Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

When you've lost Butterball . . .

12357

Comments

  • Pitchfork51Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 26,851
    the only thing worse than a leftist

    is a rino
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,354

    the only thing worse than a leftist

    is a rino

    and experts

    don't forget experts
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,003 Standard Supporter
    Well, when the Court said that voter's had no standing to sue, and then after the election said the issue was moot, then it is tough to get a court case. When POS like mello and the dazzler and the dem party have no interest in honest elections, that is sort of a tell. They have the same mad poker skillz as barry and the dementia patient (hey, a minor invasion would be ok).
    MelloDawg said:

    The truth was that Trump couldn't prove anything without the support of either the House or the Supreme Court. He had the support of neither and Barr realized that. Trump eventually realized it and he isn't president. The allegations of massive fraud have not been disproved. There were illegal changes to state election laws. That was a fact. Hundreds of millions were dumped into states to support ballot harvesting. That is a fact. The dems don't want honest elections. That is a fact. Just like the dems don't want to hear anything from Ray Epps and still, like your, lie about Russian collusion.

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Why wasn't Barr willing to lie to Trump about voter fraud Dazzler? He is a corrupt liar according to you. So why has he been saying what he is saying now for the past 2 years? He wasn't under oath for all of these past two years. Your claim is that Barr is only telling the truth now because he is under oath.

    Butterball's testimony is corroborated by others who were advising Daddy. It appears he told Daddy the truth while paying lip service to fraud allegations publicly. We don't have to take his word for the fact that Daddy was informed his stolen election claims were bullshit. You could have seen a parade of witnesses who told Daddy that. But you were afraid to watch.
    Well, when they ARE proved, you let us know. Maybe a court case or something would help clear it up.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,354
    edited June 2022

    Well, when the Court said that voter's had no standing to sue, and then after the election said the issue was moot, then it is tough to get a court case. When POS like mello and the dazzler and the dem party have no interest in honest elections, that is sort of a tell. They have the same mad poker skillz as barry and the dementia patient (hey, a minor invasion would be ok).

    MelloDawg said:

    The truth was that Trump couldn't prove anything without the support of either the House or the Supreme Court. He had the support of neither and Barr realized that. Trump eventually realized it and he isn't president. The allegations of massive fraud have not been disproved. There were illegal changes to state election laws. That was a fact. Hundreds of millions were dumped into states to support ballot harvesting. That is a fact. The dems don't want honest elections. That is a fact. Just like the dems don't want to hear anything from Ray Epps and still, like your, lie about Russian collusion.

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Why wasn't Barr willing to lie to Trump about voter fraud Dazzler? He is a corrupt liar according to you. So why has he been saying what he is saying now for the past 2 years? He wasn't under oath for all of these past two years. Your claim is that Barr is only telling the truth now because he is under oath.

    Butterball's testimony is corroborated by others who were advising Daddy. It appears he told Daddy the truth while paying lip service to fraud allegations publicly. We don't have to take his word for the fact that Daddy was informed his stolen election claims were bullshit. You could have seen a parade of witnesses who told Daddy that. But you were afraid to watch.
    Well, when they ARE proved, you let us know. Maybe a court case or something would help clear it up.
    There were 60+ cases. Many were decided on standing; many were decided on "the merits".

    Honesty appears to be in short supply at the nursing home today.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,942
    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Did ballot harvesting take place in the 2020 election in states where it isn't legal? Is it easier to engage in ballot havesting with mail in ballots? The election was lost when the decision was made to paper the states with mail in ballots. My opinion on mail in ballots and Barr's opinion on mail in ballots is the same. So is Barr telling the truth here Dazzler or is he a corrupt liar again?

    https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2020/09/02/bill-barr-intv-playing-with-fire-absentee-mail-in-voting-election-tsr-sot-vpx.cnn

    Barr's testimony about ballot harvesting was featured today. You should have watched.
    Some of us aren't fat girls who watch TV all day, like you @HHusky.
    Dazzler wasted his life on the Mueller hearings too. Then he cried.
    Dazzle watched the Meuller hearing and then just lied about what Meuller and his report actually said.

  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,354
    SFGbob said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Did ballot harvesting take place in the 2020 election in states where it isn't legal? Is it easier to engage in ballot havesting with mail in ballots? The election was lost when the decision was made to paper the states with mail in ballots. My opinion on mail in ballots and Barr's opinion on mail in ballots is the same. So is Barr telling the truth here Dazzler or is he a corrupt liar again?

    https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2020/09/02/bill-barr-intv-playing-with-fire-absentee-mail-in-voting-election-tsr-sot-vpx.cnn

    Barr's testimony about ballot harvesting was featured today. You should have watched.
    Some of us aren't fat girls who watch TV all day, like you @HHusky.
    Dazzler wasted his life on the Mueller hearings too. Then he cried.
    Dazzle watched the Meuller hearing and then just lied about what Meuller and his report actually said.

    “insufficient evidence to charge a broader conspiracy” superiority guy heard from.
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,003 Standard Supporter
    Remember the total cooperation of Maricopa County that facilitated the investigation into voter fraud? I don't. Fulton County? The illegal move to vote by mail against state statutes and constitutions? Remember the dazzler's promotion of honest and verifiable elections? That is the real tell.
    HHusky said:

    Well, when the Court said that voter's had no standing to sue, and then after the election said the issue was moot, then it is tough to get a court case. When POS like mello and the dazzler and the dem party have no interest in honest elections, that is sort of a tell. They have the same mad poker skillz as barry and the dementia patient (hey, a minor invasion would be ok).

    MelloDawg said:

    The truth was that Trump couldn't prove anything without the support of either the House or the Supreme Court. He had the support of neither and Barr realized that. Trump eventually realized it and he isn't president. The allegations of massive fraud have not been disproved. There were illegal changes to state election laws. That was a fact. Hundreds of millions were dumped into states to support ballot harvesting. That is a fact. The dems don't want honest elections. That is a fact. Just like the dems don't want to hear anything from Ray Epps and still, like your, lie about Russian collusion.

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Why wasn't Barr willing to lie to Trump about voter fraud Dazzler? He is a corrupt liar according to you. So why has he been saying what he is saying now for the past 2 years? He wasn't under oath for all of these past two years. Your claim is that Barr is only telling the truth now because he is under oath.

    Butterball's testimony is corroborated by others who were advising Daddy. It appears he told Daddy the truth while paying lip service to fraud allegations publicly. We don't have to take his word for the fact that Daddy was informed his stolen election claims were bullshit. You could have seen a parade of witnesses who told Daddy that. But you were afraid to watch.
    Well, when they ARE proved, you let us know. Maybe a court case or something would help clear it up.
    There were 60+ cases. Many were decided on standing; many were decided on "the merits".

    Honesty appears to be in short supply at the nursing home today.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,942
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Did ballot harvesting take place in the 2020 election in states where it isn't legal? Is it easier to engage in ballot havesting with mail in ballots? The election was lost when the decision was made to paper the states with mail in ballots. My opinion on mail in ballots and Barr's opinion on mail in ballots is the same. So is Barr telling the truth here Dazzler or is he a corrupt liar again?

    https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2020/09/02/bill-barr-intv-playing-with-fire-absentee-mail-in-voting-election-tsr-sot-vpx.cnn

    Barr's testimony about ballot harvesting was featured today. You should have watched.
    Some of us aren't fat girls who watch TV all day, like you @HHusky.
    Dazzler wasted his life on the Mueller hearings too. Then he cried.
    Dazzle watched the Meuller hearing and then just lied about what Meuller and his report actually said.

    “insufficient evidence to charge a broader conspiracy” superiority guy heard from.
    Yes, a "conspiracy" to defend yourself against totally bogus charges. Meanwhile, Mueller, who's dick never left your mouth, never reported on the actual Russian interference in the 2016 election when Hillary paid a foreign national for dirt on Trump that was provided by Russian's with ties to the Kremlin. Neither you or Mueller gave a shit about that and you still don't. Imagine knowing what we know now about how corrupt and partisan Mueller "investigation" really was and you still suck on Mueller cock. That's Dazzler hack level bullshit.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,354

    Remember the total cooperation of Maricopa County that facilitated the investigation into voter fraud? I don't. Fulton County? The illegal move to vote by mail against state statutes and constitutions? Remember the dazzler's promotion of honest and verifiable elections? That is the real tell.

    HHusky said:

    Well, when the Court said that voter's had no standing to sue, and then after the election said the issue was moot, then it is tough to get a court case. When POS like mello and the dazzler and the dem party have no interest in honest elections, that is sort of a tell. They have the same mad poker skillz as barry and the dementia patient (hey, a minor invasion would be ok).

    MelloDawg said:

    The truth was that Trump couldn't prove anything without the support of either the House or the Supreme Court. He had the support of neither and Barr realized that. Trump eventually realized it and he isn't president. The allegations of massive fraud have not been disproved. There were illegal changes to state election laws. That was a fact. Hundreds of millions were dumped into states to support ballot harvesting. That is a fact. The dems don't want honest elections. That is a fact. Just like the dems don't want to hear anything from Ray Epps and still, like your, lie about Russian collusion.

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Why wasn't Barr willing to lie to Trump about voter fraud Dazzler? He is a corrupt liar according to you. So why has he been saying what he is saying now for the past 2 years? He wasn't under oath for all of these past two years. Your claim is that Barr is only telling the truth now because he is under oath.

    Butterball's testimony is corroborated by others who were advising Daddy. It appears he told Daddy the truth while paying lip service to fraud allegations publicly. We don't have to take his word for the fact that Daddy was informed his stolen election claims were bullshit. You could have seen a parade of witnesses who told Daddy that. But you were afraid to watch.
    Well, when they ARE proved, you let us know. Maybe a court case or something would help clear it up.
    There were 60+ cases. Many were decided on standing; many were decided on "the merits".

    Honesty appears to be in short supply at the nursing home today.
    I remember Maricopa County Republicans finally saying enough is enough and a farcical cyber-ninja exam.

    You girls are banana republic apologists.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,069 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Did ballot harvesting take place in the 2020 election in states where it isn't legal? Is it easier to engage in ballot havesting with mail in ballots? The election was lost when the decision was made to paper the states with mail in ballots. My opinion on mail in ballots and Barr's opinion on mail in ballots is the same. So is Barr telling the truth here Dazzler or is he a corrupt liar again?

    https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2020/09/02/bill-barr-intv-playing-with-fire-absentee-mail-in-voting-election-tsr-sot-vpx.cnn

    Barr's testimony about ballot harvesting was featured today. You should have watched.
    Some of us aren't fat girls who watch TV all day, like you @HHusky.
    Dazzler wasted his life on the Mueller hearings too. Then he cried.
    Dazzle watched the Meuller hearing and then just lied about what Meuller and his report actually said.

    “insufficient evidence to charge a broader conspiracy” superiority guy heard from.
    Insufficient could also be NO EVIDENCE. Thanks for proving yourself as usual dipshit.
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Did ballot harvesting take place in the 2020 election in states where it isn't legal? Is it easier to engage in ballot havesting with mail in ballots? The election was lost when the decision was made to paper the states with mail in ballots. My opinion on mail in ballots and Barr's opinion on mail in ballots is the same. So is Barr telling the truth here Dazzler or is he a corrupt liar again?

    https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2020/09/02/bill-barr-intv-playing-with-fire-absentee-mail-in-voting-election-tsr-sot-vpx.cnn

    Barr's testimony about ballot harvesting was featured today. You should have watched.
    Some of us aren't fat girls who watch TV all day, like you @HHusky.
    Dazzler wasted his life on the Mueller hearings too. Then he cried.
    Dazzle watched the Meuller hearing and then just lied about what Meuller and his report actually said.

    “insufficient evidence to charge a broader conspiracy” superiority guy heard from.
    You’re soft in the head Dazzler. And a little Stooge slurper.
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    HHusky said:

    Remember the total cooperation of Maricopa County that facilitated the investigation into voter fraud? I don't. Fulton County? The illegal move to vote by mail against state statutes and constitutions? Remember the dazzler's promotion of honest and verifiable elections? That is the real tell.

    HHusky said:

    Well, when the Court said that voter's had no standing to sue, and then after the election said the issue was moot, then it is tough to get a court case. When POS like mello and the dazzler and the dem party have no interest in honest elections, that is sort of a tell. They have the same mad poker skillz as barry and the dementia patient (hey, a minor invasion would be ok).

    MelloDawg said:

    The truth was that Trump couldn't prove anything without the support of either the House or the Supreme Court. He had the support of neither and Barr realized that. Trump eventually realized it and he isn't president. The allegations of massive fraud have not been disproved. There were illegal changes to state election laws. That was a fact. Hundreds of millions were dumped into states to support ballot harvesting. That is a fact. The dems don't want honest elections. That is a fact. Just like the dems don't want to hear anything from Ray Epps and still, like your, lie about Russian collusion.

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Why wasn't Barr willing to lie to Trump about voter fraud Dazzler? He is a corrupt liar according to you. So why has he been saying what he is saying now for the past 2 years? He wasn't under oath for all of these past two years. Your claim is that Barr is only telling the truth now because he is under oath.

    Butterball's testimony is corroborated by others who were advising Daddy. It appears he told Daddy the truth while paying lip service to fraud allegations publicly. We don't have to take his word for the fact that Daddy was informed his stolen election claims were bullshit. You could have seen a parade of witnesses who told Daddy that. But you were afraid to watch.
    Well, when they ARE proved, you let us know. Maybe a court case or something would help clear it up.
    There were 60+ cases. Many were decided on standing; many were decided on "the merits".

    Honesty appears to be in short supply at the nursing home today.
    I remember Maricopa County Republicans finally saying enough is enough and a farcical cyber-ninja exam.

    You girls are banana republic apologists.
    You voted for Joe Biden. Sit down and STFU.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,942
    HHusky said:

    Remember the total cooperation of Maricopa County that facilitated the investigation into voter fraud? I don't. Fulton County? The illegal move to vote by mail against state statutes and constitutions? Remember the dazzler's promotion of honest and verifiable elections? That is the real tell.

    HHusky said:

    Well, when the Court said that voter's had no standing to sue, and then after the election said the issue was moot, then it is tough to get a court case. When POS like mello and the dazzler and the dem party have no interest in honest elections, that is sort of a tell. They have the same mad poker skillz as barry and the dementia patient (hey, a minor invasion would be ok).

    MelloDawg said:

    The truth was that Trump couldn't prove anything without the support of either the House or the Supreme Court. He had the support of neither and Barr realized that. Trump eventually realized it and he isn't president. The allegations of massive fraud have not been disproved. There were illegal changes to state election laws. That was a fact. Hundreds of millions were dumped into states to support ballot harvesting. That is a fact. The dems don't want honest elections. That is a fact. Just like the dems don't want to hear anything from Ray Epps and still, like your, lie about Russian collusion.

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Why wasn't Barr willing to lie to Trump about voter fraud Dazzler? He is a corrupt liar according to you. So why has he been saying what he is saying now for the past 2 years? He wasn't under oath for all of these past two years. Your claim is that Barr is only telling the truth now because he is under oath.

    Butterball's testimony is corroborated by others who were advising Daddy. It appears he told Daddy the truth while paying lip service to fraud allegations publicly. We don't have to take his word for the fact that Daddy was informed his stolen election claims were bullshit. You could have seen a parade of witnesses who told Daddy that. But you were afraid to watch.
    Well, when they ARE proved, you let us know. Maybe a court case or something would help clear it up.
    There were 60+ cases. Many were decided on standing; many were decided on "the merits".

    Honesty appears to be in short supply at the nursing home today.
    I remember Maricopa County Republicans finally saying enough is enough and a farcical cyber-ninja exam.

    You girls are banana republic apologists.
    Explains why you still defend the Mueller investigation. I've never defended or claimed that there was any evidence of computer election machine fraud. But Dazzler has fully backed all the Russian collusion stories. Hell he still claims that Mueller's report proved that Trump really did collude with the Russians.

    Here's what we know for a fact about the 2020 election. Mail in ballots in many states were sent out to every registered voter on the voter rolls. Many of these registered voters hadn't voted in years. Many of the people who were sent ballots wouldn't have voted in 2020. Rat party supporters like Zuckerberg spent hundreds of millions of dollars to pay people to make sure that as many of those ballots as possible that were sent out to certain zip codes and neighborhoods in certain key states were returned. For many of these states there was no effort made to verify any signatures on the ballot and an unknown number of these ballots were harvested illegally by people who were being paid with the money Zuckerberg provided.

    If people were still required to vote the way nearly all us here started voting and all of our parents did vote, Trump would have won in a landslide.
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,003 Standard Supporter
    Cell phone GPS data is important if you want to find out who was where in January 6, 2021. It is useless if used to track vote harvesters in November of 2020 and clearly Russian disinformation.
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Remember the total cooperation of Maricopa County that facilitated the investigation into voter fraud? I don't. Fulton County? The illegal move to vote by mail against state statutes and constitutions? Remember the dazzler's promotion of honest and verifiable elections? That is the real tell.

    HHusky said:

    Well, when the Court said that voter's had no standing to sue, and then after the election said the issue was moot, then it is tough to get a court case. When POS like mello and the dazzler and the dem party have no interest in honest elections, that is sort of a tell. They have the same mad poker skillz as barry and the dementia patient (hey, a minor invasion would be ok).

    MelloDawg said:

    The truth was that Trump couldn't prove anything without the support of either the House or the Supreme Court. He had the support of neither and Barr realized that. Trump eventually realized it and he isn't president. The allegations of massive fraud have not been disproved. There were illegal changes to state election laws. That was a fact. Hundreds of millions were dumped into states to support ballot harvesting. That is a fact. The dems don't want honest elections. That is a fact. Just like the dems don't want to hear anything from Ray Epps and still, like your, lie about Russian collusion.

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Why wasn't Barr willing to lie to Trump about voter fraud Dazzler? He is a corrupt liar according to you. So why has he been saying what he is saying now for the past 2 years? He wasn't under oath for all of these past two years. Your claim is that Barr is only telling the truth now because he is under oath.

    Butterball's testimony is corroborated by others who were advising Daddy. It appears he told Daddy the truth while paying lip service to fraud allegations publicly. We don't have to take his word for the fact that Daddy was informed his stolen election claims were bullshit. You could have seen a parade of witnesses who told Daddy that. But you were afraid to watch.
    Well, when they ARE proved, you let us know. Maybe a court case or something would help clear it up.
    There were 60+ cases. Many were decided on standing; many were decided on "the merits".

    Honesty appears to be in short supply at the nursing home today.
    I remember Maricopa County Republicans finally saying enough is enough and a farcical cyber-ninja exam.

    You girls are banana republic apologists.
    Explains why you still defend the Mueller investigation. I've never defended or claimed that there was any evidence of computer election machine fraud. But Dazzler has fully backed all the Russian collusion stories. Hell he still claims that Mueller's report proved that Trump really did collude with the Russians.

    Here's what we know for a fact about the 2020 election. Mail in ballots in many states were sent out to every registered voter on the voter rolls. Many of these registered voters hadn't voted in years. Many of the people who were sent ballots wouldn't have voted in 2020. Rat party supporters like Zuckerberg spent hundreds of millions of dollars to pay people to make sure that as many of those ballots as possible that were sent out to certain zip codes and neighborhoods in certain key states were returned. For many of these states there was no effort made to verify any signatures on the ballot and an unknown number of these ballots were harvested illegally by people who were being paid with the money Zuckerberg provided.

    If people were still required to vote the way nearly all us here started voting and all of our parents did vote, Trump would have won in a landslide.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 104,442 Founders Club
    I think the cell phone data resonates with people who look at it


    Too late to matter and most people don't look at it but one day Biden will go down as an illegitimate cheater as well as the worst president ever

    So there's that
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,069 Standard Supporter
    edited June 2022
    Imagine the data showing the same people hitting ballot drop boxes many times at many locations in multiple states in the middle of the night. I'm sure they were just dropping family ballots.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,942
    Think of the incentive for fraud that you have when you're paying people to gather and return as many mail in ballots as possible. Hey did you get a ballot? Yeah. Did you vote? No, I'm not going to vote. Well let me fill it out for you and I'll give you 20 bucks.

    That exact scenerio could have played out thousands of times and there would be zero evidence of any voter fraud.
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,003 Standard Supporter
    SFGbob said:

    Think of the incentive for fraud that you have when you're paying people to gather and return as many mail in ballots as possible. Hey did you get a ballot? Yeah. Did you vote? No, I'm not going to vote. Well let me fill it out for you and I'll give you 20 bucks.

    That exact scenerio could have played out thousands of times and there would be zero evidence of any voter fraud.

    Same with photocopying ballots with only the president and/or Senator or Congressman ballots filled in. No signature verification. Showing up at the Alzheimer unit and paying off some clearly overpaid clerk for the raw mail in ballots. Like I said, the tell is that these voting procedures without proper chain of custody and segregation of duty requirements were to be instituted under federal law all over the country. The dazzler has no interest in instituting clean voting rolls and auditable votes. Once a dirty ballot is in the system, you can recount the vote all you want and it still a dirty vote. The dazzler with his mythical MBA calls this a clean election and a clean recount that proves it was a clean election.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,354
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Did ballot harvesting take place in the 2020 election in states where it isn't legal? Is it easier to engage in ballot havesting with mail in ballots? The election was lost when the decision was made to paper the states with mail in ballots. My opinion on mail in ballots and Barr's opinion on mail in ballots is the same. So is Barr telling the truth here Dazzler or is he a corrupt liar again?

    https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2020/09/02/bill-barr-intv-playing-with-fire-absentee-mail-in-voting-election-tsr-sot-vpx.cnn

    Barr's testimony about ballot harvesting was featured today. You should have watched.
    Some of us aren't fat girls who watch TV all day, like you @HHusky.
    Dazzler wasted his life on the Mueller hearings too. Then he cried.
    Dazzle watched the Meuller hearing and then just lied about what Meuller and his report actually said.

    “insufficient evidence to charge a broader conspiracy” superiority guy heard from.
    Insufficient could also be NO EVIDENCE. Thanks for proving yourself as usual dipshit.
    But as you well know from your thorough reading of the report and your examination of Mueller's testimony, that isn't what "insufficient" meant in this case.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,069 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    Did ballot harvesting take place in the 2020 election in states where it isn't legal? Is it easier to engage in ballot havesting with mail in ballots? The election was lost when the decision was made to paper the states with mail in ballots. My opinion on mail in ballots and Barr's opinion on mail in ballots is the same. So is Barr telling the truth here Dazzler or is he a corrupt liar again?

    https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2020/09/02/bill-barr-intv-playing-with-fire-absentee-mail-in-voting-election-tsr-sot-vpx.cnn

    Barr's testimony about ballot harvesting was featured today. You should have watched.
    Some of us aren't fat girls who watch TV all day, like you @HHusky.
    Dazzler wasted his life on the Mueller hearings too. Then he cried.
    Dazzle watched the Meuller hearing and then just lied about what Meuller and his report actually said.

    “insufficient evidence to charge a broader conspiracy” superiority guy heard from.
    Insufficient could also be NO EVIDENCE. Thanks for proving yourself as usual dipshit.
    But as you well know from your thorough reading of the report and your examination of Mueller's testimony, that isn't what "insufficient" meant in this case.
    You see he couldn't find any type of a crime in 2 years of investigation including taxes because that's the first place shitty lawyers head. You know that's what you'd do as your shitty.

    To say insufficient is hilarious. None, bupkis or a little bullshit is all he could find with 32 million dollars and over 2 years and a team of crack investigators.

    You're stupidity truly is boundless!
Sign In or Register to comment.