What if I told you that

RaceBannon

UW won the Pac 12 next year and Stanford got the CFP bid?

Let's say UW beats Stanford giving Stanford their only loss while UW loses a conference game but wins the tie breaker. Both are 11-1, UW 12-1 after beating Utah in the CCG

But!

THE TOUGHEST NONCONFERENCE SCHEDULE IN THE COUNTRY
Stanford: vs. Northwestern (Aug. 31), at UCF (Sept. 14), vs. Notre Dame (Nov. 30)

In addition to their nine Pac-12 games, the Cardinal host the defending Big Ten West champions, travel to play a team that just had a 25-game winning streak snapped and close the season against a team that came closer to beating Clemson (on the scoreboard at least) than Alabama did. Coming off an up-and-down 2018, there will be no free passes for David Shaw’s crew.

Stanford sweeps these games they get voted in ahead of Pussy U and our? pussy schedule

PurpleJ

Stanford isn't sweeping those games and they'll be lucky to even be 2nd in the norte.

GrundleStiltzkin

I stand with J

DerekJohnson

GrundleStiltzkin said:

I stand with J

J?

PurpleJ

GrundleStiltzkin said:

I stand with J

Thank you for your support! Dawg life! WOOF!

RaceBannon

PurpleJ said:

Stanford isn't sweeping those games and they'll be lucky to even be 2nd in the norte.

That's not the point

You need to read for comprehension

PurpleJ

RaceBannon said:

PurpleJ said:

Stanford isn't sweeping those games and they'll be lucky to even be 2nd in the norte.

That's not the point

You need to read for comprehension

I can't read asshole.

GrundleStiltzkin

RaceBannon said:

PurpleJ said:

Stanford isn't sweeping those games and they'll be lucky to even be 2nd in the norte.

That's not the point

You need to read for comprehension

Quite honestly, Race, I don't deal in hypotheticals

RaceBannon

GrundleStiltzkin said:

RaceBannon said:

PurpleJ said:

Stanford isn't sweeping those games and they'll be lucky to even be 2nd in the norte.

That's not the point

You need to read for comprehension

Quite honestly, Race, I don't deal in hypotheticals

Racist

GrundleStiltzkin

RaceBannon said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

RaceBannon said:

PurpleJ said:

Stanford isn't sweeping those games and they'll be lucky to even be 2nd in the norte.

That's not the point

You need to read for comprehension

Quite honestly, Race, I don't deal in hypotheticals

Racist

Try reading for comprehension.

Always about Race with this one.

Meek

RaceBannon said:

UW won the Pac 12 next year and Stanford got the CFP bid?

Let's say UW beats Stanford giving Stanford their only loss while UW loses a conference game but wins the tie breaker. Both are 11-1, UW 12-1 after beating Utah in the CCG

But!

THE TOUGHEST NONCONFERENCE SCHEDULE IN THE COUNTRY
Stanford: vs. Northwestern (Aug. 31), at UCF (Sept. 14), vs. Notre Dame (Nov. 30)

In addition to their nine Pac-12 games, the Cardinal host the defending Big Ten West champions, travel to play a team that just had a 25-game winning streak snapped and close the season against a team that came closer to beating Clemson (on the scoreboard at least) than Alabama did. Coming off an up-and-down 2018, there will be no free passes for David Shaw’s crew.

Stanford sweeps these games they get voted in ahead of Pussy U and our? pussy schedule

This is a real concern that Race has identified. It shouldn't be an issue, but the reality is that ESPN hates UW so much (I still don't understand why, but they do...it's fucking weird and inappropriate) such that those douches on College Football Live simply diminish everything about UW every time they have a chance. This is where the playoff committee is totally gullible in that none of them watch every game and thus they take their cues from ESPN...with ESPN bitch slapping UW it will naturally elevate any Pac12 team that is not UW - call it Oregon or Stanford or USC.

The disrespect is unreal!

PurpleJ

I still think it's a dumb point because our DAWGS always have destiny in their hands. Losers care about ESPN and winners win. I thought Race was better than this.

Meek

PurpleJ said:

I still think it's a dumb point because our DAWGS always have destiny in their hands. Losers care about ESPN and winners win. I thought Race was better than this.

speaking of losers

PurpleJ

Meek said:

PurpleJ said:

I still think it's a dumb point because our DAWGS always have destiny in their hands. Losers care about ESPN and winners win. I thought Race was better than this.

speaking of losers

Fuck off.

Even in Race's scenario, the committee would give preference to the conference champ.

But the REAL point is, don't go 11-1 like a punk bitch and you'll have no issues.

RaceBannon

PurpleJ said:

Meek said:

PurpleJ said:

I still think it's a dumb point because our DAWGS always have destiny in their hands. Losers care about ESPN and winners win. I thought Race was better than this.

speaking of losers

Fuck off.

Even in Race's scenario, the committee would give preference to the conference champ.

But the REAL point is, don't go 11-1 like a punk bitch and you'll have no issues.

No they wouldn't fuck face

Se my Crimson Tide for an example

RaceBannon

PurpleJ said:

I still think it's a dumb point because our DAWGS always have destiny in their hands. Losers care about ESPN and winners win. I thought Race was better than this.

Racist

Meek

PurpleJ said:

Meek said:

PurpleJ said:

I still think it's a dumb point because our DAWGS always have destiny in their hands. Losers care about ESPN and winners win. I thought Race was better than this.

speaking of losers

Fuck off.

Even in Race's scenario, the committee would give preference to the conference champ.

But the REAL point is, don't go 11-1 like a punk bitch and you'll have no issues.

you have serious issues man...like I'm not trying to insult you so please consider this friendly feedback... but the way you post on these boards is really troubling.

GrundleStiltzkin

Meek said:

PurpleJ said:

Meek said:

PurpleJ said:

I still think it's a dumb point because our DAWGS always have destiny in their hands. Losers care about ESPN and winners win. I thought Race was better than this.

speaking of losers

Fuck off.

Even in Race's scenario, the committee would give preference to the conference champ.

But the REAL point is, don't go 11-1 like a punk bitch and you'll have no issues.

you have serious issues man...like I'm not trying to insult you so please consider this friendly feedback... but the way you post on these boards is really troubling.

Gnu two Jay?

PurpleJ

Meek said:

PurpleJ said:

Meek said:

PurpleJ said:

I still think it's a dumb point because our DAWGS always have destiny in their hands. Losers care about ESPN and winners win. I thought Race was better than this.

speaking of losers

Fuck off.

Even in Race's scenario, the committee would give preference to the conference champ.

But the REAL point is, don't go 11-1 like a punk bitch and you'll have no issues.

you have serious issues man...like I'm not trying to insult you so please consider this friendly feedback... but the way you post on these boards is really troubling.

Christ

PurpleJ

RaceBannon said:

PurpleJ said:

Meek said:

PurpleJ said:

I still think it's a dumb point because our DAWGS always have destiny in their hands. Losers care about ESPN and winners win. I thought Race was better than this.

speaking of losers

Fuck off.

Even in Race's scenario, the committee would give preference to the conference champ.

But the REAL point is, don't go 11-1 like a punk bitch and you'll have no issues.

No they wouldn't fuck face

Se my Crimson Tide for an example

Whatever

RaceBannon

Why so angry?