Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
You know who really did collude with Putin and the Russians to undermine...
Comments
-
You’ve forgotten why Barr got the gig.Sledog said:
Unsolicited? Seems Mueller solicited his opinion on obstruction. Didn't congress ask for a summary?HHusky said:W
Bob isn’t an institution. Nothing says impartiality like an unsolicited memo telling Daddy he can’t be guilty of anything.RaceBannon said:
Back to bashing our precious institutions again? I thought that was one of your big issues with "daddy"HHusky said: -
What goal posts? You were all over how Trump had colluded with Putin. You've now dropped that and moved to a charge of obstruction the Mueller himself declined to make a determination on.HHusky said:
Where did that fucking goalpost go?SFGbob said:
Predictable how quick this Kunt dropped Collusion.HHusky said:W
Bob isn’t an institution. Nothing says impartiality like an unsolicited memo telling Daddy he can’t be guilty of anything.RaceBannon said:
Back to bashing our precious institutions again? I thought that was one of your big issues with "daddy"HHusky said:
What the fuck is Barr supposed to do? The guy who had been investigating this for two years refuses to come to a determination on obstruction and tosses in in Barr's lap. Barr decides and Kunt like you get to whine about. If you want cry, cry about your boy Mueller. -
HHusky said:
You’ve forgotten why Barr got the gig.Sledog said:
Unsolicited? Seems Mueller solicited his opinion on obstruction. Didn't congress ask for a summary?HHusky said:W
Bob isn’t an institution. Nothing says impartiality like an unsolicited memo telling Daddy he can’t be guilty of anything.RaceBannon said:
Back to bashing our precious institutions again? I thought that was one of your big issues with "daddy"HHusky said:
-
-
Then Mueller must be in on the cover up. This circular Kunt logic is O'Keefed specialty. Mueller didn't have to let Barr come up with the determination on whether or not to prosecute for obstruction. He punted it to Barr. If Barr got the "gig" because everyone knew he wasn't going to seek an obstruction violation then Mueller is in on the cover up.RaceBannon said:HHusky said:
You’ve forgotten why Barr got the gig.Sledog said:
Unsolicited? Seems Mueller solicited his opinion on obstruction. Didn't congress ask for a summary?HHusky said:W
Bob isn’t an institution. Nothing says impartiality like an unsolicited memo telling Daddy he can’t be guilty of anything.RaceBannon said:
Back to bashing our precious institutions again? I thought that was one of your big issues with "daddy"HHusky said:
Shocking O'Keefed is pushing another bullshit conspiracy theory. -
It’s not a coverup, blob. Barr was very direct about his feelings. Yours are transparent too. Try to be happy. Daddy hasn’t been charged with anything yet.SFGbob said:
Then Mueller must be in on the cover up. This circular Kunt logic is O'Keefed specialty. Mueller didn't have to let Barr come up with the determination on whether or not to prosecute for obstruction. He punted it to Barr. If Barr got the "gig" because everyone knew he wasn't going to seek an obstruction violation then Mueller is in on the cover up.RaceBannon said:HHusky said:
You’ve forgotten why Barr got the gig.Sledog said:
Unsolicited? Seems Mueller solicited his opinion on obstruction. Didn't congress ask for a summary?HHusky said:W
Bob isn’t an institution. Nothing says impartiality like an unsolicited memo telling Daddy he can’t be guilty of anything.RaceBannon said:
Back to bashing our precious institutions again? I thought that was one of your big issues with "daddy"HHusky said:
Shocking O'Keefed is pushing another bullshit conspiracy theory. -
YellowSnow said:
@Southerndawg here's what I walk back in hindsight: I was trying to stir with pot with a little humor and thought the kid looked like a troll without seeing the whole story. Again, I don't think getting it wrong once in a while in the Tug has the same equivalence as real life- e.g., I don't have a Twitter account, nor do I ever discuss politics on social media. My critique of the MAGA hat at the pro life rally is that to me the point of demonstrating should be to win hearts and minds to your cause. But in this case, anyone that likes your MAGA hat already agrees with you.Southerndawg said:
I agree, you are respectful of others in here, kudos for that, seriously. And I mean no disrespect, but again, IMHO you're not owning up to your intent. IMO, the tagline for your post regarding the Covington Catholic story was an attempt to use humor to mask your intent. You loathe Trump and folks who show their support for him by wearing a silly hat, which by the way was probably more fitting than not at a pro-life rally since Trump is pro-life and that is a pro-Trump hat. You (and you weren't alone) were very quick to judge the kid, who turned out to be the real victim of hatred from a relentless press and social media attacks, up to and including the doxing of he and his family so as to extend the harassment to his doorstep. Walking back your hasty judgement of the kid and/or owning up to a bit of Trump Derangement Syndrome seems fitting, but that's just me. Either way, cheers, you are one of the better poasters in this hive of villainous scum.YellowSnow said:
No you c'mon @Southerndawg . Yes, I've been very open about my loathing up Trump. But I have tried to be as respectful of others as I can in the Tug. Rarely do you see me WTF another's post. I've made an effort not to personally attack any poster here unless they come at me first. I mean fuck, I've hardly posted in the tug at all in the past 6 months. (the thread I started with the MAGA kids was as joke with @swaye . So I made one comment initially about how he looked to be trolling the old Indian. What was I supposed to walk back? I stand by the statement that wearing MAGA hats to a pro life rally isn't a good look).Southerndawg said:
C'mon. You are backtracking and doubling down. And Race is right, this was tantamount to an attempted coup, even a blind man can see that. You've been open with your loathing of Trump and Trump supporters, going so far as to start a thread wherein a kid was hassled by a hate group and man in his 60's and you blamed the kid because the way he was dressed, he was begging for it. Just own it and move on.YellowSnow said:
Saying what now? That he's made some really poor decisions that didn't help build his trust worthiness and created a lot of suspicion = saying that Mueller would find get him on collusion or obstruction. Coup attempt my fucking ass. The process played out how it's fucking supposed in a country founded on rule of law.RaceBannon said:
You're saying it nowYellowSnow said:
Backtracking my ass. Where the fuck did I ever say he was guilty of collusion or obstruction or call for impeachment in the Tug? I was in the LIPO camp from day fucking 1.RaceBannon said:
Everything he did?YellowSnow said:
They (the returns) have everything to do with trust and confidence. Everything he did in the leading up to the appointment of Mueller (inc non release of the tax returns) creates suspicion.SFGbob said:His tax returns have nothing to do with Russian collusion. Firing Comey, who the press hated, was a fucking excuse to launch the investigation.
Go back and take a look at the press conference that Trump held after the bullshit Dossier story was reported by Buzzfeed.
http://youtu.be/0l4bQYZcaQk
The Rats started pushing the phony narrative of Russian collusion immediately after the election and the press was more than happy to carry their water and this was long before Trump was even sworn into office.
Jesus this is just pathetic backtracking now
It was bullshit. There's no excuse for it. It was a coup attempt
And you're running cover
Rally's are more about solidarity and motiving a group of like minded people than they are about winning the hearts and minds of those who oppose the rally's cause. How many Hillary Clinton voters do you suppose were swayed to vote for Trump by a Trump Rally? And vice versa? Anyway, we'll have to agree to disagree on this point, but IMHO, the MAGA hat fit right in at a pro-life rally and the kid had every right to wear it along with the expectation that he'd not be harassed as a result.
By the way, that's a pretty light mea culpa, but again, either way, cheers!
-
You'd think after 2 years they'd have found something. Nothing. Nada. Zip. Bupkis. Your meltdown is a wonderful thing. But but but but but but but RUSSIA!HHusky said:
It’s not a coverup, blob. Barr was very direct about his feelings. Yours are transparent too. Try to be happy. Daddy hasn’t been charged with anything yet.SFGbob said:
Then Mueller must be in on the cover up. This circular Kunt logic is O'Keefed specialty. Mueller didn't have to let Barr come up with the determination on whether or not to prosecute for obstruction. He punted it to Barr. If Barr got the "gig" because everyone knew he wasn't going to seek an obstruction violation then Mueller is in on the cover up.RaceBannon said:HHusky said:
You’ve forgotten why Barr got the gig.Sledog said:
Unsolicited? Seems Mueller solicited his opinion on obstruction. Didn't congress ask for a summary?HHusky said:W
Bob isn’t an institution. Nothing says impartiality like an unsolicited memo telling Daddy he can’t be guilty of anything.RaceBannon said:
Back to bashing our precious institutions again? I thought that was one of your big issues with "daddy"HHusky said:
Shocking O'Keefed is pushing another bullshit conspiracy theory. -
The dance of the Kunt continues. Why didn't Mueller come up with a determination to prosecute Trump for obstruction Kunt? Is that question that fucking tough for you?HHusky said:
It’s not a coverup, blob. Barr was very direct about his feelings. Yours are transparent too. Try to be happy. Daddy hasn’t been charged with anything yet.SFGbob said:
Then Mueller must be in on the cover up. This circular Kunt logic is O'Keefed specialty. Mueller didn't have to let Barr come up with the determination on whether or not to prosecute for obstruction. He punted it to Barr. If Barr got the "gig" because everyone knew he wasn't going to seek an obstruction violation then Mueller is in on the cover up.RaceBannon said:HHusky said:
You’ve forgotten why Barr got the gig.Sledog said:
Unsolicited? Seems Mueller solicited his opinion on obstruction. Didn't congress ask for a summary?HHusky said:W
Bob isn’t an institution. Nothing says impartiality like an unsolicited memo telling Daddy he can’t be guilty of anything.RaceBannon said:
Back to bashing our precious institutions again? I thought that was one of your big issues with "daddy"HHusky said:
Shocking O'Keefed is pushing another bullshit conspiracy theory.
If Mueller knew that Barr was never going to prosecute and he punted the decision to Barr anyway then Mueller had to be in on conspiracy. I realize that a dumbfuck who thinks Mike Brown was shot in the back while running away isn't real big on simple facts and logic but you still haven't answered the question.
Mueller declined to make a determination and to apply the law and left it entirely up to Barr, seems like you should be mad a Mueller Kunt. Wasn't that Mueller's job? To make a prosecutorial judgment if the law had been broken? So why are you blaming Barr? That wasn't Barr's job that was Mueller's. -
Yet you still call Hillary a criminal after they decided what she did was not prosecutable.. How are you a political shill again?SFGbob said:
The dance of the Kunt continues. Why didn't Mueller come up with a determination to prosecute Trump for obstruction Kunt? Is that question that fucking tough for you?HHusky said:
It’s not a coverup, blob. Barr was very direct about his feelings. Yours are transparent too. Try to be happy. Daddy hasn’t been charged with anything yet.SFGbob said:
Then Mueller must be in on the cover up. This circular Kunt logic is O'Keefed specialty. Mueller didn't have to let Barr come up with the determination on whether or not to prosecute for obstruction. He punted it to Barr. If Barr got the "gig" because everyone knew he wasn't going to seek an obstruction violation then Mueller is in on the cover up.RaceBannon said:HHusky said:
You’ve forgotten why Barr got the gig.Sledog said:
Unsolicited? Seems Mueller solicited his opinion on obstruction. Didn't congress ask for a summary?HHusky said:W
Bob isn’t an institution. Nothing says impartiality like an unsolicited memo telling Daddy he can’t be guilty of anything.RaceBannon said:
Back to bashing our precious institutions again? I thought that was one of your big issues with "daddy"HHusky said:
Shocking O'Keefed is pushing another bullshit conspiracy theory.
If Mueller knew that Barr was never going to prosecute and he punted the decision to Barr anyway then Mueller had to be in on conspiracy. I realize that a dumbfuck who thinks Mike Brown was shot in the back while running away isn't real big on simple facts and logic but you still haven't answered the question.
Mueller declined to make a determination and to apply the law and left it entirely up to Barr, seems like you should be mad a Mueller Kunt. Wasn't that Mueller's job? To make a prosecutorial judgment if the law had been broken? So why are you blaming Barr? That wasn't Barr's job that was Mueller's.
