Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

FBI Agents Raid Mar-a-Lago

1111214161738

Comments

  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,903 Standard Supporter
    Not even a real judge.

    https://instapundit.com/

    MAR-A-LAGO SEARCH WARRANT WAS APPARENTLY ISSUED BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE. I mean no disrespect to federal magistrate judges – who are not Article III judges and are appointed to 8-year terms – but were I the FBI, I probably would have made the effort to try to get a full-on federal judge with a life term to sign off on a unprecedented search warrant for the former (and maybe future?) President’s house. The point of such life terms is to insulate such judges from political influence, and getting a warrant from someone not so insulated, on something as hot as this, is not a great look.

    (I am ignoring the angle here that he had also represented employees of Jeffrey Epstein – it’s usually not fair to smear lawyers with their clients – but that’s not the best optics you could hope for either.)
  • RoadTrip
    RoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,240 Founders Club
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    What a ridiculous act of desperation.

    I see the results of the search are irrelevant to some. There's nothing they could find that would convince you to abandon Orange Mussolini.
    You stupid fucks are the least self aware humans on earth

    The silver lining is that they are going to be put up against a wall at some point.

    Useful idiots.
    The funny thing is that if the MAGA GOP wins this November, the useful idiots would likely be spared that fate but would never have a clue
    Thomas Massie as speaker of the house would blow up the world. There would actually be some process around things, which is exactly what both sides do not want.
    But TRUMP appointed the fbi director who is a republican


    Yep. That's the point
    That's actually a valid criticism and one of Trump's biggest flaws. He was fucking awful with way too many of his appointments.
    And yet far better than Obama or Biden's picks.

    Horrible is as horrible does.
    Name one of Obama or Biden's picks that actively worked to undermine their presidencies?
    They undermined the Country. Fuck their "presidencies."
    They did exactly what their were selected to do. Can you say the same for all of Trump's nominees? You're playing a losing hand if you're trying to defend Trump's staffing decisions.
    A shitty AG is a shitty AG is a shitty AG. IDGAF how loyal they are to a corrupt fucking tyrant.

    Talk about a losing hand.

    Has it occurred to you that Washington DC is a swamp is full of unethical turncoats who's primary loyalty is to whomever is signing their paychecks?

    JFC. You actually believe "staffing decisions" would've made a difference against the fake news media onslaught and criminal conduct committed against Trump, en masse. Wow. Good luck with that.
    I think Trump had numerous shitty staffing picks. I'll leave the defense of Jeff Sessions, Manafort, Omarosa, Sacaramucci, Wray, Rosenstein et al., up to you.

    Why didn't Obama have the same problem with these "turncoats?"

    The evidence is so damning.
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,515 Founders Club
    Sledog said:

    "Elias pointed to the passage of U.S. Code Title 18, Section 2071 that states, "Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States."

    They are trying to keep him out of the presidential election plain and simple.

    This is the government our founders warned us about.

    This was disproven. Breaking Points covered it this morning.

    SCOTUS ruled only the constitution, not statute, can determine who is qualified to run for POTUS.

    Theoretically you could run while sitting in a jail cell.

  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    RoadTrip said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    What a ridiculous act of desperation.

    I see the results of the search are irrelevant to some. There's nothing they could find that would convince you to abandon Orange Mussolini.
    You stupid fucks are the least self aware humans on earth

    The silver lining is that they are going to be put up against a wall at some point.

    Useful idiots.
    The funny thing is that if the MAGA GOP wins this November, the useful idiots would likely be spared that fate but would never have a clue
    Thomas Massie as speaker of the house would blow up the world. There would actually be some process around things, which is exactly what both sides do not want.
    But TRUMP appointed the fbi director who is a republican


    Yep. That's the point
    That's actually a valid criticism and one of Trump's biggest flaws. He was fucking awful with way too many of his appointments.
    And yet far better than Obama or Biden's picks.

    Horrible is as horrible does.
    Name one of Obama or Biden's picks that actively worked to undermine their presidencies?
    They undermined the Country. Fuck their "presidencies."
    They did exactly what their were selected to do. Can you say the same for all of Trump's nominees? You're playing a losing hand if you're trying to defend Trump's staffing decisions.
    A shitty AG is a shitty AG is a shitty AG. IDGAF how loyal they are to a corrupt fucking tyrant.

    Talk about a losing hand.

    Has it occurred to you that Washington DC is a swamp is full of unethical turncoats who's primary loyalty is to whomever is signing their paychecks?

    JFC. You actually believe "staffing decisions" would've made a difference against the fake news media onslaught and criminal conduct committed against Trump, en masse. Wow. Good luck with that.
    I think Trump had numerous shitty staffing picks. I'll leave the defense of Jeff Sessions, Manafort, Omarosa, Sacaramucci, Wray, Rosenstein et al., up to you.

    Why didn't Obama have the same problem with these "turncoats?"

    The evidence is so damning.
    People look ridiculous when they try and defend everything Trump did.
  • georgiaduck
    georgiaduck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,741 Swaye's Wigwam
    We certainly didn't help anything. Too many conservatives just stayed home- That's on Trump for saying it was a lost election.

    Kemp is going to beat Abrams which will triple her net worth. Only hope is for Walker to get Kemp voters to put the x in his box as a ride along vote. Lots of recent "news" coming out about HW- of course Warnock has his warts but those are easily ignored.

  • georgiaduck
    georgiaduck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,741 Swaye's Wigwam
    At the end of the day- Republicans need to to start playing nasty like the dems. After winning the election Trump said he wouldn't go after Hillary. Bad idea- never again. Put her on trial and let her face cross exam like she should have.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,574 Standard Supporter
    pawz said:

    Sledog said:

    "Elias pointed to the passage of U.S. Code Title 18, Section 2071 that states, "Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States."

    They are trying to keep him out of the presidential election plain and simple.

    This is the government our founders warned us about.

    This was disproven. Breaking Points covered it this morning.

    SCOTUS ruled only the constitution, not statute, can determine who is qualified to run for POTUS.

    Theoretically you could run while sitting in a jail cell.

    Dims don't know that we have a constitution.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,479 Founders Club

    We certainly didn't help anything. Too many conservatives just stayed home- That's on Trump for saying it was a lost election.

    Kemp is going to beat Abrams which will triple her net worth. Only hope is for Walker to get Kemp voters to put the x in his box as a ride along vote. Lots of recent "news" coming out about HW- of course Warnock has his warts but those are easily ignored.

    People didn't have to listen to Trump and the establishment candidates didn't have to run away from him

    Emotions were high after the phantom water pipe steal. Conservatives had no reason to support people who ran away from it anymore than they'd vote for Liz Cheney

    I predicted the double loss after the election steal

  • MelloDawg
    MelloDawg Member Posts: 6,917
    edited August 2022

    At the end of the day- Republicans need to to start playing nasty like the dems. After winning the election Trump said he wouldn't go after Hillary. Bad idea- never again. Put her on trial and let her face cross exam like she should have.

    You’re right, Trump should make “but Hillary…” a 2024 campaign platform.