Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

Slow news day, ladies?

135678

Comments

  • Options
    PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 41,845
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes

    Bob_C said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    Jake Tapper is asking questions of Rep. Raskin, the guy who tried to stop the certification of electors in 2016, about Trump's "attack" on secret service agents. Clearly he has no dog in the hunt. These corrupt media DIM operatives don't even hide it anymore.
    Didn't Raskin doctor some tweets at the rushed impeachment trial?
    Schiff said he had personal knowledge of Trump's Russian collusion. Then he didn't.
    Heard it from a friend who
    Heard it from a friend who
    Heard it from another....

  • Options
    HoustonHuskyHoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,954
    First Anniversary First Comment Photogenic 5 Awesomes
    And yet another hoax our resident speed-limit IQ @heilhusky fell for hook, line, and sinker because…well…Orange Man Bad.

    And because he’s a sh!tty lawyer.

  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,341
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam

    And yet another hoax our resident speed-limit IQ @heilhusky fell for hook, line, and sinker because…well…Orange Man Bad.

    And because he’s a sh!tty lawyer.

    But of course

  • Options
    46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    5 Up Votes First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment

    And yet another hoax our resident speed-limit IQ @heilhusky fell for hook, line, and sinker because…well…Orange Man Bad.

    And because he’s a sh!tty lawyer.

    The growing list of people that the Scammittee will never call to testify. That's why this whole thing is a joke. Gen. Milley said Trump never called on J6th about NG support, but the scammittee didn't bother to say that Trump authorized NG troops before J6th. Sounds like a guy planning a coup.
  • Options
    SwisherSweetboySwisherSweetboy Member Posts: 563
    First Comment First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    He's guilty. Why would he throw a fucking plate of food against a wall?
  • Options
    Bob_CBob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,916
    Photogenic First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment
    Founders Club

    And yet another hoax our resident speed-limit IQ @heilhusky fell for hook, line, and sinker because…well…Orange Man Bad.

    And because he’s a sh!tty lawyer.

    Wasn't a top 5 revelation for HH though, so it's cool that he fell for another lie.
  • Options
    MelloDawgMelloDawg Member Posts: 6,112
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    edited June 2022
    Keep the hearsay content but flip the parties and somehow, I imagine it’s a different analysis.

    In the meantime, something something Ray Epps.
  • Options
    Bob_CBob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,916
    Photogenic First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment
    Founders Club
    Lol, no Cheney would ever make a claim without being able to back it up.

  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,138
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    edited June 2022
    She obviously testified to some hearsay. This isn't a trial.

    That said, she had firsthand knowledge:

    1. that Daddy knew there were guns and other weapons in the crowd;
    2. that Daddy knew these were his people, not Antifa, BLM, et al.;
    3. that the violence was expected and desired by Daddy and his circle, days in advance of Jan. 6;
    4. that Daddy did want to go to the Capitol to oversee his coup and intended to; and
    5. that Daddy did not want the violence stopped (and hoped Pence might be found by the mob?).
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,920
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter

    The definition of hearsay. And hh the lawyer believes in and posts every word of it as if it were fact.

    And that is what hh based his post on.

    Pathetic.

    Of course this proceeding doesn't allow for any cross examination of the witness by the defendant nor any defense counsel at all.
  • Options
    WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 13,906
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
    Standard Supporter
    MelloDawg said:

    Keep the hearsay content but flip the parties and somehow, I imagine it’s a different analysis.

    In the meantime, something something Ray Epps.

    You would never accuse a leftard of being intellectually incurious along with being a lying hack. Same intense desire to insure that we have a honest elections.
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,920
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter

    Bob_C said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    Jake Tapper is asking questions of Rep. Raskin, the guy who tried to stop the certification of electors in 2016, about Trump's "attack" on secret service agents. Clearly he has no dog in the hunt. These corrupt media DIM operatives don't even hide it anymore.
    Didn't Raskin doctor some tweets at the rushed impeachment trial?
    Schiff said he had personal knowledge of Trump's Russian collusion. Then he didn't.
    Putting Raskin and Schiff on the committee revealed it for the farce it is.
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,920
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    She obviously testified to some hearsay. This isn't a trial.

    That said, she had firsthand knowledge:

    1. that Daddy knew there were guns and other weapons in the crowd;
    2. that Daddy knew these were his people, not Antifa, BLM, et al.;
    3. that the violence was expected and desired by Daddy and his circle, days in advance of Jan. 6;
    4. that Daddy did want to go to the Capitol to oversee his coup and intended to; and
    5. that Daddy did not want the violence stopped (and hoped Pence might be found by the mob?).

    Tell us how she "knew" that Trump knew there were guns in the crowd Dazzler?
  • Options
    MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,781
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    edited June 2022
    MelloDawg said:

    Keep the hearsay content but flip the parties and somehow, I imagine it’s a different analysis.

    In the meantime, something something Ray Epps.

    And flip 10% for the Big Guy to Trump and Mueller would be called out of retirement. Did you have a point?

    Meanwhile normal Americans are pissed Biden is waging his war on carbon based energy at their expense.
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,138
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    edited June 2022
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    She obviously testified to some hearsay. This isn't a trial.

    That said, she had firsthand knowledge:

    1. that Daddy knew there were guns and other weapons in the crowd;
    2. that Daddy knew these were his people, not Antifa, BLM, et al.;
    3. that the violence was expected and desired by Daddy and his circle, days in advance of Jan. 6;
    4. that Daddy did want to go to the Capitol to oversee his coup and intended to; and
    5. that Daddy did not want the violence stopped (and hoped Pence might be found by the mob?).

    Tell us how she "knew" that Trump knew there were guns in the crowd Dazzler?
    She was backstage at the rally.
  • Options
    WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 13,906
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
    Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    She obviously testified to some hearsay. This isn't a trial.

    That said, she had firsthand knowledge:

    1. that Daddy knew there were guns and other weapons in the crowd; You think? Funny how none of them were used except for the fire extinguisher to kill Sicknick.
    2. that Daddy knew these were his people, not Antifa, BLM, et al.; Because antifa and blm riots were okay? How many molotov cocktails were thrown to burn down the capitol? Who were the black clad dudes leading the charge into the Capitol
    3. that the violence was expected and desired by Daddy and his circle, days in advance of Jan. 6;
    4. that Daddy did want to go to the Capitol to oversee his coup and intended to; and Link? Funny if he wanted to go to the Capitol you would think he would have told the crowd to meet him there.
    5. that Daddy did not want the violence stopped (and hoped Pence might be found by the mob?). Evidence? We know that Pelosi didn't want the Capitol secured and neither did the National Guard or the FBI and Ray Epps. Maybe he was "receptive" to Pence being found by the mob. Just no evidence.

    You would think that an honest investigation might raise these point along with the hidden footage. I pity your mythical clients.
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,920
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    She obviously testified to some hearsay. This isn't a trial.

    That said, she had firsthand knowledge:

    1. that Daddy knew there were guns and other weapons in the crowd;
    2. that Daddy knew these were his people, not Antifa, BLM, et al.;
    3. that the violence was expected and desired by Daddy and his circle, days in advance of Jan. 6;
    4. that Daddy did want to go to the Capitol to oversee his coup and intended to; and
    5. that Daddy did not want the violence stopped (and hoped Pence might be found by the mob?).

    Tell us how she "knew" that Trump knew there were guns in the crowd Dazzler?
    She was backstage at the rally.
    Well that fucking seals it!!!

    Dazzler Ace attorney solves the case.
  • Options
    46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    5 Up Votes First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment
    edited June 2022
    Thin
    HHusky said:

    She obviously testified to some hearsay. This isn't a trial.

    That said, she had firsthand knowledge:

    1. that Daddy knew there were guns and other weapons in the crowd;
    2. that Daddy knew these were his people, not Antifa, BLM, et al.;
    3. that the violence was expected and desired by Daddy and his circle, days in advance of Jan. 6;
    4. that Daddy did want to go to the Capitol to oversee his coup and intended to; and
    5. that Daddy did not want the violence stopped (and hoped Pence might be found by the mob?).

    Things a deranged lunatic would believe and poast. You need help. I’d say call a friend but we know you don’t have any. Unhinged.

    And yet she wanted to work for Daddy in FL.
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,920
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    edited June 2022
    46XiJCAB said:

    Thin

    HHusky said:

    She obviously testified to some hearsay. This isn't a trial.

    That said, she had firsthand knowledge:

    1. that Daddy knew there were guns and other weapons in the crowd;
    2. that Daddy knew these were his people, not Antifa, BLM, et al.;
    3. that the violence was expected and desired by Daddy and his circle, days in advance of Jan. 6;
    4. that Daddy did want to go to the Capitol to oversee his coup and intended to; and
    5. that Daddy did not want the violence stopped (and hoped Pence might be found by the mob?).

    Things a deranged lunatic would believe and poast. You need help. I’d say call a friend but we know you don’t have any. Unhinged.

    And yet she wanted to work for Daddy in FL.
    Of course there was no defense counsel available to question the witness about how she "knew" all of these things. Dazzler likes his show trials.

    Weird how Trump "knew" there were guns and yet nobody was arrested with a gun and the only person shot with a gun was a Trump supporter and Dazzler cheered her shooting.
Sign In or Register to comment.