Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

Big Lie being blown to bits

24

Comments

  • Options
    SledogSledog Member Posts: 30,744
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    HHusky said:

    Daddy knew "the Steal" was a lie. Or he refused to know it. Conspiracy after conspiracy was examined as if they were plausible claims to begin with. (Looking at you, Sled.) All were batted back in his face.

    His serious people looked and told him the truth.

    You gals and Daddy preferred drunk Rudy and Navarro.

    Really? Show me all this proof professor. I'll wait.
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,131
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Daddy knew "the Steal" was a lie. Or he refused to know it. Conspiracy after conspiracy was examined as if they were plausible claims to begin with. (Looking at you, Sled.) All were batted back in his face.

    His serious people looked and told him the truth.

    You gals and Daddy preferred drunk Rudy and Navarro.

    Really? Show me all this proof professor. I'll wait.
    They don't have teevee in Idaho yet?
  • Options
    Bob_CBob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,912
    Photogenic First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment
    Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Daddy knew "the Steal" was a lie. Or he refused to know it. Conspiracy after conspiracy was examined as if they were plausible claims to begin with. (Looking at you, Sled.) All were batted back in his face.

    His serious people looked and told him the truth.

    You gals and Daddy preferred drunk Rudy and Navarro.

    Really? Show me all this proof professor. I'll wait.
    They don't have teevee in Idaho yet?
    Spoon feed the evidence please.
  • Options
    pawzpawz Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,775
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    pawz said:

    HHusky said:

    Daddy knew "the Steal" was a lie. Or he refused to know it. Conspiracy after conspiracy was examined as if they were plausible claims to begin with. (Looking at you, Sled.) All were batted back in his face.

    His serious people looked and told him the truth.

    You gals and Daddy preferred drunk Rudy and Navarro.

    If the "securest election in history" was just that, why did the Dems run out and try to nationalize the election laws?

    Take as much tim as you need.

    So change the subject.

    Imagine my surprise.
    Great deflection as always. Imagine my surprise.

  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,131
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Daddy knew "the Steal" was a lie. Or he refused to know it. Conspiracy after conspiracy was examined as if they were plausible claims to begin with. (Looking at you, Sled.) All were batted back in his face.

    His serious people looked and told him the truth.

    You gals and Daddy preferred drunk Rudy and Navarro.

    Really? Show me all this proof professor. I'll wait.
    They don't have teevee in Idaho yet?
    Spoon feed the evidence please.
    I'm sure it's available on demand.
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,131
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    pawz said:

    HHusky said:

    pawz said:

    HHusky said:

    Daddy knew "the Steal" was a lie. Or he refused to know it. Conspiracy after conspiracy was examined as if they were plausible claims to begin with. (Looking at you, Sled.) All were batted back in his face.

    His serious people looked and told him the truth.

    You gals and Daddy preferred drunk Rudy and Navarro.

    If the "securest election in history" was just that, why did the Dems run out and try to nationalize the election laws?

    Take as much tim as you need.

    So change the subject.

    Imagine my surprise.
    Great deflection as always. Imagine my surprise.

    #projection
  • Options
    pawzpawz Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,775
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    pawz said:

    HHusky said:

    pawz said:

    HHusky said:

    Daddy knew "the Steal" was a lie. Or he refused to know it. Conspiracy after conspiracy was examined as if they were plausible claims to begin with. (Looking at you, Sled.) All were batted back in his face.

    His serious people looked and told him the truth.

    You gals and Daddy preferred drunk Rudy and Navarro.

    If the "securest election in history" was just that, why did the Dems run out and try to nationalize the election laws?

    Take as much tim as you need.

    So change the subject.

    Imagine my surprise.
    Great deflection as always. Imagine my surprise.

    #projection
    Irony.
  • Options
    pawzpawz Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,775
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Daddy knew "the Steal" was a lie. Or he refused to know it. Conspiracy after conspiracy was examined as if they were plausible claims to begin with. (Looking at you, Sled.) All were batted back in his face.

    His serious people looked and told him the truth.

    You gals and Daddy preferred drunk Rudy and Navarro.

    Really? Show me all this proof professor. I'll wait.
    They don't have teevee in Idaho yet?
    Spoon feed the evidence please.
    I'm sure it's available on demand.
    So you should have no trouble at all finding it. TIA
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,131
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


  • Options
    pawzpawz Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,775
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Actually true. Some of us? can spot a fraud from a country mile.

    Others love being lied to. **@HeilHusky looks in mirror**


    Hope this helps.

  • Options
    Bob_CBob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,912
    Photogenic First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment
    Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Daddy knew "the Steal" was a lie. Or he refused to know it. Conspiracy after conspiracy was examined as if they were plausible claims to begin with. (Looking at you, Sled.) All were batted back in his face.

    His serious people looked and told him the truth.

    You gals and Daddy preferred drunk Rudy and Navarro.

    Really? Show me all this proof professor. I'll wait.
    They don't have teevee in Idaho yet?
    Spoon feed the evidence please.
    I'm sure it's available on demand.
    Sounds like the Schiff kind of evidence.
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,920
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
  • Options
    PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 41,830
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    You misspelled Kangaroo Court.

  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,131
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
  • Options
    WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 13,901
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
    Standard Supporter
    edited June 2022
    Geezus. The opposition was supposed to show up under House rules, but the Nazi Pelosi refused the republican participants. I'm sure you knew this, but given the chance to be honest or suck Pelosi's dick, well ...
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
  • Options
    pawzpawz Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,775
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    Again, some of us? can spot a fraud from a country mile.

    You love being lied to.


    I'll give you this, it must be tough going through life in an extremely fragile emotional state.


  • Options
    Bob_CBob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,912
    Photogenic First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment
    Founders Club
    Agreed, some of us can.


    pawz said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    Again, some of us? can spot a fraud from a country mile.

    You love being lied to.


    I'll give you this, it must be tough going through life in an extremely fragile emotional state.


    pawz said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    Again, some of us? can spot a fraud from a country mile.

    You love being lied to.


    I'll give you this, it must be tough going through life in an extremely fragile emotional state.


  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,131
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    pawz said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    Again, some of us? can spot a fraud from a country mile.

    You love being lied to.


    I'll give you this, it must be tough going through life in an extremely fragile emotional state.


    So you admit the pre-emptive pardon crew didn't show. I guess we can agree on that at least.

    #5thAmendment
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,920
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    Lie. Shocking
  • Options
    SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,920
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter

    Geezus. The opposition was supposed to show up under House rules, but the Nazi Pelosi refused the republican participants. I'm sure you knew this, but given the chance to be honest or suck Pelosi's dick, well ...

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    TugCon response to the hearings thus far:


    Don't hearings usually allow for the opposition party to ask questions and put on evidence as well? The is correctly identified as a show trial. This isn't a hearing.
    The opposition refused to show up.

    Surprised you missed that.

    It was in the papers.
    They love to lie and they love being lied to. By every definition of the term this is nothing more than a show trial where one side picks both the prosecution and the "defense"
Sign In or Register to comment.