Comey is confused
Comments
-
Most forget that all of this crap started under Obama's watch. I believe he was involved and had full knowledge.SFGbob said:
All of the Russian hacking, if there was any, and all of the corruption at the FBI that was uncovered by the exposure of McCabe and Strozk and Page happened on Comey's watch. He should have been fired for being a shitty Administrator.Sledog said:Interesting thought process. According to Comey you don't even need a crime to investigate to investigate. KGB man right there.
After 2 years all the witnesses, search warrants and FBI agents working this entirely fabricated crime of a non-crime (collusion) and they have absolutely nothing. Comey thought his firing was the obstruction but he was a liar and he was telling those lies because of his own political beliefs and bias. He was fired for it. Unfit for law enforcement. -
I do as well, and I think that much of this "investigation" has been designed to give time and opportunity to the Obama loyalist to cover their tracks.Sledog said:
Most forget that all of this crap started under Obama's watch. I believe he was involved and had full knowledge.SFGbob said:
All of the Russian hacking, if there was any, and all of the corruption at the FBI that was uncovered by the exposure of McCabe and Strozk and Page happened on Comey's watch. He should have been fired for being a shitty Administrator.Sledog said:Interesting thought process. According to Comey you don't even need a crime to investigate to investigate. KGB man right there.
After 2 years all the witnesses, search warrants and FBI agents working this entirely fabricated crime of a non-crime (collusion) and they have absolutely nothing. Comey thought his firing was the obstruction but he was a liar and he was telling those lies because of his own political beliefs and bias. He was fired for it. Unfit for law enforcement.
Why can't we answer at this late date with 100% certainty if the DNC was ever really hacked and who they were hacked by? -
He had to know the how and why and give permission for the unmasking, In fact he issued an order to allow freer exchange of raw intelligence data within the government so it could occur.SFGbob said:
I do as well, and I think that much of this "investigation" has been designed to give time and opportunity to the Obama loyalist to cover their tracks.Sledog said:
Most forget that all of this crap started under Obama's watch. I believe he was involved and had full knowledge.SFGbob said:
All of the Russian hacking, if there was any, and all of the corruption at the FBI that was uncovered by the exposure of McCabe and Strozk and Page happened on Comey's watch. He should have been fired for being a shitty Administrator.Sledog said:Interesting thought process. According to Comey you don't even need a crime to investigate to investigate. KGB man right there.
After 2 years all the witnesses, search warrants and FBI agents working this entirely fabricated crime of a non-crime (collusion) and they have absolutely nothing. Comey thought his firing was the obstruction but he was a liar and he was telling those lies because of his own political beliefs and bias. He was fired for it. Unfit for law enforcement.
Why can't we answer at this late date with 100% certainty if the DNC was ever really hacked and who they were hacked by?
-
If they were hacked? El oh El. You don't recall the emails that were released? Fuck you are stupid.SFGbob said:
I do as well, and I think that much of this "investigation" has been designed to give time and opportunity to the Obama loyalist to cover their tracks.Sledog said:
Most forget that all of this crap started under Obama's watch. I believe he was involved and had full knowledge.SFGbob said:
All of the Russian hacking, if there was any, and all of the corruption at the FBI that was uncovered by the exposure of McCabe and Strozk and Page happened on Comey's watch. He should have been fired for being a shitty Administrator.Sledog said:Interesting thought process. According to Comey you don't even need a crime to investigate to investigate. KGB man right there.
After 2 years all the witnesses, search warrants and FBI agents working this entirely fabricated crime of a non-crime (collusion) and they have absolutely nothing. Comey thought his firing was the obstruction but he was a liar and he was telling those lies because of his own political beliefs and bias. He was fired for it. Unfit for law enforcement.
Why can't we answer at this late date with 100% certainty if the DNC was ever really hacked and who they were hacked by?
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/russian-officers-indicted-for-allegedly-hacking-clinton-campaign-dnc-emails -
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/barr-is-wrong-obstruction-of-justice-doesnt-require-another-underlying-crime/ar-BBVfmVfSledog said:Interesting thought process. According to Comey you don't even need a crime to investigate to investigate. KGB man right there.
After 2 years all the witnesses, search warrants and FBI agents working this entirely fabricated crime of a non-crime (collusion) and they have absolutely nothing. Comey thought his firing was the obstruction but he was a liar and he was telling those lies because of his own political beliefs and bias. He was fired for it. Unfit for law enforcement.
It’s black letter law that a defendant can satisfy the corrupt intent criterion for obstruction even if the defendant himself committed no underlying crime. For example, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit recently ruled that a defendant could be convicted of obstruction “[e]ven if [his] primary motivation was to extricate the sister of his childhood friend from a troubled situation.” A court in Utah held in 2013 that a defendant could be liable for obstruction where his only apparent motive was to protect a friend from a criminal charge.
Former Detroit mayor Kwame Kilpatrick went to jail for obstructing justice in 2008 after he lied under oath about an extramarital affair. And this past January, a U.S. Navy captain in Florida was indicted on a charge of obstruction of justice after he allegedly misled investigators about his extramarital affair with a civilian employee’s spouse. Of course, adultery is not a crime. But interfering with an investigation to cover up adultery certainly is. -
And you think Mueller wouldn't charge it if he could? Or that the author for the uber liberal Post has a better legal understanding than Mueller or Barr? But Comey saying it has sparked the hopefuls on this BS.HHusky said:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/barr-is-wrong-obstruction-of-justice-doesnt-require-another-underlying-crime/ar-BBVfmVfSledog said:Interesting thought process. According to Comey you don't even need a crime to investigate to investigate. KGB man right there.
After 2 years all the witnesses, search warrants and FBI agents working this entirely fabricated crime of a non-crime (collusion) and they have absolutely nothing. Comey thought his firing was the obstruction but he was a liar and he was telling those lies because of his own political beliefs and bias. He was fired for it. Unfit for law enforcement.
You still need a crime to investigate. HTH -
but but but still - hondo
Is being charged the same as being guilty? Podesta was phished and gave out his password. That's how they got out2001400ex said:
If they were hacked? El oh El. You don't recall the emails that were released? Fuck you are stupid.SFGbob said:
I do as well, and I think that much of this "investigation" has been designed to give time and opportunity to the Obama loyalist to cover their tracks.Sledog said:
Most forget that all of this crap started under Obama's watch. I believe he was involved and had full knowledge.SFGbob said:
All of the Russian hacking, if there was any, and all of the corruption at the FBI that was uncovered by the exposure of McCabe and Strozk and Page happened on Comey's watch. He should have been fired for being a shitty Administrator.Sledog said:Interesting thought process. According to Comey you don't even need a crime to investigate to investigate. KGB man right there.
After 2 years all the witnesses, search warrants and FBI agents working this entirely fabricated crime of a non-crime (collusion) and they have absolutely nothing. Comey thought his firing was the obstruction but he was a liar and he was telling those lies because of his own political beliefs and bias. He was fired for it. Unfit for law enforcement.
Why can't we answer at this late date with 100% certainty if the DNC was ever really hacked and who they were hacked by?
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/russian-officers-indicted-for-allegedly-hacking-clinton-campaign-dnc-emails
And what they showed was the DNC fixing the race for Hillary, I'm glad they got caught for it. Anyone should be
Blaming Russia is what Hillary shills do to cover up for her same as when she lost the election. El Oh EL!!!!!! -
The smarter readers understand that challenging spurious reasoning is exactly that. Your legal understanding and Barr's are both incorrect. Thus Comey's confusion.Sledog said:
And you think Mueller wouldn't charge it if he could? Or that the author for the uber liberal Post has a better legal understanding than Mueller or Barr? But Comey saying it has sparked the hopefuls on this BS.HHusky said:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/barr-is-wrong-obstruction-of-justice-doesnt-require-another-underlying-crime/ar-BBVfmVfSledog said:Interesting thought process. According to Comey you don't even need a crime to investigate to investigate. KGB man right there.
After 2 years all the witnesses, search warrants and FBI agents working this entirely fabricated crime of a non-crime (collusion) and they have absolutely nothing. Comey thought his firing was the obstruction but he was a liar and he was telling those lies because of his own political beliefs and bias. He was fired for it. Unfit for law enforcement.
You still need a crime to investigate. HTH -
I;m sure a partisan hack like yourself knows better. Just like the partisan hack ComeyHHusky said:
The smarter readers understand that challenging spurious reasoning is exactly that. Your legal understanding and Barr's are both incorrect. Thus Comey's confusion.Sledog said:
And you think Mueller wouldn't charge it if he could? Or that the author for the uber liberal Post has a better legal understanding than Mueller or Barr? But Comey saying it has sparked the hopefuls on this BS.HHusky said:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/barr-is-wrong-obstruction-of-justice-doesnt-require-another-underlying-crime/ar-BBVfmVfSledog said:Interesting thought process. According to Comey you don't even need a crime to investigate to investigate. KGB man right there.
After 2 years all the witnesses, search warrants and FBI agents working this entirely fabricated crime of a non-crime (collusion) and they have absolutely nothing. Comey thought his firing was the obstruction but he was a liar and he was telling those lies because of his own political beliefs and bias. He was fired for it. Unfit for law enforcement.
You still need a crime to investigate. HTH -
I know better than virtually everyone. It's very frustrating and you should sympathize a little.RaceBannon said:
I;m sure a partisan hack like yourself knows better. Just like the partisan hack ComeyHHusky said:
The smarter readers understand that challenging spurious reasoning is exactly that. Your legal understanding and Barr's are both incorrect. Thus Comey's confusion.Sledog said:
And you think Mueller wouldn't charge it if he could? Or that the author for the uber liberal Post has a better legal understanding than Mueller or Barr? But Comey saying it has sparked the hopefuls on this BS.HHusky said:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/barr-is-wrong-obstruction-of-justice-doesnt-require-another-underlying-crime/ar-BBVfmVfSledog said:Interesting thought process. According to Comey you don't even need a crime to investigate to investigate. KGB man right there.
After 2 years all the witnesses, search warrants and FBI agents working this entirely fabricated crime of a non-crime (collusion) and they have absolutely nothing. Comey thought his firing was the obstruction but he was a liar and he was telling those lies because of his own political beliefs and bias. He was fired for it. Unfit for law enforcement.
You still need a crime to investigate. HTH
