Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Jake Locker TD run against Arizona

1235

Comments

  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 69,733 Founders Club
    RoadDawg55 said:

    DerekJohnson said:

    RaceBannon said:

    AtomicDawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Locker was the ultimate cock tease

    Didn't FINISH

    He was a great talent but avg qb. Would have looked great for chip Kelly though.
    The oft maligned Rick would have used him like Tui. Which would have been great
    Seriously, we might have been in the running for a Rose Bowl berth in 2010
    No. Mason Foster was the only good player on defense. We got destroyed often.
    How many times did we go three and out that year? A ton. And we finished 3rd in the conference as it was. Running the Tui offense might have netted 1-2 more wins, and thus put UW in the running heading into November. Only Oregon and Stanford had better conference records.

    Now, does this mean I think we would have been a great team with an excellent shot at the RB? No. After all, Sark was our coach and Holt was our DC. I'm just saying the conference was so weak and we would have been better than trying to make Locker into something he wasn't, that we could have made it more interesting.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,805 Swaye's Wigwam
    DerekJohnson said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    DerekJohnson said:

    RaceBannon said:

    AtomicDawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Locker was the ultimate cock tease

    Didn't FINISH

    He was a great talent but avg qb. Would have looked great for chip Kelly though.
    The oft maligned Rick would have used him like Tui. Which would have been great
    Seriously, we might have been in the running for a Rose Bowl berth in 2010
    No. Mason Foster was the only good player on defense. We got destroyed often.
    How many times did we go three and out that year? A ton. And we finished 3rd in the conference as it was. Running the Tui offense might have netted 1-2 more wins, and thus put UW in the running heading into November. Only Oregon and Stanford had better conference records.

    Now, does this mean I think we would have been a great team with an excellent shot at the RB? No. After all, Sark was our coach and Holt was our DC. I'm just saying the conference was so weak and we would have been better than trying to make Locker into something he wasn't, that we could have made it more interesting.
    I also think a better offense would have helped that defense a lot. There wasn't a ton of talent but they were playing with the Sark three and out handicap.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WoolleyDoog
    WoolleyDoog Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 5,737 Founders Club
    edited August 2022
    2010 Oregon and Stanford were super legit to the point I have a hard time seeing a UW team of that era getting past them, but the rest of the conference was legit terrible.

    Those Sark teams probably could have won the conference the past four years or at least been in serious contention. Pete and the program picked a terrible time to unnecessarily tank.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,455 Founders Club
    chuck said:

    DerekJohnson said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    DerekJohnson said:

    RaceBannon said:

    AtomicDawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Locker was the ultimate cock tease

    Didn't FINISH

    He was a great talent but avg qb. Would have looked great for chip Kelly though.
    The oft maligned Rick would have used him like Tui. Which would have been great
    Seriously, we might have been in the running for a Rose Bowl berth in 2010
    No. Mason Foster was the only good player on defense. We got destroyed often.
    How many times did we go three and out that year? A ton. And we finished 3rd in the conference as it was. Running the Tui offense might have netted 1-2 more wins, and thus put UW in the running heading into November. Only Oregon and Stanford had better conference records.

    Now, does this mean I think we would have been a great team with an excellent shot at the RB? No. After all, Sark was our coach and Holt was our DC. I'm just saying the conference was so weak and we would have been better than trying to make Locker into something he wasn't, that we could have made it more interesting.
    I also think a better offense would have helped that defense a lot. There wasn't a ton of talent but they were playing with the Sark three and out handicap.
    Then we got the second half against Oregon three and outs and the settle for a field goal blues under Pete in 18 and 19

    Finding a way to lose
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dtd
    dtd Member Posts: 5,573 Standard Supporter
    DerekJohnson said:

    RaceBannon said:

    AtomicDawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Locker was the ultimate cock tease

    Didn't FINISH

    He was a great talent but avg qb. Would have looked great for chip Kelly though.
    The oft maligned Rick would have used him like Tui. Which would have been great
    Seriously, we might have been in the running for a Rose Bowl berth in 2010

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dtd
    dtd Member Posts: 5,573 Standard Supporter
    RaceBannon said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    DerekJohnson said:

    RaceBannon said:

    AtomicDawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Locker was the ultimate cock tease

    Didn't FINISH

    He was a great talent but avg qb. Would have looked great for chip Kelly though.
    The oft maligned Rick would have used him like Tui. Which would have been great
    Seriously, we might have been in the running for a Rose Bowl berth in 2010
    No. Mason Foster was the only good player on defense. We got destroyed often.
    Petersen was initially loved because he brought defense back to UW

    If only he was as good at offense as his press clippings

    Statue of liberty play at the Fiesta Bowl gif
    I will never understand why he wasn't a grand slam. I thought it was all over for us?.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dtd
    dtd Member Posts: 5,573 Standard Supporter
    edited August 2022
    RaceBannon said:

    chuck said:

    DerekJohnson said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    DerekJohnson said:

    RaceBannon said:

    AtomicDawg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Locker was the ultimate cock tease

    Didn't FINISH

    He was a great talent but avg qb. Would have looked great for chip Kelly though.
    The oft maligned Rick would have used him like Tui. Which would have been great
    Seriously, we might have been in the running for a Rose Bowl berth in 2010
    No. Mason Foster was the only good player on defense. We got destroyed often.
    How many times did we go three and out that year? A ton. And we finished 3rd in the conference as it was. Running the Tui offense might have netted 1-2 more wins, and thus put UW in the running heading into November. Only Oregon and Stanford had better conference records.

    Now, does this mean I think we would have been a great team with an excellent shot at the RB? No. After all, Sark was our coach and Holt was our DC. I'm just saying the conference was so weak and we would have been better than trying to make Locker into something he wasn't, that we could have made it more interesting.
    I also think a better offense would have helped that defense a lot. There wasn't a ton of talent but they were playing with the Sark three and out handicap.
    Then we got the second half against Oregon three and outs and the settle for a field goal blues under Pete in 18 and 19

    Finding a way to lose
    I can't believe crystalballz beet Peet twice.

    Ohhh, Peyton Henry, now I remember. Fuck kickers.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter