In 2015 Pete took a playoff roster that even had a better pass rush and more depth at the position than 2016 and won 7 games, with losses to Cal, Utah, and ASU in addition to a pathetic performance against Oregon where he just sat in prevent and punted the entire game.
16 team names score on 2015 team on basis of Vita and Gaines alone.
2015 offense playoff roster worthy......... if you say so
You realize Gaines played for the 2015 team too right? 15 team had Feeney and Littleton and a better pass rush.
I do, and watched him vs. Oregon as a true freshman not be moved off his spot being double teamed all game.
16 team better at lb, corner, safety, wr, te, and OL
16 team is better everywhere except outside pass rush. That’s pretty close too.
It's not about that. It's that almost all of the players were on that 2015 team and he won 7 games with an easier schedule.
They wouldn't "name their score" against that 2015 defense with a legit pass rush on Browning either.
ha ha your original premise was the 2015 team was better (or more underachieving) b/c they had a better pass outside pass rush. Now it's not about that?????
15 team had easier schedule than 16? 2016 was a one game season at home vs. SC
How many does the 15 offense put up on the 16 defense?
In 2015 Pete took a playoff roster that even had a better pass rush and more depth at the position than 2016 and won 7 games, with losses to Cal, Utah, and ASU in addition to a pathetic performance against Oregon where he just sat in prevent and punted the entire game.
16 team names score on 2015 team on basis of Vita and Gaines alone.
2015 offense playoff roster worthy......... if you say so
You realize Gaines played for the 2015 team too right? 15 team had Feeney and Littleton and a better pass rush.
I do, and watched him vs. Oregon as a true freshman not be moved off his spot being double teamed all game.
16 team better at lb, corner, safety, wr, te, and OL
16 team is better everywhere except outside pass rush. That’s pretty close too.
It's not about that. It's that almost all of the players were on that 2015 team and he won 7 games with an easier schedule.
They wouldn't "name their score" against that 2015 defense with a legit pass rush on Browning either.
ha ha your original premise was the 2015 team was better (or more underachieving) b/c they had a better pass outside pass rush. Now it's not about that?????
15 team had easier schedule than 16? 2016 was a one game season at home vs. SC
How many does the 15 offense put up on the 16 defense?
Your the best ballz
They're the most underachieving team in the last 15 years at least to me, yes. Maybe they didn't have the maturity or whatever as 2016, and Ross sat out that year, but it was the most wasted opportunity.
Schedule? Dude, 2016 had the shit schedule compared to them. Look the bitch up yourself. Pete should have won 10 just off of that.
They had pretty much the same roster as a playoff team minus the wr which was big, but that 2016 team had no depth at DE and 2015 had that as a strength.
So taking away retarded comparisons to an accomplished playoff team, that 2015 team with that roster should have done much, much more that year than 7 wins. Stanford won it, UW played them in Palo Alto without Browning, but still. Look at the roster and their record.
7 wins with that roster. That is an absolute failure.
In 2015 Pete took a playoff roster that even had a better pass rush and more depth at the position than 2016 and won 7 games, with losses to Cal, Utah, and ASU in addition to a pathetic performance against Oregon where he just sat in prevent and punted the entire game.
16 team names score on 2015 team on basis of Vita and Gaines alone.
2015 offense playoff roster worthy......... if you say so
You realize Gaines played for the 2015 team too right? 15 team had Feeney and Littleton and a better pass rush.
I do, and watched him vs. Oregon as a true freshman not be moved off his spot being double teamed all game.
16 team better at lb, corner, safety, wr, te, and OL
16 team is better everywhere except outside pass rush. That’s pretty close too.
It's not about that. It's that almost all of the players were on that 2015 team and he won 7 games with an easier schedule.
They wouldn't "name their score" against that 2015 defense with a legit pass rush on Browning either.
ha ha your original premise was the 2015 team was better (or more underachieving) b/c they had a better pass outside pass rush. Now it's not about that?????
15 team had easier schedule than 16? 2016 was a one game season at home vs. SC
How many does the 15 offense put up on the 16 defense?
Your the best ballz
They're the most underachieving team in the last 15 years at least to me, yes. Maybe they didn't have the maturity or whatever as 2016, and Ross sat out that year, but it was the most wasted opportunity.
Schedule? Dude, 2016 had the shit schedule compared to them. Look the bitch up yourself. Pete should have won 10 just off of that.
They had pretty much the same roster as a playoff team minus the wr which was big, but that 2016 team had no depth at DE and 2015 had that as a strength.
So taking away retarded comparisons to an accomplished playoff team, that 2015 team with that roster should have done much, much more that year than 7 wins. Stanford won it, UW played them in Palo Alto without Browning, but still. Look at the roster and their record.
7 wins with that roster. That is an absolute failure.
"We're so fucking young"
Fuck Petersen
2015 team went through what most teams do in sports and that was learning how to win (usually in losses) so that years like 2016 can happen
Your original quote was
"In 2015 Pete took a playoff roster that even had a better pass rush and more depth at the position than 2016 and won 7 games'
Comments
15 team had easier schedule than 16? 2016 was a one game season at home vs. SC
How many does the 15 offense put up on the 16 defense?
Your the best ballz
Schedule? Dude, 2016 had the shit schedule compared to them. Look the bitch up yourself. Pete should have won 10 just off of that.
They had pretty much the same roster as a playoff team minus the wr which was big, but that 2016 team had no depth at DE and 2015 had that as a strength.
So taking away retarded comparisons to an accomplished playoff team, that 2015 team with that roster should have done much, much more that year than 7 wins. Stanford won it, UW played them in Palo Alto without Browning, but still. Look at the roster and their record.
7 wins with that roster. That is an absolute failure.
"We're so fucking young"
Fuck Petersen
Your original quote was
"In 2015 Pete took a playoff roster that even had a better pass rush and more depth at the position than 2016 and won 7 games'
Disagree.