Surprise surprise!
Comments
-
Banks can be held liable. Idiot.SFGbob said:AOC: "Hypothetically, if there was a leak, from the DAP why shouldn't Wells Fargo pay for the cleanup of it?"
She is then roundly mocked.
Hondo then jumps into to defend her:
Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.
The only liar here as always Hondo is you. -
If only you hadn't failed miserably to prove that2001400ex said:
Banks can be held liable. Idiot.SFGbob said:AOC: "Hypothetically, if there was a leak, from the DAP why shouldn't Wells Fargo pay for the cleanup of it?"
She is then roundly mocked.
Hondo then jumps into to defend her:
Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.
The only liar here as always Hondo is you.
So just repeat the lie -
What is there to prove? I stated that I don't know enough about the pipeline spill. But if the bank knew, or should have known, the spill could happen. They could be held liable. And I posted the regulatory link to show that.RaceBannon said:
If only you hadn't failed miserably to prove that2001400ex said:
Banks can be held liable. Idiot.SFGbob said:AOC: "Hypothetically, if there was a leak, from the DAP why shouldn't Wells Fargo pay for the cleanup of it?"
She is then roundly mocked.
Hondo then jumps into to defend her:
Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.
The only liar here as always Hondo is you.
So just repeat the lie
But stay Ignorant like Bob.
Tbe point I'm making isn't even about AOC. It's about partisan people like you and Bob that are scared of her. So you try to monk everything she says without even knowing if the statement is true. You think it sounds dumb so you roll with it can can't consider anything else. -
2001400ex said:
What is there to prove? I stated that I don't know enough about the pipeline spill. But if the bank knew, or should have known, the spill could happen. They could be held liable. And I posted the regulatory link to show that.RaceBannon said:
If only you hadn't failed miserably to prove that2001400ex said:
Banks can be held liable. Idiot.SFGbob said:AOC: "Hypothetically, if there was a leak, from the DAP why shouldn't Wells Fargo pay for the cleanup of it?"
She is then roundly mocked.
Hondo then jumps into to defend her:
Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.
The only liar here as always Hondo is you.
So just repeat the lie
But stay Ignorant like Bob.
Tbe point I'm making isn't even about AOC. It's about partisan people like you and Bob that are scared of her. So you try to monk everything she says without even knowing if the statement is true. You think it sounds dumb so you roll with it can can't consider anything else.
Still waiting for an example.... just one.
Her question/point was dumb. Speaking of partisan, you have to defend everything she says. It’s pathological.
Yes, if the bank financed a known illegal pipeline that burst into flames and killed people I suppose they would be liable in part. Except that has never or would ever happen. Dumlbshit. What scenario goes through your pea brain to think this is even a remote possibility. -
I have stated that I don't agree with AOC on many things. This situation is even hypothetical. And there are circumstances where attorneys will go after deep pockets, if you don't understand that basic rule of America, I can't help you.MikeDamone said:2001400ex said:
What is there to prove? I stated that I don't know enough about the pipeline spill. But if the bank knew, or should have known, the spill could happen. They could be held liable. And I posted the regulatory link to show that.RaceBannon said:
If only you hadn't failed miserably to prove that2001400ex said:
Banks can be held liable. Idiot.SFGbob said:AOC: "Hypothetically, if there was a leak, from the DAP why shouldn't Wells Fargo pay for the cleanup of it?"
She is then roundly mocked.
Hondo then jumps into to defend her:
Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.
The only liar here as always Hondo is you.
So just repeat the lie
But stay Ignorant like Bob.
Tbe point I'm making isn't even about AOC. It's about partisan people like you and Bob that are scared of her. So you try to monk everything she says without even knowing if the statement is true. You think it sounds dumb so you roll with it can can't consider anything else.
Still waiting for an example.... just one.
Her question/point was dumb. Speaking of partisan, you have to defend everything she says. It’s pathological.
Yes, if the bank financed a known illegal pipeline that burst into flames and killed people I suppose they would be liable in part. Except that has never or would ever happen. Dumlbshit. What scenario goes through your pea brain to think this is even a remote possibility.
And whether it's happened in the past is irrelevant. Things change all the time. Prior to Arthur Anderson, no huge CPA firm had been taken down for fraud at a couple clients. Prior to the great recession, no large investment brokerage like Lehman brothers had gone down (post great depression). In other words, your defense by saying "it's never happened before" is laughable and ignorant. -
Shut up2001400ex said:
What is there to prove? I stated that I don't know enough about the pipeline spill. But if the bank knew, or should have known, the spill could happen. They could be held liable. And I posted the regulatory link to show that.RaceBannon said:
If only you hadn't failed miserably to prove that2001400ex said:
Banks can be held liable. Idiot.SFGbob said:AOC: "Hypothetically, if there was a leak, from the DAP why shouldn't Wells Fargo pay for the cleanup of it?"
She is then roundly mocked.
Hondo then jumps into to defend her:
Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.
The only liar here as always Hondo is you.
So just repeat the lie
But stay Ignorant like Bob.
Tbe point I'm making isn't even about AOC. It's about partisan people like you and Bob that are scared of her. So you try to monk everything she says without even knowing if the statement is true. You think it sounds dumb so you roll with it can can't consider anything else. -
ThudHHusky said:I hope Meadows brings one of Trump's former gardeners up on stage and tells us the gardener thinks so too. Classic move!
-
So no examples. Got it.2001400ex said:
I have stated that I don't agree with AOC on many things. This situation is even hypothetical. And there are circumstances where attorneys will go after deep pockets, if you don't understand that basic rule of America, I can't help you.MikeDamone said:2001400ex said:
What is there to prove? I stated that I don't know enough about the pipeline spill. But if the bank knew, or should have known, the spill could happen. They could be held liable. And I posted the regulatory link to show that.RaceBannon said:
If only you hadn't failed miserably to prove that2001400ex said:
Banks can be held liable. Idiot.SFGbob said:AOC: "Hypothetically, if there was a leak, from the DAP why shouldn't Wells Fargo pay for the cleanup of it?"
She is then roundly mocked.
Hondo then jumps into to defend her:
Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.
The only liar here as always Hondo is you.
So just repeat the lie
But stay Ignorant like Bob.
Tbe point I'm making isn't even about AOC. It's about partisan people like you and Bob that are scared of her. So you try to monk everything she says without even knowing if the statement is true. You think it sounds dumb so you roll with it can can't consider anything else.
Still waiting for an example.... just one.
Her question/point was dumb. Speaking of partisan, you have to defend everything she says. It’s pathological.
Yes, if the bank financed a known illegal pipeline that burst into flames and killed people I suppose they would be liable in part. Except that has never or would ever happen. Dumlbshit. What scenario goes through your pea brain to think this is even a remote possibility.
And whether it's happened in the past is irrelevant. Things change all the time. Prior to Arthur Anderson, no huge CPA firm had been taken down for fraud at a couple clients. Prior to the great recession, no large investment brokerage like Lehman brothers had gone down (post great depression). In other words, your defense by saying "it's never happened before" is laughable and ignorant. -
2001400ex said:
I have stated that I don't agree with AOC on many things. This situation is even hypothetical. And there are circumstances where attorneys will go after deep pockets, if you don't understand that basic rule of America, I can't help you.MikeDamone said:2001400ex said:
What is there to prove? I stated that I don't know enough about the pipeline spill. But if the bank knew, or should have known, the spill could happen. They could be held liable. And I posted the regulatory link to show that.RaceBannon said:
If only you hadn't failed miserably to prove that2001400ex said:
Banks can be held liable. Idiot.SFGbob said:AOC: "Hypothetically, if there was a leak, from the DAP why shouldn't Wells Fargo pay for the cleanup of it?"
She is then roundly mocked.
Hondo then jumps into to defend her:
Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.
The only liar here as always Hondo is you.
So just repeat the lie
But stay Ignorant like Bob.
Tbe point I'm making isn't even about AOC. It's about partisan people like you and Bob that are scared of her. So you try to monk everything she says without even knowing if the statement is true. You think it sounds dumb so you roll with it can can't consider anything else.
Still waiting for an example.... just one.
Her question/point was dumb. Speaking of partisan, you have to defend everything she says. It’s pathological.
Yes, if the bank financed a known illegal pipeline that burst into flames and killed people I suppose they would be liable in part. Except that has never or would ever happen. Dumlbshit. What scenario goes through your pea brain to think this is even a remote possibility.
And whether it's happened in the past is irrelevant. Things change all the time. Prior to Arthur Anderson, no huge CPA firm had been taken down for fraud at a couple clients. Prior to the great recession, no large investment brokerage like Lehman brothers had gone down (post great depression). In other words, your defense by saying "it's never happened before" is laughable and ignorant.
Your establishment shill-masters don't agree with AOC on many things.
Fuck off.
-



