Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
The Dems FS
Comments
-
Let me get this straight. Are you really saying that a reduction in insect population is from wind turbines?Sledog said:
I was just reading that we are all doomed as insect populations are declining. You don't think that has anything to do with all those wind turbines smashing them? Endangered birds as well. Solar farms fry them all when they fly through as well. Damn greenies are destroying the planet!MikeDamone said:
When did I say I’m against investing in new “clean” energy technology? You’re so lazy In your logic. Which is probably why you love use fallacies. Why do you assume that if someone doesn’t think think the government should do something, they don’t think it should be done at all?2001400ex said:
I meant debt. And at some point we will need to work on paying it down.MikeDamone said:
El oh fucking el at people (Hondo)who think the “deficit” has some date were it has to be “paid off”.2001400ex said:
We'll all be long dead before we have to pay off the deficit. Didn't stop you from screaming about that for 8 years.PurpleThrobber said:
We’re all long fucking dead and decomposed before an Ice Age hits. And probably twenty generations after that will be worm food as well.allpurpleallgold said:
Not getting rid of of air travel.Swaye said:10 years to completely remove fossil fuels AND nuclear energy all while getting rid of air travel? The sheer enormity of that makes the moon landing look like building a lego house. Is anyone at all thinking this is absurd?
The goal is no nuclear. If we can do it without nuclear we should, if we can’t do it without nuclear we’ll end up using it.
No shit it’s absurd. This is what happens when you sit on your ass ignoring scientists. Do it or we’re chillin with the dinosaurs.
On another note, I’m sure if the government can take in enough money, they will solve climate change. Hell, I bet the climate will stay as it is for millions of years. They have a great track record.
And why are you so against investing in clean energy?
And you have no idea how the debt works or is financed, apparently. How do “we” work on “paying it down”. Tell me how that works. El oh fucking el. -
Getting rid of nuclear energy is fs, hth.
It’s a sustainable source of clean burning fuel that’s safe to generate ( unless you massively fuck up like Trinobyl but still).
AOC is a clown. -
If you hate nuclear energy you are a fucking stupid fuck.
They’ve made advance to smaller generators that don’t require massive nuclear plants too. To discredit it means you didn’t do your research and are playing on misconceived public fears to pander. AOC is a fucking hack. -
You needed a double shit post for Nuclear? Has anyone here said we should get rid of Nuclear?
-
Noted socialist AOC has!2001400ex said:You needed a double shit post for Nuclear? Has anyone here said we should get rid of Nuclear?
-
They kill birds like crazy including endangered species. You don't think they kill insects?2001400ex said:
Let me get this straight. Are you really saying that a reduction in insect population is from wind turbines?Sledog said:
I was just reading that we are all doomed as insect populations are declining. You don't think that has anything to do with all those wind turbines smashing them? Endangered birds as well. Solar farms fry them all when they fly through as well. Damn greenies are destroying the planet!MikeDamone said:
When did I say I’m against investing in new “clean” energy technology? You’re so lazy In your logic. Which is probably why you love use fallacies. Why do you assume that if someone doesn’t think think the government should do something, they don’t think it should be done at all?2001400ex said:
I meant debt. And at some point we will need to work on paying it down.MikeDamone said:
El oh fucking el at people (Hondo)who think the “deficit” has some date were it has to be “paid off”.2001400ex said:
We'll all be long dead before we have to pay off the deficit. Didn't stop you from screaming about that for 8 years.PurpleThrobber said:
We’re all long fucking dead and decomposed before an Ice Age hits. And probably twenty generations after that will be worm food as well.allpurpleallgold said:
Not getting rid of of air travel.Swaye said:10 years to completely remove fossil fuels AND nuclear energy all while getting rid of air travel? The sheer enormity of that makes the moon landing look like building a lego house. Is anyone at all thinking this is absurd?
The goal is no nuclear. If we can do it without nuclear we should, if we can’t do it without nuclear we’ll end up using it.
No shit it’s absurd. This is what happens when you sit on your ass ignoring scientists. Do it or we’re chillin with the dinosaurs.
On another note, I’m sure if the government can take in enough money, they will solve climate change. Hell, I bet the climate will stay as it is for millions of years. They have a great track record.
And why are you so against investing in clean energy?
And you have no idea how the debt works or is financed, apparently. How do “we” work on “paying it down”. Tell me how that works. El oh fucking el. -
If she had nuclear in it you’d be arguing that it’s too expensive or dangerous. You guys don’t argue in good faith. You’re against it and you’re going to find a reason to be against it so help you god.backthepack said:Getting rid of nuclear energy is fs, hth.
It’s a sustainable source of clean burning fuel that’s safe to generate ( unless you massively fuck up like Trinobyl but still).
AOC is a clown.
100% renewable is viable now. We have a government run electric company that’s successful and knows how to build it.
Stop screaming just to scream. -
How many insects do cars kill? And how many birds do buildings kill? I don't see you calling to end vehicles and tall buildings.Sledog said:
They kill birds like crazy including endangered species. You don't think they kill insects?2001400ex said:
Let me get this straight. Are you really saying that a reduction in insect population is from wind turbines?Sledog said:
I was just reading that we are all doomed as insect populations are declining. You don't think that has anything to do with all those wind turbines smashing them? Endangered birds as well. Solar farms fry them all when they fly through as well. Damn greenies are destroying the planet!MikeDamone said:
When did I say I’m against investing in new “clean” energy technology? You’re so lazy In your logic. Which is probably why you love use fallacies. Why do you assume that if someone doesn’t think think the government should do something, they don’t think it should be done at all?2001400ex said:
I meant debt. And at some point we will need to work on paying it down.MikeDamone said:
El oh fucking el at people (Hondo)who think the “deficit” has some date were it has to be “paid off”.2001400ex said:
We'll all be long dead before we have to pay off the deficit. Didn't stop you from screaming about that for 8 years.PurpleThrobber said:
We’re all long fucking dead and decomposed before an Ice Age hits. And probably twenty generations after that will be worm food as well.allpurpleallgold said:
Not getting rid of of air travel.Swaye said:10 years to completely remove fossil fuels AND nuclear energy all while getting rid of air travel? The sheer enormity of that makes the moon landing look like building a lego house. Is anyone at all thinking this is absurd?
The goal is no nuclear. If we can do it without nuclear we should, if we can’t do it without nuclear we’ll end up using it.
No shit it’s absurd. This is what happens when you sit on your ass ignoring scientists. Do it or we’re chillin with the dinosaurs.
On another note, I’m sure if the government can take in enough money, they will solve climate change. Hell, I bet the climate will stay as it is for millions of years. They have a great track record.
And why are you so against investing in clean energy?
And you have no idea how the debt works or is financed, apparently. How do “we” work on “paying it down”. Tell me how that works. El oh fucking el.
That being said. You are fucktarded for saying a significant amount of insects are killed by wind turbines. I wish you were trolling but you are just dumb. -
Divine intervention wasn't required.allpurpleallgold said:
If she had nuclear in it you’d be arguing that it’s too expensive or dangerous. You guys don’t argue in good faith. You’re against it and you’re going to find a reason to be against it so help you god.backthepack said:Getting rid of nuclear energy is fs, hth.
It’s a sustainable source of clean burning fuel that’s safe to generate ( unless you massively fuck up like Trinobyl but still).
AOC is a clown.
100% renewable is viable now. We have a government run electric company that’s successful and knows how to build it.
Stop screaming just to scream.
At all -
Your dumb as a rock. No actually the rock is smarter.2001400ex said:
How many insects do cars kill? And how many birds do buildings kill? I don't see you calling to end vehicles and tall buildings.Sledog said:
They kill birds like crazy including endangered species. You don't think they kill insects?2001400ex said:
Let me get this straight. Are you really saying that a reduction in insect population is from wind turbines?Sledog said:
I was just reading that we are all doomed as insect populations are declining. You don't think that has anything to do with all those wind turbines smashing them? Endangered birds as well. Solar farms fry them all when they fly through as well. Damn greenies are destroying the planet!MikeDamone said:
When did I say I’m against investing in new “clean” energy technology? You’re so lazy In your logic. Which is probably why you love use fallacies. Why do you assume that if someone doesn’t think think the government should do something, they don’t think it should be done at all?2001400ex said:
I meant debt. And at some point we will need to work on paying it down.MikeDamone said:
El oh fucking el at people (Hondo)who think the “deficit” has some date were it has to be “paid off”.2001400ex said:
We'll all be long dead before we have to pay off the deficit. Didn't stop you from screaming about that for 8 years.PurpleThrobber said:
We’re all long fucking dead and decomposed before an Ice Age hits. And probably twenty generations after that will be worm food as well.allpurpleallgold said:
Not getting rid of of air travel.Swaye said:10 years to completely remove fossil fuels AND nuclear energy all while getting rid of air travel? The sheer enormity of that makes the moon landing look like building a lego house. Is anyone at all thinking this is absurd?
The goal is no nuclear. If we can do it without nuclear we should, if we can’t do it without nuclear we’ll end up using it.
No shit it’s absurd. This is what happens when you sit on your ass ignoring scientists. Do it or we’re chillin with the dinosaurs.
On another note, I’m sure if the government can take in enough money, they will solve climate change. Hell, I bet the climate will stay as it is for millions of years. They have a great track record.
And why are you so against investing in clean energy?
And you have no idea how the debt works or is financed, apparently. How do “we” work on “paying it down”. Tell me how that works. El oh fucking el.
That being said. You are fucktarded for saying a significant amount of insects are killed by wind turbines. I wish you were trolling but you are just dumb.
We won't have cars anymore if you commies are ever in charge.
-
No, nuclear energy is a good thing.allpurpleallgold said:
If she had nuclear in it you’d be arguing that it’s too expensive or dangerous. You guys don’t argue in good faith. You’re against it and you’re going to find a reason to be against it so help you god.backthepack said:Getting rid of nuclear energy is fs, hth.
It’s a sustainable source of clean burning fuel that’s safe to generate ( unless you massively fuck up like Trinobyl but still).
AOC is a clown.
100% renewable is viable now. We have a government run electric company that’s successful and knows how to build it.
Stop screaming just to scream.
Axe my very liberal environmental science professor she thinks it’s fucking stupid too! -
I’m all for renewable and sustainable energy sources. But nuclear energy is by far the most viable and most efficent. We already have the infrastructure in place too! Advancement in recent technologies have made it so you don’t need a big nuclear plane either. Effectively making an already very safe process even safer!
-
Planes are going to be banned. Double banning for nuclear planes.backthepack said:I’m all for renewable and sustainable energy sources. But nuclear energy is by far the most viable and most efficent. We already have the infrastructure in place too! Advancement in recent technologies have made it so you don’t need a big nuclear plane either. Effectively making an already very safe process even safer!
-
Obvious troll is obvious.backthepack said:I’m all for renewable and sustainable energy sources. But nuclear energy is by far the most viable and most efficent. We already have the infrastructure in place too! Advancement in recent technologies have made it so you don’t need a big nuclear plane either. Effectively making an already very safe process even safer!
-
Fuck off. You know I meant plant2001400ex said:
Planes are going to be banned. Double banning for nuclear planes.backthepack said:I’m all for renewable and sustainable energy sources. But nuclear energy is by far the most viable and most efficent. We already have the infrastructure in place too! Advancement in recent technologies have made it so you don’t need a big nuclear plane either. Effectively making an already very safe process even safer!
-
allpurpleallgold said:
Obvious troll is obvious.backthepack said:I’m all for renewable and sustainable energy sources. But nuclear energy is by far the most viable and most efficent. We already have the infrastructure in place too! Advancement in recent technologies have made it so you don’t need a big nuclear plane either. Effectively making an already very safe process even safer!
Well you suck at trolling so.
Stick to sucking off Lebron! -
Did you know Newsom is living in Reagan’s old house in Sacramento?backthepack said:
Fuck off. You know I meant plant2001400ex said:
Planes are going to be banned. Double banning for nuclear planes.backthepack said:I’m all for renewable and sustainable energy sources. But nuclear energy is by far the most viable and most efficent. We already have the infrastructure in place too! Advancement in recent technologies have made it so you don’t need a big nuclear plane either. Effectively making an already very safe process even safer!
-
I hear in Sacramento black folks still aren't allowed to drink from public water fountains and Social Security doesn't exist.MikeDamone said:
Did you know Newsom is living in Reagan’s old house in Sacramento?backthepack said:
Fuck off. You know I meant plant2001400ex said:
Planes are going to be banned. Double banning for nuclear planes.backthepack said:I’m all for renewable and sustainable energy sources. But nuclear energy is by far the most viable and most efficent. We already have the infrastructure in place too! Advancement in recent technologies have made it so you don’t need a big nuclear plane either. Effectively making an already very safe process even safer!
-
Actually, this is true. I think they issue incidental take permits under the ESA for those things. They do get birds.Sledog said:
They kill birds like crazy including endangered species. You don't think they kill insects?2001400ex said:
Let me get this straight. Are you really saying that a reduction in insect population is from wind turbines?Sledog said:
I was just reading that we are all doomed as insect populations are declining. You don't think that has anything to do with all those wind turbines smashing them? Endangered birds as well. Solar farms fry them all when they fly through as well. Damn greenies are destroying the planet!MikeDamone said:
When did I say I’m against investing in new “clean” energy technology? You’re so lazy In your logic. Which is probably why you love use fallacies. Why do you assume that if someone doesn’t think think the government should do something, they don’t think it should be done at all?2001400ex said:
I meant debt. And at some point we will need to work on paying it down.MikeDamone said:
El oh fucking el at people (Hondo)who think the “deficit” has some date were it has to be “paid off”.2001400ex said:
We'll all be long dead before we have to pay off the deficit. Didn't stop you from screaming about that for 8 years.PurpleThrobber said:
We’re all long fucking dead and decomposed before an Ice Age hits. And probably twenty generations after that will be worm food as well.allpurpleallgold said:
Not getting rid of of air travel.Swaye said:10 years to completely remove fossil fuels AND nuclear energy all while getting rid of air travel? The sheer enormity of that makes the moon landing look like building a lego house. Is anyone at all thinking this is absurd?
The goal is no nuclear. If we can do it without nuclear we should, if we can’t do it without nuclear we’ll end up using it.
No shit it’s absurd. This is what happens when you sit on your ass ignoring scientists. Do it or we’re chillin with the dinosaurs.
On another note, I’m sure if the government can take in enough money, they will solve climate change. Hell, I bet the climate will stay as it is for millions of years. They have a great track record.
And why are you so against investing in clean energy?
And you have no idea how the debt works or is financed, apparently. How do “we” work on “paying it down”. Tell me how that works. El oh fucking el.
Insects? Any fucking insect that can't miss one of those blades deserves to be extinct.
-
Aside from the typo HRYK. "Renewables" aren't going to manage baseload all over the world. We had a decent informative discussion about this the other day.backthepack said:I’m all for renewable and sustainable energy sources. But nuclear energy is by far the most viable and most efficent. We already have the infrastructure in place too! Advancement in recent technologies have made it so you don’t need a big nuclear plant either. Effectively making an already very safe process even safer!
Also, the green new deal is based on the concept of economic stimulus...which is the last thing this economy needs. FS. Stagflation would be great!
If you want to dump other people's money somewhere dump it into pure R&D, DARPA, or research grants for "clean" energy. It's one of the few areas where the government is reasonably effective. -
Disgusting!MikeDamone said:
Did you know Newsom is living in Reagan’s old house in Sacramento?backthepack said:
Fuck off. You know I meant plant2001400ex said:
Planes are going to be banned. Double banning for nuclear planes.backthepack said:I’m all for renewable and sustainable energy sources. But nuclear energy is by far the most viable and most efficent. We already have the infrastructure in place too! Advancement in recent technologies have made it so you don’t need a big nuclear plane either. Effectively making an already very safe process even safer!
-
This.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Aside from the typo HRYK. "Renewables" aren't going to manage baseload all over the world. We had a decent informative discussion about this the other day.backthepack said:I’m all for renewable and sustainable energy sources. But nuclear energy is by far the most viable and most efficent. We already have the infrastructure in place too! Advancement in recent technologies have made it so you don’t need a big nuclear plant either. Effectively making an already very safe process even safer!
Also, the green new deal is based on the concept of economic stimulus...which is the last thing this economy needs. FS. Stagflation would be great!
If you want to dump other people's money somewhere dump it into pure R&D, DARPA, or research grants for "clean" energy. It's one of the few areas where the government is reasonably effective. -
That's not true. I'm screaming because any plan that hopes to slow or end global warming without crushing the poor has to include nuclear power. Anything else is unrealistic given today's technology, and will ultimately be unsuccessful - and frankly we don't have time for all that fucking around. Why can't the green new deal be realistic and include nuclear power?allpurpleallgold said:
If she had nuclear in it you’d be arguing that it’s too expensive or dangerous. You guys don’t argue in good faith. You’re against it and you’re going to find a reason to be against it so help you god.backthepack said:Getting rid of nuclear energy is fs, hth.
It’s a sustainable source of clean burning fuel that’s safe to generate ( unless you massively fuck up like Trinobyl but still).
AOC is a clown.
100% renewable is viable now. We have a government run electric company that’s successful and knows how to build it.
Stop screaming just to scream. -
Because the authors of the Green New Deal are a dancing bartender and those that worship feelings over facts. They don’t realize or just simply ignore that China and India pollute moar than we do.dflea said:
That's not true. I'm screaming because any plan that hopes to slow or end global warming without crushing the poor has to include nuclear power. Anything else is unrealistic given today's technology, and will ultimately be unsuccessful - and frankly we don't have time for all that fucking around. Why can't the green new deal be realistic and include nuclear power?allpurpleallgold said:
If she had nuclear in it you’d be arguing that it’s too expensive or dangerous. You guys don’t argue in good faith. You’re against it and you’re going to find a reason to be against it so help you god.backthepack said:Getting rid of nuclear energy is fs, hth.
It’s a sustainable source of clean burning fuel that’s safe to generate ( unless you massively fuck up like Trinobyl but still).
AOC is a clown.
100% renewable is viable now. We have a government run electric company that’s successful and knows how to build it.
Stop screaming just to scream.
Somewhere at @AZDuck is murder bonering over the Trains!!!! proposal though. -
Lots of dogs eating well in the free market paradise of SomaliaSledog said:
Your dumb as a rock. No actually the rock is smarter.2001400ex said:
How many insects do cars kill? And how many birds do buildings kill? I don't see you calling to end vehicles and tall buildings.Sledog said:
They kill birds like crazy including endangered species. You don't think they kill insects?2001400ex said:
Let me get this straight. Are you really saying that a reduction in insect population is from wind turbines?Sledog said:
I was just reading that we are all doomed as insect populations are declining. You don't think that has anything to do with all those wind turbines smashing them? Endangered birds as well. Solar farms fry them all when they fly through as well. Damn greenies are destroying the planet!MikeDamone said:
When did I say I’m against investing in new “clean” energy technology? You’re so lazy In your logic. Which is probably why you love use fallacies. Why do you assume that if someone doesn’t think think the government should do something, they don’t think it should be done at all?2001400ex said:
I meant debt. And at some point we will need to work on paying it down.MikeDamone said:
El oh fucking el at people (Hondo)who think the “deficit” has some date were it has to be “paid off”.2001400ex said:
We'll all be long dead before we have to pay off the deficit. Didn't stop you from screaming about that for 8 years.PurpleThrobber said:
We’re all long fucking dead and decomposed before an Ice Age hits. And probably twenty generations after that will be worm food as well.allpurpleallgold said:
Not getting rid of of air travel.Swaye said:10 years to completely remove fossil fuels AND nuclear energy all while getting rid of air travel? The sheer enormity of that makes the moon landing look like building a lego house. Is anyone at all thinking this is absurd?
The goal is no nuclear. If we can do it without nuclear we should, if we can’t do it without nuclear we’ll end up using it.
No shit it’s absurd. This is what happens when you sit on your ass ignoring scientists. Do it or we’re chillin with the dinosaurs.
On another note, I’m sure if the government can take in enough money, they will solve climate change. Hell, I bet the climate will stay as it is for millions of years. They have a great track record.
And why are you so against investing in clean energy?
And you have no idea how the debt works or is financed, apparently. How do “we” work on “paying it down”. Tell me how that works. El oh fucking el.
That being said. You are fucktarded for saying a significant amount of insects are killed by wind turbines. I wish you were trolling but you are just dumb.
We won't have cars anymore if you commies are ever in charge. -
Ignorant and cliche. You’re a fucking miracle.MariotaTheGawd said:
Lots of dogs eating well in the free market paradise of SomaliaSledog said:
Your dumb as a rock. No actually the rock is smarter.2001400ex said:
How many insects do cars kill? And how many birds do buildings kill? I don't see you calling to end vehicles and tall buildings.Sledog said:
They kill birds like crazy including endangered species. You don't think they kill insects?2001400ex said:
Let me get this straight. Are you really saying that a reduction in insect population is from wind turbines?Sledog said:
I was just reading that we are all doomed as insect populations are declining. You don't think that has anything to do with all those wind turbines smashing them? Endangered birds as well. Solar farms fry them all when they fly through as well. Damn greenies are destroying the planet!MikeDamone said:
When did I say I’m against investing in new “clean” energy technology? You’re so lazy In your logic. Which is probably why you love use fallacies. Why do you assume that if someone doesn’t think think the government should do something, they don’t think it should be done at all?2001400ex said:
I meant debt. And at some point we will need to work on paying it down.MikeDamone said:
El oh fucking el at people (Hondo)who think the “deficit” has some date were it has to be “paid off”.2001400ex said:
We'll all be long dead before we have to pay off the deficit. Didn't stop you from screaming about that for 8 years.PurpleThrobber said:
We’re all long fucking dead and decomposed before an Ice Age hits. And probably twenty generations after that will be worm food as well.allpurpleallgold said:
Not getting rid of of air travel.Swaye said:10 years to completely remove fossil fuels AND nuclear energy all while getting rid of air travel? The sheer enormity of that makes the moon landing look like building a lego house. Is anyone at all thinking this is absurd?
The goal is no nuclear. If we can do it without nuclear we should, if we can’t do it without nuclear we’ll end up using it.
No shit it’s absurd. This is what happens when you sit on your ass ignoring scientists. Do it or we’re chillin with the dinosaurs.
On another note, I’m sure if the government can take in enough money, they will solve climate change. Hell, I bet the climate will stay as it is for millions of years. They have a great track record.
And why are you so against investing in clean energy?
And you have no idea how the debt works or is financed, apparently. How do “we” work on “paying it down”. Tell me how that works. El oh fucking el.
That being said. You are fucktarded for saying a significant amount of insects are killed by wind turbines. I wish you were trolling but you are just dumb.
We won't have cars anymore if you commies are ever in charge. -
As opposed to the super genius "actually classical liberal, bet you've never heard of it" guyMikeDamone said:
Ignorant and cliche. You’re a fucking miracle.MariotaTheGawd said:
Lots of dogs eating well in the free market paradise of SomaliaSledog said:
Your dumb as a rock. No actually the rock is smarter.2001400ex said:
How many insects do cars kill? And how many birds do buildings kill? I don't see you calling to end vehicles and tall buildings.Sledog said:
They kill birds like crazy including endangered species. You don't think they kill insects?2001400ex said:
Let me get this straight. Are you really saying that a reduction in insect population is from wind turbines?Sledog said:
I was just reading that we are all doomed as insect populations are declining. You don't think that has anything to do with all those wind turbines smashing them? Endangered birds as well. Solar farms fry them all when they fly through as well. Damn greenies are destroying the planet!MikeDamone said:
When did I say I’m against investing in new “clean” energy technology? You’re so lazy In your logic. Which is probably why you love use fallacies. Why do you assume that if someone doesn’t think think the government should do something, they don’t think it should be done at all?2001400ex said:
I meant debt. And at some point we will need to work on paying it down.MikeDamone said:
El oh fucking el at people (Hondo)who think the “deficit” has some date were it has to be “paid off”.2001400ex said:
We'll all be long dead before we have to pay off the deficit. Didn't stop you from screaming about that for 8 years.PurpleThrobber said:
We’re all long fucking dead and decomposed before an Ice Age hits. And probably twenty generations after that will be worm food as well.allpurpleallgold said:
Not getting rid of of air travel.Swaye said:10 years to completely remove fossil fuels AND nuclear energy all while getting rid of air travel? The sheer enormity of that makes the moon landing look like building a lego house. Is anyone at all thinking this is absurd?
The goal is no nuclear. If we can do it without nuclear we should, if we can’t do it without nuclear we’ll end up using it.
No shit it’s absurd. This is what happens when you sit on your ass ignoring scientists. Do it or we’re chillin with the dinosaurs.
On another note, I’m sure if the government can take in enough money, they will solve climate change. Hell, I bet the climate will stay as it is for millions of years. They have a great track record.
And why are you so against investing in clean energy?
And you have no idea how the debt works or is financed, apparently. How do “we” work on “paying it down”. Tell me how that works. El oh fucking el.
That being said. You are fucktarded for saying a significant amount of insects are killed by wind turbines. I wish you were trolling but you are just dumb.
We won't have cars anymore if you commies are ever in charge. -
1) you’d never heard of it.MariotaTheGawd said:
As opposed to the super genius "actually classical liberal, bet you've never heard of it" guyMikeDamone said:
Ignorant and cliche. You’re a fucking miracle.MariotaTheGawd said:
Lots of dogs eating well in the free market paradise of SomaliaSledog said:
Your dumb as a rock. No actually the rock is smarter.2001400ex said:
How many insects do cars kill? And how many birds do buildings kill? I don't see you calling to end vehicles and tall buildings.Sledog said:
They kill birds like crazy including endangered species. You don't think they kill insects?2001400ex said:
Let me get this straight. Are you really saying that a reduction in insect population is from wind turbines?Sledog said:
I was just reading that we are all doomed as insect populations are declining. You don't think that has anything to do with all those wind turbines smashing them? Endangered birds as well. Solar farms fry them all when they fly through as well. Damn greenies are destroying the planet!MikeDamone said:
When did I say I’m against investing in new “clean” energy technology? You’re so lazy In your logic. Which is probably why you love use fallacies. Why do you assume that if someone doesn’t think think the government should do something, they don’t think it should be done at all?2001400ex said:
I meant debt. And at some point we will need to work on paying it down.MikeDamone said:
El oh fucking el at people (Hondo)who think the “deficit” has some date were it has to be “paid off”.2001400ex said:
We'll all be long dead before we have to pay off the deficit. Didn't stop you from screaming about that for 8 years.PurpleThrobber said:
We’re all long fucking dead and decomposed before an Ice Age hits. And probably twenty generations after that will be worm food as well.allpurpleallgold said:
Not getting rid of of air travel.Swaye said:10 years to completely remove fossil fuels AND nuclear energy all while getting rid of air travel? The sheer enormity of that makes the moon landing look like building a lego house. Is anyone at all thinking this is absurd?
The goal is no nuclear. If we can do it without nuclear we should, if we can’t do it without nuclear we’ll end up using it.
No shit it’s absurd. This is what happens when you sit on your ass ignoring scientists. Do it or we’re chillin with the dinosaurs.
On another note, I’m sure if the government can take in enough money, they will solve climate change. Hell, I bet the climate will stay as it is for millions of years. They have a great track record.
And why are you so against investing in clean energy?
And you have no idea how the debt works or is financed, apparently. How do “we” work on “paying it down”. Tell me how that works. El oh fucking el.
That being said. You are fucktarded for saying a significant amount of insects are killed by wind turbines. I wish you were trolling but you are just dumb.
We won't have cars anymore if you commies are ever in charge.
2) who’s the fag in your avatar? -
Lmfao you really do think "classical liberal" is some unique snowflake thingMikeDamone said:
1) you’d never heard of it.MariotaTheGawd said:
As opposed to the super genius "actually classical liberal, bet you've never heard of it" guyMikeDamone said:
Ignorant and cliche. You’re a fucking miracle.MariotaTheGawd said:
Lots of dogs eating well in the free market paradise of SomaliaSledog said:
Your dumb as a rock. No actually the rock is smarter.2001400ex said:
How many insects do cars kill? And how many birds do buildings kill? I don't see you calling to end vehicles and tall buildings.Sledog said:
They kill birds like crazy including endangered species. You don't think they kill insects?2001400ex said:
Let me get this straight. Are you really saying that a reduction in insect population is from wind turbines?Sledog said:
I was just reading that we are all doomed as insect populations are declining. You don't think that has anything to do with all those wind turbines smashing them? Endangered birds as well. Solar farms fry them all when they fly through as well. Damn greenies are destroying the planet!MikeDamone said:
When did I say I’m against investing in new “clean” energy technology? You’re so lazy In your logic. Which is probably why you love use fallacies. Why do you assume that if someone doesn’t think think the government should do something, they don’t think it should be done at all?2001400ex said:
I meant debt. And at some point we will need to work on paying it down.MikeDamone said:
El oh fucking el at people (Hondo)who think the “deficit” has some date were it has to be “paid off”.2001400ex said:
We'll all be long dead before we have to pay off the deficit. Didn't stop you from screaming about that for 8 years.PurpleThrobber said:
We’re all long fucking dead and decomposed before an Ice Age hits. And probably twenty generations after that will be worm food as well.allpurpleallgold said:
Not getting rid of of air travel.Swaye said:10 years to completely remove fossil fuels AND nuclear energy all while getting rid of air travel? The sheer enormity of that makes the moon landing look like building a lego house. Is anyone at all thinking this is absurd?
The goal is no nuclear. If we can do it without nuclear we should, if we can’t do it without nuclear we’ll end up using it.
No shit it’s absurd. This is what happens when you sit on your ass ignoring scientists. Do it or we’re chillin with the dinosaurs.
On another note, I’m sure if the government can take in enough money, they will solve climate change. Hell, I bet the climate will stay as it is for millions of years. They have a great track record.
And why are you so against investing in clean energy?
And you have no idea how the debt works or is financed, apparently. How do “we” work on “paying it down”. Tell me how that works. El oh fucking el.
That being said. You are fucktarded for saying a significant amount of insects are killed by wind turbines. I wish you were trolling but you are just dumb.
We won't have cars anymore if you commies are ever in charge.
2) who’s the fag in your avatar?
The jokes write themselves -
No, I don’t. I just think you don’t know what it is. Pretty simple.MariotaTheGawd said:
Lmfao you really do think "classical liberal" is some unique snowflake thingMikeDamone said:
1) you’d never heard of it.MariotaTheGawd said:
As opposed to the super genius "actually classical liberal, bet you've never heard of it" guyMikeDamone said:
Ignorant and cliche. You’re a fucking miracle.MariotaTheGawd said:
Lots of dogs eating well in the free market paradise of SomaliaSledog said:
Your dumb as a rock. No actually the rock is smarter.2001400ex said:
How many insects do cars kill? And how many birds do buildings kill? I don't see you calling to end vehicles and tall buildings.Sledog said:
They kill birds like crazy including endangered species. You don't think they kill insects?2001400ex said:
Let me get this straight. Are you really saying that a reduction in insect population is from wind turbines?Sledog said:
I was just reading that we are all doomed as insect populations are declining. You don't think that has anything to do with all those wind turbines smashing them? Endangered birds as well. Solar farms fry them all when they fly through as well. Damn greenies are destroying the planet!MikeDamone said:
When did I say I’m against investing in new “clean” energy technology? You’re so lazy In your logic. Which is probably why you love use fallacies. Why do you assume that if someone doesn’t think think the government should do something, they don’t think it should be done at all?2001400ex said:
I meant debt. And at some point we will need to work on paying it down.MikeDamone said:
El oh fucking el at people (Hondo)who think the “deficit” has some date were it has to be “paid off”.2001400ex said:
We'll all be long dead before we have to pay off the deficit. Didn't stop you from screaming about that for 8 years.PurpleThrobber said:
We’re all long fucking dead and decomposed before an Ice Age hits. And probably twenty generations after that will be worm food as well.allpurpleallgold said:
Not getting rid of of air travel.Swaye said:10 years to completely remove fossil fuels AND nuclear energy all while getting rid of air travel? The sheer enormity of that makes the moon landing look like building a lego house. Is anyone at all thinking this is absurd?
The goal is no nuclear. If we can do it without nuclear we should, if we can’t do it without nuclear we’ll end up using it.
No shit it’s absurd. This is what happens when you sit on your ass ignoring scientists. Do it or we’re chillin with the dinosaurs.
On another note, I’m sure if the government can take in enough money, they will solve climate change. Hell, I bet the climate will stay as it is for millions of years. They have a great track record.
And why are you so against investing in clean energy?
And you have no idea how the debt works or is financed, apparently. How do “we” work on “paying it down”. Tell me how that works. El oh fucking el.
That being said. You are fucktarded for saying a significant amount of insects are killed by wind turbines. I wish you were trolling but you are just dumb.
We won't have cars anymore if you commies are ever in charge.
2) who’s the fag in your avatar?
The jokes write themselves
That said, who’s the fag in your avatar ?
