Crazy thing is I feel like Locker lost a gear after 2007. 2007 he felt like one of the fastest QBs I've ever seen.
He got bigger, thicker after 2007. He still had great straight line speed but his first step wasn’t sudden. He Would often get tripped up two or three steps into his scrambles.
I wonder what he would have done on those Browning led teams. Browning was a pain in the ass but he was a winner. But Lockner had the multiple threat that makes it like you have twelve players on offense
Crazy thing is I feel like Locker lost a gear after 2007. 2007 he felt like one of the fastest QBs I've ever seen.
He got bigger, thicker after 2007. He still had great straight line speed but his first step wasn’t sudden. He Would often get tripped up two or three steps into his scrambles.
Disagree. He was the most thicc in 2007. Sark leaned him out to turn him into a “pro” QB.
Dumb bastard would’ve been spectacular playing for Urban.
I wonder what he would have done on those Browning led teams. Browning was a pain in the ass but he was a winner. But Lockner had the multiple threat that makes it like you have twelve players on offense
Was there ever a game where you went "Without Browning we lose that game".?
I wonder what he would have done on those Browning led teams. Browning was a pain in the ass but he was a winner. But Lockner had the multiple threat that makes it like you have twelve players on offense
Was there ever a game where you went "Without Browning we lose that game".?
I wonder what he would have done on those Browning led teams. Browning was a pain in the ass but he was a winner. But Lockner had the multiple threat that makes it like you have twelve players on offense
Was there ever a game where you went "Without Browning we lose that game".?
Can’t say there is one game where I said that
Closest I can think of was Utah 2017, but that was more "Without Whittingham we lose that game"
Comments
Dumb bastard would’ve been spectacular playing for Urban.
https://youtu.be/4QeIe0fUqhM?t=256
Didn't FINISH