Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Woody nominated for national athletic director of the year
Comments
-
Bill fucking gets it:Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Woodward has definitely improved at his job since 2008. I feel kind of bad having called him "Pool Bitch" a few times, but that's my passion for winning. I know the award is probably ultra faggy and p.c., so it encompasses 287 Olympic sports, and we're probably doing well in those. In terms of the money sports, he's done okay, maybe decent, but retaining Romar after three years of missing the tournament is a bad move.
-
I like how AZDuck is naive to think Phil Knight isn't running everything at Oregon. The AD just a figurehead.
Also before Sven thinks I'm crowning Woodward I'd suggest he read my earlier comments in this thread.
I'd say he's a B- right now trending up. -
I guaranfuckingtee that Phil Knight did not decide to hire Mark Helfrich.
And its when you start playing the Phil Knight card that you sound like a fucking Doog in D-major. -
AZDuck, how are you ahead? How the fuck do you think? Your football and basketball programs have an endless money pit and ties to Nike (and their marketing). You have the best facilities in the country. Every teen boy stalking visit report has the recruit jacking off over those facilities and how great they are. That won't get you all that far without good coaches, but don't be a fucking idiot on how you got ahead. You are giving that much credit to UW's incompetence for Oregon's success?
-
The fuck?AZDuck said:The Oregon AD or Phil Knight's assistant hired Helfrich and Altman. Those aren't looking like great hires. Jeremy Foley at Florida has a mantle full of championships in football and basketball. He also hired Ron Zook and Will Muschamp. I would love to see the AD with a perfect track record.
The guy at Dook or maybe whoever's in charge at Stanford (Sears Cups holla)... but Helfrich is still an unproven commodity and Altman is looking pretty fucking good. Woody isn't even a top 50% AD. Oregon has gone from being near last in the Pac-12 in revenue to the top in the last few years, and I don't even think our AD is that great.
How we are ahead of you fucks who are located in the middle of the largest city in the PNW with a 70K stadium and twice as many living alumni (320K for UW vs. 160K for UO)... our guys are doing some shit right. And that is argument one for why your guy isn't all that.
It really amuses me that so many people think that building the stadium is a great accomplishment. Getting the stadium done is what I would call "minimal competence." Let's see, the UW owns the land, and has for over a century. There was already a stadium there, so zoning wasn't really an issue. It was a matter of knocking heads and getting donors to open up their pocketbooks, and of the 320K UW alums worldwide, 215K live in the state of Washington.
Earth to so-called halfbrains, your AD isn't all that great.
I'm hearing that Peterman wanted the UW job more than the AD wanted Peterman, so there's that as well. But please, let this guy and his cronies continue to run your AD. We probably need another ten years or so to really solidify our position as the premiere sports program in the NW.
Agree with most of this, but Woodward is still easily a top half AD in the fucking dreckfest that is the Pac-12. I only see two good ADs in the whole conference.
Here's my ranking of the list:
1. Byrne
2. Hill
--------------- (fucking dreckfest line) --------------------------
3. Patterson
4. Guerrero
5. Woodward
6. Muir (hasn't had to do much at Stanford yet)
7. Moos
8. Mullens (settling on Helfrich when Oregon could have gotten a great coach sucks)
9. De Carolis
10. Bohn
11. Barbour
12. Haden
Yes, Cal is way too fucking high in this list.
-
Why? Facts are facts. Knight entered your program and you took off.AZDuck said:I guaranfuckingtee that Phil Knight did not decide to hire Mark Helfrich.
And its when you start playing the Phil Knight card that you sound like a fucking Doog in D-major.
Knight gave you the nike brand so shiny new uni's which appealed to recruits.
Knight also paid Bellotti a shitload of money to LEAVE! After a top 10 season.
Knight is why despite being in BFE you are a national product.
Minimizing Knight isn't even being a Quook it's just plain FS. -
When did Phil Knight turn into an absentee owner?AZDuck said:I guaranfuckingtee that Phil Knight did not decide to hire Mark Helfrich.
And its when you start playing the Phil Knight card that you sound like a fucking Doog in D-major. -
Agree with most of this, but Woodward is still easily a top half AD in the fucking dreckfest that is the Pac-12. I only see two good ADs in the whole conference.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The fuck?AZDuck said:The Oregon AD or Phil Knight's assistant hired Helfrich and Altman. Those aren't looking like great hires. Jeremy Foley at Florida has a mantle full of championships in football and basketball. He also hired Ron Zook and Will Muschamp. I would love to see the AD with a perfect track record.
The guy at Dook or maybe whoever's in charge at Stanford (Sears Cups holla)... but Helfrich is still an unproven commodity and Altman is looking pretty fucking good. Woody isn't even a top 50% AD. Oregon has gone from being near last in the Pac-12 in revenue to the top in the last few years, and I don't even think our AD is that great.
How we are ahead of you fucks who are located in the middle of the largest city in the PNW with a 70K stadium and twice as many living alumni (320K for UW vs. 160K for UO)... our guys are doing some shit right. And that is argument one for why your guy isn't all that.
It really amuses me that so many people think that building the stadium is a great accomplishment. Getting the stadium done is what I would call "minimal competence." Let's see, the UW owns the land, and has for over a century. There was already a stadium there, so zoning wasn't really an issue. It was a matter of knocking heads and getting donors to open up their pocketbooks, and of the 320K UW alums worldwide, 215K live in the state of Washington.
Earth to so-called halfbrains, your AD isn't all that great.
I'm hearing that Peterman wanted the UW job more than the AD wanted Peterman, so there's that as well. But please, let this guy and his cronies continue to run your AD. We probably need another ten years or so to really solidify our position as the premiere sports program in the NW.
Here's my ranking of the list:
1. Byrne
2. Hill
--------------- (fucking dreckfest line) --------------------------
3. Patterson
4. Guerrero
5. Woodward
6. Muir (hasn't had to do much at Stanford yet)
7. Moos
8. Mullens (settling on Helfrich when Oregon could have gotten a great coach sucks)
9. De Carolis
10. Bohn
11. Barbour
12. Haden
Yes, Cal is way too fucking high in this list.
PAC 12 AD superiority guy.
-
When Dan Guerrero is the 4th best AD in the conference, most of the ADs in your conference suck.
-
The fuck?AZDuck said:The Oregon AD or Phil Knight's assistant hired Helfrich and Altman. Those aren't looking like great hires. Jeremy Foley at Florida has a mantle full of championships in football and basketball. He also hired Ron Zook and Will Muschamp. I would love to see the AD with a perfect track record.
The guy at Dook or maybe whoever's in charge at Stanford (Sears Cups holla)... but Helfrich is still an unproven commodity and Altman is looking pretty fucking good. Woody isn't even a top 50% AD. Oregon has gone from being near last in the Pac-12 in revenue to the top in the last few years, and I don't even think our AD is that great.
How we are ahead of you fucks who are located in the middle of the largest city in the PNW with a 70K stadium and twice as many living alumni (320K for UW vs. 160K for UO)... our guys are doing some shit right. And that is argument one for why your guy isn't all that.
It really amuses me that so many people think that building the stadium is a great accomplishment. Getting the stadium done is what I would call "minimal competence." Let's see, the UW owns the land, and has for over a century. There was already a stadium there, so zoning wasn't really an issue. It was a matter of knocking heads and getting donors to open up their pocketbooks, and of the 320K UW alums worldwide, 215K live in the state of Washington.
Earth to so-called halfbrains, your AD isn't all that great.
I'm hearing that Peterman wanted the UW job more than the AD wanted Peterman, so there's that as well. But please, let this guy and his cronies continue to run your AD. We probably need another ten years or so to really solidify our position as the premiere sports program in the NW.
Wow!
I seriously, seriously, EL. OH. ELed. At that fucking statement.
Two words.
Phil Fucking Knight
If you think he doesn't own everything associated with and weighs on every fucking decision made at Oregon ... then you live in a trailer in Springfield.
Nike has a major fucking investment in Oregon. In particular Nike Football. Phil sits in the fucking owners box with a headphones on listening the play calls.
You don't think he didn't approve Slingblade as head coach? I got some ocean front property in Arizona to sell your dumb ass.
Oregon exists because Uncle Phil writes the check ... Washington's most uber donors are poor compared to him.
Hope that answers you above questions ...
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
