg by himself.
Derek look at your original message for this board though. Your advice was for those who don't get it to lurk for a while so they aren't exposed. RoadDawg clearly doesn't get it.
Harv is what he is. Anyone who takes his baiting seriously this forum is better off without them. I mean he basically ran that Bert Winthrop guy. Judging by his posts that was a good thing not a bad thing too.
This also sets a bad precedent which you always complained about Kim. If you aren't toeing the company line you get banned. Harv wasn't toeing your company line so he was banned. Sets a terrible precedent going forward. Just like dawgboard did when they banned Harv's "cfetters" account but allowed other fake accounts on there.
I've been getting feedback from several people who said they're looking for a new place to hang out but wouldn't do it with Harvey here...
DAO wasn't a problem as that account was getting attacked and people weren't putting up with it. In fact Harv wasn't a problem until Road Dawg's recent struggles and continuing of taking Harv's bait.
If these guys would stop taking the bait and simply relax then there is no need to ban anyone. -
I walk with Derek Johnston.DerekJohnson said:He_Needs_More_Time said:
RoadDawg was practically bending over inviting everyone to run a train on him. Did you see his posts the last 24 hours?HillsboroDuck said:
A little Harv goes a long way. Boards are best when Harv is lurking and pops in every couple or months or things to liven things up and make his presence felt. If Derek takes Harv off his leash come September it will be interesting. If he does not, it will be less interesting.He_Needs_More_Time said:Every board is better off with Harv than without it. Derek, I think banning him just opens up a can of worms.
Also a bit hypocritical since we all complain how Kim is ban happy.
And while I agree with the sentiment about Harv making newbies his own personal millcreekcoog, Harv wasn't exactly running a train on RoadDawg by himself.
Derek look at your original message for this board though. Your advice was for those who don't get it to lurk for a while so they aren't exposed. RoadDawg clearly doesn't get it.
Harv is what he is. Anyone who takes his baiting seriously this forum is better off without them. I mean he basically ran that Bert Winthrop guy. Judging by his posts that was a good thing not a bad thing too.
This also sets a bad precedent which you always complained about Kim. If you aren't toeing the company line you get banned. Harv wasn't toeing your company line so he was banned. Sets a terrible precedent going forward. Just like dawgboard did when they banned Harv's "cfetters" account but allowed other fake accounts on there.
Everyone draws the line somewhere, but we've shown just about everything is fair game here. As we've said before, if someone posts porn, people's personal info or outright slander, that can't happen. RoadDawg has certainly struggled to grasp certain basics, but RoadDawg was but a small part of this decision. I've been getting feedback from several people who said they're looking for a new place to hang out but wouldn't do it with Harvey here... When I told Harv that he could be an asset around here I meant it, and I do think it's a shame. I enjoyed a lot of his posts.
I can understand some of the angst but I'm comfortable with the decision. Time will show there is no slippery slope because that's not where we're at in terms of a philosophy. -
Fuck Harvey Road. That guy is an idiot.
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
