Brandon Kaho Commemorative Collegiate Career Impact Forecast - 2019 Results
Comments
-
I don’t know if this means I’m good or bad at this.Woof said:
@UW_Doog_Bot please to be helping me.
In the meantime I’m going to just assume I did awesome.
-
So much free pub. I’m gonna quit my day job and start a pod.Woof said: -
Woof said:
SO....I guess this is interesting if you care if your grading matches up with what the whole HH group graded out on average but isn't really meaningful unless you care about being in-sync with the hive mind, including the idiots like @Bread.DoogCourics said:
I don’t know if this means I’m good or bad at this.Woof said:
@UW_Doog_Bot please to be helping me.
In the meantime I’m going to just assume I did awesome.
Now, there is some "wisdom in crowds" and "balance of optimism" stuff that occurs over a large enough sample so I guess having a high correlation with the net score is "maybe" a good thing. Then again, an expert opinion like that of @CokeGreaterThanPepsi might deviate significantly from the norm since we are all relatively un-expert opinions and therefore he could have a low correlation while being very correct in his assessment. Call it the Ballz factor.
TLDM(ath) This chart is mostly meaningless without the matching JC rankings in 3-5 years for these players. Feel free to give yourself a participation trophy though since I failed to even submit my answers.
-
What MIGHT be interesting is if you took the net HH scores and matched them up against the recruiting rankings/grades and see where there were significant differences. Guys like KamFab who may have been more or less overlooked but we fell in love with. Similar to how we always compare 247 and composite to see where there might be bias.
-
Thanks!UW_Doog_Bot said:Woof said:
SO....I guess this is interesting if you care if your grading matches up with what the whole HH group graded out on average but isn't really meaningful unless you care about being in-sync with the hive mind, including the idiots like @Bread.DoogCourics said:
I don’t know if this means I’m good or bad at this.Woof said:
@UW_Doog_Bot please to be helping me.
In the meantime I’m going to just assume I did awesome.
Now, there is some "wisdom in crowds" and "balance of optimism" stuff that occurs over a large enough sample so I guess having a high correlation with the net score is "maybe" a good thing. Then again, an expert opinion like that of @CokeGreaterThanPepsi might deviate significantly from the norm since we are all relatively un-expert opinions and therefore he could have a low correlation while being very correct in his assessment. Call it the Ballz factor.
TLDM(ath) This chart is mostly meaningless without the matching JC rankings in 3-5 years for these players. Feel free to give yourself a participation trophy though since I failed to even submit my answers.
Before you got here I was all like:
-
I've studied the results carefully and concluded the following:
1). There is a poster here named Fecalfeast.
That is all. -
How do you predict which ones are going to underperform? Did you arbitrarily pick some guys as flameouts/disappointments so your average would stay at what you deemed to be a realistic level?Houhusky said:Hmm, and I thought I was overly optimistic/generous.
The scores seem a tad skewed, there are going to be a few players that flame out or never contribute but no one really wants to give a 1 or 2.
Seems like most people graded most of the recruits on a 3-5 scale?
Giving the class an average predictive grade of 3.7+ doesn't seem realistic.
Most players are going to end up like a Jaylen Johnson or Tevis "3"... More will flame out as 1s or 2s than achieve All-American MMFG 5s.
@Woof How does the percentage distribution of 1-5 grades compare to the Jesse Callier grades given out historically? Also how have the average Jesse Callier grades changed over time?
Thanks, leave it on my desk, Ill be back after lunch.
Nothing wrong with rating guys lower than the services and most everyone else if it's based in your own evals. -
Free pubchuck said:I've studied the results carefully and concluded the following:
1). There is a poster here named Fecalfeast.
That is all. -
Not free. There's a price which we can negotiate.FecalFeast said:
Free pubchuck said:I've studied the results carefully and concluded the following:
1). There is a poster here named Fecalfeast.
That is all.
Don't offer me anything to eat though. -
Safe to say @Mosster47 s composite score fell below 3? @MikeSeaver ?
