What if I told you that
Let's say UW beats Stanford giving Stanford their only loss while UW loses a conference game but wins the tie breaker. Both are 11-1, UW 12-1 after beating Utah in the CCG
But!
THE TOUGHEST NONCONFERENCE SCHEDULE IN THE COUNTRY
Stanford: vs. Northwestern (Aug. 31), at UCF (Sept. 14), vs. Notre Dame (Nov. 30)
In addition to their nine Pac-12 games, the Cardinal host the defending Big Ten West champions, travel to play a team that just had a 25-game winning streak snapped and close the season against a team that came closer to beating Clemson (on the scoreboard at least) than Alabama did. Coming off an up-and-down 2018, there will be no free passes for David Shaw’s crew.
Stanford sweeps these games they get voted in ahead of Pussy U and our? pussy schedule
Comments
-
Stanford isn't sweeping those games and they'll be lucky to even be 2nd in the norte.
-
I stand with J
-
J?GrundleStiltzkin said:I stand with J
-
Thank you for your support! Dawg life! WOOF!GrundleStiltzkin said:I stand with J
-
That's not the pointPurpleJ said:Stanford isn't sweeping those games and they'll be lucky to even be 2nd in the norte.
You need to read for comprehension
-
I can't read asshole.RaceBannon said:
That's not the pointPurpleJ said:Stanford isn't sweeping those games and they'll be lucky to even be 2nd in the norte.
You need to read for comprehension -
Quite honestly, Race, I don't deal in hypotheticalsRaceBannon said:
That's not the pointPurpleJ said:Stanford isn't sweeping those games and they'll be lucky to even be 2nd in the norte.
You need to read for comprehension -
RacistGrundleStiltzkin said:
Quite honestly, Race, I don't deal in hypotheticalsRaceBannon said:
That's not the pointPurpleJ said:Stanford isn't sweeping those games and they'll be lucky to even be 2nd in the norte.
You need to read for comprehension -
Try reading for comprehension.RaceBannon said:
RacistGrundleStiltzkin said:
Quite honestly, Race, I don't deal in hypotheticalsRaceBannon said:
That's not the pointPurpleJ said:Stanford isn't sweeping those games and they'll be lucky to even be 2nd in the norte.
You need to read for comprehension
Always about Race with this one. -
This is a real concern that Race has identified. It shouldn't be an issue, but the reality is that ESPN hates UW so much (I still don't understand why, but they do...it's fucking weird and inappropriate) such that those douches on College Football Live simply diminish everything about UW every time they have a chance. This is where the playoff committee is totally gullible in that none of them watch every game and thus they take their cues from ESPN...with ESPN bitch slapping UW it will naturally elevate any Pac12 team that is not UW - call it Oregon or Stanford or USC.RaceBannon said:UW won the Pac 12 next year and Stanford got the CFP bid?
Let's say UW beats Stanford giving Stanford their only loss while UW loses a conference game but wins the tie breaker. Both are 11-1, UW 12-1 after beating Utah in the CCG
But!
THE TOUGHEST NONCONFERENCE SCHEDULE IN THE COUNTRY
Stanford: vs. Northwestern (Aug. 31), at UCF (Sept. 14), vs. Notre Dame (Nov. 30)
In addition to their nine Pac-12 games, the Cardinal host the defending Big Ten West champions, travel to play a team that just had a 25-game winning streak snapped and close the season against a team that came closer to beating Clemson (on the scoreboard at least) than Alabama did. Coming off an up-and-down 2018, there will be no free passes for David Shaw’s crew.
Stanford sweeps these games they get voted in ahead of Pussy U and our? pussy schedule
The disrespect is unreal! -
I still think it's a dumb point because our DAWGS always have destiny in their hands. Losers care about ESPN and winners win. I thought Race was better than this.
-
speaking of losersPurpleJ said:I still think it's a dumb point because our DAWGS always have destiny in their hands. Losers care about ESPN and winners win. I thought Race was better than this.
-
Fuck off.Meek said:
speaking of losersPurpleJ said:I still think it's a dumb point because our DAWGS always have destiny in their hands. Losers care about ESPN and winners win. I thought Race was better than this.
Even in Race's scenario, the committee would give preference to the conference champ.
But the REAL point is, don't go 11-1 like a punk bitch and you'll have no issues. -
No they wouldn't fuck facePurpleJ said:
Fuck off.Meek said:
speaking of losersPurpleJ said:I still think it's a dumb point because our DAWGS always have destiny in their hands. Losers care about ESPN and winners win. I thought Race was better than this.
Even in Race's scenario, the committee would give preference to the conference champ.
But the REAL point is, don't go 11-1 like a punk bitch and you'll have no issues.
Se my Crimson Tide for an example -
RacistPurpleJ said:I still think it's a dumb point because our DAWGS always have destiny in their hands. Losers care about ESPN and winners win. I thought Race was better than this.
-
you have serious issues man...like I'm not trying to insult you so please consider this friendly feedback... but the way you post on these boards is really troubling.PurpleJ said:
Fuck off.Meek said:
speaking of losersPurpleJ said:I still think it's a dumb point because our DAWGS always have destiny in their hands. Losers care about ESPN and winners win. I thought Race was better than this.
Even in Race's scenario, the committee would give preference to the conference champ.
But the REAL point is, don't go 11-1 like a punk bitch and you'll have no issues. -
Gnu two Jay?Meek said:
you have serious issues man...like I'm not trying to insult you so please consider this friendly feedback... but the way you post on these boards is really troubling.PurpleJ said:
Fuck off.Meek said:
speaking of losersPurpleJ said:I still think it's a dumb point because our DAWGS always have destiny in their hands. Losers care about ESPN and winners win. I thought Race was better than this.
Even in Race's scenario, the committee would give preference to the conference champ.
But the REAL point is, don't go 11-1 like a punk bitch and you'll have no issues. -
ChristMeek said:
you have serious issues man...like I'm not trying to insult you so please consider this friendly feedback... but the way you post on these boards is really troubling.PurpleJ said:
Fuck off.Meek said:
speaking of losersPurpleJ said:I still think it's a dumb point because our DAWGS always have destiny in their hands. Losers care about ESPN and winners win. I thought Race was better than this.
Even in Race's scenario, the committee would give preference to the conference champ.
But the REAL point is, don't go 11-1 like a punk bitch and you'll have no issues. -
WhateverRaceBannon said:
No they wouldn't fuck facePurpleJ said:
Fuck off.Meek said:
speaking of losersPurpleJ said:I still think it's a dumb point because our DAWGS always have destiny in their hands. Losers care about ESPN and winners win. I thought Race was better than this.
Even in Race's scenario, the committee would give preference to the conference champ.
But the REAL point is, don't go 11-1 like a punk bitch and you'll have no issues.
Se my Crimson Tide for an example -
Why so angry?
-
Clam down truboRaceBannon said:Why so angry?
-
-
-
The world is not out to get UW.Meek said:
This is a real concern that Race has identified. It shouldn't be an issue, but the reality is that ESPN hates UW so much (I still don't understand why, but they do...it's fucking weird and inappropriate) such that those douches on College Football Live simply diminish everything about UW every time they have a chance. This is where the playoff committee is totally gullible in that none of them watch every game and thus they take their cues from ESPN...with ESPN bitch slapping UW it will naturally elevate any Pac12 team that is not UW - call it Oregon or Stanford or USC.RaceBannon said:UW won the Pac 12 next year and Stanford got the CFP bid?
Let's say UW beats Stanford giving Stanford their only loss while UW loses a conference game but wins the tie breaker. Both are 11-1, UW 12-1 after beating Utah in the CCG
But!
THE TOUGHEST NONCONFERENCE SCHEDULE IN THE COUNTRY
Stanford: vs. Northwestern (Aug. 31), at UCF (Sept. 14), vs. Notre Dame (Nov. 30)
In addition to their nine Pac-12 games, the Cardinal host the defending Big Ten West champions, travel to play a team that just had a 25-game winning streak snapped and close the season against a team that came closer to beating Clemson (on the scoreboard at least) than Alabama did. Coming off an up-and-down 2018, there will be no free passes for David Shaw’s crew.
Stanford sweeps these games they get voted in ahead of Pussy U and our? pussy schedule
The disrespect is unreal!
We were treated as well or better than we deserved in both 2016 (last playoff team in) and 2017 (last NY6 team in).
There's no anti UW conspiracy, and the playoff committee is not looking to screw us. In Race's scenario Stanford gets in ahead of us because Stanford would deserve to be ahead of us. It's not going to happen though.
Take this shit to Doogman. -
You can't read either. I was saying go undefeated or shut the fuck up. Meek was the one that brought up ESECPN. You know I don't buy into that shit. Be better. Be BEST!HillsboroDuck said:
The world is not out to get UW.PurpleJ said:
Fuck off.Meek said:
speaking of losersPurpleJ said:I still think it's a dumb point because our DAWGS always have destiny in their hands. Losers care about ESPN and winners win. I thought Race was better than this.
Even in Race's scenario, the committee would give preference to the conference champ.
But the REAL point is, don't go 11-1 like a punk bitch and you'll have no issues.
We were treated as well or better than we deserved in both 2016 (last playoff team in) and 2017 (last NY6 team in).
There's no anti UW conspiracy, and the playoff committee is not looking to screw us. In Race's scenario Stanford gets in ahead of us because Stanford would deserve to be ahead of us. It's not going to happen though.
Take this shit to Doogman. -
I was trying to reply to meek, note who I down voted. Fat fingers strike again!PurpleJ said:
You can't read either. I was saying go undefeated or shut the fuck up. Meek was the one that brought up ESECPN. You know I don't buy into that shit. Be better. Be BEST!HillsboroDuck said:
The world is not out to get UW.PurpleJ said:
Fuck off.Meek said:
speaking of losersPurpleJ said:I still think it's a dumb point because our DAWGS always have destiny in their hands. Losers care about ESPN and winners win. I thought Race was better than this.
Even in Race's scenario, the committee would give preference to the conference champ.
But the REAL point is, don't go 11-1 like a punk bitch and you'll have no issues.
We were treated as well or better than we deserved in both 2016 (last playoff team in) and 2017 (last NY6 team in).
There's no anti UW conspiracy, and the playoff committee is not looking to screw us. In Race's scenario Stanford gets in ahead of us because Stanford would deserve to be ahead of us. It's not going to happen though.
Take this shit to Doogman. -
-
-
HillsboroDuck said:
I was trying to reply to meek, note who I down voted. Fat fingers strike again!PurpleJ said:
You can't read either. I was saying go undefeated or shut the fuck up. Meek was the one that brought up ESECPN. You know I don't buy into that shit. Be better. Be BEST!HillsboroDuck said:
The world is not out to get UW.PurpleJ said:
Fuck off.Meek said:
speaking of losersPurpleJ said:I still think it's a dumb point because our DAWGS always have destiny in their hands. Losers care about ESPN and winners win. I thought Race was better than this.
Even in Race's scenario, the committee would give preference to the conference champ.
But the REAL point is, don't go 11-1 like a punk bitch and you'll have no issues.
We were treated as well or better than we deserved in both 2016 (last playoff team in) and 2017 (last NY6 team in).
There's no anti UW conspiracy, and the playoff committee is not looking to screw us. In Race's scenario Stanford gets in ahead of us because Stanford would deserve to be ahead of us. It's not going to happen though.
Take this shit to Doogman.
-
Meek said:
you have serious issues man...like I'm not trying to insult you so please consider this friendly feedback... but the way you post on these boards is really troubling.PurpleJ said:
Fuck off.Meek said:
speaking of losersPurpleJ said:I still think it's a dumb point because our DAWGS always have destiny in their hands. Losers care about ESPN and winners win. I thought Race was better than this.
Even in Race's scenario, the committee would give preference to the conference champ.
But the REAL point is, don't go 11-1 like a punk bitch and you'll have no issues.
