Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Big Lie being blown to bits

24

Comments

  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,460 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Daddy knew "the Steal" was a lie. Or he refused to know it. Conspiracy after conspiracy was examined as if they were plausible claims to begin with. (Looking at you, Sled.) All were batted back in his face.

    His serious people looked and told him the truth.

    You gals and Daddy preferred drunk Rudy and Navarro.

    Really? Show me all this proof professor. I'll wait.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,626
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Daddy knew "the Steal" was a lie. Or he refused to know it. Conspiracy after conspiracy was examined as if they were plausible claims to begin with. (Looking at you, Sled.) All were batted back in his face.

    His serious people looked and told him the truth.

    You gals and Daddy preferred drunk Rudy and Navarro.

    Really? Show me all this proof professor. I'll wait.
    They don't have teevee in Idaho yet?
  • Bob_CBob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 10,924 Swaye's Wigwam
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Daddy knew "the Steal" was a lie. Or he refused to know it. Conspiracy after conspiracy was examined as if they were plausible claims to begin with. (Looking at you, Sled.) All were batted back in his face.

    His serious people looked and told him the truth.

    You gals and Daddy preferred drunk Rudy and Navarro.

    Really? Show me all this proof professor. I'll wait.
    They don't have teevee in Idaho yet?
    Spoon feed the evidence please.
  • pawzpawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,267 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    pawz said:

    HHusky said:

    Daddy knew "the Steal" was a lie. Or he refused to know it. Conspiracy after conspiracy was examined as if they were plausible claims to begin with. (Looking at you, Sled.) All were batted back in his face.

    His serious people looked and told him the truth.

    You gals and Daddy preferred drunk Rudy and Navarro.

    If the "securest election in history" was just that, why did the Dems run out and try to nationalize the election laws?

    Take as much tim as you need.

    So change the subject.

    Imagine my surprise.
    Great deflection as always. Imagine my surprise.

  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,626
    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Daddy knew "the Steal" was a lie. Or he refused to know it. Conspiracy after conspiracy was examined as if they were plausible claims to begin with. (Looking at you, Sled.) All were batted back in his face.

    His serious people looked and told him the truth.

    You gals and Daddy preferred drunk Rudy and Navarro.

    Really? Show me all this proof professor. I'll wait.
    They don't have teevee in Idaho yet?
    Spoon feed the evidence please.
    I'm sure it's available on demand.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,626
    pawz said:

    HHusky said:

    pawz said:

    HHusky said:

    Daddy knew "the Steal" was a lie. Or he refused to know it. Conspiracy after conspiracy was examined as if they were plausible claims to begin with. (Looking at you, Sled.) All were batted back in his face.

    His serious people looked and told him the truth.

    You gals and Daddy preferred drunk Rudy and Navarro.

    If the "securest election in history" was just that, why did the Dems run out and try to nationalize the election laws?

    Take as much tim as you need.

    So change the subject.

    Imagine my surprise.
    Great deflection as always. Imagine my surprise.

    #projection
  • pawzpawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,267 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    pawz said:

    HHusky said:

    pawz said:

    HHusky said:

    Daddy knew "the Steal" was a lie. Or he refused to know it. Conspiracy after conspiracy was examined as if they were plausible claims to begin with. (Looking at you, Sled.) All were batted back in his face.

    His serious people looked and told him the truth.

    You gals and Daddy preferred drunk Rudy and Navarro.

    If the "securest election in history" was just that, why did the Dems run out and try to nationalize the election laws?

    Take as much tim as you need.

    So change the subject.

    Imagine my surprise.
    Great deflection as always. Imagine my surprise.

    #projection
    Irony.
  • pawzpawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,267 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Daddy knew "the Steal" was a lie. Or he refused to know it. Conspiracy after conspiracy was examined as if they were plausible claims to begin with. (Looking at you, Sled.) All were batted back in his face.

    His serious people looked and told him the truth.

    You gals and Daddy preferred drunk Rudy and Navarro.

    Really? Show me all this proof professor. I'll wait.
    They don't have teevee in Idaho yet?
    Spoon feed the evidence please.
    I'm sure it's available on demand.
    So you should have no trouble at all finding it. TIA
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,626
    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


  • pawzpawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,267 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Actually true. Some of us? can spot a fraud from a country mile.

    Others love being lied to. **@HeilHusky looks in mirror**


    Hope this helps.

  • Bob_CBob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 10,924 Swaye's Wigwam
    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Daddy knew "the Steal" was a lie. Or he refused to know it. Conspiracy after conspiracy was examined as if they were plausible claims to begin with. (Looking at you, Sled.) All were batted back in his face.

    His serious people looked and told him the truth.

    You gals and Daddy preferred drunk Rudy and Navarro.

    Really? Show me all this proof professor. I'll wait.
    They don't have teevee in Idaho yet?
    Spoon feed the evidence please.
    I'm sure it's available on demand.
    Sounds like the Schiff kind of evidence.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,070
    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,833 Standard Supporter
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    You misspelled Kangaroo Court.

  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,626
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,713 Standard Supporter
    edited June 2022
    Geezus. The opposition was supposed to show up under House rules, but the Nazi Pelosi refused the republican participants. I'm sure you knew this, but given the chance to be honest or suck Pelosi's dick, well ...
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
  • pawzpawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,267 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    Again, some of us? can spot a fraud from a country mile.

    You love being lied to.


    I'll give you this, it must be tough going through life in an extremely fragile emotional state.


  • Bob_CBob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 10,924 Swaye's Wigwam
    Agreed, some of us can.


    pawz said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    Again, some of us? can spot a fraud from a country mile.

    You love being lied to.


    I'll give you this, it must be tough going through life in an extremely fragile emotional state.


    pawz said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    Again, some of us? can spot a fraud from a country mile.

    You love being lied to.


    I'll give you this, it must be tough going through life in an extremely fragile emotional state.


  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,626
    pawz said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    Again, some of us? can spot a fraud from a country mile.

    You love being lied to.


    I'll give you this, it must be tough going through life in an extremely fragile emotional state.


    So you admit the pre-emptive pardon crew didn't show. I guess we can agree on that at least.

    #5thAmendment
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,070
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    Lie. Shocking
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,070

    Geezus. The opposition was supposed to show up under House rules, but the Nazi Pelosi refused the republican participants. I'm sure you knew this, but given the chance to be honest or suck Pelosi's dick, well ...

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    They love to lie and they love being lied to. By every definition of the term this is nothing more than a show trial where one side picks both the prosecution and the "defense"
Sign In or Register to comment.