Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
You know who really did collude with Putin and the Russians to undermine...
Comments
-
The underlying grounds or obstruction was a media report that Trump was "thinking about" firing Mueller
Gee wonder why that couldn't be proven
Trump was exonerated. Eat shit
You got your fucking investigation and it didn't prove shit so take it like a man for once in your lives -
It was only 4 pages, Race. You couldn't be troubled to read it?RaceBannon said:The underlying grounds or obstruction was a media report that Trump was "thinking about" firing Mueller
Gee wonder why that couldn't be proven
Trump was exonerated. Eat shit
You got your fucking investigation and it didn't prove shit so take it like a man for once in your lives -
Who says I didn't?HHusky said:
It was only 4 pages, Race. You couldn't be troubled to read it?RaceBannon said:The underlying grounds or obstruction was a media report that Trump was "thinking about" firing Mueller
Gee wonder why that couldn't be proven
Trump was exonerated. Eat shit
You got your fucking investigation and it didn't prove shit so take it like a man for once in your lives
-
How did you miss there is not and never was a crime. Therefore no criminal investigation or charge exists that can be obstructed. You can't obstruct nothing because nothing should never be investigated.HHusky said:
Indeed. The Mueller Report is quoted in Barr's letter. How did you miss that?Sledog said:
"In making this determination, we noted that the Special Counsel recognized that "the evidence does not establish that the President was involved in an underlying crime related to Russian election interference," and that, while not determinative, the absence of such evidence bears upon the President's intent with respect to obstruction. Generally speaking, to obtain and sustain an obstruction conviction, the government would need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a person, acting with corrupt intent, engaged in obstructive conduct with a sufficient nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding. In cataloging the President's actions, many of which took place in public view, the report identifies no actions that, in our judgment, constitute obstructive conduct, had a nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding, and were done with corrupt intent, each of which, under the Department's principles of federal prosecution guiding charging decisions, would need to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to establish an obstruction-of-justice."CirrhosisDawg said:
According to mueller and Barr, was trump exonerated on obstruction of justice allegations Bob?SFGbob said:So both Mueller and Barr are in on the cover up. Got it.
Read for comprehension. -
You didn’t read the Barr summary. Not surprised.Sledog said:
How did you miss there is not and never was a crime. Therefore no criminal investigation or charge exists that can be obstructed. You can't obstruct nothing because nothing should never be investigated.HHusky said:
Indeed. The Mueller Report is quoted in Barr's letter. How did you miss that?Sledog said:
"In making this determination, we noted that the Special Counsel recognized that "the evidence does not establish that the President was involved in an underlying crime related to Russian election interference," and that, while not determinative, the absence of such evidence bears upon the President's intent with respect to obstruction. Generally speaking, to obtain and sustain an obstruction conviction, the government would need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a person, acting with corrupt intent, engaged in obstructive conduct with a sufficient nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding. In cataloging the President's actions, many of which took place in public view, the report identifies no actions that, in our judgment, constitute obstructive conduct, had a nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding, and were done with corrupt intent, each of which, under the Department's principles of federal prosecution guiding charging decisions, would need to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to establish an obstruction-of-justice."CirrhosisDawg said:
According to mueller and Barr, was trump exonerated on obstruction of justice allegations Bob?SFGbob said:So both Mueller and Barr are in on the cover up. Got it.
Read for comprehension. -
Prove me wrong.CirrhosisDawg said:
You didn’t read the Barr summary. Not surprised.Sledog said:
How did you miss there is not and never was a crime. Therefore no criminal investigation or charge exists that can be obstructed. You can't obstruct nothing because nothing should never be investigated.HHusky said:
Indeed. The Mueller Report is quoted in Barr's letter. How did you miss that?Sledog said:
"In making this determination, we noted that the Special Counsel recognized that "the evidence does not establish that the President was involved in an underlying crime related to Russian election interference," and that, while not determinative, the absence of such evidence bears upon the President's intent with respect to obstruction. Generally speaking, to obtain and sustain an obstruction conviction, the government would need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a person, acting with corrupt intent, engaged in obstructive conduct with a sufficient nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding. In cataloging the President's actions, many of which took place in public view, the report identifies no actions that, in our judgment, constitute obstructive conduct, had a nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding, and were done with corrupt intent, each of which, under the Department's principles of federal prosecution guiding charging decisions, would need to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to establish an obstruction-of-justice."CirrhosisDawg said:
According to mueller and Barr, was trump exonerated on obstruction of justice allegations Bob?SFGbob said:So both Mueller and Barr are in on the cover up. Got it.
Read for comprehension. -
You didn’t read the Barr summary. Not surprised.Sledog said:
Prove me wrong.CirrhosisDawg said:
You didn’t read the Barr summary. Not surprised.Sledog said:
How did you miss there is not and never was a crime. Therefore no criminal investigation or charge exists that can be obstructed. You can't obstruct nothing because nothing should never be investigated.HHusky said:
Indeed. The Mueller Report is quoted in Barr's letter. How did you miss that?Sledog said:
"In making this determination, we noted that the Special Counsel recognized that "the evidence does not establish that the President was involved in an underlying crime related to Russian election interference," and that, while not determinative, the absence of such evidence bears upon the President's intent with respect to obstruction. Generally speaking, to obtain and sustain an obstruction conviction, the government would need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a person, acting with corrupt intent, engaged in obstructive conduct with a sufficient nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding. In cataloging the President's actions, many of which took place in public view, the report identifies no actions that, in our judgment, constitute obstructive conduct, had a nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding, and were done with corrupt intent, each of which, under the Department's principles of federal prosecution guiding charging decisions, would need to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to establish an obstruction-of-justice."CirrhosisDawg said:
According to mueller and Barr, was trump exonerated on obstruction of justice allegations Bob?SFGbob said:So both Mueller and Barr are in on the cover up. Got it.
Read for comprehension. -
Barr quoted the Mueller Report, Mall Cop. It explicitly did not exonerate Daddy of obstruction.
-
He doesn't know what explicitly means. So I'll add that the memo clearly stated they are not exonerating Trump.HHusky said:Barr quoted the Mueller Report, Mall Cop. It explicitly did not exonerate Daddy of obstruction.
-
Trump exonerated of obstruction?
Good news for America
-
Same thing prove me wrong. Barr did because Mueller is a pussy who wouldn't make a statement knowing full well that he can't bring charges. He passed it to Barr and Barr made the correct decision. Therefore Trump was cleared and Mueller had nothing to with it. So who fucking cares what Mueller said.HHusky said:Barr quoted the Mueller Report, Mall Cop. It explicitly did not exonerate Daddy of obstruction.
Guess who Mueller's boss is? -
Barr made a decision not to charge Daddy. It may even have been a good decision. There would have been no decision to make absent evidence of guilt.Sledog said:
Same thing prove me wrong. Barr did because Mueller is a pussy who wouldn't make a statement knowing full well that he can't bring charges. He passed it to Barr and Barr made the correct decision. Therefore Trump was cleared and Mueller had nothing to with it. So who fucking cares what Mueller said.HHusky said:Barr quoted the Mueller Report, Mall Cop. It explicitly did not exonerate Daddy of obstruction.
Guess who Mueller's boss is? -
You forget there is an absence of a crime. You can not have obstruction without the underlying crime that is being investigated. Every part of this investigation is based on lies paid for by your gal Hillary, Sure sounds like fruit of the poisonous tree to me. But then you and Schiff probably spoon.HHusky said:
Barr made a decision not to charge Daddy. It may even have been a good decision. There would have been no decision to make absent evidence of guilt.Sledog said:
Same thing prove me wrong. Barr did because Mueller is a pussy who wouldn't make a statement knowing full well that he can't bring charges. He passed it to Barr and Barr made the correct decision. Therefore Trump was cleared and Mueller had nothing to with it. So who fucking cares what Mueller said.HHusky said:Barr quoted the Mueller Report, Mall Cop. It explicitly did not exonerate Daddy of obstruction.
Guess who Mueller's boss is?
"In cataloging the President's actions, many of which took place in public view, the report identifies no actions that, in our judgment, constitute obstructive conduct, had a nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding, and were done with corrupt intent, each of which, under the Department's principles of federal prosecution guiding charging decisions, would need to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to establish an obstruction-of-justice." -
That would’ve been great!RaceBannon said:Trump exonerated of obstruction?
Good news for America -
You can't fake your level of stupidity.CirrhosisDawg said:
That would’ve been great!RaceBannon said:Trump exonerated of obstruction?
Good news for America -
He's notSledog said:
You can't fake your level of stupidity.CirrhosisDawg said:
That would’ve been great!RaceBannon said:Trump exonerated of obstruction?
Good news for America -
You didn’t read the Barr summary. Not surprised.Sledog said:
You can't fake your level of stupidity.CirrhosisDawg said:
That would’ve been great!RaceBannon said:Trump exonerated of obstruction?
Good news for America -
What a great day to be a white trash Trumpanzee Trumptard unable to compete in America manCirrhosisDawg said:
You didn’t read the Barr summary. Not surprised.Sledog said:
You can't fake your level of stupidity.CirrhosisDawg said:
That would’ve been great!RaceBannon said:Trump exonerated of obstruction?
Good news for America -
Better quote it for me. Mom can help when she brings your bagel bites down to your command center.CirrhosisDawg said:
You didn’t read the Barr summary. Not surprised.Sledog said:
You can't fake your level of stupidity.CirrhosisDawg said:
That would’ve been great!RaceBannon said:Trump exonerated of obstruction?
Good news for America -
CirrhosisoftheBrain doing his best HondoFS impression.CirrhosisDawg said:
You didn’t read the Barr summary. Not surprised.Sledog said:
How did you miss there is not and never was a crime. Therefore no criminal investigation or charge exists that can be obstructed. You can't obstruct nothing because nothing should never be investigated.HHusky said:
Indeed. The Mueller Report is quoted in Barr's letter. How did you miss that?Sledog said:
"In making this determination, we noted that the Special Counsel recognized that "the evidence does not establish that the President was involved in an underlying crime related to Russian election interference," and that, while not determinative, the absence of such evidence bears upon the President's intent with respect to obstruction. Generally speaking, to obtain and sustain an obstruction conviction, the government would need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a person, acting with corrupt intent, engaged in obstructive conduct with a sufficient nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding. In cataloging the President's actions, many of which took place in public view, the report identifies no actions that, in our judgment, constitute obstructive conduct, had a nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding, and were done with corrupt intent, each of which, under the Department's principles of federal prosecution guiding charging decisions, would need to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to establish an obstruction-of-justice."CirrhosisDawg said:
According to mueller and Barr, was trump exonerated on obstruction of justice allegations Bob?SFGbob said:So both Mueller and Barr are in on the cover up. Got it.
Read for comprehension.
The butthurt in the special ed liberals these last couple of days has been epic... -
Vindicated!HoustonHusky said:
CirrhosisoftheBrain doing his best HondoFS impression.CirrhosisDawg said:
You didn’t read the Barr summary. Not surprised.Sledog said:
How did you miss there is not and never was a crime. Therefore no criminal investigation or charge exists that can be obstructed. You can't obstruct nothing because nothing should never be investigated.HHusky said:
Indeed. The Mueller Report is quoted in Barr's letter. How did you miss that?Sledog said:
"In making this determination, we noted that the Special Counsel recognized that "the evidence does not establish that the President was involved in an underlying crime related to Russian election interference," and that, while not determinative, the absence of such evidence bears upon the President's intent with respect to obstruction. Generally speaking, to obtain and sustain an obstruction conviction, the government would need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a person, acting with corrupt intent, engaged in obstructive conduct with a sufficient nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding. In cataloging the President's actions, many of which took place in public view, the report identifies no actions that, in our judgment, constitute obstructive conduct, had a nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding, and were done with corrupt intent, each of which, under the Department's principles of federal prosecution guiding charging decisions, would need to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to establish an obstruction-of-justice."CirrhosisDawg said:
According to mueller and Barr, was trump exonerated on obstruction of justice allegations Bob?SFGbob said:So both Mueller and Barr are in on the cover up. Got it.
Read for comprehension.
The butthurt in the special ed liberals these last couple of days has been epic... -
No you c'mon @Southerndawg . Yes, I've been very open about my loathing up Trump. But I have tried to be as respectful of others as I can in the Tug. Rarely do you see me WTF another's post. I've made an effort not to personally attack any poster here unless they come at me first. I mean fuck, I've hardly posted in the tug at all in the past 6 months. (the thread I started with the MAGA kids was as joke with @swaye . So I made one comment initially about how he looked to be trolling the old Indian. What was I supposed to walk back? I stand by the statement that wearing MAGA hats to a pro life rally isn't a good look).Southerndawg said:
C'mon. You are backtracking and doubling down. And Race is right, this was tantamount to an attempted coup, even a blind man can see that. You've been open with your loathing of Trump and Trump supporters, going so far as to start a thread wherein a kid was hassled by a hate group and man in his 60's and you blamed the kid because the way he was dressed, he was begging for it. Just own it and move on.YellowSnow said:
Saying what now? That he's made some really poor decisions that didn't help build his trust worthiness and created a lot of suspicion = saying that Mueller would find get him on collusion or obstruction. Coup attempt my fucking ass. The process played out how it's fucking supposed in a country founded on rule of law.RaceBannon said:
You're saying it nowYellowSnow said:
Backtracking my ass. Where the fuck did I ever say he was guilty of collusion or obstruction or call for impeachment in the Tug? I was in the LIPO camp from day fucking 1.RaceBannon said:
Everything he did?YellowSnow said:
They (the returns) have everything to do with trust and confidence. Everything he did in the leading up to the appointment of Mueller (inc non release of the tax returns) creates suspicion.SFGbob said:His tax returns have nothing to do with Russian collusion. Firing Comey, who the press hated, was a fucking excuse to launch the investigation.
Go back and take a look at the press conference that Trump held after the bullshit Dossier story was reported by Buzzfeed.
http://youtu.be/0l4bQYZcaQk
The Rats started pushing the phony narrative of Russian collusion immediately after the election and the press was more than happy to carry their water and this was long before Trump was even sworn into office.
Jesus this is just pathetic backtracking now
It was bullshit. There's no excuse for it. It was a coup attempt
And you're running cover
-
So it was you who drug me back into this shit. Fuck. As liverdwag so aptly observes, I'd been doing a pretty good jerb of of not caring for many months. Covington Catholic story was so horribly botched it brought me back in.YellowSnow said:
No you c'mon @Southerndawg . Yes, I've been very open about my loathing up Trump. But I have tried to be as respectful of others as I can in the Tug. Rarely do you see me WTF another's post. I've made an effort not to personally attack any poster here unless they come at me first. I mean fuck, I've hardly posted in the tug at all in the past 6 months. (the thread I started with the MAGA kids was as joke with @swaye . So I made one comment initially about how he looked to be trolling the old Indian. What was I supposed to walk back? I stand by the statement that wearing MAGA hats to a pro life rally isn't a good look).Southerndawg said:
C'mon. You are backtracking and doubling down. And Race is right, this was tantamount to an attempted coup, even a blind man can see that. You've been open with your loathing of Trump and Trump supporters, going so far as to start a thread wherein a kid was hassled by a hate group and man in his 60's and you blamed the kid because the way he was dressed, he was begging for it. Just own it and move on.YellowSnow said:
Saying what now? That he's made some really poor decisions that didn't help build his trust worthiness and created a lot of suspicion = saying that Mueller would find get him on collusion or obstruction. Coup attempt my fucking ass. The process played out how it's fucking supposed in a country founded on rule of law.RaceBannon said:
You're saying it nowYellowSnow said:
Backtracking my ass. Where the fuck did I ever say he was guilty of collusion or obstruction or call for impeachment in the Tug? I was in the LIPO camp from day fucking 1.RaceBannon said:
Everything he did?YellowSnow said:
They (the returns) have everything to do with trust and confidence. Everything he did in the leading up to the appointment of Mueller (inc non release of the tax returns) creates suspicion.SFGbob said:His tax returns have nothing to do with Russian collusion. Firing Comey, who the press hated, was a fucking excuse to launch the investigation.
Go back and take a look at the press conference that Trump held after the bullshit Dossier story was reported by Buzzfeed.http://youtu.be/0l4bQYZcaQk
The Rats started pushing the phony narrative of Russian collusion immediately after the election and the press was more than happy to carry their water and this was long before Trump was even sworn into office.
Jesus this is just pathetic backtracking now
It was bullshit. There's no excuse for it. It was a coup attempt
And you're running cover
I hold you responsible now for my caring. -
Please accept my apologies.GrundleStiltzkin said:
So it was you who drug me back into this shit. Fuck. As liverdwag so aptly observes, I'd been doing a pretty good jerb of of not caring for many months. Covington Catholic story was so horribly botched it brought me back in.YellowSnow said:
No you c'mon @Southerndawg . Yes, I've been very open about my loathing up Trump. But I have tried to be as respectful of others as I can in the Tug. Rarely do you see me WTF another's post. I've made an effort not to personally attack any poster here unless they come at me first. I mean fuck, I've hardly posted in the tug at all in the past 6 months. (the thread I started with the MAGA kids was as joke with @swaye . So I made one comment initially about how he looked to be trolling the old Indian. What was I supposed to walk back? I stand by the statement that wearing MAGA hats to a pro life rally isn't a good look).Southerndawg said:
C'mon. You are backtracking and doubling down. And Race is right, this was tantamount to an attempted coup, even a blind man can see that. You've been open with your loathing of Trump and Trump supporters, going so far as to start a thread wherein a kid was hassled by a hate group and man in his 60's and you blamed the kid because the way he was dressed, he was begging for it. Just own it and move on.YellowSnow said:
Saying what now? That he's made some really poor decisions that didn't help build his trust worthiness and created a lot of suspicion = saying that Mueller would find get him on collusion or obstruction. Coup attempt my fucking ass. The process played out how it's fucking supposed in a country founded on rule of law.RaceBannon said:
You're saying it nowYellowSnow said:
Backtracking my ass. Where the fuck did I ever say he was guilty of collusion or obstruction or call for impeachment in the Tug? I was in the LIPO camp from day fucking 1.RaceBannon said:
Everything he did?YellowSnow said:
They (the returns) have everything to do with trust and confidence. Everything he did in the leading up to the appointment of Mueller (inc non release of the tax returns) creates suspicion.SFGbob said:His tax returns have nothing to do with Russian collusion. Firing Comey, who the press hated, was a fucking excuse to launch the investigation.
Go back and take a look at the press conference that Trump held after the bullshit Dossier story was reported by Buzzfeed.http://youtu.be/0l4bQYZcaQk
The Rats started pushing the phony narrative of Russian collusion immediately after the election and the press was more than happy to carry their water and this was long before Trump was even sworn into office.
Jesus this is just pathetic backtracking now
It was bullshit. There's no excuse for it. It was a coup attempt
And you're running cover
I hold you responsible now for my caring. -
I agree, you are respectful of others in here, kudos for that, seriously. And I mean no disrespect, but again, IMHO you're not owning up to your intent. IMO, the tagline for your post regarding the Covington Catholic story was an attempt to use humor to mask your intent. You loathe Trump and folks who show their support for him by wearing a silly hat, which by the way was probably more fitting than not at a pro-life rally since Trump is pro-life and that is a pro-Trump hat. You (and you weren't alone) were very quick to judge the kid, who turned out to be the real victim of hatred from a relentless press and social media attacks, up to and including the doxing of he and his family so as to extend the harassment to his doorstep. Walking back your hasty judgement of the kid and/or owning up to a bit of Trump Derangement Syndrome seems fitting, but that's just me. Either way, cheers, you are one of the better poasters in this hive of villainous scum.YellowSnow said:
No you c'mon @Southerndawg . Yes, I've been very open about my loathing up Trump. But I have tried to be as respectful of others as I can in the Tug. Rarely do you see me WTF another's post. I've made an effort not to personally attack any poster here unless they come at me first. I mean fuck, I've hardly posted in the tug at all in the past 6 months. (the thread I started with the MAGA kids was as joke with @swaye . So I made one comment initially about how he looked to be trolling the old Indian. What was I supposed to walk back? I stand by the statement that wearing MAGA hats to a pro life rally isn't a good look).Southerndawg said:
C'mon. You are backtracking and doubling down. And Race is right, this was tantamount to an attempted coup, even a blind man can see that. You've been open with your loathing of Trump and Trump supporters, going so far as to start a thread wherein a kid was hassled by a hate group and man in his 60's and you blamed the kid because the way he was dressed, he was begging for it. Just own it and move on.YellowSnow said:
Saying what now? That he's made some really poor decisions that didn't help build his trust worthiness and created a lot of suspicion = saying that Mueller would find get him on collusion or obstruction. Coup attempt my fucking ass. The process played out how it's fucking supposed in a country founded on rule of law.RaceBannon said:
You're saying it nowYellowSnow said:
Backtracking my ass. Where the fuck did I ever say he was guilty of collusion or obstruction or call for impeachment in the Tug? I was in the LIPO camp from day fucking 1.RaceBannon said:
Everything he did?YellowSnow said:
They (the returns) have everything to do with trust and confidence. Everything he did in the leading up to the appointment of Mueller (inc non release of the tax returns) creates suspicion.SFGbob said:His tax returns have nothing to do with Russian collusion. Firing Comey, who the press hated, was a fucking excuse to launch the investigation.
Go back and take a look at the press conference that Trump held after the bullshit Dossier story was reported by Buzzfeed.http://youtu.be/0l4bQYZcaQk
The Rats started pushing the phony narrative of Russian collusion immediately after the election and the press was more than happy to carry their water and this was long before Trump was even sworn into office.
Jesus this is just pathetic backtracking now
It was bullshit. There's no excuse for it. It was a coup attempt
And you're running cover -
@Southerndawg here's what I walk back in hindsight: I was trying to stir with pot with a little humor and thought the kid looked like a troll without seeing the whole story. Again, I don't think getting it wrong once in a while in the Tug has the same equivalence as real life- e.g., I don't have a Twitter account, nor do I ever discuss politics on social media. My critique of the MAGA hat at the pro life rally is that to me the point of demonstrating should be to win hearts and minds to your cause. But in this case, anyone that likes your MAGA hat already agrees with you.Southerndawg said:
I agree, you are respectful of others in here, kudos for that, seriously. And I mean no disrespect, but again, IMHO you're not owning up to your intent. IMO, the tagline for your post regarding the Covington Catholic story was an attempt to use humor to mask your intent. You loathe Trump and folks who show their support for him by wearing a silly hat, which by the way was probably more fitting than not at a pro-life rally since Trump is pro-life and that is a pro-Trump hat. You (and you weren't alone) were very quick to judge the kid, who turned out to be the real victim of hatred from a relentless press and social media attacks, up to and including the doxing of he and his family so as to extend the harassment to his doorstep. Walking back your hasty judgement of the kid and/or owning up to a bit of Trump Derangement Syndrome seems fitting, but that's just me. Either way, cheers, you are one of the better poasters in this hive of villainous scum.YellowSnow said:
No you c'mon @Southerndawg . Yes, I've been very open about my loathing up Trump. But I have tried to be as respectful of others as I can in the Tug. Rarely do you see me WTF another's post. I've made an effort not to personally attack any poster here unless they come at me first. I mean fuck, I've hardly posted in the tug at all in the past 6 months. (the thread I started with the MAGA kids was as joke with @swaye . So I made one comment initially about how he looked to be trolling the old Indian. What was I supposed to walk back? I stand by the statement that wearing MAGA hats to a pro life rally isn't a good look).Southerndawg said:
C'mon. You are backtracking and doubling down. And Race is right, this was tantamount to an attempted coup, even a blind man can see that. You've been open with your loathing of Trump and Trump supporters, going so far as to start a thread wherein a kid was hassled by a hate group and man in his 60's and you blamed the kid because the way he was dressed, he was begging for it. Just own it and move on.YellowSnow said:
Saying what now? That he's made some really poor decisions that didn't help build his trust worthiness and created a lot of suspicion = saying that Mueller would find get him on collusion or obstruction. Coup attempt my fucking ass. The process played out how it's fucking supposed in a country founded on rule of law.RaceBannon said:
You're saying it nowYellowSnow said:
Backtracking my ass. Where the fuck did I ever say he was guilty of collusion or obstruction or call for impeachment in the Tug? I was in the LIPO camp from day fucking 1.RaceBannon said:
Everything he did?YellowSnow said:
They (the returns) have everything to do with trust and confidence. Everything he did in the leading up to the appointment of Mueller (inc non release of the tax returns) creates suspicion.SFGbob said:His tax returns have nothing to do with Russian collusion. Firing Comey, who the press hated, was a fucking excuse to launch the investigation.
Go back and take a look at the press conference that Trump held after the bullshit Dossier story was reported by Buzzfeed.http://youtu.be/0l4bQYZcaQk
The Rats started pushing the phony narrative of Russian collusion immediately after the election and the press was more than happy to carry their water and this was long before Trump was even sworn into office.
Jesus this is just pathetic backtracking now
It was bullshit. There's no excuse for it. It was a coup attempt
And you're running cover -
It is absolute bullshit to argue that one cannot obstruct justice in the absence of a crime. It is Bill Barr’s position however. Why do you think he got the job?Sledog said:
You forget there is an absence of a crime. You can not have obstruction without the underlying crime that is being investigated. Every part of this investigation is based on lies paid for by your gal Hillary, Sure sounds like fruit of the poisonous tree to me. But then you and Schiff probably spoon.HHusky said:
Barr made a decision not to charge Daddy. It may even have been a good decision. There would have been no decision to make absent evidence of guilt.Sledog said:
Same thing prove me wrong. Barr did because Mueller is a pussy who wouldn't make a statement knowing full well that he can't bring charges. He passed it to Barr and Barr made the correct decision. Therefore Trump was cleared and Mueller had nothing to with it. So who fucking cares what Mueller said.HHusky said:Barr quoted the Mueller Report, Mall Cop. It explicitly did not exonerate Daddy of obstruction.
Guess who Mueller's boss is?
"In cataloging the President's actions, many of which took place in public view, the report identifies no actions that, in our judgment, constitute obstructive conduct, had a nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding, and were done with corrupt intent, each of which, under the Department's principles of federal prosecution guiding charging decisions, would need to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to establish an obstruction-of-justice." -
#Resisting going full Teq on the Covington thing....
It's hard -
And here comes the angerHHusky said:
It is absolute bullshit to argue that one cannot obstruct justice in the absence of a crime. It is Bill Barr’s position however. Why do you think he got the job?Sledog said:
You forget there is an absence of a crime. You can not have obstruction without the underlying crime that is being investigated. Every part of this investigation is based on lies paid for by your gal Hillary, Sure sounds like fruit of the poisonous tree to me. But then you and Schiff probably spoon.HHusky said:
Barr made a decision not to charge Daddy. It may even have been a good decision. There would have been no decision to make absent evidence of guilt.Sledog said:
Same thing prove me wrong. Barr did because Mueller is a pussy who wouldn't make a statement knowing full well that he can't bring charges. He passed it to Barr and Barr made the correct decision. Therefore Trump was cleared and Mueller had nothing to with it. So who fucking cares what Mueller said.HHusky said:Barr quoted the Mueller Report, Mall Cop. It explicitly did not exonerate Daddy of obstruction.
Guess who Mueller's boss is?
"In cataloging the President's actions, many of which took place in public view, the report identifies no actions that, in our judgment, constitute obstructive conduct, had a nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding, and were done with corrupt intent, each of which, under the Department's principles of federal prosecution guiding charging decisions, would need to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to establish an obstruction-of-justice." -
I can’t imagine caring about this.RaceBannon said:
And here comes the angerHHusky said:
It is absolute bullshit to argue that one cannot obstruct justice in the absence of a crime. It is Bill Barr’s position however. Why do you think he got the job?Sledog said:
You forget there is an absence of a crime. You can not have obstruction without the underlying crime that is being investigated. Every part of this investigation is based on lies paid for by your gal Hillary, Sure sounds like fruit of the poisonous tree to me. But then you and Schiff probably spoon.HHusky said:
Barr made a decision not to charge Daddy. It may even have been a good decision. There would have been no decision to make absent evidence of guilt.Sledog said:
Same thing prove me wrong. Barr did because Mueller is a pussy who wouldn't make a statement knowing full well that he can't bring charges. He passed it to Barr and Barr made the correct decision. Therefore Trump was cleared and Mueller had nothing to with it. So who fucking cares what Mueller said.HHusky said:Barr quoted the Mueller Report, Mall Cop. It explicitly did not exonerate Daddy of obstruction.
Guess who Mueller's boss is?
"In cataloging the President's actions, many of which took place in public view, the report identifies no actions that, in our judgment, constitute obstructive conduct, had a nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding, and were done with corrupt intent, each of which, under the Department's principles of federal prosecution guiding charging decisions, would need to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to establish an obstruction-of-justice."
