Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

UCLA

24567

Comments

  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    this site is seething with Mora hate
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HeretoBeatmyChest
    HeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    Lets look at the metrics from last year.

    UCLA was 8 in SRS and 8 in Sagarin.
    UW was 13 in SRS and 11 in Sagarin.

    I agree that UW probably beats UCLA at home. On a neutral field UCLA is probably a 5-6 point favorite.

    I also agree that we shouldn't be marking UCLA as a likely loss. I think UCLA and Stanford are 50-50 games and that Arizona and WSU also are potentially 50-50 games. These games are very hard to call. I could see us losing to any of those teams but I also think we could be favored in each game.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    RoadDawg, I was feeling the same way. I know they return the most starters of any team in conference but holy fuck they've lost a ton of talent.

    They are still my runaway pick to win the South though.

    UCLA returns the same number of starters as USC buttfuck. "Runaway" favorite just shows how ignant u is. Stick to gardening u pansy, leave the football discussion to those in-the-know.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    RoadDawg, I was feeling the same way. I know they return the most starters of any team in conference but holy fuck they've lost a ton of talent.

    They are still my runaway pick to win the South though.

    UCLA returns the same number of starters as USC buttfuck. "Runaway" favorite just shows how ignant u is. Stick to gardening u pansy, leave the football discussion to those in-the-know.
    http://espn.go.com/blog/pac12/post/_/id/68273/pac-12-returning-starters-2

    UCLA: 9* offense, 7 defense, 2 specialists
    Big names: QB Brett Hundley, C Jake Brendel, LB/RB Myles Jack, LB Eric Kendricks, DL Ellis McCarthy, S Randall Goforth, CB Ishmael Adams
    USC: 7* offense, 8 defense, 2 specialists
    Big names: WR Nelson Agholor, RB Javorius Allen, DT Leonard Williams, LB Hayes Pullard, CB Josh Shaw, S Su'a Cravens

    Doogs hate facts so not surprised you are wrong on this.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 69,765 Founders Club
    I have a hunch Stanford will fall back to earth this season.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    DerekJohnson said:

    I have a hunch Stanford will fall back to earth this season.

    I know we've been saying that for a few years now but I believe it this year.

    Stanford: 5* offense, 7 defense, 2 specialists Only returning 5 offensive starters hurts plus they play at UW, at UCLA, at ASU, and at Oregon not to mention at Notre Dame as well. That's just brutal.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 26,125 Standard Supporter
    HeretoBeatmyChest said:

    Lets look at the metrics from last year.

    UCLA was 8 in SRS and 8 in Sagarin.
    UW was 13 in SRS and 11 in Sagarin.

    I agree that UW probably beats UCLA at home. On a neutral field UCLA is probably a 5-6 point favorite.

    I also agree that we shouldn't be marking UCLA as a likely loss. I think UCLA and Stanford are 50-50 games and that Arizona and WSU also are potentially 50-50 games. These games are very hard to call. I could see us losing to any of those teams but I also think we could be favored in each game.

    AZ will be tough. UW's been mutilated in Tucson since '08 (plus there's altitude and heat!!!!). With an adult in charge, chances are better though.

    WSU seems like a should win, but who knows (insert throw out the records because it's a rivalry game line). I can't look up returning starters because it's May 10th......it seems weird...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • pat_hm
    pat_hm Member Posts: 941
    #BruinRevolution
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    RoadDawg, I was feeling the same way. I know they return the most starters of any team in conference but holy fuck they've lost a ton of talent.

    They are still my runaway pick to win the South though.

    UCLA returns the same number of starters as USC buttfuck. "Runaway" favorite just shows how ignant u is. Stick to gardening u pansy, leave the football discussion to those in-the-know.
    http://espn.go.com/blog/pac12/post/_/id/68273/pac-12-returning-starters-2

    UCLA: 9* offense, 7 defense, 2 specialists
    Big names: QB Brett Hundley, C Jake Brendel, LB/RB Myles Jack, LB Eric Kendricks, DL Ellis McCarthy, S Randall Goforth, CB Ishmael Adams
    USC: 7* offense, 8 defense, 2 specialists
    Big names: WR Nelson Agholor, RB Javorius Allen, DT Leonard Williams, LB Hayes Pullard, CB Josh Shaw, S Su'a Cravens

    Doogs hate facts so not surprised you are wrong on this.
    LISTEN creampuff, UCLA a n d usc both return 16 starters by every major publication (and don't count kickers, they DONT COUNT U stupid fuck). USC actually returns 17 according to the only expert that matters...sugarlove

    so, like EVERY STINKING CUNT ROTTEN time before, you're wrong bitch. How the hell do you get through life.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    And for fuck sake, quit making shit up to sound football smart and trying to fit in. Talk about Micheal Sam, at least you'll have a little expertise in that football arena!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter