Black people are criminals POTD
Comments
-
So you acted the same way and stomped your feet and screamed at the neighborhood kids you didn't like when Hillary Clinton spoke extensively about criminal justice reform at the Dem Convention in 2016? Or are you just doing the liberal hypocritical thing and objecting when Trump mentions it?
-
But Trump did it so now it's not wanted. It has now become evil!
That the liberal/commie mind at work! #Resist -
Your racism addiction knows no bounds
-
BendMeOver hates context. You think criminal justice reform is the issue?Bendintheriver said:So you acted the same way and stomped your feet and screamed at the neighborhood kids you didn't like when Hillary Clinton spoke extensively about criminal justice reform at the Dem Convention in 2016? Or are you just doing the liberal hypocritical thing and objecting when Trump mentions it?
-
Come on down and tell us what YOUR issue is. You are clearly going to tell us what you think Trumps issue is. "Enquiring" minds want to know! Give it your best shot.2001400ex said:
BendMeOver hates context. You think criminal justice reform is the issue?Bendintheriver said:So you acted the same way and stomped your feet and screamed at the neighborhood kids you didn't like when Hillary Clinton spoke extensively about criminal justice reform at the Dem Convention in 2016? Or are you just doing the liberal hypocritical thing and objecting when Trump mentions it?
-
Read the OP. If you can't figure it out from that. I can't help you.Bendintheriver said:
Come on down and tell us what YOUR issue is. You are clearly going to tell us what you think Trumps issue is. "Enquiring" minds want to know! Give it your best shot.2001400ex said:
BendMeOver hates context. You think criminal justice reform is the issue?Bendintheriver said:So you acted the same way and stomped your feet and screamed at the neighborhood kids you didn't like when Hillary Clinton spoke extensively about criminal justice reform at the Dem Convention in 2016? Or are you just doing the liberal hypocritical thing and objecting when Trump mentions it?
-
-
So the guy who just claimed that ability to pay for birth control is somehow tied to skin color is now trying to call someone else out for being a racist?
Criminal justice reform was an important issue to many black politicians and activists. Why shouldn't he list it as an accomplishment? -
So the guy who just claimed that ability to pay for birth control is somehow tied to skin color is now trying to call someone else out for being a racist?
Did he really say that? It is so racist to think that way I can't believe he actually shared his true thoughts on the subject. It falls right in line with the lefts thinking that blacks are too stupid or lazy to get ID to vote.
If you let them talk long enough the ol' dem party racism comes out of all of them. -
They are the historical racists but purchased votes with our tax dollars. Republicans freed the slaves at the cost of many thousands of white lives in the civil war. Odd the democrats gave their lives to continue slavery. Dem's gave them Jim Crow, the KKK, and segregation. I guess the question is which party gave more. Evidence would suggest the dems did by purchasing the votes. Keep those checks going out. Nothing else matters.Bendintheriver said:So the guy who just claimed that ability to pay for birth control is somehow tied to skin color is now trying to call someone else out for being a racist?
Did he really say that? It is so racist to think that way I can't believe he actually shared his true thoughts on the subject. It falls right in line with the lefts thinking that blacks are too stupid or lazy to get ID to vote.
If you let them talk long enough the ol' dem party racism comes out of all of them. -
Lil lyin Bob.SFGbob said:So the guy who just claimed that ability to pay for birth control is somehow tied to skin color is now trying to call someone else out for being a racist?
Criminal justice reform was an important issue to many black politicians and activists. Why shouldn't he list it as an accomplishment? -
No. I didn't say that.Bendintheriver said:So the guy who just claimed that ability to pay for birth control is somehow tied to skin color is now trying to call someone else out for being a racist?
Did he really say that? It is so racist to think that way I can't believe he actually shared his true thoughts on the subject. It falls right in line with the lefts thinking that blacks are too stupid or lazy to get ID to vote.
If you let them talk long enough the ol' dem party racism comes out of all of them. -
i'm not sure that anything irritates decrepit boomers more than an outspoken black guy
maybe a 20-something congresswoman from new york -
"When my guy says racist shit I point at the other guy for shit from 70 years ago" POTDSledog said:
They are the historical racists but purchased votes with our tax dollars. Republicans freed the slaves at the cost of many thousands of white lives in the civil war. Odd the democrats gave their lives to continue slavery. Dem's gave them Jim Crow, the KKK, and segregation. I guess the question is which party gave more. Evidence would suggest the dems did by purchasing the votes. Keep those checks going out. Nothing else matters.Bendintheriver said:So the guy who just claimed that ability to pay for birth control is somehow tied to skin color is now trying to call someone else out for being a racist?
Did he really say that? It is so racist to think that way I can't believe he actually shared his true thoughts on the subject. It falls right in line with the lefts thinking that blacks are too stupid or lazy to get ID to vote.
If you let them talk long enough the ol' dem party racism comes out of all of them. -
It probably says something that the segregationists immediately fled the Democratic party and joined the Republicans after 1964. I wonder what happened to cause that2001400ex said:
"When my guy says racist shit I point at the other guy for shit from 70 years ago" POTDSledog said:
They are the historical racists but purchased votes with our tax dollars. Republicans freed the slaves at the cost of many thousands of white lives in the civil war. Odd the democrats gave their lives to continue slavery. Dem's gave them Jim Crow, the KKK, and segregation. I guess the question is which party gave more. Evidence would suggest the dems did by purchasing the votes. Keep those checks going out. Nothing else matters.Bendintheriver said:So the guy who just claimed that ability to pay for birth control is somehow tied to skin color is now trying to call someone else out for being a racist?
Did he really say that? It is so racist to think that way I can't believe he actually shared his true thoughts on the subject. It falls right in line with the lefts thinking that blacks are too stupid or lazy to get ID to vote.
If you let them talk long enough the ol' dem party racism comes out of all of them.
The sound you're hearing is the idiot deplorables googling "what happened in 1964" -
Lyndon Johnson purchasing the black vote. That's what happened.MariotaTheGawd said:
It probably says something that the segregationists immediately fled the Democratic party and joined the Republicans after 1964. I wonder what happened to cause that2001400ex said:
"When my guy says racist shit I point at the other guy for shit from 70 years ago" POTDSledog said:
They are the historical racists but purchased votes with our tax dollars. Republicans freed the slaves at the cost of many thousands of white lives in the civil war. Odd the democrats gave their lives to continue slavery. Dem's gave them Jim Crow, the KKK, and segregation. I guess the question is which party gave more. Evidence would suggest the dems did by purchasing the votes. Keep those checks going out. Nothing else matters.Bendintheriver said:So the guy who just claimed that ability to pay for birth control is somehow tied to skin color is now trying to call someone else out for being a racist?
Did he really say that? It is so racist to think that way I can't believe he actually shared his true thoughts on the subject. It falls right in line with the lefts thinking that blacks are too stupid or lazy to get ID to vote.
If you let them talk long enough the ol' dem party racism comes out of all of them.
The sound you're hearing is the idiot deplorables googling "what happened in 1964" -
A reminder that the current Democrat Governor of Virginia was dressed in a yearbook as a Klansman...
-
Yeah he really did. In the thread about Trump de-funding Planned Parenthood, Hondo claimed that that is was a move that would deny birth control to poor people. Put aside the fact that Hondo's claim is pure bullshit,Bendintheriver said:So the guy who just claimed that ability to pay for birth control is somehow tied to skin color is now trying to call someone else out for being a racist?
Did he really say that? It is so racist to think that way I can't believe he actually shared his true thoughts on the subject. It falls right in line with the lefts thinking that blacks are too stupid or lazy to get ID to vote.
If you let them talk long enough the ol' dem party racism comes out of all of them.
Greenblood responded with the following:2001400ex said:Why provide birth control options for the poor. So more people get pregnant. Resulting in more abortions. You guys should check into unintended consequences.
Hondo's response to Greenblood was:greenblood said:
I’m so tired of this bullshit. How much is a 3 pack of Trojan condoms? Cost isn’t the reason poor people don’t use birth control. Poor people don’t use it, because they have spent a lifetime of making poor decision, which has become a way of life. So why not make another bad decision?2001400ex said:Why provide birth control options for the poor. So more people get pregnant. Resulting in more abortions. You guys should check into unintended consequences.
How much does birth control cost? Awfully white male comment of you. I'm sorry you don't like facts.
Of course he now lies and claims he didn't say what he clearly did say. Skin color, in Hondo's mind has something to do with the ability to pay for birth control.
-
Is that why George Wallace ran for President as a Rat in 1972? Lester Maddox, Robert Byrd, Al Gore's dad, Richard Russell, John Stennis, the list goes on and on, they all died as proud members of the Rat party.MariotaTheGawd said:
It probably says something that the segregationists immediately fled the Democratic party and joined the Republicans after 1964. I wonder what happened to cause that2001400ex said:
"When my guy says racist shit I point at the other guy for shit from 70 years ago" POTDSledog said:
They are the historical racists but purchased votes with our tax dollars. Republicans freed the slaves at the cost of many thousands of white lives in the civil war. Odd the democrats gave their lives to continue slavery. Dem's gave them Jim Crow, the KKK, and segregation. I guess the question is which party gave more. Evidence would suggest the dems did by purchasing the votes. Keep those checks going out. Nothing else matters.Bendintheriver said:So the guy who just claimed that ability to pay for birth control is somehow tied to skin color is now trying to call someone else out for being a racist?
Did he really say that? It is so racist to think that way I can't believe he actually shared his true thoughts on the subject. It falls right in line with the lefts thinking that blacks are too stupid or lazy to get ID to vote.
If you let them talk long enough the ol' dem party racism comes out of all of them.
The sound you're hearing is the idiot deplorables googling "what happened in 1964" -
true, it took someone like ronald reagan to truly unite all of the racists under one bannerSFGbob said:
Is that why George Wallace ran for President as a Rat in 1972? Lester Maddox, Robert Byrd, Al Gore's dad, Richard Russell, John Stennis, the list goes on and on, they all died as proud members of the Rat party.MariotaTheGawd said:
It probably says something that the segregationists immediately fled the Democratic party and joined the Republicans after 1964. I wonder what happened to cause that2001400ex said:
"When my guy says racist shit I point at the other guy for shit from 70 years ago" POTDSledog said:
They are the historical racists but purchased votes with our tax dollars. Republicans freed the slaves at the cost of many thousands of white lives in the civil war. Odd the democrats gave their lives to continue slavery. Dem's gave them Jim Crow, the KKK, and segregation. I guess the question is which party gave more. Evidence would suggest the dems did by purchasing the votes. Keep those checks going out. Nothing else matters.Bendintheriver said:So the guy who just claimed that ability to pay for birth control is somehow tied to skin color is now trying to call someone else out for being a racist?
Did he really say that? It is so racist to think that way I can't believe he actually shared his true thoughts on the subject. It falls right in line with the lefts thinking that blacks are too stupid or lazy to get ID to vote.
If you let them talk long enough the ol' dem party racism comes out of all of them.
The sound you're hearing is the idiot deplorables googling "what happened in 1964" -
Al Sharpton and Louis Farrakhan were Reagan supporters?MariotaTheGawd said:
true, it took someone like ronald reagan to truly unite all of the racists under one bannerSFGbob said:
Is that why George Wallace ran for President as a Rat in 1972? Lester Maddox, Robert Byrd, Al Gore's dad, Richard Russell, John Stennis, the list goes on and on, they all died as proud members of the Rat party.MariotaTheGawd said:
It probably says something that the segregationists immediately fled the Democratic party and joined the Republicans after 1964. I wonder what happened to cause that2001400ex said:
"When my guy says racist shit I point at the other guy for shit from 70 years ago" POTDSledog said:
They are the historical racists but purchased votes with our tax dollars. Republicans freed the slaves at the cost of many thousands of white lives in the civil war. Odd the democrats gave their lives to continue slavery. Dem's gave them Jim Crow, the KKK, and segregation. I guess the question is which party gave more. Evidence would suggest the dems did by purchasing the votes. Keep those checks going out. Nothing else matters.Bendintheriver said:So the guy who just claimed that ability to pay for birth control is somehow tied to skin color is now trying to call someone else out for being a racist?
Did he really say that? It is so racist to think that way I can't believe he actually shared his true thoughts on the subject. It falls right in line with the lefts thinking that blacks are too stupid or lazy to get ID to vote.
If you let them talk long enough the ol' dem party racism comes out of all of them.
The sound you're hearing is the idiot deplorables googling "what happened in 1964" -
Translation: What I originally claimed was pure bullshit, I lack the integrity to admit as much so why don't I cover for that initial lie but telling another lie.MariotaTheGawd said:
true, it took someone like ronald reagan to truly unite all of the racists under one bannerSFGbob said:
Is that why George Wallace ran for President as a Rat in 1972? Lester Maddox, Robert Byrd, Al Gore's dad, Richard Russell, John Stennis, the list goes on and on, they all died as proud members of the Rat party.MariotaTheGawd said:
It probably says something that the segregationists immediately fled the Democratic party and joined the Republicans after 1964. I wonder what happened to cause that2001400ex said:
"When my guy says racist shit I point at the other guy for shit from 70 years ago" POTDSledog said:
They are the historical racists but purchased votes with our tax dollars. Republicans freed the slaves at the cost of many thousands of white lives in the civil war. Odd the democrats gave their lives to continue slavery. Dem's gave them Jim Crow, the KKK, and segregation. I guess the question is which party gave more. Evidence would suggest the dems did by purchasing the votes. Keep those checks going out. Nothing else matters.Bendintheriver said:So the guy who just claimed that ability to pay for birth control is somehow tied to skin color is now trying to call someone else out for being a racist?
Did he really say that? It is so racist to think that way I can't believe he actually shared his true thoughts on the subject. It falls right in line with the lefts thinking that blacks are too stupid or lazy to get ID to vote.
If you let them talk long enough the ol' dem party racism comes out of all of them.
The sound you're hearing is the idiot deplorables googling "what happened in 1964" -
undefined
it's incredible how much of a caricature you areSFGbob said:
Al Sharpton and Louis Farrakhan were Reagan supporters?MariotaTheGawd said:
true, it took someone like ronald reagan to truly unite all of the racists under one bannerSFGbob said:
Is that why George Wallace ran for President as a Rat in 1972? Lester Maddox, Robert Byrd, Al Gore's dad, Richard Russell, John Stennis, the list goes on and on, they all died as proud members of the Rat party.MariotaTheGawd said:
It probably says something that the segregationists immediately fled the Democratic party and joined the Republicans after 1964. I wonder what happened to cause that2001400ex said:
"When my guy says racist shit I point at the other guy for shit from 70 years ago" POTDSledog said:
They are the historical racists but purchased votes with our tax dollars. Republicans freed the slaves at the cost of many thousands of white lives in the civil war. Odd the democrats gave their lives to continue slavery. Dem's gave them Jim Crow, the KKK, and segregation. I guess the question is which party gave more. Evidence would suggest the dems did by purchasing the votes. Keep those checks going out. Nothing else matters.Bendintheriver said:So the guy who just claimed that ability to pay for birth control is somehow tied to skin color is now trying to call someone else out for being a racist?
Did he really say that? It is so racist to think that way I can't believe he actually shared his true thoughts on the subject. It falls right in line with the lefts thinking that blacks are too stupid or lazy to get ID to vote.
If you let them talk long enough the ol' dem party racism comes out of all of them.
The sound you're hearing is the idiot deplorables googling "what happened in 1964"
it's like someone built a deplorable prototype and deployed it onto the internet -
The difference is I was talking to a white male. Idiot.SFGbob said:
Yeah he really did. In the thread about Trump de-funding Planned Parenthood, Hondo claimed that that is was a move that would deny birth control to poor people. Put aside the fact that Hondo's claim is pure bullshit,Bendintheriver said:So the guy who just claimed that ability to pay for birth control is somehow tied to skin color is now trying to call someone else out for being a racist?
Did he really say that? It is so racist to think that way I can't believe he actually shared his true thoughts on the subject. It falls right in line with the lefts thinking that blacks are too stupid or lazy to get ID to vote.
If you let them talk long enough the ol' dem party racism comes out of all of them.
Greenblood responded with the following:2001400ex said:Why provide birth control options for the poor. So more people get pregnant. Resulting in more abortions. You guys should check into unintended consequences.
Hondo's response to Greenblood was:greenblood said:
I’m so tired of this bullshit. How much is a 3 pack of Trojan condoms? Cost isn’t the reason poor people don’t use birth control. Poor people don’t use it, because they have spent a lifetime of making poor decision, which has become a way of life. So why not make another bad decision?2001400ex said:Why provide birth control options for the poor. So more people get pregnant. Resulting in more abortions. You guys should check into unintended consequences.
How much does birth control cost? Awfully white male comment of you. I'm sorry you don't like facts.
Of course he now lies and claims he didn't say what he clearly did say. Skin color, in Hondo's mind has something to do with the ability to pay for birth control. -
using a talk radio host's webpage as a citation while unironically saying "educate yourself"
holy shit you really couldn't make this stuff up -
You are either ignorant or lying. Why don't you tell us.MariotaTheGawd said:
It probably says something that the segregationists immediately fled the Democratic party and joined the Republicans after 1964. I wonder what happened to cause that2001400ex said:
"When my guy says racist shit I point at the other guy for shit from 70 years ago" POTDSledog said:
They are the historical racists but purchased votes with our tax dollars. Republicans freed the slaves at the cost of many thousands of white lives in the civil war. Odd the democrats gave their lives to continue slavery. Dem's gave them Jim Crow, the KKK, and segregation. I guess the question is which party gave more. Evidence would suggest the dems did by purchasing the votes. Keep those checks going out. Nothing else matters.Bendintheriver said:So the guy who just claimed that ability to pay for birth control is somehow tied to skin color is now trying to call someone else out for being a racist?
Did he really say that? It is so racist to think that way I can't believe he actually shared his true thoughts on the subject. It falls right in line with the lefts thinking that blacks are too stupid or lazy to get ID to vote.
If you let them talk long enough the ol' dem party racism comes out of all of them.
The sound you're hearing is the idiot deplorables googling "what happened in 1964"
Educate yourself.
https://newstalk1130.iheart.com/featured/common-sense-central/content/2018-05-01-the-myth-of-the-republican-democrat-switch/
The Myth of the Republican-Democrat 'Switch'
In June of 1964, though, the bill came up again, and it passed...over the strenuous objections of Southern Democrats. 80% of House Republicans voted for the measure, compared with just 61% of Democrats, while 82% of Republicans in the Senate supported it, compared with 69% of Democrats.
Nearly all of the opposition was, naturally, in the South, which was still nearly unanimously Democratic and nearly unanimously resistant to the changing country. One thing that most assuredly didn't change, though, was party affiliation. A total of 21 Democrats in the Senate opposed the Civil Rights Act. Only one of them, "Dixiecrat" Strom Thurmond, ever became a Republican. The rest, including Al Gore, Sr. and Robert Byrd--a former Exalted Cyclops in the Ku Klux Klan--remained Democrats until the day they died.
Moreover, as those 20 lifelong Democrats retired, their Senate seats remained in Democrat hands for several decades afterwards. So too did the overwhelming majority of the House seats in the South until 1994, when a Republican wave election swept the GOP into control of the House for the first time since 1952. 1994 was also the first time Republicans ever held a majority of House seats in the South--a full 30 years after the passage of the Civil Rights Act.
From there, Republicans gradually built their support in the South until two more wave elections in 2010 and 2014 gave them the overwhelming majorities they enjoy today.
If this was a sudden "switch" to the Republican Party for the old Democrat segregationists, it sure took a long time to happen.
The reality is that it didn't. After the 1964 election--the first after the passage of the Civil Rights Act and the opportune time for racist Democrat voters to abandon the party in favor of Republicans--Democrats still held a 102-20 House majority in states that had once been part of the Confederacy. In 1960, remember, that advantage was 117-8. A pickup of 12 seats (half of them in Alabama) is hardly the massive shift one would expect if racist voters suddenly abandoned the Democratic Party in favor of the GOP.
In fact, voting patterns in the South didn't really change all that much after the Civil Rights era. Democrats still dominated Senate, House, and gubernatorial elections for decades afterward. Alabama, for example, didn't elect a Republican governor until 1986. Mississippi didn't elect one until 1991. Georgia didn't elect one until 2002.
In the Senate, Republicans picked up four southern Senate seats in the 1960s and 1970s, while Democrats also picked up four. Democratic incumbents won routinely. If anything, those racist southern voters kept voting Democrat.
-
The problem with the liberal narrative here isn't that they're wrong about a lot of Republicans being racist (they're not) it's that they're in complete denial about the racism within their own ranks.Bendintheriver said:
You are either ignorant or lying. Why don't you tell us.MariotaTheGawd said:
It probably says something that the segregationists immediately fled the Democratic party and joined the Republicans after 1964. I wonder what happened to cause that2001400ex said:
"When my guy says racist shit I point at the other guy for shit from 70 years ago" POTDSledog said:
They are the historical racists but purchased votes with our tax dollars. Republicans freed the slaves at the cost of many thousands of white lives in the civil war. Odd the democrats gave their lives to continue slavery. Dem's gave them Jim Crow, the KKK, and segregation. I guess the question is which party gave more. Evidence would suggest the dems did by purchasing the votes. Keep those checks going out. Nothing else matters.Bendintheriver said:So the guy who just claimed that ability to pay for birth control is somehow tied to skin color is now trying to call someone else out for being a racist?
Did he really say that? It is so racist to think that way I can't believe he actually shared his true thoughts on the subject. It falls right in line with the lefts thinking that blacks are too stupid or lazy to get ID to vote.
If you let them talk long enough the ol' dem party racism comes out of all of them.
The sound you're hearing is the idiot deplorables googling "what happened in 1964"
Educate yourself.
https://newstalk1130.iheart.com/featured/common-sense-central/content/2018-05-01-the-myth-of-the-republican-democrat-switch/
The Myth of the Republican-Democrat 'Switch'
In June of 1964, though, the bill came up again, and it passed...over the strenuous objections of Southern Democrats. 80% of House Republicans voted for the measure, compared with just 61% of Democrats, while 82% of Republicans in the Senate supported it, compared with 69% of Democrats.
Nearly all of the opposition was, naturally, in the South, which was still nearly unanimously Democratic and nearly unanimously resistant to the changing country. One thing that most assuredly didn't change, though, was party affiliation. A total of 21 Democrats in the Senate opposed the Civil Rights Act. Only one of them, "Dixiecrat" Strom Thurmond, ever became a Republican. The rest, including Al Gore, Sr. and Robert Byrd--a former Exalted Cyclops in the Ku Klux Klan--remained Democrats until the day they died.
Moreover, as those 20 lifelong Democrats retired, their Senate seats remained in Democrat hands for several decades afterwards. So too did the overwhelming majority of the House seats in the South until 1994, when a Republican wave election swept the GOP into control of the House for the first time since 1952. 1994 was also the first time Republicans ever held a majority of House seats in the South--a full 30 years after the passage of the Civil Rights Act.
From there, Republicans gradually built their support in the South until two more wave elections in 2010 and 2014 gave them the overwhelming majorities they enjoy today.
If this was a sudden "switch" to the Republican Party for the old Democrat segregationists, it sure took a long time to happen.
The reality is that it didn't. After the 1964 election--the first after the passage of the Civil Rights Act and the opportune time for racist Democrat voters to abandon the party in favor of Republicans--Democrats still held a 102-20 House majority in states that had once been part of the Confederacy. In 1960, remember, that advantage was 117-8. A pickup of 12 seats (half of them in Alabama) is hardly the massive shift one would expect if racist voters suddenly abandoned the Democratic Party in favor of the GOP.
In fact, voting patterns in the South didn't really change all that much after the Civil Rights era. Democrats still dominated Senate, House, and gubernatorial elections for decades afterward. Alabama, for example, didn't elect a Republican governor until 1986. Mississippi didn't elect one until 1991. Georgia didn't elect one until 2002.
In the Senate, Republicans picked up four southern Senate seats in the 1960s and 1970s, while Democrats also picked up four. Democratic incumbents won routinely. If anything, those racist southern voters kept voting Democrat.
Until they're willing to own, acknowledge and deal with that their screams at the right are going to continue to be ineffective and dishonest.
The right needs to deal with that shit in their own ranks because racism is wrong, but not because the left has any moral superiority on the subject. -
What difference does that make? You think his skin color has something something to do with knowing how much or how little birth control costs. The fact that you were talking to a white guy is what allowed you to drop the mask.2001400ex said:
The difference is I was talking to a white male. Idiot.SFGbob said:
Yeah he really did. In the thread about Trump de-funding Planned Parenthood, Hondo claimed that that is was a move that would deny birth control to poor people. Put aside the fact that Hondo's claim is pure bullshit,Bendintheriver said:So the guy who just claimed that ability to pay for birth control is somehow tied to skin color is now trying to call someone else out for being a racist?
Did he really say that? It is so racist to think that way I can't believe he actually shared his true thoughts on the subject. It falls right in line with the lefts thinking that blacks are too stupid or lazy to get ID to vote.
If you let them talk long enough the ol' dem party racism comes out of all of them.
Greenblood responded with the following:2001400ex said:Why provide birth control options for the poor. So more people get pregnant. Resulting in more abortions. You guys should check into unintended consequences.
Hondo's response to Greenblood was:greenblood said:
I’m so tired of this bullshit. How much is a 3 pack of Trojan condoms? Cost isn’t the reason poor people don’t use birth control. Poor people don’t use it, because they have spent a lifetime of making poor decision, which has become a way of life. So why not make another bad decision?2001400ex said:Why provide birth control options for the poor. So more people get pregnant. Resulting in more abortions. You guys should check into unintended consequences.
How much does birth control cost? Awfully white male comment of you. I'm sorry you don't like facts.
Of course he now lies and claims he didn't say what he clearly did say. Skin color, in Hondo's mind has something to do with the ability to pay for birth control.
Btw, I thought your lie was that you never said it? -
Incredible what a fucking lightweight you are. Seriously, the last thing this board needs is a fucking liberal who can't back up their mouth.MariotaTheGawd said:undefined
it's incredible how much of a caricature you areSFGbob said:
Al Sharpton and Louis Farrakhan were Reagan supporters?MariotaTheGawd said:
true, it took someone like ronald reagan to truly unite all of the racists under one bannerSFGbob said:
Is that why George Wallace ran for President as a Rat in 1972? Lester Maddox, Robert Byrd, Al Gore's dad, Richard Russell, John Stennis, the list goes on and on, they all died as proud members of the Rat party.MariotaTheGawd said:
It probably says something that the segregationists immediately fled the Democratic party and joined the Republicans after 1964. I wonder what happened to cause that2001400ex said:
"When my guy says racist shit I point at the other guy for shit from 70 years ago" POTDSledog said:
They are the historical racists but purchased votes with our tax dollars. Republicans freed the slaves at the cost of many thousands of white lives in the civil war. Odd the democrats gave their lives to continue slavery. Dem's gave them Jim Crow, the KKK, and segregation. I guess the question is which party gave more. Evidence would suggest the dems did by purchasing the votes. Keep those checks going out. Nothing else matters.Bendintheriver said:So the guy who just claimed that ability to pay for birth control is somehow tied to skin color is now trying to call someone else out for being a racist?
Did he really say that? It is so racist to think that way I can't believe he actually shared his true thoughts on the subject. It falls right in line with the lefts thinking that blacks are too stupid or lazy to get ID to vote.
If you let them talk long enough the ol' dem party racism comes out of all of them.
The sound you're hearing is the idiot deplorables googling "what happened in 1964"
it's like someone built a deplorable prototype and deployed it onto the internet -
Agreed, racism is wrong and I think the right does a pretty good job in policing their own. Duke was kicked out of the GOP, Sharpton was turned into an honored elder statesman and king maker in the Rat party.HillsboroDuck said:
The problem with the liberal narrative here isn't that they're wrong about a lot of Republicans being racist (they're not) it's that they're in complete denial about the racism within their own ranks.Bendintheriver said:
You are either ignorant or lying. Why don't you tell us.MariotaTheGawd said:
It probably says something that the segregationists immediately fled the Democratic party and joined the Republicans after 1964. I wonder what happened to cause that2001400ex said:
"When my guy says racist shit I point at the other guy for shit from 70 years ago" POTDSledog said:
They are the historical racists but purchased votes with our tax dollars. Republicans freed the slaves at the cost of many thousands of white lives in the civil war. Odd the democrats gave their lives to continue slavery. Dem's gave them Jim Crow, the KKK, and segregation. I guess the question is which party gave more. Evidence would suggest the dems did by purchasing the votes. Keep those checks going out. Nothing else matters.Bendintheriver said:So the guy who just claimed that ability to pay for birth control is somehow tied to skin color is now trying to call someone else out for being a racist?
Did he really say that? It is so racist to think that way I can't believe he actually shared his true thoughts on the subject. It falls right in line with the lefts thinking that blacks are too stupid or lazy to get ID to vote.
If you let them talk long enough the ol' dem party racism comes out of all of them.
The sound you're hearing is the idiot deplorables googling "what happened in 1964"
Educate yourself.
https://newstalk1130.iheart.com/featured/common-sense-central/content/2018-05-01-the-myth-of-the-republican-democrat-switch/
The Myth of the Republican-Democrat 'Switch'
In June of 1964, though, the bill came up again, and it passed...over the strenuous objections of Southern Democrats. 80% of House Republicans voted for the measure, compared with just 61% of Democrats, while 82% of Republicans in the Senate supported it, compared with 69% of Democrats.
Nearly all of the opposition was, naturally, in the South, which was still nearly unanimously Democratic and nearly unanimously resistant to the changing country. One thing that most assuredly didn't change, though, was party affiliation. A total of 21 Democrats in the Senate opposed the Civil Rights Act. Only one of them, "Dixiecrat" Strom Thurmond, ever became a Republican. The rest, including Al Gore, Sr. and Robert Byrd--a former Exalted Cyclops in the Ku Klux Klan--remained Democrats until the day they died.
Moreover, as those 20 lifelong Democrats retired, their Senate seats remained in Democrat hands for several decades afterwards. So too did the overwhelming majority of the House seats in the South until 1994, when a Republican wave election swept the GOP into control of the House for the first time since 1952. 1994 was also the first time Republicans ever held a majority of House seats in the South--a full 30 years after the passage of the Civil Rights Act.
From there, Republicans gradually built their support in the South until two more wave elections in 2010 and 2014 gave them the overwhelming majorities they enjoy today.
If this was a sudden "switch" to the Republican Party for the old Democrat segregationists, it sure took a long time to happen.
The reality is that it didn't. After the 1964 election--the first after the passage of the Civil Rights Act and the opportune time for racist Democrat voters to abandon the party in favor of Republicans--Democrats still held a 102-20 House majority in states that had once been part of the Confederacy. In 1960, remember, that advantage was 117-8. A pickup of 12 seats (half of them in Alabama) is hardly the massive shift one would expect if racist voters suddenly abandoned the Democratic Party in favor of the GOP.
In fact, voting patterns in the South didn't really change all that much after the Civil Rights era. Democrats still dominated Senate, House, and gubernatorial elections for decades afterward. Alabama, for example, didn't elect a Republican governor until 1986. Mississippi didn't elect one until 1991. Georgia didn't elect one until 2002.
In the Senate, Republicans picked up four southern Senate seats in the 1960s and 1970s, while Democrats also picked up four. Democratic incumbents won routinely. If anything, those racist southern voters kept voting Democrat.
Until they're willing to own, acknowledge and deal with that their screams at the right are going to continue to be ineffective and dishonest.
The right needs to deal with that shit in their own ranks because racism is wrong, but not because the left has any moral superiority on the subject.
