Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Big Lie being blown to bits

13

Comments

  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 18,954
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    Lie. Shocking
    https://www.voanews.com/a/jan-6-committee-subpoenas-republican-congressmen/6570802.html
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 18,954
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment

    Geezus. The opposition was supposed to show up under House rules, but the Nazi Pelosi refused the republican participants. I'm sure you knew this, but given the chance to be honest or suck Pelosi's dick, well ...

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    Imagine Jim Jordan investigating his own felonies.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,919
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    Lie. Shocking
    https://www.voanews.com/a/jan-6-committee-subpoenas-republican-congressmen/6570802.html
    So you're either a liar or moron. Subpoened witnesses aren't the defense. But you are really shitty lawyer so maybe you feel they are.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 18,954
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    Lie. Shocking
    https://www.voanews.com/a/jan-6-committee-subpoenas-republican-congressmen/6570802.html
    So you're either a liar or moron. Subpoened witnesses aren't the defense. But you are really shitty lawyer so maybe you feel they are.
    Free to come refute anything they want to. In fact, they were invited. They refused.
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 13,699
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
    Standard Supporter
    Where is Ray Epps? I want him to testify. The dazzler doesn't. That's the definition of a Soviet show trial.

    PS The dazzler wants my guns. Scratch a leftist, find a fascist.
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    Lie. Shocking
    https://www.voanews.com/a/jan-6-committee-subpoenas-republican-congressmen/6570802.html
    So you're either a liar or moron. Subpoened witnesses aren't the defense. But you are really shitty lawyer so maybe you feel they are.
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 41,657
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Liz Cheney and Adam Schiff are the ones screaming "we have the evidence".

    So credible.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,919
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    edited June 2022
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    Lie. Shocking
    https://www.voanews.com/a/jan-6-committee-subpoenas-republican-congressmen/6570802.html
    So you're either a liar or moron. Subpoened witnesses aren't the defense. But you are really shitty lawyer so maybe you feel they are.
    Free to come refute anything they want to. In fact, they were invited. They refused.
    They aren't free to present evidence and they aren't free to question their accusers. By no definition are they part of any defense. You're either a really bad liar or a fucking moron. Which is it Dazzler? The fact that you would support a Soviet style show trial is hardly shocking. Your phony concern for our norms and institution was always a lie and a fraud.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,919
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter

    Where is Ray Epps? I want him to testify. The dazzler doesn't. That's the definition of a Soviet show trial.

    PS The dazzler wants my guns. Scratch a leftist, find a fascist.

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    Lie. Shocking
    https://www.voanews.com/a/jan-6-committee-subpoenas-republican-congressmen/6570802.html
    So you're either a liar or moron. Subpoened witnesses aren't the defense. But you are really shitty lawyer so maybe you feel they are.
    All the evidence that's presented is selected by the prosecution. But hey, this isn't a show trial.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 18,954
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    Lie. Shocking
    https://www.voanews.com/a/jan-6-committee-subpoenas-republican-congressmen/6570802.html
    So you're either a liar or moron. Subpoened witnesses aren't the defense. But you are really shitty lawyer so maybe you feel they are.
    Free to come refute anything they want to. In fact, they were invited. They refused.
    They aren't free to present evidence and they aren't free to question their accusers. By no definition are they part of any defense. You're either a really bad liar or a fucking moron. Which is it Dazzler? The fact that you would support a Soviet style show trial is hardly shocking. Your phony concern for our norms and institution was always a lie and a fraud.
    So Barr was lying.

    Make up your mind, lady.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,919
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    Lie. Shocking
    https://www.voanews.com/a/jan-6-committee-subpoenas-republican-congressmen/6570802.html
    So you're either a liar or moron. Subpoened witnesses aren't the defense. But you are really shitty lawyer so maybe you feel they are.
    Free to come refute anything they want to. In fact, they were invited. They refused.
    They aren't free to present evidence and they aren't free to question their accusers. By no definition are they part of any defense. You're either a really bad liar or a fucking moron. Which is it Dazzler? The fact that you would support a Soviet style show trial is hardly shocking. Your phony concern for our norms and institution was always a lie and a fraud.
    So Barr was lying.

    Make up your mind, lady.
    Unlike you Dazzler there is no dick in my mouth and I'm not a Kunt. Was Barr lying when he claimed the entire Russian collusion narrative that you pushed for 4 years and that you still claim is true, was a fraud?
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 18,954
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    Lie. Shocking
    https://www.voanews.com/a/jan-6-committee-subpoenas-republican-congressmen/6570802.html
    So you're either a liar or moron. Subpoened witnesses aren't the defense. But you are really shitty lawyer so maybe you feel they are.
    Free to come refute anything they want to. In fact, they were invited. They refused.
    They aren't free to present evidence and they aren't free to question their accusers. By no definition are they part of any defense. You're either a really bad liar or a fucking moron. Which is it Dazzler? The fact that you would support a Soviet style show trial is hardly shocking. Your phony concern for our norms and institution was always a lie and a fraud.
    So Barr was lying.

    Make up your mind, lady.
    Unlike you Dazzler there is no dick in my mouth and I'm not a Kunt. Was Barr lying when he claimed the entire Russian collusion narrative that you pushed for 4 years and that you still claim is true, was a fraud?
    Yes
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,919
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    Lie. Shocking
    https://www.voanews.com/a/jan-6-committee-subpoenas-republican-congressmen/6570802.html
    So you're either a liar or moron. Subpoened witnesses aren't the defense. But you are really shitty lawyer so maybe you feel they are.
    Free to come refute anything they want to. In fact, they were invited. They refused.
    They aren't free to present evidence and they aren't free to question their accusers. By no definition are they part of any defense. You're either a really bad liar or a fucking moron. Which is it Dazzler? The fact that you would support a Soviet style show trial is hardly shocking. Your phony concern for our norms and institution was always a lie and a fraud.
    So Barr was lying.

    Make up your mind, lady.
    Unlike you Dazzler there is no dick in my mouth and I'm not a Kunt. Was Barr lying when he claimed the entire Russian collusion narrative that you pushed for 4 years and that you still claim is true, was a fraud?
    Yes
    Okay, so Barr is a corrupt liar who is willing to lie under oath.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 18,954
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    Lie. Shocking
    https://www.voanews.com/a/jan-6-committee-subpoenas-republican-congressmen/6570802.html
    So you're either a liar or moron. Subpoened witnesses aren't the defense. But you are really shitty lawyer so maybe you feel they are.
    Free to come refute anything they want to. In fact, they were invited. They refused.
    They aren't free to present evidence and they aren't free to question their accusers. By no definition are they part of any defense. You're either a really bad liar or a fucking moron. Which is it Dazzler? The fact that you would support a Soviet style show trial is hardly shocking. Your phony concern for our norms and institution was always a lie and a fraud.
    So Barr was lying.

    Make up your mind, lady.
    Unlike you Dazzler there is no dick in my mouth and I'm not a Kunt. Was Barr lying when he claimed the entire Russian collusion narrative that you pushed for 4 years and that you still claim is true, was a fraud?
    Yes
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    Lie. Shocking
    https://www.voanews.com/a/jan-6-committee-subpoenas-republican-congressmen/6570802.html
    So you're either a liar or moron. Subpoened witnesses aren't the defense. But you are really shitty lawyer so maybe you feel they are.
    Free to come refute anything they want to. In fact, they were invited. They refused.
    They aren't free to present evidence and they aren't free to question their accusers. By no definition are they part of any defense. You're either a really bad liar or a fucking moron. Which is it Dazzler? The fact that you would support a Soviet style show trial is hardly shocking. Your phony concern for our norms and institution was always a lie and a fraud.
    So Barr was lying.

    Make up your mind, lady.
    Unlike you Dazzler there is no dick in my mouth and I'm not a Kunt. Was Barr lying when he claimed the entire Russian collusion narrative that you pushed for 4 years and that you still claim is true, was a fraud?
    Yes
    Okay, so Barr is a corrupt liar who is willing to lie under oath.
    When did he ever say that under oath?
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,919
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    Lie. Shocking
    https://www.voanews.com/a/jan-6-committee-subpoenas-republican-congressmen/6570802.html
    So you're either a liar or moron. Subpoened witnesses aren't the defense. But you are really shitty lawyer so maybe you feel they are.
    Free to come refute anything they want to. In fact, they were invited. They refused.
    They aren't free to present evidence and they aren't free to question their accusers. By no definition are they part of any defense. You're either a really bad liar or a fucking moron. Which is it Dazzler? The fact that you would support a Soviet style show trial is hardly shocking. Your phony concern for our norms and institution was always a lie and a fraud.
    So Barr was lying.

    Make up your mind, lady.
    I'm not the one who is calling Barr a corrupt liar Kunt, you are.
  • Fenderbender123Fenderbender123 Member Posts: 2,850
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    I've listened to every minute of the hearings so far. Haven't heard anything of substance yet. Nothing damning against Trump. Maybe something will come up, but I don't expect it to.
  • RoadTripRoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,162
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    Lie. Shocking
    https://www.voanews.com/a/jan-6-committee-subpoenas-republican-congressmen/6570802.html
    So you're either a liar or moron. Subpoened witnesses aren't the defense. But you are really shitty lawyer so maybe you feel they are.
    Free to come refute anything they want to. In fact, they were invited. They refused.
    They aren't free to present evidence and they aren't free to question their accusers. By no definition are they part of any defense. You're either a really bad liar or a fucking moron. Which is it Dazzler? The fact that you would support a Soviet style show trial is hardly shocking. Your phony concern for our norms and institution was always a lie and a fraud.
    So Barr was lying.

    Make up your mind, lady.
    Unlike you Dazzler there is no dick in my mouth and I'm not a Kunt. Was Barr lying when he claimed the entire Russian collusion narrative that you pushed for 4 years and that you still claim is true, was a fraud?
    Yes
    What an absolute miserable dumb cunt you are. Fuck off shitstain!
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 18,954
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    RoadTrip said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    Lie. Shocking
    https://www.voanews.com/a/jan-6-committee-subpoenas-republican-congressmen/6570802.html
    So you're either a liar or moron. Subpoened witnesses aren't the defense. But you are really shitty lawyer so maybe you feel they are.
    Free to come refute anything they want to. In fact, they were invited. They refused.
    They aren't free to present evidence and they aren't free to question their accusers. By no definition are they part of any defense. You're either a really bad liar or a fucking moron. Which is it Dazzler? The fact that you would support a Soviet style show trial is hardly shocking. Your phony concern for our norms and institution was always a lie and a fraud.
    So Barr was lying.

    Make up your mind, lady.
    Unlike you Dazzler there is no dick in my mouth and I'm not a Kunt. Was Barr lying when he claimed the entire Russian collusion narrative that you pushed for 4 years and that you still claim is true, was a fraud?
    Yes
    What an absolute miserable dumb cunt you are. Fuck off shitstain!
    Compelling argument.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,919
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    RoadTrip said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    Lie. Shocking
    https://www.voanews.com/a/jan-6-committee-subpoenas-republican-congressmen/6570802.html
    So you're either a liar or moron. Subpoened witnesses aren't the defense. But you are really shitty lawyer so maybe you feel they are.
    Free to come refute anything they want to. In fact, they were invited. They refused.
    They aren't free to present evidence and they aren't free to question their accusers. By no definition are they part of any defense. You're either a really bad liar or a fucking moron. Which is it Dazzler? The fact that you would support a Soviet style show trial is hardly shocking. Your phony concern for our norms and institution was always a lie and a fraud.
    So Barr was lying.

    Make up your mind, lady.
    Unlike you Dazzler there is no dick in my mouth and I'm not a Kunt. Was Barr lying when he claimed the entire Russian collusion narrative that you pushed for 4 years and that you still claim is true, was a fraud?
    Yes
    What an absolute miserable dumb cunt you are. Fuck off shitstain!
    Compelling argument.
    Almost as compelling an argument as you're providing Dazzler. Supoenaed witnesses are part of the defense. Brillant Kunt.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 18,954
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    I've listened to every minute of the hearings so far. Haven't heard anything of substance yet. Nothing damning against Trump. Maybe something will come up, but I don't expect it to.
    What is your first language?
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 30,478
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Daddy knew "the Steal" was a lie. Or he refused to know it. Conspiracy after conspiracy was examined as if they were plausible claims to begin with. (Looking at you, Sled.) All were batted back in his face.

    His serious people looked and told him the truth.

    You gals and Daddy preferred drunk Rudy and Navarro.

    Really? Show me all this proof professor. I'll wait.
    They don't have teevee in Idaho yet?
    Spoon feed the evidence please.
    I'm sure it's available on demand.
    Zero proof then. Should be easy. I'll wait dipshit.
Sign In or Register to comment.