Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

UO/UW Glory (3) years

2

Comments

  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967

    Well, if we're even being troll reasonable, there's no writing off what they did to Florida State, and they had the players to do it.

    I can't remember every play of every game from a long time ago, but I think Breeze had like two forced fumbles, and the key one in the 4th quarter was helmet on ball forced. Hard to dispute that one.

    Smug FSU fans were comparing the teams based on how they looked in street clothes. They’re so “tiny.”

    That was a beat down any way you slice it.
  • thechatch
    thechatch Member Posts: 7,215 Standard Supporter
    You guys better go get our resident VERY BIG BOY another beer before he comes stomping his little feet in here, letting everyone know how much money he makes down in fucking Battle Ground or Vancouver or wherever the fuck….
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    thechatch said:

    You guys better go get our resident VERY BIG BOY another beer before he comes stomping his little feet in here, letting everyone know how much money he makes down in fucking Battle Ground or Vancouver or wherever the fuck….

    “I’m a MAN!”
  • ntxduck
    ntxduck Member Posts: 6,121

    Well, if we're even being troll reasonable, there's no writing off what they did to Florida State, and they had the players to do it.

    I can't remember every play of every game from a long time ago, but I think Breeze had like two forced fumbles, and the key one in the 4th quarter was helmet on ball forced. Hard to dispute that one.

    Would like to hear his definition of “unforced turnover”. Aside from the Jameis fumble when the game was already decided, I can’t remember an “unforced” turnover Florida state had?
  • thechatch
    thechatch Member Posts: 7,215 Standard Supporter
    ntxduck said:

    Well, if we're even being troll reasonable, there's no writing off what they did to Florida State, and they had the players to do it.

    I can't remember every play of every game from a long time ago, but I think Breeze had like two forced fumbles, and the key one in the 4th quarter was helmet on ball forced. Hard to dispute that one.

    Would like to hear his definition of “unforced turnover”. Aside from the Jameis fumble when the game was already decided, I can’t remember an “unforced” turnover Florida state had?
    Even Jameis’ fumble was caused by pressure….

    I mean it’s not like there were muffed punts or fumbled exchanges.

    Winners win and losers talk about how different it would have been if only we hadn’t turned it over 5x

    I mean talk about dooging…..
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,035
    edited July 2022
    ntxduck said:

    Well, if we're even being troll reasonable, there's no writing off what they did to Florida State, and they had the players to do it.

    I can't remember every play of every game from a long time ago, but I think Breeze had like two forced fumbles, and the key one in the 4th quarter was helmet on ball forced. Hard to dispute that one.

    Would like to hear his definition of “unforced turnover”. Aside from the Jameis fumble when the game was already decided, I can’t remember an “unforced” turnover Florida state had?
    I just did a "highlight" video search. I'm not spending any more time on this, but but the first half Wisky pick was a pass he threw under pressure, and the first fumble was Dye stripping it from Taylor.

    Really the only self-inflicted TO was the muffed punt, and you can argue there that he looked up at the pressure that had come through the LOS. But that one was mostly the punter choking.

    Both teams made their share of mistakes, including both QBs. The main thing that people don't talk enough about in that game that was critical, which I thought would be a huge problem for the Ducks, was keeping Taylor relatively in check. Keeping that kid, who is a fucking stud pro, under a hundy, and the entire Wisky running game to under 150, was pretty huge. That's why Oregon won.
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    If Tyrone Wheatley had not run over the bull-dawgs 1992 RB team, 235 yards, they'd be RB champs.
  • Goduckies
    Goduckies Member Posts: 7,965 Standard Supporter
    thechatch said:

    haie said:

    thechatch said:

    Imagine jerking it to a team that got blown out in their only postseason game, because it’s the closest thing to success you’ve experienced in 2 decades.

    Couldn’t be me, but you keep on doogin, wee-man👍

    Look, 2016 was a good team. They had a great defense and a couple of playmakers on offense.

    But you gotta win in January for it to be worth a shit. I don’t see any Rose Bowls or Playoff wins, so just pipe down.

    What you have is an 8-1 record and a conference title in a down year for the PAC and a blowout loss on the big stage. It was a good season overall, but let’s not pretend it was something it wasn’t.

    Nearly every year in every conference, a team has a season like 2016 UW. It wasn’t special, no matter how much it feels like it was to you.

    Imagine jerking off to your 2014 team.

    In the last ~8 years, Oregon's best teams needed their opponents to give up unforced turnovers. A lot of them.

    2014 Semi final. 2019 CCG and 2020 Rosebowl. 2020 CCG.

    You have been insanely lucky and still don't have much to show for it.
    Oregon won the 2014 semifinal against the defending champs by 40.

    I know this because I was at the game. Just like the 2012 RB and the 2020 RB.

    How many UW Rose Bowl wins have you seen in person?
    That game was awesome! The fans singing the FSU war chant back to them we felt on top of the world... then they popped Carrington for pot DOH.
  • Goduckies
    Goduckies Member Posts: 7,965 Standard Supporter
    edited July 2022
    haie said:

    thechatch said:

    haie said:

    thechatch said:

    Imagine jerking it to a team that got blown out in their only postseason game, because it’s the closest thing to success you’ve experienced in 2 decades.

    Couldn’t be me, but you keep on doogin, wee-man👍

    Look, 2016 was a good team. They had a great defense and a couple of playmakers on offense.

    But you gotta win in January for it to be worth a shit. I don’t see any Rose Bowls or Playoff wins, so just pipe down.

    What you have is an 8-1 record and a conference title in a down year for the PAC and a blowout loss on the big stage. It was a good season overall, but let’s not pretend it was something it wasn’t.

    Nearly every year in every conference, a team has a season like 2016 UW. It wasn’t special, no matter how much it feels like it was to you.

    Imagine jerking off to your 2014 team.

    In the last ~8 years, Oregon's best teams needed their opponents to give up unforced turnovers. A lot of them.

    2014 Semi final. 2019 CCG and 2020 Rosebowl. 2020 CCG.

    You have been insanely lucky and still don't have much to show for it.
    Oregon won the 2014 semifinal against the defending champs by 40.

    I know this because I was at the game. Just like the 2012 RB and the 2020 RB.

    How many UW Rose Bowl wins have you seen in person?
    When Oregon didn't get unforced 5 turnovers they turned back into Oregon State with a Mega Booster in the champ game.
    That game was without Carrington and he had 180 yards in the Rose Bowl... there were two or 3 key plays in the title game that had he been there would have been different. Even with him gone, game was close until the 4th. Then we got ran over. If Carrington was there I believe we win.
  • WoolleyDoog
    WoolleyDoog Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 5,082 Founders Club
    edited July 2022
    46XiJCAB said:

    Just a comparison because any talk of Oregon-Washington football always comes back to the 1/2 natty awarded by the coaches poll and those early 90's UW teams.

    UW 1990-92: 31-5 overall. 21-3 Pac-8. 2-1 Bowls. Coaches poll champs 1991. Final ranking CP 90-92: 5, 1, 10.
    UO 2010-12: 36-4 overall. 25-2 Pac-10/12. 2-1 Bowls. Nat. Championship 3pt. loss. Final ranking CP 10-12: 3, 4, 2.


    Winners win dude. You had your chances. You got an Auburn team that was a mental case Cam, Nick Fairley and a bunch of ass run over twice. Should have blown that team out of the water or won like 56-35.

    2012 was kinda scary but lost to the only good team they played, at home, with freshman Kevin Hogan at QB.

    Fair point that 92 Dawgs fell apart. Will always be curious what happens if Hobes doesn't get busted for Ruby Ridge loan.
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967

    46XiJCAB said:

    Just a comparison because any talk of Oregon-Washington football always comes back to the 1/2 natty awarded by the coaches poll and those early 90's UW teams.

    UW 1990-92: 31-5 overall. 21-3 Pac-8. 2-1 Bowls. Coaches poll champs 1991. Final ranking CP 90-92: 5, 1, 10.
    UO 2010-12: 36-4 overall. 25-2 Pac-10/12. 2-1 Bowls. Nat. Championship 3pt. loss. Final ranking CP 10-12: 3, 4, 2.


    Winners win dude. You had your chances. You got an Auburn team that was a mental case Cam, Nick Fairley and a bunch of ass run over twice. Should have blown that team out of the water or won like 56-35.

    2012 was kinda scary but lost to the only good team they played, at home, with freshman Kevin Hogan at QB.

    Fair point that 92 Dawgs fell apart. Will always be curious what happens if Hobes doesn't get busted for Ruby Ridge loan.
    That win over the U in 1991 was epic.

    Oh wait.
  • trublue
    trublue Member Posts: 3,042
    Washington beat Miami, 34-29, in 2000 at Husky Stadiim.

    In 2001, Washington paid a visit to the Orange Bowl. Miami rolled ‘em, 65-7.

    Fuck off, Fetters.
  • trublue
    trublue Member Posts: 3,042
    edited July 2022

    46XiJCAB said:

    Just a comparison because any talk of Oregon-Washington football always comes back to the 1/2 natty awarded by the coaches poll and those early 90's UW teams.

    UW 1990-92: 31-5 overall. 21-3 Pac-8. 2-1 Bowls. Coaches poll champs 1991. Final ranking CP 90-92: 5, 1, 10.
    UO 2010-12: 36-4 overall. 25-2 Pac-10/12. 2-1 Bowls. Nat. Championship 3pt. loss. Final ranking CP 10-12: 3, 4, 2.


    Winners win dude. You had your chances. You got an Auburn team that was a mental case Cam, Nick Fairley and a bunch of ass run over twice. Should have blown that team out of the water or won like 56-35.

    2012 was kinda scary but lost to the only good team they played, at home, with freshman Kevin Hogan at QB.

    Fair point that 92 Dawgs fell apart. Will always be curious what happens if Hobes doesn't get busted for Ruby Ridge loan.
    The Auburn team was a “mental case”?

    8-0 in SEC; 12-0 season.

    Beat the crap out of South Carolina in SEC Championship game, 56-17.

    JC transfers Nick Fairly and Cam Newton were dominating all season.

    OC Gus Malzahn ran the show. After he left to be HC at Arkansas State, Chizek’s days were numbered.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Auburn_Tigers_football_team

  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,325 Founders Club
    46XiJCAB said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    Just a comparison because any talk of Oregon-Washington football always comes back to the 1/2 natty awarded by the coaches poll and those early 90's UW teams.

    UW 1990-92: 31-5 overall. 21-3 Pac-8. 2-1 Bowls. Coaches poll champs 1991. Final ranking CP 90-92: 5, 1, 10.
    UO 2010-12: 36-4 overall. 25-2 Pac-10/12. 2-1 Bowls. Nat. Championship 3pt. loss. Final ranking CP 10-12: 3, 4, 2.


    Winners win dude. You had your chances. You got an Auburn team that was a mental case Cam, Nick Fairley and a bunch of ass run over twice. Should have blown that team out of the water or won like 56-35.

    2012 was kinda scary but lost to the only good team they played, at home, with freshman Kevin Hogan at QB.

    Fair point that 92 Dawgs fell apart. Will always be curious what happens if Hobes doesn't get busted for Ruby Ridge loan.
    That win over the U in 1991 was epic.

    Oh wait.
    https://vault.si.com/vault/1992/01/13/the-dream-game-would-you-believe-it-washington-beat-miami-in-the-battle-of-two-no-1s
  • thechatch
    thechatch Member Posts: 7,215 Standard Supporter
    Winners win.

    Oregon did a good job against Newton but Fairley was dominant in that NCG.

    And while I think there were a handful of plays that were really important for tOSU in the late 3rd Q of the 2014 NCG, I don’t think Carrington was going to be the difference there. We dropped some important balls and couldn’t stop Elliott when it mattered.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,792 Founders Club
    Bama couldn't stop Elliott

    A truly great back
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,035
    thechatch said:

    Winners win.

    Oregon did a good job against Newton but Fairley was dominant in that NCG.

    And while I think there were a handful of plays that were really important for tOSU in the late 3rd Q of the 2014 NCG, I don’t think Carrington was going to be the difference there. We dropped some important balls and couldn’t stop Elliott when it mattered.

    That is a good review of the Buck game. Oregon came out solid and missed some critical opportunities to go up by two scores. But that Buck running game was super big boy and would have eventually taken over the game anyway. Had Oregon had a comparable running game, then with Mariota I think you have a real game, but my aunts still no balls.

    Auburn, a game a barely remember, was different. Newton was other level at QB. A lot of great players are mental cases.
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,035

    46XiJCAB said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    Just a comparison because any talk of Oregon-Washington football always comes back to the 1/2 natty awarded by the coaches poll and those early 90's UW teams.

    UW 1990-92: 31-5 overall. 21-3 Pac-8. 2-1 Bowls. Coaches poll champs 1991. Final ranking CP 90-92: 5, 1, 10.
    UO 2010-12: 36-4 overall. 25-2 Pac-10/12. 2-1 Bowls. Nat. Championship 3pt. loss. Final ranking CP 10-12: 3, 4, 2.


    Winners win dude. You had your chances. You got an Auburn team that was a mental case Cam, Nick Fairley and a bunch of ass run over twice. Should have blown that team out of the water or won like 56-35.

    2012 was kinda scary but lost to the only good team they played, at home, with freshman Kevin Hogan at QB.

    Fair point that 92 Dawgs fell apart. Will always be curious what happens if Hobes doesn't get busted for Ruby Ridge loan.
    That win over the U in 1991 was epic.

    Oh wait.
    https://vault.si.com/vault/1992/01/13/the-dream-game-would-you-believe-it-washington-beat-miami-in-the-battle-of-two-no-1s

  • trublue
    trublue Member Posts: 3,042
    edited July 2022

    46XiJCAB said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    Just a comparison because any talk of Oregon-Washington football always comes back to the 1/2 natty awarded by the coaches poll and those early 90's UW teams.

    UW 1990-92: 31-5 overall. 21-3 Pac-8. 2-1 Bowls. Coaches poll champs 1991. Final ranking CP 90-92: 5, 1, 10.
    UO 2010-12: 36-4 overall. 25-2 Pac-10/12. 2-1 Bowls. Nat. Championship 3pt. loss. Final ranking CP 10-12: 3, 4, 2.


    Winners win dude. You had your chances. You got an Auburn team that was a mental case Cam, Nick Fairley and a bunch of ass run over twice. Should have blown that team out of the water or won like 56-35.

    2012 was kinda scary but lost to the only good team they played, at home, with freshman Kevin Hogan at QB.

    Fair point that 92 Dawgs fell apart. Will always be curious what happens if Hobes doesn't get busted for Ruby Ridge loan.
    That win over the U in 1991 was epic.

    Oh wait.
    https://vault.si.com/vault/1992/01/13/the-dream-game-would-you-believe-it-washington-beat-miami-in-the-battle-of-two-no-1s
    Steve Emtman never took anabolic steroids. He said so. He went from being a nothing special recruit to being the No. 1 pick in the NFL draft.

    Becoming a “workout warrior” in the weightroom during his redshirt freshman at UW added 20-30 pounds of muscle to his body.

    Roid rage much?

    Was he ever tested?

    No.

    What was up with volunteer physicians that lurked around the athletic department from the mid-80’s through the 90’s?


  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    Dump for dumbfuck Haie.

  • BleachedAnusDawg
    BleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 13,184 Standard Supporter
    It's hilarious to see how many Quooks still spaz out, 31 years later, over the fact that UW has natty and they don't. "But we almost beat Auburn!" Congrats on your 3-year run of "almost!"
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967

    It's hilarious to see how many Quooks still spaz out, 31 years later, over the fact that UW has natty and they don't. "But we almost beat Auburn!" Congrats on your 3-year run of "almost!"

    1/2 Natty.

    Oregon lost their chance on the field, twice. Not at the ballot box.

    UW run was really 2 1/2 years. The 92' team shit the bed by years end.
  • whatshouldicareabout
    whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 12,990
    46XiJCAB said:

    It's hilarious to see how many Quooks still spaz out, 31 years later, over the fact that UW has natty and they don't. "But we almost beat Auburn!" Congrats on your 3-year run of "almost!"

    1/2 Natty.

    Oregon lost their chance on the field, twice. Not at the ballot box.

    UW run was really 2 1/2 years. The 92' team shit the bed by years end.
    We have 2 national championship trophies.

    That's 2 more than you'll ever have.
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,696 Founders Club
    46XiJCAB said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    Just a comparison because any talk of Oregon-Washington football always comes back to the 1/2 natty awarded by the coaches poll and those early 90's UW teams.

    UW 1990-92: 31-5 overall. 21-3 Pac-8. 2-1 Bowls. Coaches poll champs 1991. Final ranking CP 90-92: 5, 1, 10.
    UO 2010-12: 36-4 overall. 25-2 Pac-10/12. 2-1 Bowls. Nat. Championship 3pt. loss. Final ranking CP 10-12: 3, 4, 2.


    Winners win dude. You had your chances. You got an Auburn team that was a mental case Cam, Nick Fairley and a bunch of ass run over twice. Should have blown that team out of the water or won like 56-35.

    2012 was kinda scary but lost to the only good team they played, at home, with freshman Kevin Hogan at QB.

    Fair point that 92 Dawgs fell apart. Will always be curious what happens if Hobes doesn't get busted for Ruby Ridge loan.
    That win over the U in 1991 was epic.

    Oh wait.
    Still waiting on Oregon's undefeated season.
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967

    46XiJCAB said:

    It's hilarious to see how many Quooks still spaz out, 31 years later, over the fact that UW has natty and they don't. "But we almost beat Auburn!" Congrats on your 3-year run of "almost!"

    1/2 Natty.

    Oregon lost their chance on the field, twice. Not at the ballot box.

    UW run was really 2 1/2 years. The 92' team shit the bed by years end.
    We have 2 national championship trophies.

    That's 2 more than you'll ever have.
    1 1/2. To be correct.
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    Just a comparison because any talk of Oregon-Washington football always comes back to the 1/2 natty awarded by the coaches poll and those early 90's UW teams.

    UW 1990-92: 31-5 overall. 21-3 Pac-8. 2-1 Bowls. Coaches poll champs 1991. Final ranking CP 90-92: 5, 1, 10.
    UO 2010-12: 36-4 overall. 25-2 Pac-10/12. 2-1 Bowls. Nat. Championship 3pt. loss. Final ranking CP 10-12: 3, 4, 2.


    Winners win dude. You had your chances. You got an Auburn team that was a mental case Cam, Nick Fairley and a bunch of ass run over twice. Should have blown that team out of the water or won like 56-35.

    2012 was kinda scary but lost to the only good team they played, at home, with freshman Kevin Hogan at QB.

    Fair point that 92 Dawgs fell apart. Will always be curious what happens if Hobes doesn't get busted for Ruby Ridge loan.
    That win over the U in 1991 was epic.

    Oh wait.
    Still waiting on Oregon's undefeated season.
    Well they've not had an 0-12 either.

    So that's double win for UW.

    GD you're dumb.
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,696 Founders Club
    edited August 2022
    46XiJCAB said:

    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    Just a comparison because any talk of Oregon-Washington football always comes back to the 1/2 natty awarded by the coaches poll and those early 90's UW teams.

    UW 1990-92: 31-5 overall. 21-3 Pac-8. 2-1 Bowls. Coaches poll champs 1991. Final ranking CP 90-92: 5, 1, 10.
    UO 2010-12: 36-4 overall. 25-2 Pac-10/12. 2-1 Bowls. Nat. Championship 3pt. loss. Final ranking CP 10-12: 3, 4, 2.


    Winners win dude. You had your chances. You got an Auburn team that was a mental case Cam, Nick Fairley and a bunch of ass run over twice. Should have blown that team out of the water or won like 56-35.

    2012 was kinda scary but lost to the only good team they played, at home, with freshman Kevin Hogan at QB.

    Fair point that 92 Dawgs fell apart. Will always be curious what happens if Hobes doesn't get busted for Ruby Ridge loan.
    That win over the U in 1991 was epic.

    Oh wait.
    Still waiting on Oregon's undefeated season.
    Well they've not had an 0-12 either.

    So that's double win for UW.

    GD you're dumb.
    A flag whiter than the robes southern Oregonians love to wear. :D
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    Just a comparison because any talk of Oregon-Washington football always comes back to the 1/2 natty awarded by the coaches poll and those early 90's UW teams.

    UW 1990-92: 31-5 overall. 21-3 Pac-8. 2-1 Bowls. Coaches poll champs 1991. Final ranking CP 90-92: 5, 1, 10.
    UO 2010-12: 36-4 overall. 25-2 Pac-10/12. 2-1 Bowls. Nat. Championship 3pt. loss. Final ranking CP 10-12: 3, 4, 2.


    Winners win dude. You had your chances. You got an Auburn team that was a mental case Cam, Nick Fairley and a bunch of ass run over twice. Should have blown that team out of the water or won like 56-35.

    2012 was kinda scary but lost to the only good team they played, at home, with freshman Kevin Hogan at QB.

    Fair point that 92 Dawgs fell apart. Will always be curious what happens if Hobes doesn't get busted for Ruby Ridge loan.
    That win over the U in 1991 was epic.

    Oh wait.
    Still waiting on Oregon's undefeated season.
    Well they've not had an 0-12 either.

    So that's double win for UW.

    GD you're dumb.
    A flag whiter than the robes southern Oregonians love to wear. :D
    Right.

    Did you enjoy that rake to the face Moron?

    So you grew up in So. Oregon.

  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,696 Founders Club
    edited August 2022
    LOL.

    Coworker who went to Sheldon with Herbert and doesn't give a shit about sports, "When Washington comes here, it's a bigger deal than any other team or game I can remember, and I've lived here my whole life. I wouldn't recommend coming to the game this year or if you do don't come with the purple plates.

    It's not really a big deal when Oregon State comes here."

    Science is settled.
  • trublue
    trublue Member Posts: 3,042
    edited August 2022

    It's hilarious to see how many Quooks still spaz out, 31 years later, over the fact that UW has natty and they don't. "But we almost beat Auburn!" Congrats on your 3-year run of "almost!"

    Sorry, Anus, ‘No Natty’ is the Malamutes go to phrase as the Malamutes slither gradually down towards obscurity.

    Remember when it used to be, ‘Win a Rose Bowl, then pop off’?

    Personally, I’m just happy beating the crap out of Warshington in the current day and age.

    My two favorite teams are Oregon and whoever is playing Warshington.