Good paying jobs update

RaceBannon said:

allpurpleallgold said:

RaceBannon said:

allpurpleallgold said:

People getting welfare is bad. Corporations getting welfare is good. Just do whatever the rich want, it’ll trickle down.

The varsity is here

There would have been 125,000 people getting high paying jobs which keeps them off welfare. Its a legit argument whether tax breaks are worth it for that but its an argument I would expect from Damone not AOC who wants a living wage for all through government investment.

Isn't that what this was?

Guaranteeing 25,000 jobs over 10 years now creates 125,000 jobs. It’ll trickle down, just give them whatever they want.

Sounds like my news source is lying to me. The 125,000 is sourced in the OP and confirmed by the dem leaders in NY. Former dem leaders I should say.

You literally quoted it saying 25,000 jobs.

RaceBannon said:

allpurpleallgold said:

RaceBannon said:

allpurpleallgold said:

RaceBannon said:

allpurpleallgold said:

People getting welfare is bad. Corporations getting welfare is good. Just do whatever the rich want, it’ll trickle down.

The varsity is here

There would have been 125,000 people getting high paying jobs which keeps them off welfare. Its a legit argument whether tax breaks are worth it for that but its an argument I would expect from Damone not AOC who wants a living wage for all through government investment.

Isn't that what this was?

Guaranteeing 25,000 jobs over 10 years now creates 125,000 jobs. It’ll trickle down, just give them whatever they want.

Sounds like my news source is lying to me. The 125,000 is sourced in the OP and confirmed by the dem leaders in NY. Former dem leaders I should say.

You literally quoted it saying 25,000 jobs.

I literally did el oh el

I fucked up.

There is a “theoretically it could create 125,000 jobs” argument out there. It’s not complete bullshit.

2001400ex said:

RaceBannon said:

The article said it had 70% support. Nothing ever gets 100%

You're not saying anything. That's the point el oh el read for comprehension you missed the context

There's polls saying 70% of the people want Medicare for all. Yet if that happened you'd go into convulsions and probably have a stroke if that happened.

Again no context.

What are the poll numbers when people are told that it will increase the taxes they have to pay and increase the waiting period for them to see a doctor?

Just like with the bullshit polling numbers surrounding the GND, it's fairly easy to get a high approval number for the program you're asking about when the questions list nothing but a series of appealing outcomes without mentioning a single drawback.

Would you be in favor of providing Medicare style healthcare coverage for every American?

Would you be in favor of providing Medicare style healthcare coverage for every American if it meant you had to give up your private insurance?

Poll those two question and you'll get vastly different responses. But you're both stupid and liar an thus you just continue to repeat your bullshit about how both of these proposal receive high polling numbers.