Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

The Dems FS

1235715

Comments

  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,685 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    Why don’t you just go to her website and read it?

    Link?
    You act like you haven't been there begging to help her campaign for president.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,685 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Swaye said:

    10 years to completely remove fossil fuels AND nuclear energy all while getting rid of air travel? The sheer enormity of that makes the moon landing look like building a lego house. Is anyone at all thinking this is absurd?

    Not getting rid of of air travel.

    The goal is no nuclear. If we can do it without nuclear we should, if we can’t do it without nuclear we’ll end up using it.

    No shit it’s absurd. This is what happens when you sit on your ass ignoring scientists. Do it or we’re chillin with the dinosaurs.
    We’re all long fucking dead and decomposed before an Ice Age hits. And probably twenty generations after that will be worm food as well.
    We'll all be long dead before we have to pay off the deficit. Didn't stop you from screaming about that for 8 years.
    So the lefties used to run the moral equivalence play to no end.

    Now it’s the space time continuum equivalence angle. Because 8 years of deficits = 800 years of climate change.

    Brilliant.
    No the climate change deal won't happen overnight. And honestly we need to be tougher on China and India and shit or what we do won't matter.

    But if we don't start doing something now, we might get left behind. I'd rather be in the forefront of renewable energy. And you are fucktarded if you don't think it's a good idea to invest in it.

    It's too bad the GOP is bought off by big oil so they are scared about the green new deal and peddle lies and bullshit about it. And you eat it up.
    It won't happen. It will never happen. But then the plan is to get rid of the constitution. How you gonna do that since the constitution won't allow the moves that would have to be made to deprive millions of their property, rights, freedom, pursuit of happiness etc. etc. etc.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Swaye said:

    10 years to completely remove fossil fuels AND nuclear energy all while getting rid of air travel? The sheer enormity of that makes the moon landing look like building a lego house. Is anyone at all thinking this is absurd?

    Not getting rid of of air travel.

    The goal is no nuclear. If we can do it without nuclear we should, if we can’t do it without nuclear we’ll end up using it.

    No shit it’s absurd. This is what happens when you sit on your ass ignoring scientists. Do it or we’re chillin with the dinosaurs.
    We’re all long fucking dead and decomposed before an Ice Age hits. And probably twenty generations after that will be worm food as well.
    We'll all be long dead before we have to pay off the deficit. Didn't stop you from screaming about that for 8 years.
    So the lefties used to run the moral equivalence play to no end.

    Now it’s the space time continuum equivalence angle. Because 8 years of deficits = 800 years of climate change.

    Brilliant.
    No the climate change deal won't happen overnight. And honestly we need to be tougher on China and India and shit or what we do won't matter.

    But if we don't start doing something now, we might get left behind. I'd rather be in the forefront of renewable energy. And you are fucktarded if you don't think it's a good idea to invest in it.

    It's too bad the GOP is bought off by big oil so they are scared about the green new deal and peddle lies and bullshit about it. And you eat it up.
    So the GOP is bought off by big oil and one of the biggest talking points for Rats since 2012 is how Obama increased oil production in the US. Interesting.

  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    edited February 2019

    SFGbob said:

    Swaye said:

    10 years to completely remove fossil fuels AND nuclear energy all while getting rid of air travel? The sheer enormity of that makes the moon landing look like building a lego house. Is anyone at all thinking this is absurd?

    Anyone with even understanding of economics, human nature, and an ounce of integrity. So pretty much everyone that isn't a committed leftist. They are cultists. This is their religion. And like most religious people their beliefs are based upon faith, not on a tangible reality or facts.

    Why is it the dumbest, loudest people are always the ones claiming to understand human nature and economics? It's almost like a mating call

    "Guys, over here! I read part of Atlas Shrugged and skimmed Milton Friedman's wikipedia entry too!"
    Why do the people who are always claiming to be so smart come off as mouthy fucking morons. Go ahead Kunt, inform us on how you plan on paying for all the shit AOC is advocating for.
  • Doogles
    Doogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,812 Founders Club

    Swaye said:

    10 years to completely remove fossil fuels AND nuclear energy all while getting rid of air travel? The sheer enormity of that makes the moon landing look like building a lego house. Is anyone at all thinking this is absurd?

    Not getting rid of of air travel.

    The goal is no nuclear. If we can do it without nuclear we should, if we can’t do it without nuclear we’ll end up using it.

    No shit it’s absurd. This is what happens when you sit on your ass ignoring scientists. Do it or we’re chillin with the dinosaurs.
    Are China and India on board? If not, it doesn't matter at all.
  • jecornel
    jecornel Member Posts: 9,737
    Doogles said:

    Swaye said:

    10 years to completely remove fossil fuels AND nuclear energy all while getting rid of air travel? The sheer enormity of that makes the moon landing look like building a lego house. Is anyone at all thinking this is absurd?

    Not getting rid of of air travel.

    The goal is no nuclear. If we can do it without nuclear we should, if we can’t do it without nuclear we’ll end up using it.

    No shit it’s absurd. This is what happens when you sit on your ass ignoring scientists. Do it or we’re chillin with the dinosaurs.
    Are China and India on board? If not, it doesn't matter at all.
    This.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    2001400ex said:

    Swaye said:

    10 years to completely remove fossil fuels AND nuclear energy all while getting rid of air travel? The sheer enormity of that makes the moon landing look like building a lego house. Is anyone at all thinking this is absurd?

    Not getting rid of of air travel.

    The goal is no nuclear. If we can do it without nuclear we should, if we can’t do it without nuclear we’ll end up using it.

    No shit it’s absurd. This is what happens when you sit on your ass ignoring scientists. Do it or we’re chillin with the dinosaurs.
    We’re all long fucking dead and decomposed before an Ice Age hits. And probably twenty generations after that will be worm food as well.
    We'll all be long dead before we have to pay off the deficit. Didn't stop you from screaming about that for 8 years.
    El oh fucking el at people (Hondo)who think the “deficit” has some date were it has to be “paid off”.

    On another note, I’m sure if the government can take in enough money, they will solve climate change. Hell, I bet the climate will stay as it is for millions of years. They have a great track record.

  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    Swaye said:

    10 years to completely remove fossil fuels AND nuclear energy all while getting rid of air travel? The sheer enormity of that makes the moon landing look like building a lego house. Is anyone at all thinking this is absurd?

    Not getting rid of of air travel.

    The goal is no nuclear. If we can do it without nuclear we should, if we can’t do it without nuclear we’ll end up using it.

    No shit it’s absurd. This is what happens when you sit on your ass ignoring scientists. Do it or we’re chillin with the dinosaurs.
    We’re all long fucking dead and decomposed before an Ice Age hits. And probably twenty generations after that will be worm food as well.
    We'll all be long dead before we have to pay off the deficit. Didn't stop you from screaming about that for 8 years.
    El oh fucking el at people (Hondo)who think the “deficit” has some date were it has to be “paid off”.

    On another note, I’m sure if the government can take in enough money, they will solve climate change. Hell, I bet the climate will stay as it is for millions of years. They have a great track record.

    I meant debt. And at some point we will need to work on paying it down.

    And why are you so against investing in clean energy?
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited February 2019
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Swaye said:

    10 years to completely remove fossil fuels AND nuclear energy all while getting rid of air travel? The sheer enormity of that makes the moon landing look like building a lego house. Is anyone at all thinking this is absurd?

    Not getting rid of of air travel.

    The goal is no nuclear. If we can do it without nuclear we should, if we can’t do it without nuclear we’ll end up using it.

    No shit it’s absurd. This is what happens when you sit on your ass ignoring scientists. Do it or we’re chillin with the dinosaurs.
    We’re all long fucking dead and decomposed before an Ice Age hits. And probably twenty generations after that will be worm food as well.
    We'll all be long dead before we have to pay off the deficit. Didn't stop you from screaming about that for 8 years.
    El oh fucking el at people (Hondo)who think the “deficit” has some date were it has to be “paid off”.

    On another note, I’m sure if the government can take in enough money, they will solve climate change. Hell, I bet the climate will stay as it is for millions of years. They have a great track record.

    I meant debt. And at some point we will need to work on paying it down.

    And why are you so against investing in clean energy?
    When did I say I’m against investing in new “clean” energy technology? You’re so lazy In your logic. Which is probably why you love use fallacies. Why do you assume that if someone doesn’t think think the government should do something, they don’t think it should be done at all?

    And you have no idea how the debt works or is financed, apparently. How do “we” work on “paying it down”. Tell me how that works. El oh fucking el.